10–50 m
MmWave is a very high band spectrum between 30 to 300 GHz. As it is a significantly less used spectrum, it provides very high-speed wireless communication. MmWave offers ultra-wide bandwidth for next-generation mobile networks. MmWave has lots of advantages, but it has some disadvantages, too, such as mmWave signals are very high-frequency signals, so they have more collision with obstacles in the air which cause the signals loses energy quickly. Buildings and trees also block MmWave signals, so these signals cover a shorter distance. To resolve these issues, multiple small cell stations are installed to cover the gap between end-user and base station [ 18 ]. Small cell covers a very shorter range, so the installation of a small cell depends on the population of a particular area. Generally, in a populated place, the distance between each small cell varies from 10 to 90 meters. In the survey [ 20 ], various authors implemented small cells with massive MIMO simultaneously. They also reviewed multiple technologies used in 5G like beamforming, small cell, massive MIMO, NOMA, device to device (D2D) communication. Various problems like interference management, spectral efficiency, resource management, energy efficiency, and backhauling are discussed. The author also gave a detailed presentation of all the issues occurring while implementing small cells with various 5G technologies. As shown in the Figure 7 , mmWave has a higher range, so it can be easily blocked by the obstacles as shown in Figure 7 a. This is one of the key concerns of millimeter-wave signal transmission. To solve this issue, the small cell can be placed at a short distance to transmit the signals easily, as shown in Figure 7 b.
Pictorial representation of communication with and without small cells.
Beamforming is a key technology of wireless networks which transmits the signals in a directional manner. 5G beamforming making a strong wireless connection toward a receiving end. In conventional systems when small cells are not using beamforming, moving signals to particular areas is quite difficult. Beamforming counter this issue using beamforming small cells are able to transmit the signals in particular direction towards a device like mobile phone, laptops, autonomous vehicle and IoT devices. Beamforming is improving the efficiency and saves the energy of the 5G network. Beamforming is broadly divided into three categories: Digital beamforming, analog beamforming and hybrid beamforming. Digital beamforming: multiuser MIMO is equal to digital beamforming which is mainly used in LTE Advanced Pro and in 5G NR. In digital beamforming the same frequency or time resources can be used to transmit the data to multiple users at the same time which improves the cell capacity of wireless networks. Analog Beamforming: In mmWave frequency range 5G NR analog beamforming is a very important approach which improves the coverage. In digital beamforming there are chances of high pathloss in mmWave as only one beam per set of antenna is formed. While the analog beamforming saves high pathloss in mmWave. Hybrid beamforming: hybrid beamforming is a combination of both analog beamforming and digital beamforming. In the implementation of MmWave in 5G network hybrid beamforming will be used [ 84 ].
Wireless signals in the 4G network are spreading in large areas, and nature is not Omnidirectional. Thus, energy depletes rapidly, and users who are accessing these signals also face interference problems. The beamforming technique is used in the 5G network to resolve this issue. In beamforming signals are directional. They move like a laser beam from the base station to the user, so signals seem to be traveling in an invisible cable. Beamforming helps achieve a faster data rate; as the signals are directional, it leads to less energy consumption and less interference. In [ 21 ], investigators evolve some techniques which reduce interference and increase system efficiency of the 5G mobile network. In this survey article, the authors covered various challenges faced while designing an optimized beamforming algorithm. Mainly focused on different design parameters such as performance evaluation and power consumption. In addition, they also described various issues related to beamforming like CSI, computation complexity, and antenna correlation. They also covered various research to cover how beamforming helps implement MIMO in next-generation mobile networks [ 85 ]. Figure 8 shows the pictorial representation of communication with and without using beamforming.
Pictorial Representation of communication with and without using beamforming.
Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) [ 24 ]: MEC is an extended version of cloud computing that brings cloud resources closer to the end-user. When we talk about computing, the very first thing that comes to our mind is cloud computing. Cloud computing is a very famous technology that offers many services to end-user. Still, cloud computing has many drawbacks. The services available in the cloud are too far from end-users that create latency, and cloud user needs to download the complete application before use, which also increases the burden to the device [ 86 ]. MEC creates an edge between the end-user and cloud server, bringing cloud computing closer to the end-user. Now, all the services, namely, video conferencing, virtual software, etc., are offered by this edge that improves cloud computing performance. Another essential feature of MEC is that the application is split into two parts, which, first one is available at cloud server, and the second is at the user’s device. Therefore, the user need not download the complete application on his device that increases the performance of the end user’s device. Furthermore, MEC provides cloud services at very low latency and less bandwidth. In [ 23 , 87 ], the author’s investigation proved that successful deployment of MEC in 5G network increases the overall performance of 5G architecture. Graphical differentiation between cloud computing and mobile edge computing is presented in Figure 9 .
Pictorial representation of cloud computing vs. mobile edge computing.
Security is the key feature in the telecommunication network industry, which is necessary at various layers, to handle 5G network security in applications such as IoT, Digital forensics, IDS and many more [ 88 , 89 ]. The authors [ 90 ], discussed the background of 5G and its security concerns, challenges and future directions. The author also introduced the blockchain technology that can be incorporated with the IoT to overcome the challenges in IoT. The paper aims to create a security framework which can be incorporated with the LTE advanced network, and effective in terms of cost, deployment and QoS. In [ 91 ], author surveyed various form of attacks, the security challenges, security solutions with respect to the affected technology such as SDN, Network function virtualization (NFV), Mobile Clouds and MEC, and security standardizations of 5G, i.e., 3GPP, 5GPPP, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Next Generation Mobile Networks (NGMN), European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). In [ 92 ], author elaborated various technological aspects, security issues and their existing solutions and also mentioned the new emerging technological paradigms for 5G security such as blockchain, quantum cryptography, AI, SDN, CPS, MEC, D2D. The author aims to create new security frameworks for 5G for further use of this technology in development of smart cities, transportation and healthcare. In [ 93 ], author analyzed the threats and dark threat, security aspects concerned with SDN and NFV, also their Commercial & Industrial Security Corporation (CISCO) 5G vision and new security innovations with respect to the new evolving architectures of 5G [ 94 ].
AuthenticationThe identification of the user in any network is made with the help of authentication. The different mobile network generations from 1G to 5G have used multiple techniques for user authentication. 5G utilizes the 5G Authentication and Key Agreement (AKA) authentication method, which shares a cryptographic key between user equipment (UE) and its home network and establishes a mutual authentication process between the both [ 95 ].
Access Control To restrict the accessibility in the network, 5G supports access control mechanisms to provide a secure and safe environment to the users and is controlled by network providers. 5G uses simple public key infrastructure (PKI) certificates for authenticating access in the 5G network. PKI put forward a secure and dynamic environment for the 5G network. The simple PKI technique provides flexibility to the 5G network; it can scale up and scale down as per the user traffic in the network [ 96 , 97 ].
Communication Security 5G deals to provide high data bandwidth, low latency, and better signal coverage. Therefore secure communication is the key concern in the 5G network. UE, mobile operators, core network, and access networks are the main focal point for the attackers in 5G communication. Some of the common attacks in communication at various segments are Botnet, message insertion, micro-cell, distributed denial of service (DDoS), and transport layer security (TLS)/secure sockets layer (SSL) attacks [ 98 , 99 ].
Encryption The confidentiality of the user and the network is done using encryption techniques. As 5G offers multiple services, end-to-end (E2E) encryption is the most suitable technique applied over various segments in the 5G network. Encryption forbids unauthorized access to the network and maintains the data privacy of the user. To encrypt the radio traffic at Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) layer, three 128-bits keys are applied at the user plane, nonaccess stratum (NAS), and access stratum (AS) [ 100 ].
In this section, various issues addressed by investigators in 5G technologies are presented in Table 13 . In addition, different parameters are considered, such as throughput, latency, energy efficiency, data rate, spectral efficiency, fairness & computing capacity, transmission rate, coverage, cost, security requirement, performance, QoS, power optimization, etc., indexed from R1 to R14.
Summary of 5G Technology above stated challenges (R1:Throughput, R2:Latency, R3:Energy Efficiency, R4:Data Rate, R5:Spectral efficiency, R6:Fairness & Computing Capacity, R7:Transmission Rate, R8:Coverage, R9:Cost, R10:Security requirement, R11:Performance, R12:Quality of Services (QoS), R13:Power Optimization).
Approach | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | R8 | R9 | R10 | R11 | R12 | R13 | R14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Panzner et al. [ ] | Good | Low | Good | - | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Qiao et al. [ ] | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Avg | Good | Avg | - | - | - | - |
He et al. [ ] | Avg | Low | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Abrol and jha [ ] | - | - | Good | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Good |
Al-Imari et al. [ ] | - | - | - | - | Good | Good | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Papadopoulos et al. [ ] | Good | Low | Avg | - | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Kiani and Nsari [ ] | - | - | - | - | Avg | Good | Good | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Beck [ ] | - | Low | - | - | - | - | - | Avg | - | - | - | Good | - | Avg |
Ni et al. [ ] | - | - | - | Good | - | - | - | - | - | - | Avg | Avg | - | - |
Elijah [ ] | Avg | Low | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Alawe et al. [ ] | - | Low | Good | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Avg | - |
Zhou et al. [ ] | Avg | - | Good | - | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Islam et al. [ ] | - | - | - | - | Good | Avg | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Bega et al. [ ] | - | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Good | - |
Akpakwu et al. [ ] | - | - | - | Good | - | - | - | - | - | - | Avg | Good | - | - |
Wei et al. [ ] | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Good | Avg | Low | - | - | - | - |
Khurpade et al. [ ] | - | - | - | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Avg | - | - |
Timotheou and Krikidis [ ] | - | - | - | - | Good | Good | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Wang [ ] | Avg | Low | Avg | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Akhil Gupta & R. K. Jha [ ] | - | - | Good | Avg | Good | - | - | - | - | - | - | Good | Good | - |
Pérez-Romero et al. [ ] | - | - | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Avg |
Pi [ ] | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Good | Good | Avg | - | - | - | - |
Zi et al. [ ] | - | Avg | Good | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Chin [ ] | - | - | Good | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | Avg | - | Good | - | - |
Mamta Agiwal [ ] | - | Avg | - | Good | - | - | - | - | - | - | Good | Avg | - | - |
Ramesh et al. [ ] | Good | Avg | Good | - | Good | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Niu [ ] | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Good | Avg | Avg | - | - | - | |
Fang et al. [ ] | - | Avg | Good | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Good | - |
Hoydis [ ] | - | - | Good | - | Good | - | - | - | - | Avg | - | Good | - | - |
Wei et al. [ ] | - | - | - | - | Good | Avg | Good | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Hong et al. [ ] | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Avg | Avg | Low | - | - | - |
Rashid [ ] | - | - | - | Good | - | - | - | Good | - | - | - | Avg | - | Good |
Prasad et al. [ ] | Good | - | Good | - | Avg | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Lähetkangas et al. [ ] | - | Low | Av | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
This survey article illustrates the emergence of 5G, its evolution from 1G to 5G mobile network, applications, different research groups, their work, and the key features of 5G. It is not just a mobile broadband network, different from all the previous mobile network generations; it offers services like IoT, V2X, and Industry 4.0. This paper covers a detailed survey from multiple authors on different technologies in 5G, such as massive MIMO, Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA), millimeter wave, small cell, MEC (Mobile Edge Computing), beamforming, optimization, and machine learning in 5G. After each section, a tabular comparison covers all the state-of-the-research held in these technologies. This survey also shows the importance of these newly added technologies and building a flexible, scalable, and reliable 5G network.
This article covers a detailed survey on the 5G mobile network and its features. These features make 5G more reliable, scalable, efficient at affordable rates. As discussed in the above sections, numerous technical challenges originate while implementing those features or providing services over a 5G mobile network. So, for future research directions, the research community can overcome these challenges while implementing these technologies (MIMO, NOMA, small cell, mmWave, beam-forming, MEC) over a 5G network. 5G communication will bring new improvements over the existing systems. Still, the current solutions cannot fulfill the autonomous system and future intelligence engineering requirements after a decade. There is no matter of discussion that 5G will provide better QoS and new features than 4G. But there is always room for improvement as the considerable growth of centralized data and autonomous industry 5G wireless networks will not be capable of fulfilling their demands in the future. So, we need to move on new wireless network technology that is named 6G. 6G wireless network will bring new heights in mobile generations, as it includes (i) massive human-to-machine communication, (ii) ubiquitous connectivity between the local device and cloud server, (iii) creation of data fusion technology for various mixed reality experiences and multiverps maps. (iv) Focus on sensing and actuation to control the network of the entire world. The 6G mobile network will offer new services with some other technologies; these services are 3D mapping, reality devices, smart homes, smart wearable, autonomous vehicles, artificial intelligence, and sense. It is expected that 6G will provide ultra-long-range communication with a very low latency of 1 ms. The per-user bit rate in a 6G wireless network will be approximately 1 Tbps, and it will also provide wireless communication, which is 1000 times faster than 5G networks.
Author contributions.
Conceptualization: R.D., I.Y., G.C., P.L. data gathering: R.D., G.C., P.L, I.Y. funding acquisition: I.Y. investigation: I.Y., G.C., G.P. methodology: R.D., I.Y., G.C., P.L., G.P., survey: I.Y., G.C., P.L, G.P., R.D. supervision: G.C., I.Y., G.P. validation: I.Y., G.P. visualization: R.D., I.Y., G.C., P.L. writing, original draft: R.D., I.Y., G.C., P.L., G.P. writing, review, and editing: I.Y., G.C., G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This paper was supported by Soonchunhyang University.
Informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
In an increasingly interconnected world, the demand for faster, more reliable, and transformative connectivity has propelled the development of fifth-generation (5G) technology. 5G is not merely an upgrade from previous generations but a revolutionary leap forward in wireless communication.
Home > Technical Articles > 5G technology essay
Introduction:.
In an increasingly interconnected world, the demand for faster, more reliable, and transformative connectivity has propelled the development of fifth-generation (5G) technology. 5G is not merely an upgrade from previous generations but a revolutionary leap forward in wireless communication. This essay delves into the intricacies of 5G technology, its underlying principles, potential applications, and the profound impact it is set to have on various industries and society as a whole.
5G technology represents the culmination of years of research, innovation, and collaborative efforts by telecommunication companies, technology leaders, and regulatory bodies. It is characterized by several key features:
At its core, 5G technology builds upon several technical foundations that set it apart from its predecessors:
The advent of 5G technology unlocks a plethora of applications and transformative use cases:
The advent of 5G technology is poised to have a profound impact on society and the economy:
5G offers a number of benefits over 4G LTE, including:
5G also faces a number of challenges, including:
5G technology represents a revolutionary leap forward in wireless communication, redefining the possibilities of connectivity and paving the way for a transformative future. With its remarkable speed, ultra-low latency, and massive connectivity, 5G has the potential to revolutionize industries, empower individuals, bridge the digital divide, and drive sustainable development. As 5G networks continue to be deployed globally, we stand on the cusp of a connected era where the boundaries of innovation and human potential are pushed even further.
Subscribe to the mailing list and receive the latest 5G white papers and articles
We respect your privacy.
TELCOMA Global is a leader in Telecom Training Courses and Certifications since 2009. Learn the trending technological skills in 6G, 5G, 4G-LTE, IoT, Machine Learning, and Artificial Intelligence (ML/AI), Cloud and microservices, ORAN, Edge Computing, etc and get hired in the world's best Telecom companies. Discover the fastest, most effective way to gain job-ready expertise for the careers of the future. With TELCOMA Certification, you can be the Telecom professional employers seek.
All 5g, 4g-lte, 3g, 2g, wimax, wifi, voip, nfv, sdn, volte, cloud and iot training & certifications.
180 Course Bundle
All 5g - architecture, hardware, planning, optimization, nr, radio access, air interface, security, ngc, protocols, deployment training and certifications.
106 Course Bundle
All 4g lte, lte-a, epc, lte-a pro, volte, wimax, planning, optimization and dt trainings with certifications.
26 Course Bundle
By Rob Pegoraro
When 5G—the fifth-generation mobile network—arrived in 2019, industry advocates touted it with the sort of vague fervor usually associated with cryptocurrency evangelism. Connected vehicles! Virtual reality that’s even realer! Full-length movies downloaded in seconds! But in the three years since, 5G has often fallen vastly short of those promises.
What is 5g (supposed to be), how fast is 5g, is 5g expensive, which carrier has the fastest 5g, which carrier has the broadest 5g coverage, what phones support 5g, what to look forward to.
The chapters in the story of wireless connectivity consist of broad generations of technology, each of which has delivered a notable jump in speed. Things began in the 1980s with 1G , or analog cellular , and advanced in the 1990s with 2G , the first digital cellular service . By the late 2000s, 2G had been shoved aside by 3G (remember how much faster the iPhone 3G seemed after its predecessor?), but within a few years 4G (also known as LTE, short for Long Term Evolution) had begun making 3G obsolete.
The change to 5G stands apart from those earlier transitions because so much of it has been driven by wireless carriers lighting up extensive new swaths of spectrum. In this case spectrum refers to wide ranges of wireless frequencies, licensed in the US by the Federal Communications Commission , that are themselves split into much narrower bands—individual lanes of a sort—that a particular carrier may or may not use and that a particular phone may or may not support. Whereas the 3G and 4G transitions did not require carriers to start using new-to-them spectrum, the arrival of 5G has involved two new sets of higher-frequency bands that allow for faster speeds and greater capacity but don’t reach as far.
Telecom companies use the image of a layer cake to compare 5G’s frequency ranges and illustrate their trade-offs. The widest, base layer of 5G consists of today’s low-band frequencies: 600 MHz to 1900 MHz . These allow about the same range and reliability as 4G but don’t provide much of a boost in speed. The middle layer represents today’s midband frequencies, from 2.5 GHz to almost 4 GHz, which offer a higher gear of speed but require a step back in coverage. The top layer is millimeter-wave (or mmWave) 5G, which runs from 28 GHz to 47 GHz among US carriers and provides the fastest connectivity with the lowest latency but also has the worst range. The three layers comprise the cake called 5G, but obviously, not all the layers are created equal, even if they’re all referred to by the same name.
The three US carriers, meanwhile, use their own branding for different types of 5G connectivity. AT&T and Verizon call the low-band version Nationwide 5G, while T-Mobile brands it as Extended Range. Midband 5G gets a separate moniker at each carrier: T-Mobile calls it Ultra Capacity , AT&T labels it 5G+ , and Verizon calls it 5G Ultra Wideband . Confusing things even further, AT&T and Verizon also use those respective brands for their mmWave 5G.
The speeds that mmWave can theoretically provide have fueled most of the more wild-eyed forecasts about it—for instance, that it will make self-driving cars possible , which likely sounds absurd to anybody who has struggled to find a mmWave signal where a carrier’s coverage map says it should exist.
How you experience 5G depends on where you sit or stand while using it. If you’re on a low-band 5G connection—the most likely situation unless you’re in or near a city—you may not be impressed. Even the carriers themselves have advised customers not to expect much of a speedup . Though we’ve seen low-band 5G connections exceed 200 megabits per second, we’ve also seen them deliver slower speed-test results than 4G in the same spot.
But if you connect to midband 5G, you’re in for a different experience—one that may leave your home wired broadband looking slow in comparison. Download speeds on these frequencies can easily exceed 400 Mbps and approach 1 Gbps. You may not notice the difference when you’re installing an app, but it should be easy to spot on a laptop or tablet tethered to your phone’s mobile hotspot. However, you’re likely to encounter this enhanced connectivity only in built-up areas in major metropolitan areas, and you may lose a midband signal if you’re indoors.
Should your phone latch on to a millimeter-wave signal, it may feel like you just engaged its hyperdrive—mmWave download speeds generally start at 1 Gbps and can exceed 2 Gbps. But because mmWave’s range is so short ( Verizon puts it at 1,500 feet at best) and restricted to outdoors, you’ll probably find it’s as unreliable as the Millennium Falcon’ s hyperdrive in The Empire Strikes Back . We’ve found that we can’t count on mmWave signals covering even an entire city block—or just reaching all four corners of an intersection.
The wireless carriers have spent tens of billions of dollars on spectrum licenses to build out 5G, but so far that hasn’t appeared to have much effect on their rate plans. Aside from some cheaper limited-data plans and the entry-level “unlimited” offering at Verizon, the big three carriers’ postpaid plans all provide full 5G access and don’t subject it to any extra limits should you want to share this next-gen bandwidth with your laptop or tablet via your phone’s mobile-hotspot feature.
Prepaid services and wireless resellers, however, may rule out 5G or provide only low-band 5G, which you may often see described as “nationwide” 5G. Using any of these offerings is effectively like using a 4G plan.
Midband 5G’s performance and range, meanwhile, have allowed T-Mobile and Verizon to sell “fixed wireless” broadband to homes at just $50 a month (or half that at Verizon for customers already on one of its more expensive unlimited smartphone plans). These services run at speeds that can compete with cable—but without the data caps of so many cable providers, making them especially worth considering if your household hoovers up data on several devices.
The 5G experience can, however, cost you extra when you buy a phone. Millimeter-wave reception requires not just a different radio but also an additional antenna, which can result in mmWave-compatible models costing $50 or so extra—see, for example, the $500 price of the mmWave-ready Pixel 6a that Verizon sells and the $450 price of the mmWave-deprived model that Google sells.
There are two ways to answer that question: best case and likeliest case.
In an ideal situation, mmWave 5G outperforms every other kind, and no carrier has built out millimeter-wave 5G as aggressively as Verizon. AT&T is a distant second in mmWave deployment, and T-Mobile has all but given up on the technology.
But on an everyday basis, multiple third-party tests have shown that T-Mobile’s 5G averages faster, thanks to that carrier’s early and widespread deployment of midband 5G using the 2.5 GHz spectrum it picked up with Sprint when it bought its smaller competitor. In July 2022, Ookla reported that measurements from its widely used Speedtest app showed median 5G download speeds of 187.33 Mbps for T-Mobile, 113.52 Mbps for Verizon, and 71.54 Mbps for AT&T.
Verizon ranks second, not so much because of its early and avid rollout of mmWave but because of its introduction of midband 5G on “C-band” frequencies starting in January. Those signals reach much farther than its mmWave signal, and in the 46 and counting metro areas in which Verizon offers C-band connectivity, they make the carrier much more competitive with T-Mobile.
AT&T ranks a fairly distant third because its own C-band launch in January covered only eight markets (PDF) —Austin, Chicago, Dallas–Fort Worth, Detroit, Houston, Jacksonville, Miami, and Orlando—while its mmWave coverage is even more evanescent than Verizon’s. You’ll have to wait until 2023 to see the situation change in any meaningful way.
But even if you look at midband 5G alone, T-Mobile retains an advantage. As Opensignal analyst Francesco Rizzato summed up speed-test app data published at the end of March : “When connected to mid-band 5G across the U.S., our users experienced average 5G download speeds of 225.5 Mbps on T-Mobile, 211.8 Mbps on Verizon, and 160 Mbps on AT&T.”
Those differences also show up in the various services that resell the big three’s networks. T-Mobile resellers like Mint Mobile stand to offer a better 5G experience than Verizon resellers like Comcast’s Xfinity Mobile.
Because the carriers have invested most in low-band 5G, the answer as to which carrier has the broadest 5G coverage doesn’t amount to much—with low-band, you don’t get a significant speed boost, and you may even find that 5G runs slower than 4G in the same spot.
That said, the service-comparison site WhistleOut checked the coverage of all three carriers and found that T-Mobile’s 5G service reached more of the US as of early July, covering 53.79%. AT&T came in second with 29.52% coverage, followed by Verizon with 12.77%.
The other reason to avoid putting too much weight on this metric: Coverage in places where you don’t live, work, or visit counts for much less than coverage in your usual whereabouts, and raw totals don’t tell you anything about that. You can use WhistleOut’s coverage maps to see how the various phone service providers stack up in your area.
The logical next question is which carriers have the broadest midband service. Again, T-Mobile’s early deployment of 2.5 GHz 5G gives it a commanding lead: The carrier estimates that those frequencies are reaching 225 million people and plans to extend that reach to 260 million by the end of the year. Verizon says it will cover 175 million by the end of 2022 . AT&T is again a distant third, reaching 70 million people with its midband 5G now and saying in its July second-quarter earnings announcement that it remains “on track to approach 100 million people” by year-end.
PCMag’s Best Mobile Networks 2022 project (in which I put in almost 1,700 miles of drive testing ) bore this out. As PCMag’s Sascha Segan writes, this on-the-road testing found that in rural areas, T-Mobile test phones were on midband 43% of the time, versus 9% for Verizon test phones and just 2% for the AT&T phones. The same pattern prevailed in metropolitan areas, too: “Across 19 cities where we felt we had sufficient data,” Segan writes, “we saw T-Mobile’s high-quality 5G UC 78% of the time, compared with Verizon’s 5G UW 20% of the time and AT&T’s 5G+ 7% of the time.”
Between inadequate documentation from phone manufacturers and incomplete support from some carriers (which essentially treat 5G support as a privilege they can ration out), shopping for a 5G phone can be much more work than necessary.
Your compatibility odds are highest with a pricey flagship phone such as a new iPhone or Samsung Galaxy S–series phone. The odds get lower as the handset prices drop—smaller sizes may also prevent mmWave support—and are generally the worst with phones not sold by carriers. For example, although Apple’s current iPhone 13 and SE lines both support midband at all three carriers, only the larger iPhone 13 lineup covers mmWave, too.
If a carrier doesn’t explicitly advertise that a phone works on its fastest frequencies—5G+ on AT&T, Ultra Capacity on T-Mobile, or 5G Ultra Wideband on Verizon—you’ll have to check the phone’s specifications to see which band numbers it supports. The important ones, in terms of getting a faster connection, are n41 (T-Mobile midband), n77 (AT&T and Verizon C-band), and n260 and n261 (Verizon mmWave).
But even the spec sheets can be wrong. Consider, for instance, the Galaxy A52 5G , which Samsung shipped in 2021. Samsung’s specs for that phone show just low-band 5G support, but Phone Scoop’s eagle-eyed founder Rich Brome checked Federal Communications Commission filings to confirm that the A52 supports the important midband frequencies . Earlier this year, I saw the A52 hit midband speeds with a T-Mobile SIM —but on Verizon, it operated as a low-band phone until Verizon shipped a software update for it. And that happened recently enough for Verizon’s supported-phones list to not reflect what PCMag’s independent tally shows.
The promise of 5G has thus far gone unfulfilled, but the industry is taking baby steps toward a faster mobile future. Dish Network is building its own 5G-only network—the government’s approval of T-Mobile’s purchase of Sprint in 2019 required the merged firm to divest Sprint’s prepaid services and some spectrum to Dish , which in turn has committed to cover 70% of the US population by 2023 . Dish launched $30-per-month unlimited service in Las Vegas but supported only a single phone model on that service, an offering that left analysts unimpressed .
The ongoing C-band buildout at AT&T and Verizon promises quicker rewards, especially at the latter carrier, which is off to a faster start and is working to accelerate that deployment further. In March, it announced deals with satellite providers that would help them hand off more of the C-band spectrum they’d been using, which would then allow Verizon to bring C-band to Atlanta, Baltimore, Denver, and Washington, DC, this year .
And yes, the wireless world is starting to make noise about 6G and what it might look like. But the industry has been here before. Conserve your energy and enthusiasm. It’s years too soon for any reality-based phone buyer to spend any mental processing cycles worrying about that.
This article was edited by Arthur Gies and Jason Chen.
Rob Pegoraro
by Geoffrey Morrison and Signe Brewster
If you want smoother, more professional-looking video from your smartphone, the Insta360 Flow is the best gimbal.
by Sarah Witman
The Belkin BoostCharge Pro is your best bet for charging a single device wirelessly. It has MagSafe capabilities, a long cord, and a handy built-in stand.
by Andrew Cunningham
With thousands of hours testing phones and tablets , we know iOS and Android. We can help you decide which is better for you—or if it’s even worth switching.
by Roderick Scott
Switching from iPhone to Android is a big change, but it doesn’t have to be a hard one.
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology volume 31 , pages 585–605 ( 2021 ) Cite this article
178k Accesses
73 Citations
381 Altmetric
Metrics details
The increased use of radiofrequency (RF) fields above 6 GHz, particularly for the 5 G mobile phone network, has given rise to public concern about any possible adverse effects to human health. Public exposure to RF fields from 5 G and other sources is below the human exposure limits specified by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). This state-of-the science review examined the research into the biological and health effects of RF fields above 6 GHz at exposure levels below the ICNIRP occupational limits. The review included 107 experimental studies that investigated various bioeffects including genotoxicity, cell proliferation, gene expression, cell signalling, membrane function and other effects. Reported bioeffects were generally not independently replicated and the majority of the studies employed low quality methods of exposure assessment and control. Effects due to heating from high RF energy deposition cannot be excluded from many of the results. The review also included 31 epidemiological studies that investigated exposure to radar, which uses RF fields above 6 GHz similar to 5 G. The epidemiological studies showed little evidence of health effects including cancer at different sites, effects on reproduction and other diseases. This review showed no confirmed evidence that low-level RF fields above 6 GHz such as those used by the 5 G network are hazardous to human health. Future experimental studies should improve the experimental design with particular attention to dosimetry and temperature control. Future epidemiological studies should continue to monitor long-term health effects in the population related to wireless telecommunications.
Introduction.
There are continually emerging technologies that use radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields particularly in telecommunications. Most telecommunication sources currently operate at frequencies below 6 GHz, including radio and TV broadcasting and wireless sources such as local area networks and mobile telephony. With the increasing demand for higher data rates, better quality of service and lower latency to users, future wireless telecommunication sources are planned to operate at frequencies above 6 GHz and into the ‘millimetre wave’ range (30–300 GHz) [ 1 ]. Frequencies above 6 GHz have been in use for many years in various applications such as radar, microwave links, airport security screening and in medicine for therapeutic applications. However, the planned use of millimetre waves by future wireless telecommunications, particularly the 5th generation (5 G) of mobile networks, has given rise to public concern about any possible adverse effects to human health.
The interaction mechanisms of RF fields with the human body have been extensively described and tissue heating is the main effect for RF fields above 100 kHz (e.g. HPA; SCENHIR) [ 2 , 3 ]. RF fields become less penetrating into body tissue with increasing frequency and for frequencies above 6 GHz the depth of penetration is relatively short with surface heating being the predominant effect [ 4 ].
International exposure guidelines for RF fields have been developed on the basis of current scientific knowledge to ensure that RF exposure is not harmful to human health [ 5 , 6 ]. The guidelines developed by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) in particular form the basis for regulations in the majority of countries worldwide [ 7 ]. In the frequency range above 6 GHz and up to 300 GHz the ICNIRP guidelines prevent excessive heating at the surface of the skin and in the eye.
Although not as extensively studied as RF fields at lower frequencies, a number of studies have investigated the effects of RF fields at frequencies above 6 GHz. Previous reviews have reported studies investigating frequencies above 6 GHz that show effects although many of the reported effects occurred at levels greater than the ICNIRP guidelines [ 1 , 8 ]. Given the public concern over the planned roll-out of 5 G using millimetre waves, it is important to determine whether there are any related adverse health consequences at levels encountered in the environment. The aim of this paper is to present a state-of-the-science review of the bioeffects research into RF fields above 6 GHz at low levels of exposure (exposure below the occupational limits of the ICNIRP guidelines). A meta-analysis of in vitro and in vivo studies, providing quantitative effect estimates for each study, is presented separately in a companion paper [ 9 ].
The state-of-the-science review included a comprehensive search of all available literature and examined the extent, range and nature of evidence into the bioeffects of RF fields above 6 GHz, at levels below the ICNIRP occupational limits. The review consisted of biomedical studies on low-level RF electromagnetic fields from 6 GHz to 300 GHz published at any starting date up to December 2019. Studies were initially found by searching the databases PubMed, EMF-Portal, Google Scholar, Embase and Web of Science using the search terms “millimeter wave”, “millimetre wave”, “gigahertz”, “GHz” and “radar”. We further searched major reviews published by health authorities on RF and health [ 2 , 3 , 10 , 11 ]. Finally, we searched the reference list of all the studies included. Studies were only included if the full paper was available in English.
Although over 300 studies were considered, this review was limited to experimental studies (in vitro, in vivo, human) where the stated RF exposure level was at or below the occupational whole-body limits specified by the ICNIRP (2020) guidelines: power density (PD) reference level of 50 W/m 2 or specific absorption rate (SAR) basic restriction of 0.4 W/kg. Since the PD occupational limits for local exposure are more relevant to in vitro studies, and since these limits are higher, we have included those studies with PD up to 100–200 W/m 2 , depending on frequency. The review included studies below the ICNIRP general public limits that are lower than the occupational limits.
The review also included epidemiological studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional) investigating exposure to radar but excluded studies where the stated radar frequencies were below 6 GHz. Epidemiological studies on radar were included as they represent occupational exposure below the ICNIRP guidelines. Case reports or case series were excluded. Studies investigating therapeutical outcomes were also excluded unless they reported specific bio-effects.
The state-of-the-science review appraised the quality of the included studies, but unlike a systematic review it did not exclude any studies based on quality. The review also identified gaps in knowledge for future investigation and research. The reporting of results in this paper is narrative with tabular accompaniment showing study characteristics. In this paper, the acronym “MMWs” (or millimetre waves) is used to denote RF fields above 6 GHz.
The review included 107 experimental studies (91 in vitro, 15 in vivo, and 1 human) that investigated various bioeffects, including genotoxicity, cell proliferation, gene expression, cell signalling, membrane function and other effects. The exposure characteristics and biological system investigated in experimental studies for the various bioeffects are shown in Tables 1 – 6 . The results of the meta-analysis of the in vitro and in vivo studies are presented separately in Wood et al. [ 9 ].
Studies have examined the effects of exposing whole human or mouse blood samples or lymphocytes and leucocytes to low-level MMWs to determine possible genotoxicity. Some of the genotoxicity studies have looked at the possible effects of MMWs on chromosome aberrations [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. At exposure levels below the ICNIRP limits, the results have been inconsistent, with either a statistically significant increase [ 14 ] or no significant increase [ 12 , 13 ] in chromosome aberrations.
MMWs do not penetrate past the skin therefore epithelial and skin cells have been a common model of examination for possible genotoxic effects. DNA damage in a number of epithelial and skin cell types and at varied exposure parameters both below and above the ICNIRP limits have been examined using comet assays [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Despite the varied exposure models and methods used, no statistically significant evidence of DNA damage was identified in these studies. Evidence of genotoxic damage was further assessed in skin cells by the occurrence of micro-nucleation. De Amicis et al. [ 18 ] and Franchini et al. [ 19 ] reported a statistically significant increase in micro-nucleation, however, Hintzsche et al. [ 15 ] and Koyama et al. [ 16 , 17 ] did not find an effect. Two of the studies also examined telomere length and found no statistically significant difference between exposed and unexposed cells [ 15 , 19 ]. Last, a Ukrainian research group examined different skin cell types in three studies and reported an increase in chromosome condensation in the nucleus [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]; these results have not been independently verified. Overall, there was no confirmed evidence of MMWs causing genotoxic damage in epithelial and skin cells.
Three studies from an Indian research group have examined indicators of DNA damage and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in rats exposed in vivo to MMWs. The studies reported DNA strand breaks based on evidence from comet assays [ 23 , 24 ] and changes in enzymes that control the build-up of ROS [ 24 ]. Kumar et al. also reported an increase in ROS production [ 25 ]. All the studies from this research group had low animal numbers (six animals exposed) and their results have not been independently replicated. An in vitro study that investigated ROS production in yeast cultures reported an increase in free radicals exposed to high-level but not low-level MMWs [ 26 ].
Other studies have looked at the effect of low-level MMWs on DNA in a range of different ways. Two studies reported that MMWs induce colicin synthesis and prophage induction in bacterial cells, both of which are suggested as indicative of DNA damage [ 27 , 28 ]. Another study suggested that DNA exposed to MMWs undergoes polymerase chain reaction synthesis differently than unexposed DNA [ 29 ], although no statistical analysis was presented. Hintzsche et al. reported statistically significant occurrence of spindle disturbance in hybrid cells exposed to MMWs [ 30 ]. Zeni et al. found no evidence of DNA damage or alteration of cell cycle kinetics in blood cells exposed to MMWs [ 31 ]. Last, two studies from a Russian research group examined the protective effects of MMWs where mouse blood leukocytes were pre-exposed to low-level MMWs and then to X-rays [ 32 , 33 ]. The studies reported that there was statistically significant less DNA damage in the leucocytes that were pre-exposed to MMWs than those exposed to X-rays alone. Overall, these studies had no independent replication.
A number of studies have examined the effects of low-level MMWs on cell proliferation and they have used a variety of cellular models and methods of investigation. Studies have exposed bacterial cells to low-level MMWs alone or in conjunction with other agents. Two early studies reported changes in the growth rate of E. coli cultures exposed to low-level MMWs; however, both of these studies were preliminary in nature without appropriate dosimetry or statistical analysis [ 34 , 35 ]. Two studies exposed E. coli cultures and one study exposed yeast cell cultures to MMWs alone, and before and after UVC exposure [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. All three studies reported that MMWs alone had no significant effect on bacterial cell proliferation or survival. Rojavin et al., however, did report that when E. coli bacteria were exposed to MMWs after UVC sterilisation treatment, there was an increase in their survival rate [ 36 ]. The authors suggested this could be due to the MMW activation of bacterial DNA repair mechanisms. Other studies by an Armenian research group reported a reduction in E. coli cell growth when exposed to MMWs [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. These studies reported that when E.coli cultures were exposed to MMWs in the presence of antibiotics, there was a greater reduction in the bacterial growth rate and an increase in the time between bacterial cell division compared with antibiotics exposure alone. Two of these studies investigated if these effects could be due to a reduction in the activity of the E. coli ATPase when exposed to MMWs. The studies reported exposure to MMWs in combination with particular antibiotics changed the concentration of H + and K + ions in the E.coli cells, which the authors linked to changes in ATPase activity [ 43 , 44 ]. Overall, the results from studies on cell proliferation of bacterial cells have been inconsistent with different research groups reporting conflicting results.
Studies have also examined how exposure to low-level MMWs could affect cell proliferation in yeast. Two early studies by a German research group reported changes in yeast cell growth [ 46 , 47 ]. However, another two independent studies did not report any changes in the growth rate of exposed yeast [ 48 , 49 ]. Furia et al. [ 48 ] noted that the Grundler and Keilmann studies [ 46 , 47 ] had a number of methodical issues, which may have skewed their results, such as poor exposure control and analysis of results. Another study exposed yeast to MMWs before and after UVC exposure and reported that MMWs did not change the rates of cell survival [ 37 ].
Studies have also examined the possible effect of low-level MMWs on tumour cells with some studies reporting a possible anti-proliferative effect. Chidichimo et al. reported a reduction in the growth of a variety of tumour cells exposed to MMWs; however, the results of the study did not support this conclusion [ 50 ]. An Italian research group published a number of studies investigating proliferation effects on human melanoma cell lines with conflicting results. Two of the studies reported reduced growth rate [ 51 , 52 ] and a third study showed no change in proliferation or in the cell cycle [ 53 ]. Beneduci et al. also reported changes in the morphology of MMW exposed cells; however, the authors did not present quantitative data for these reported changes [ 51 , 52 ]. In another study by the same Italian group, Beneduci et al. reported that exposure to low-level MMWs had a greater than 40% reduction in the number of viable erythromyeloid leukaemia cells compared with controls; however, there was no significant change in the number of dead cells [ 54 ]. More recently, Yaekashiwa et al. reported no statistically significant effect in proliferation or cellular activity in glioblastoma cells exposed to low-level MMWs [ 55 ].
Other studies did not report statistically significant effects on proliferation in chicken embryo cell cultures, rat nerve cells or human skin fibroblasts exposed to low-level MMWs [ 55 , 56 , 57 ].
Some studies have investigated whether low-level MMWs can influence gene expression. Le Queument et al. examined a multitude of genes using microarray analyses and reported transient expression changes in five of them. However, the authors concluded that these results were extremely minor, especially when compared with studies using microarrays to study known pollutants [ 58 ]. Studies by a French research group have examined the effect of MMWs on stress sensitive genes, stress sensitive gene promotors and chaperone proteins in human glial cell lines. In two studies, glial cells were exposed to low-level MMWs and there was no observed modification in the expression of stress sensitive gene promotors when compared with sham exposed cells [ 59 , 60 , 61 ]. Further, glial cells were examined for the expression of the chaperone protein clusterin (CLU) and heat shock protein HSP70. These proteins are activated in times of cellular stress to maintain protein functions and help with the repair process [ 60 ]. There was no observed modification in gene expression of the chaperone proteins. Other studies have examined the endoplasmic reticulum of glial cells exposed to MMWs [ 62 , 63 ]. The endoplasmic reticulum is the site of synthesis and folding of secreted proteins and has been shown to be sensitive to environmental insults [ 62 ]. The authors reported that there was no elevation in mRNA expression levels of endoplasmic reticulum specific chaperone proteins. Studies of stress sensitive genes in glial cells have consistently shown no modification due to low-level MMW exposure [ 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ].
Belyaev and co-authors have studied a possible resonance effect of low-level MMWs primarily on Escherichia Coli (E. coli) cells and cultures. The Belyaev research group reported that the resonance effect of MMWs can change the conformation state of chromosomal DNA complexes [ 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 ]; however, most of these experiments were not temperature controlled. This resonance effect was not supported by earlier experiments on a number of different cell types conducted by Gandhi et al. and Bush et al. [ 75 , 76 ].
The results of Belyaev and co-workers have primarily been based on evidence from the anomalous viscosity time dependence (AVTD) method [ 77 ]. The research group argued that changes in the AVTD curve can indicate changes to the DNA conformation state and DNA-protein bonds. Belyaev and co-workers have reported in a number of studies that differences in the AVTD curve were dependent on several parameter including MMW characteristics (frequency, exposure level, and polarisation), cellular concentration and cell growth rate [ 69 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 ]. In some of the Belyaev studies E. coli were pre-exposed to X-rays, which was reported to change the AVTD curve; however, if the cells were then exposed to MMWs there was no longer a change in the AVTD curve [ 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 ]. The authors suggested that exposure to MMWs increased the rate of recovery in bacterial cells previously exposed to ionising radiation. The Belyaev group also used rat thymocytes in another study and they concluded that the results closely paralleled those found in E. coli cells [ 67 ]. The studies on the DNA conformation state change relied heavily on the AVTD method that has only been used by the Balyaev group and has not been independently validated [ 78 ].
Studies examining effects of low-level MMWs on cell signalling have mainly involved MMW exposure to nervous system tissue of various animals. An in vivo study on rats recorded extracellular background electrical spike activity from neurons in the supraoptic nucleus of the hypothalamus after MMW exposure [ 79 ]. The study reported that there were changes in inter-spike interval and spike activity in the cells of exposed animals when compared with controls. There was also a mixture of significant shifts in neuron population proportions and spike frequency. The effect on the regularity of neuron spike activity was greater at higher frequencies. An in vitro study on rat cortical tissue slices reported that neuron firing rates decreased in half of the samples exposed to low-level MMWs [ 80 ]. The width of the signals was also decreased but all effects were short lived. The observed changes were not consistent between the two studies, but this could be a consequence of different brain regions being studied.
In vitro experiments by a Japanese research group conducted on crayfish exposed the dissected optical components and brain to MMWs [ 81 , 82 ]. Munemori and Ikeda reported that there was no significant change in the inter-spike intervals or amplitude of spontaneous discharges [ 81 ]. However, there was a change in the distribution of inter-spike intervals where the initial standard deviation decreased and then restored in a short time to a rhythm comparable to the control. A follow-up study on the same tissues and a wide range of exposure levels (many above the ICNIRP limits) reported similar results with the distribution of spike intervals decreasing with increasing exposure level [ 82 ]. These results on action potentials in crayfish tissue have not been independently investigated.
Mixed results were reported in experiments conducted by a US research group on sciatic frog nerve preparations. These studies applied electrical stimulation to the nerve and examined the effect of MMWs on the compound action potentials (CAPs) conductivity through the neurological tissue fibre. Pakhomov et al. found a reduction in CAP latency accompanied by an amplitude increase for MMWs above the ICNIRP limits but not for low-level MMWs [ 83 ]. However, in two follow-up studies, Pakhomov et al. reported that the attenuation in amplitude of test CAPs caused by high-rate stimulus was significantly reduced to the same magnitude at various MMW exposure levels [ 84 , 85 ]. In all of these studies, the observed effect on the CAPs was temporal and reversible, but there were implications of a frequency specific resonance interaction with the nervous tissue. These results on action potentials in frog sciatic nerves have not been investigated by others.
Other common experimental systems involved low-level MMW exposure to isolated ganglia of leeches. Pikov and Siegel reported that there was a decrease in the firing rate in one of the tested neurons and, through the measurement of input resistance in an inserted electrode, there was a transient dose-dependent change in membrane permeability [ 86 ]. However, Romanenko et al. found that low-level MMWs did not cause suppression of neuron firing rate [ 87 ]. Further experiments by Romanenko et al. reported that MMWs at the ICNIRP public exposure limit and above reported similar action potential firing rate suppression [ 88 ]. Significant differences were reported between MMW effects and effects due to an equivalent rise in temperature caused by heating the bathing solution by conventional means.
Studies examining membrane interactions with low-level MMWs have all been conducted at frequencies above 40 GHz in in vitro experiments. A number of studies investigated membrane phase transitions involving exposure to a range of phospholipid vesicles prepared to mimic biological cell membranes. One group of studies by an Italian research group reported effects on membrane hydration dynamics and phase transition [ 89 , 90 , 91 ]. Observations included transition delays from the gel to liquid phase or vice versa when compared with sham exposures maintained at the same temperature; the effect was reversed after exposure. These reported changes remain unconfirmed by independent groups.
A number of studies investigated membrane permeability. One study focussed on Ca 2+ activated K + channels on the membrane surface of cultured kidney cells of African Green Marmosets [ 92 ]. The study reported modifications to the Hill coefficient and apparent affinity of the Ca 2+ by the K + channels. Another study reported that the effectiveness of a chemical to supress membrane permeability in the gap junction was transiently reduced when the cells were exposed to MMWs [ 93 , 94 ]. Two studies by one research group reported increases in the movement of molecules into skin cells during MMW exposure and suggested this indicates increased cell membrane permeability [ 21 , 91 ]. Permeability changes based on membrane pressure differences were also investigated in relation to phospholipid organisation [ 95 ]. Although there was no evidence of effects on phospholipid organisation on exposed model membranes, the authors reported a measurable difference in membrane pressure at low exposure levels. Another study reported neuron shrinkage and dehydration of brain tissues [ 96 ]. The study reported this was due to influences of low-level MMWs on the cellular bathing medium and intracellular water. Further, the authors suggested this influence of MMWs may have led to formation of unknown messengers, which are able to modulate brain cell hydration. A study using an artificial axon system consisting of a network of cells containing aqueous phospholipid vesicles reported permeability changes with exposure to MMWs by measuring K + efflux [ 97 ]. In this case, the authors emphasised limitations in applying this model to processes within a living organism. The varied effects of low-level MMWs on membrane permeability lack replication.
Other studies have examined the shape or size of vesicles to determine possible effects on membrane permeability. Ramundo-Orlando et al., reported effects on the shape of giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs), specifically elongation, attributed to permeability changes [ 98 ]. However, another study reported that only smaller diameter vesicles demonstrated a statistically significant change when exposed to MMWs [ 99 ]. A study by Cosentino et al. examined the effect of MMWs on the size distributions of both large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) and GUVs in in vitro preparations [ 100 ]. It was reported that size distribution was only affected when the vesicles were under osmotic stress, resulting in a statistically significant reduction in their size. In this case, the effect was attributed to dehydration as a result of membrane permeability changes. There is, generally, lack of replication on physical changes to phospholipid vesicles due to low-level MMWs.
Studies on E. coli and E. hirae cultures have reported resonance effects on membrane proteins and phospholipid constituents or within the media suspension [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. These studies observed cell proliferation effects such as changes to cell growth rate, viability and lag phase duration. These effects were reported to be more pronounced at specific MMW frequencies. The authors suggested this could be due to a resonance effect on the cell membrane or the suspension medium. Torgomyan et al. and Hovnanyan et al. reported similar changes to proliferation that they attributed to changes in membrane permeability from MMW exposure [ 43 , 45 ]. These experiments were all conducted by an Armenian research group and have not been replicated by others.
A number of studies have reported on the experimental results of other effects. Reproductive effects were examined in three studies on mice, rats and human spermatozoa. An in vivo study on mice exposed to low-level MMWs reported that spermatogonial cells had significantly more metaphase translocation disturbances than controls and an increased number of cells with unpaired chromosomes [ 101 ]. Another in vivo study on rats reported increased morphological abnormalities to spermatozoa following exposure, however, there was no statistical analysis presented [ 102 ]. Conversely, an in vitro study on human spermatozoa reported that there was an increase in motility after a short time of exposure to MMWs with no changes in membrane integrity and no generation of apoptosis [ 103 ]. All three of these studies looked at different effects on spermatozoa making it difficult to make an overall conclusion. A further two studies exposed rats to MMWs and examined their sperm for indicators of ROS production. One study reported both increases and decreases in enzymes that control the build-up of ROS [ 104 ]. The other study reported a decrease in the activity of histone kinase and an increase in ROS [ 105 ]. Both studies had low animal numbers (six animals exposed) and these results have not been independently replicated.
Immune function was also examined in a limited number of studies focussing on the effects of low-level MMWs on antigens and antibody systems. Three studies by a Russian research group that exposed neutrophils to MMWs reported frequency dependant changes in ROS production [ 106 , 107 , 108 ]. Another study reported a statistically significant decrease in antigen binding to antibodies when exposed to MMWs [ 109 ]; the study also reported that exposure decreased the stability of previously formed antigen–antibody complexes.
The effect on fatty acid composition in mice exposed to MMWs has been examined by a Russian research group using a number of experimental methods [ 110 , 111 , 112 ]. One study that exposed mice afflicted with an inflammatory condition to low-level MMWs reported no change in the fatty acid concentrations in the blood plasma. However, there was a significant increase in the omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid content of the thymus [ 110 ]. Another study exposed tumour-bearing mice and reported that monounsaturated fatty acids decreased and polyunsaturated fatty acids increased in both the thymus and tumour tissue. These changes resulted in fatty acid composition of the thymus tissue more closely resembling that of the healthy control animals [ 111 ]. The authors also examined the effect of exposure to X-rays of healthy mice, which was reported to reduce the total weight of the thymus. However, when the thymus was exposed to MMWs before or after exposure to X-rays, the fatty acid content was restored and was no longer significantly different from controls [ 112 ]. Overall, the authors reported a potential protective effect of MMWs on the recovery of fatty acids, however, all the results came from the same research group with a lack of replication from others.
Physiological effects were examined by a study conducted on mice exposed to WWMs to assess the safety of police radar [ 113 ]. The authors reported no statistically significant changes in the physiological parameters tested, which included body mass and temperature, peripheral blood and the mass and cellular composition, and number of cells in several important organs. Another study exposing human volunteers to low-level MMWs specifically examined cardiovascular function of exposed and sham exposed groups by electrocardiogram (ECG) and atrioventricular conduction velocity derivation [ 114 ]. This study reported that there were no significant differences in the physiological indicators assessed in test subjects.
Other individual studies have looked at various other effects. An early study reported differences in the attenuation of MMWs at specific frequencies in healthy and tumour cells [ 115 ]. Another early study reported no effect in the morphology of BHK-21/C13 cell cultures when exposed to low-level MMWs; the study did report morphological changes at higher levels, which were related to heating [ 116 ]. One study examined whether low-level MMWs induced cancer promotion in leukaemia and Lewis tumour cell grafted mice. The study reported no statistically significant growth promotion in either of the grafted cancer cell types [ 117 ]. Another study looked at the activity of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase enzyme in rats after treatment with hydrocortisone and exposure to MMWs [ 118 ]. The study reported no effects at exposures below the ICNIRP limit, however, at levels above authors reported a range of effects. Another study exposed saline liquid solutions to continuous low and high level MMWs and reported temperature oscillations within the liquid medium but lacked a statistical analysis [ 119 ]. Another study reported that low-level MMWs decrease the mobility of the protozoa S. ambiguum offspring [ 120 ]. None of the reported effects in all of these other studies have been investigated elsewhere.
There are no epidemiological studies that have directly investigated 5 G and potential health effects. There are however epidemiological studies that have looked at occupational exposure to radar, which could potentially include the frequency range from 6 to 300 GHz. Epidemiological studies on radar were included as they represent occupational exposure below the ICNIRP guidelines. The review included 31 epidemiological studies (8 cohort, 13 case-control, 9 cross-sectional and 1 meta-analysis) that investigated exposure to radar and various health outcomes including cancer at different sites, effects on reproduction and other diseases. The risk estimates as well as limitations of the epidemiological studies are shown in Table 7 .
Three large cohort studies investigated mortality in military personnel with potential exposure to MMWs from radar. Studies reporting on over 40-year follow-up of US navy veterans of the Korean War found that radar exposure had little effect on all-cause or cancer mortality with the second study reporting risk estimates below unity [ 121 , 122 ]. Similarly, in a 40-year follow-up of Belgian military radar operators, there was no statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality [ 123 , 124 ]; the study did, however, find a small increase in cancer mortality. More recently in a 25-year follow-up of military personnel who served in the French Navy, there was no increase in all-cause or cancer mortality for personnel exposed to radar [ 125 ]. The main limitation in the cohort studies was the lack of individual levels of RF exposure with most studies based on job-title. Comparisons were made between occupations with presumed high exposure to RF fields and other occupations with presumed lower exposure. This type of non-differential misclassification in dichotomous exposure assessment is associated mostly with an effect measure biased towards a null effect if there is a true effect of RF fields. If there is no true effect of RF fields, non-differential exposure misclassification will not bias the effect estimate (which will be close to the null value, but may vary because of random error). The military personnel in these studies were compared with the general population and this ‘healthy worker effect’ presents possible bias since military personnel are on average in better health than the general population; the healthy worker effect tends to underestimate the risk. The cohort studies also lacked information on possible confounding factors including other occupational exposures such as chemicals and lifestyle factors such as smoking.
Several epidemiological studies have specifically investigated radar exposure and testicular cancer. In a case-control study where most of the subjects were selected from military hospitals in Washington DC, USA, Hayes et al. found no increased risk between exposure to radar and testicular cancer [ 126 ]; exposure to radar was self-reported and thus subject to misclassification. In this study, the misclassification was likely non-differential, biasing the result towards the null. Davis and Mostofi reported a cluster of testicular cancer within a small cohort of 340 police officers in Washington State (USA) where the cases routinely used handheld traffic radar guns [ 127 ]; however, exposure was not assessed for the full cohort, which may have overestimated the risk. In a population-based case-control study conducted in Sweden, Hardell et al. did not find a statistically significant association between radar work and testicular cancer; however, the result was based on only five radar workers questioning the validity of this result [ 128 ]. In a larger population-based case control study in Germany, Baumgardt-Elms et al. also reported no association between working near radar units (both self-reported and expert assessed) and testicular cancer [ 129 ]; a limitation of this study was the low participation of identified controls (57%), however, there was no difference compared with the characteristics of the cases so selection bias was unlikely. In the cohort study of US navy veterans previously mentioned exposure to radar was not associated with testicular cancer [ 122 ]; the limitations of this cohort study mentioned earlier may have underestimated the risk. Finally, in a hospital-based case-control study in France, radar workers were also not associated with risk of testicular cancer [ 130 ]; a limitation was the low participation of controls (37%) with a difference in education level between participating and non-participating controls, which may have underestimated this result.
A limited number of studies have investigated radar exposure and brain cancer. In a nested case-control study within a cohort of male US Air Force personnel, Grayson reported a small association between brain cancer and RF exposure, which included radar [ 131 ]; no potential confounders were included in the analysis, which may have overestimated the result. However, in a case-control study of personnel in the Brazilian Navy, Santana et al. reported no association between naval occupations likely to be exposed to radar and brain cancer [ 132 ]; the small number of cases and lack of diagnosis confirmation may have biased the results towards the null. All of the cohort studies on military personnel previously mentioned also examined brain cancer mortality and found no association with exposure to radar [ 122 , 124 , 125 ].
A limited number of studies have investigated radar exposure and ocular cancer. Holly et al. in a population-based case-control study in the US reported an association between self-reported exposure to radar or microwaves and uveal melanoma [ 133 ]; the study investigated many different exposures and the result is prone to multiple testing. In another case-control study, which used both hospital and population controls, Stang et al. did not find an association between self-reported exposure to radar and uveal melanoma [ 134 ]; a high non-response in the population controls (52%) and exposure misclassification may have underestimated this result. The cohort studies of the Belgian military and French navy also found no association between exposure to radar and ocular cancer [ 124 , 125 ].
A few other studies have examined the potential association between radar and other cancers. In a hospital-based case-control study in Italy, La Vecchia investigated 14 occupational agents and risk of bladder cancer and found no association with radar, although no risk estimate was reported [ 135 ]; non-differential self-reporting of exposure may have underestimated this finding if there is a true effect. Finkelstein found an increased risk for melanoma in a large cohort of Ontario police officers exposed to traffic radar and followed for 31 years [ 136 ]; there was significant loss to follow up which may have biased this result in either direction. Finkelstein found no statistically significant associations with other types of cancer and the study reported a statistically significant risk estimate just below unity for all cancers, which is reflective of the healthy worker effect [ 136 ]. In a large population-based case-control study in France, Fabbro-Peray et al. investigated a large number of occupational and environmental risk factors in relation to non-Hodgkin lymphoma and found no association with radar operators based on job-title; however, the result was based on a small number of radar operators [ 137 ]. The cohort studies on military personnel did not find statistically significant associations between exposure to radar and other cancers [ 122 , 124 , 125 ].
Variani et al. conducted a recent systematic review and meta-analysis investigating occupational exposure to radar and cancer risk [ 138 ]. The meta-analysis included three cohort studies [ 122 , 124 , 125 ] and three case-control studies [ 129 , 130 , 131 ] for a total sample size of 53,000 subjects. The meta-analysis reported a decrease in cancer risk for workers exposed to radar but noted the small number of studies included with significant heterogeneity between the studies.
Apart from cancer, a number of epidemiological studies have investigated radar exposure and reproductive outcomes. Two early studies on military personnel in the US [ 139 ] and Denmark [ 140 ] reported differences in semen parameters between personnel using radar and personnel on other duty assignments; these studies included only volunteers with potential fertility concerns and are prone to bias. A further volunteer study on US military personnel did not find a difference in semen parameters in a similar comparison [ 141 ]; in general these type of cross-sectional investigations on volunteers provide limited evidence on possible risk. In a case-control study of personnel in the French military, Velez de la Calle et al. reported no association between exposure to radar and male infertility [ 142 ]; non-differential self-reporting of exposure may have underestimated this finding if there is a true effect. In two separate cross-sectional studies of personnel in the Norwegian navy, Baste et al. and Møllerløkken et al. reported an association between exposure to radar and male infertility, but there has been no follow up cohort or case control studies to confirm these results [ 143 , 144 ].
Again considering reproduction, a number of studies investigated pregnancy and offspring outcomes. In a population-based case-control study conducted in the US and Canada, De Roos et al. found no statistically significant association between parental occupational exposure to radar and neuroblastoma in offspring; however, the result was based on a small number of cases and controls exposed to radar [ 145 ]. In another cross-sectional study of the Norwegian navy, Mageroy et al. reported a higher risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring of personnel who were exposed to radar; the study found positive associations with a large number of other chemical and physical exposures, but the study involved multiple comparisons so is prone to over-interpretation [ 146 ]. Finally, a number of pregnancy outcomes were investigated in a cohort study of Norwegian navy personnel enlisted between 1950 and 2004 [ 147 ]. The study reported an increase in perinatal mortality for parental service aboard fast patrol boats during a short period (3 months); exposure to radar was one of many possible exposures when serving on fast patrol boats and the result is prone to multiple testing. No associations were found between long-term exposure and any pregnancy outcomes.
There is limited research investigating exposure to radar and other diseases. In a large case-control study of US military veterans investigating a range of risk factors and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Beard et al. did not find a statistically significant association with radar [ 148 ]; the study reported a likely under-ascertainment of non-exposed cases, which may have biased the result away from the null. The cohort studies on military personnel did not find statistically significant associations between exposure to radar and other diseases [ 122 , 124 , 125 ].
A number of observational studies have investigated outcomes measured on volunteers in the laboratory. They are categorised as epidemiological studies because exposure to radar was not based on provocation. These studies investigated genotoxicity [ 149 ], oxidative stress [ 149 ], cognitive effects [ 150 ] and endocrine function [ 151 ]; the studies generally reported positive associations with radar. These volunteer studies did not sample from a defined population and are prone to bias [ 152 ].
The experimental studies investigating exposure to MMWs at levels below the ICNIRP occupational limits have looked at a variety of biological effects. Genotoxicity was mainly examined by using comet assays of exposed cells. This approach has consistently found no evidence of DNA damage in skin cells in well-designed studies. However, animal studies conducted by one research group reported DNA strand breaks and changes in enzymes that control the build-up of ROS, noting that these studies had low animal numbers (six animals exposed); these results have not been independently replicated. Studies have also investigated other indications of genotoxicity including chromosome aberrations, micro-nucleation and spindle disturbances. The methods used to investigate these indicators have generally been rigorous; however, the studies have reported contradictory results. Two studies by a Russian research group have also reported indicators of DNA damage in bacteria, however, these results have not been verified by other investigators.
The studies of the effect of MMWs on cell proliferation primarily focused on bacteria, yeast cells and tumour cells. Studies of bacteria were mainly from an Armenian research group that reported a reduction in the bacterial growth rate of exposed E. coli cells at different MMW frequencies; however, the studies suffered from inadequate dosimetry and temperature control and heating due to high RF energy deposition may have contributed to the results. Other authors have reported no effect of MMWs on E. coli cell growth rate. The results on cell proliferation of yeast exposed to MMWs were also contradictory. An Italian research group that has conducted the majority of the studies on tumour cells reported either a reduction or no change in the proliferation of exposed cells; however, these studies also suffered from inadequate dosimetry and temperature control.
The studies on gene expression mainly examined two different indicators, expression of stress sensitive genes and chaperone proteins and the occurrence of a resonance effect in cells to explain DNA conformation state changes. Most studies reported no effect of low-level MMWs on the expression of stress sensitive genes or chaperone proteins using a range of experimental methods to confirm these results; noting that these studies did not use blinding so experimental bias cannot be excluded from the results. A number of studies from a Russian research group reported a resonance effect of MMWs, which they propose can change the conformation state of chromosomal DNA complexes. Their results relied heavily on the AVTD method for testing changes in the DNA conformation state, however, the biological relevance of results obtained through the AVTD method has not been independently validated.
Studies on cell signalling and electrical activity reported a range of different outcomes including increases or decreases in signal amplitude and changes in signal rhythm, with no consistent effect noting the lack of blinding in most of the studies. Further, temperature contributions could not be eliminated from the studies and in some cases thermal interactions by conventional heating were studied and found to differ from the MMW effects. The results from some studies were based on small sample sizes, some being confined to a single specimen, or by observed effects only occurring in a small number of the samples tested. Overall, the reported electrical activity effects could not be dismissed as being within normal variability. This is indicated by studies reporting the restoration of normal function within a short time during ongoing exposure. In this case there is no implication of an expected negative health outcome.
Studies on membrane effects examined changes in membrane properties and permeability. Some studies observed changes in transitions from liquid to gel phase or vice versa and the authors implied that MMWs influenced cell hydration, however the statistical methods used in these studies were not described so it is difficult to examine the validity of these results. Other studies observing membrane properties in artificial cell suspensions and dissected tissue reported changes in vesicle shape, reduced cell volume and morphological changes although most of these studies suffered from various methodological problems including poor temperature control and no blinding. Experiments on bacteria and yeast were conducted by the same research group reporting changes in membrane permeability, which was attributed to cell proliferation effects, however, the studies suffered from inadequate dosimetry and temperature control. Overall, although there were a variety of membrane bioeffects reported, these have not been independently replicated.
The limited number of studies on a number of other effects from exposure to MMWs below the ICNIRP limits generally reported little to no consistent effects. The single in vivo study on cancer promotion did not find an effect although the study did not include sham controls. Effects on reproduction were contradictory that may have been influenced by opposing objectives of examining adverse health effects or infertility treatment. Further, the only study on human sperm found no effects of low-level MMWs. The studies on reproduction suffered from inadequate dosimetry and temperature control, and since sperm is sensitive to temperature, the effect of heating due to high RF energy deposition may have contributed to the studies showing an effect. A number of studies from two research groups reported effects on ROS production in relation to reproduction and immune function; the in vivo studies had low animal numbers (six animals per exposure) and the in vitro studies generally had inadequate dosimetry and temperature control. Studies on fatty acid composition and physiological indicators did not generally show any effects; poor temperature control was also a problem in the majority of these studies. A number of other studies investigating various other biological effects reported mixed results.
Although a range of bioeffects have been reported in many of the experimental studies, the results were generally not independently reproduced. Approximately half of the studies were from just five laboratories and several studies represented a collaboration between one or more laboratories. The exposure characteristics varied considerably among the different studies with studies showing the highest effect size clustered around a PD of approximately 1 W/m 2 . The meta-analysis of the experimental studies in our companion paper [ 9 ] showed that there was no dose-response relationship between the exposure (either PD or SAR) and the effect size. In fact, studies with a higher exposure tended to show a lower effect size, which is counterfactual. Most of the studies showing a large effect size were conducted in the frequency range around 40–55 GHz, representing investigations into the use of MMWs for therapeutic purposes, rather than deleterious health consequences. Future experimental research would benefit from investigating bioeffects at the specific frequency range of the next stage of the 5 G network roll-out in the range 26–28 GHz. Mobile communications beyond the 5 G network plan to use frequencies higher than 30 GHz so research across the MMW band is relevant.
An investigation into the methods of the experimental studies showed that the majority of studies were lacking in a number of quality criteria including proper attention to dosimetry, incorporating positive controls, using blind evaluation or accurately measuring or controlling the temperature of the biological system being tested. Our meta-analysis showed that the bulk of the studies had a quality score lower than 2 out of a possible 5, with only one study achieving a maximum quality score of 5 [ 9 ]. The meta-analysis further showed that studies with a low quality score were more likely to show a greater effect. Future research should pay careful attention to the experimental design to reduce possible sources of artefact.
The experimental studies included in this review reported PDs below the ICNIRP exposure limits. Many of the authors suggested that the resulting biological effects may be related to non-thermal mechanisms. However, as is shown in our meta-analysis, data from these studies should be treated with caution because the estimated SAR values in many of the studies were much higher than the ICNIRP SAR limits [ 9 ]. SAR values much higher than the ICNIRP guidelines are certainly capable of producing significant temperature rise and are far beyond the levels expected for 5 G telecommunication devices [ 1 ]. Future research into the low-level effects of MMWs should pay particular attention to appropriate temperature control in order to avoid possible heating effects.
Although a systematic review of experimental studies was not conducted, this paper presents a critical appraisal of study design and quality of all available studies into the bioeffects of low level MMWs. The conclusions from the review of experimental studies are supported by a meta-analysis in our companion paper [ 9 ]. Given the low-quality methods of the majority of the experimental studies we infer that a systematic review of different bioeffects is not possible at present. Our review includes recommendations for future experimental research. A search of the available literature showed a further 44 non-English papers that were not included in our review. Although the non-English papers may have some important results it is noted that the majority are from research groups that have published English papers that are included in our review.
The epidemiological studies on MMW exposure from radar that has a similar frequency range to that of 5 G and exposure levels below the ICNIRP occupational limits in most situations, provided little evidence of an association with any adverse health effects. Only a small number of studies reported positive associations with various methodological issues such as risk of bias, confounding and multiple testing questioning the result. The three large cohort studies of military personnel exposed to radar in particular did not generally show an association with cancer or other diseases. A key concern across all the epidemiological studies was the quality of exposure assessment. Various challenges such as variability in complex occupational environments that also include other co-exposures, retrospective estimation of exposure and an appropriate exposure metric remain central in studies of this nature [ 153 ]. Exposure in most of the epidemiological studies was self-reported or based on job-title, which may not necessarily be an adequate proxy for exposure to RF fields above 6 GHz. Some studies improved on exposure assessment by using expert assessment and job-exposure matrices, however, the possibility of exposure misclassification is not eliminated. Another limitation in many of the studies was the poor assessment of possible confounding including other occupational exposures and lifestyle factors. It should also be noted that close proximity to certain very powerful radar units could have exceeded the ICNIRP occupational limits, therefore the reported effects especially related to reproductive outcomes could potentially be related to heating.
Given that wireless communications have only recently started to use RF frequencies above 6 GHz there are no epidemiological studies investigating 5 G directly as yet. Some previous epidemiological studies have reported a possible weak association between mobile phone use (from older networks using frequencies below 6 GHz) and brain cancer [ 11 ]. However, methodological limitations in these studies prevent conclusions of causality being drawn from the observations [ 152 ]. Recent investigations have not shown an increase in the incidence of brain cancer in the population that can be attributed to mobile phone use [ 154 , 155 ]. Future epidemiological research should continue to monitor long-term health effects in the population related to wireless telecommunications.
The review of experimental studies provided no confirmed evidence that low-level MMWs are associated with biological effects relevant to human health. Many of the studies reporting effects came from the same research groups and the results have not been independently reproduced. The majority of the studies employed low quality methods of exposure assessment and control so the possibility of experimental artefact cannot be excluded. Further, many of the effects reported may have been related to heating from high RF energy deposition so the assertion of a ‘low-level’ effect is questionable in many of the studies. Future studies into the low-level effects of MMWs should improve the experimental design with particular attention to dosimetry and temperature control. The results from epidemiological studies presented little evidence of an association between low-level MMWs and any adverse health effects. Future epidemiological research would benefit from specific investigation on the impact of 5 G and future telecommunication technologies.
Wu T, Rappaport TS, Collins CM. Safe for generations to come: considerations of safety for millimeter waves in wireless communications. IEEE Micro Mag. 2015;16:65–84.
Article Google Scholar
Health protection agency (HPA). Health effects from radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: the report of the independent advisory group on non-ionising radiation (AGNIR). HPA. 2012; RCE 20.
Scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks (SCENHIR). Potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF). Euro Comm. 2015; 1831-4783.
Australian radiation protection and nuclear safety agency (ARPANSA). Radiation protection standard for maximum exposure levels to radiofrequency fields—3 kHz to 300 GHz. Radiation Protection Series 3. ARPANSA; 2002.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). ICNIRP guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 KHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 2020;118:483–524.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Institute of electrical and electronics engineers (IEEE). IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz. IEEE 2019; C95.1.
Stam R. Comparison of international policies on electromagnetic fields (power frequency and radiofrequency fields). National institute for public health and the environment, RIVM 2018.
Simkó M, Mattsson MO. 5G Wireless communication and health effects—a pragmatic review based on available studies regarding 6 to 100 GHz. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:3406.
Article PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Wood A, Mate R, Karipidis K. Meta-analysis of in vitro and in vivo studies of the biological effects of low-level millimetre waves. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-021-00307-7 .
International commission on non-Ionizing radiation protection (ICNIRP). Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (100 kHz-300 GHz). ICNIRP 2009; 978-3-934994-10-2.
International agency for research on cancer (IARC). IARC monographs: non-ionizing radiation, part 2: radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. IARC 2013;102:1–460.
Google Scholar
Garaj-Vrhovac V, Horvat D, Koren Z. The relationship between colony-forming ability, chromosome aberrations and incidence of micronuclei in V79 Chinese hamster cells exposed to microwave radiation. Mutat Res Lett. 1991;263:143–9.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Garaj-Vrhovac V, Fučić A, Horvat D. The correlation between the frequency of micronuclei and specific chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes exposed to microwave radiation in vitro. Mutat Res Lett. 1992;281:181–6.
Korenstein-Ilan A, Barbul A, Hasin P, Eliran A, Gover A, Korenstein R. Terahertz radiation increases genomic instability in human lymphocytes. Radiat Res. 2008;170:224–34.
Hintzsche H, Jastrow C, Kleine-Ostmann T, Kärst U, Schrader T, Stopper H. Terahertz electromagnetic fields (0.106 THz) do not induce manifest genomic damage in vitro. PloS One. 2012;7:e46397.
Koyama S, Narita E, Shimizu Y, Suzuki Y, Shiina T, Taki M, et al. Effects of long-term exposure to 60 GHz millimeter-wavelength radiation on the genotoxicity and heat shock protein (Hsp) expression of cells derived from human eye. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13:802.
Koyama S, Narita E, Suzuki Y, Shiina T, Taki M, Shinohara N, et al. Long-term exposure to a 40-GHz electromagnetic field does not affect genotoxicity or heat shock protein expression in HCE-T or SRA01/04 cells. J Radiat Res. 2019;60:417–23.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
De Amicis A, De Sanctis S, Di Cristofaro S, Franchini V, Lista F, Regalbuto E, et al. Biological effects of in vitro THz radiation exposure in human foetal fibroblasts. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2015;793:150–60.
Franchini V, Regalbuto E, De Amicis A, De Sanctis S, Di Cristofaro S, Coluzzi E, et al. Genotoxic effects in human fibroblasts exposed to microwave radiation. Health Phys. 2018;115:126–39.
Shckorbatov YG, Grigoryeva NN, Shakhbazov VG, Grabina VA, Bogoslavsky AM. Microwave irradiation influences on the state of human cell nuclei. Bioelectromagnetics. 1998;19:414–9.
Shckorbatov YG, Pasiuga VN, Kolchigin NN, Grabina VA, Batrakov DO, Kalashnikov VV. The influence of differently polarised microwave radiation on chromatin in human cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 2009;85:322–9.
Shckorbatov YG, Pasiuga VN, Goncharuk EI, Petrenko TP, Grabina VA, Kolchigin NN, et al. Effects of differently polarized microwave radiation on the microscopic structure of the nuclei in human fibroblasts. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2010;11:801–5.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Paulraj R, Behari J. Single strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells exposed to microwave radiation. Mutat Res. 2006;596:76–80.
Kesari KK, Behari J. Fifty-gigahertz microwave exposure effect of radiations on rat brain. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2009;158:126.
Kumar S, Kesari KK, Behari J. Evaluation of genotoxic effects in male Wistar rats following microwave exposure. Indian J Exp Biol. 2010;48:586–92.
PubMed Google Scholar
Crouzier D, Perrin A, Torres G, Dabouis V, Debouzy JC. Pulsed electromagnetic field at 9.71 GHz increase free radical production in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Patho Biol. 2009;57:245–51.
Smolyanskaya AZ, Vilenskaya RL. Effects of millimeter-band electromagnetic radiation on the functional activity of certain genetic elements of bacterial cells. Sov Phys. 1974;16:571. USPEKHI
Lukashevsky KV, Belyaev IY. Switching of prophage lambda genes in Escherichia coli by millimetre waves. Med Sci Res. 1990;18:955–7.
Kalantaryan VP, Vardevanyan PO, Babayan YS, Gevorgyan ES, Hakobyan SN, Antonyan AP. Influence of low intensity coherent electromagnetic millimeter radiation (EMR) on aqua solution of DNA. Prog Electromag Res. 2010;13:1–9.
Hintzsche H, Jastrow C, Kleine-Ostmann T. Terahertz radiation induces spindle disturbances in human-hamster hybrid cells. Radiat Res. 2011;175:569–74.
Zeni O, Gallerano GP, Perrotta A, Romano M, Sannino A, Sarti M, et al. Cytogenetic observations in human peripheral blood leukocytes following in vitro exposure to THz radiation: a pilot study. Health Phys. 2007;92:349–57.
Gapeyev A, Lukyanova N, Gudkov S. Hydrogen peroxide induced by modulated electromagnetic radiation protects the cells from DNA damage. Open Life Sci. 2014;9:915–21.
Gapeyev AB, Lukyanova NA. Pulse-modulated extremely high-frequency electromagnetic radiation protects cellular DNA from the damaging effects of physical and chemical factors in vitro. Biophys. 2015;60:732–8.
Webb SJ, Dodds DD. Inhibition of bacterial cell growth by 136 GC microwaves. Nature. 1968;218:374–5.
Webb SJ, Booth AD. Absorption of microwaves by microorganisms. Nature. 1969;222:1199–200.
Rojavin MA, Ziskin MC. Effect of millimeter waves on survival of UVC‐exposed Escherichia coli. Bioelectromagnetics. 1995;16:188–96.
Pakhomova ON, Pakhomov AG, Akyel Y. Effect of millimeter waves on UV-induced recombination and mutagenesis in yeast. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg. 1997;43:227–32.
Cohen I, Cahan R, Shani G, Cohen E, Abramovich A. Effect of 99 GHz continuous millimeter wave electro-magnetic radiation on E. coli viability and metabolic activity. Int J Radiat Biol. 2010;86:390–9.
Tadevosyan H, Kalantaryan V, Trchounian A. Extremely high frequency electromagnetic radiation enforces bacterial effects of inhibitors and antibiotics. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2008;51:97–103.
Torgomyan H, Trchounian A. Low-intensity electromagnetic irradiation of 70.6 and 73 GHz frequencies enhances the effects of disulfide bonds reducer on Escherichia coli growth and affects the bacterial surface oxidation–reduction state. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;414:265–9.
Torgomyan H, Kalantaryan V, Trchounian A. Low intensity electromagnetic irradiation with 70.6 and 73 GHz frequencies affects Escherichia coli growth and changes water properties. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2011;60:275–81.
Torgomyan H, Hovnanyan K, Trchounian A. Escherichia coli growth changes by the mediated effects after low-intensity electromagnetic irradiation of extremely high frequencies. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2012;65:445–54.
Torgomyan H, Ohanyan V, Blbulyan S, Kalantaryan V, Trchounian A. Electromagnetic irradiation of Enterococcus hirae at low-intensity 51.8-and 53.0-GHz frequencies: changes in bacterial cell membrane properties and enhanced antibiotics effects. FEMS microbiol Lett. 2012;329:131–7.
Soghomonyan D, Trchounian A. Comparable effects of low-intensity electromagnetic irradiation at the frequency of 51.8 and 53 GHz and antibiotic ceftazidime on Lactobacillus acidophilus growth and survival. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013;67:829–35.
Hovnanyan K, Kalantaryan V, Trchounian A. The distinguishing effects of low‐intensity electromagnetic radiation of different extremely high frequencies on Enterococcus hirae: growth rate inhibition and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Lett Appl microbiol. 2017;65:220–5.
Grundler W, Keilmann F. Nonthermal effects of millimeter microwaves on yeast growth. Z Naturforsch. 1977;33:15–22.
Grundler W, Keilmann F. Sharp resonances in yeast growth prove nonthermal sensitivity to microwaves. Phys Rev Lett. 1983;51:1214.
Furia L, Hill DW, Gandhi OMP. Effect of millimeter-wave irradiation on growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. IEEE Trans Biom Eng. 1986;33:993–9.
Gos P, Eicher B, Kohli J, Heyer WD. Extremely high frequency electromagnetic fields at low power density do not affect the division of exponential phase Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 1997;18:142–55.
Chidichimo G, Beneduci A, Nicoletta M, Critelli M, De RR, Tkatchenko Y, et al. Selective inhibition of tumoral cells growth by low power millimeter waves. Anticancer Res. 2002;22:1681–8.
Beneduci A, Chidichimo G, Tripepi S, Perrotte E. Frequency and irradiation time-dependant antiproliferative effect of low-power millimeter waves on RPMI 7932 human melanoma cell line. Anticancer Res. 2005;25(2A):1023–8.
Beneduci A, Chidichimo G, Tripepi S, Perrotte E. Transmission electron microscopy study of the effects produced by wide-band low-power millimeter waves on MCF-7 human breast cancer cells in culture. Anticancer Res. 2005;25(2A):1009–13.
Beneduci A. Evaluation of the potential in vitro antiproliferative effects of millimeter waves at some therapeutic frequencies on RPMI 7932 human skin malignant melanoma cells. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2009;1:25–32.
Beneduci A, Chidichimo G, Tripepi S, Perrotta E, Cufone F. Antiproliferative effect of millimeter radiation on human erythromyeloid leukemia cell line K562 in culture: ultrastructural-and metabolic-induced changes. Bioelectrochemistry. 2007;70:214–20.
Yaekashiwa N, Otsuki S, Hayashi SI, Kawase K. Investigation of the non-thermal effects of exposing cells to 70–300 GHz irradiation using a widely tunable source. J Radiat Res. 2017;59:116–21.
Badzhinyan SA, Sayadyan AB, Sarkisyan NK, Grigoryan RM, Gasparyan GG. Lethal effect of electromagnetic radiation of the millimeter wavelength range on cell cultures of chicken embryo. Dokl Biochem Biophys. 2001;377:94–5.
Shiina T, Suzuki Y, Kasai Y, Inami Y, Taki M, Wake K. Effect of two-times 24 h exposures to 60 GHz millimeter-waves on neurite outgrowth in PC12VG cells in consideration of polarization. IEEE Int Sympo Electromag Compat. 2014;13:166–9.
Le Quément C, Nicolas Nicolaz C, Zhadobov M, Desmots F, Sauleau R, Aubry M, et al. Whole‐genome expression analysis in primary human keratinocyte cell cultures exposed to 60 GHz radiation. Bioelectromagnetics. 2012;33:147–58.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zhadobov M, Sauleau R, Le Coq L, Thouroude D, Orlov I, Michel D et al. 60 GHz electromagnetic fields do not activate stress-sensitive gene expression. IEEE 11th Int Sympo on Antenna Technol and appl electromag. 2005;11:1–4.
Zhadobov M, Sauleau R, Le Coq L, Debure L, Thouroude D, Michel D, et al. Low‐power millimeter wave radiations do not alter stress‐sensitive gene expression of chaperone proteins. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007;28:188–96.
Zhadobov M, Nicolaz CN, Sauleau R, Desmots F, Thouroude D, Michel D, et al. Evaluation of the potential biological effects of the 60-GHz millimeter waves upon human cells. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2009;57:2949–56.
Nicolaz CN, Zhadobov M, Desmots F, Ansart A, Sauleau R, Thouroude D, et al. Study of narrow band millimeter‐wave potential interactions with endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor genes. Bioelectromagnetics. 2008;30:365–73.
Nicolaz CN, Zhadobov M, Desmots F, Sauleau R, Thouroude D, Michel D, et al. Absence of direct effect of low-power millimeter-wave radiation at 60.4 GHz on endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2009;25:471–8.
Belyaev IY, Alipov YD, Shcheglov VS, Lystsov VN. Resonance effect of microwaves on the genome conformational state of E. coli cells. Z Naturforsch C. 1992;47:621–7.
Belyaev IY, Shcheglov VS, Alipov YD. Existence of selection rules on helicity during discrete transitions of the genome conformational state of E. coli cells exposed to low-level millimetre radiation. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg. 1992;27:405–11.
Belyaev IY, Shcheglov VS, Alipov YD. Selection rules on helicity during discrete transitions of the genome conformational state in intact and X-rayed cells of E. coli in millimeter range of electromagnetic field. Charg Field Eff Biosyst. 1992;3:115–26.
Belyaev I, Alipov YD, Shcheglov VS, Chromosome DNA. as a target of resonant interaction between Escherichia coli cells and low–intensity millimeter waves. Electro Magnetobiol. 1992;11:97–108.
Belyaev IY, Alipov YD, Polunin VA, Shcheglov VS. Evidence for dependence of resonant frequency of millimeter wave interaction with Escherichia coli K12 cells on haploid genome length. Electro Magnetobiol. 1993;12:39–49.
Belyaev IY, Shcheglov VS, Alipov YD, Radko SP. Regularities of separate and combined effects of circularly polarized millimeter waves on E. coli cells at different phases of culture growth. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg. 1993;31:49–63.
Belyaev IY, Alipov YD, Shcheglov VS, Polunin VA, Aizenberg OA. Cooperative response of Escherichia coli cells to the resonance effect of millimeter waves at super low intensity. Electro Magnetobiol. 1994;13:53–66.
Belyaev IY, Kravchenko VG. Resonance effect of low-intensity millimeter waves on the chromatin conformational state of rat thymocytes. Z Naturforsch. 1994;49:352–8.
Belyaev IY, Shcheglov VS, Alipov YD, Polunin VA. Resonance effect of millimeter waves in the power range from 10‐19 to 3× 10‐3 W/cm2 on Escherichia coli cells at different concentrations. Bioelectromagnetics. 1996;17:312–21.
Shcheglov VS, Belyaev I, Alipov YD, Ushakov VL. Power-dependent rearrangement in the spectrum of resonance effect of millimeter waves on the genome conformational state of Escherichia Coli cells. Electro Magnetobiol. 1997;16:69–82.
Shcheglov VS, Alipov ED, Belyaev I. Cell-to-cell communication in response of E. coli cells at different phases of growth to low-intensity microwaves. Biochim biophys Acta. 2002;1572:101–6.
Gandhi OP, Hagmann MJ, Hill DW, Partlow LM, Bush L. Millimeter wave absorption spectra of biological samples. Bioelectromagnetics. 1980;1:285–98.
Bush LG, Hill DW, Riazi A, Stensaas LJ, Partlow LM, Gandhi OP. Effects of millimeter‐wave radiation on monolayer cell cultures. III. A search for frequency‐specific athermal biological effects on protein synthesis. Bioelectromagnetics. 1981;2:151–9.
Belyaev IY, Shcheglov VS, Alipov ED, Ushakov VD. Nonthermal effects of extremely high-frequency microwaves on chromatin conformation in cells in vitro—dependence on physical, physiological, and genetic factors. IEEE Trans Micro Theory Tech. 2000;48:2172–9.
Pakhomov AG, Akyel Y, Pakhomova ON, Stuck BE, Murphy MR. Current state and implications of research on biological effects of millimeter waves: a review of the literature. Bioelectromagnetics. 1998;19:393–413.
Minasyan SM, Grigoryan GY, Saakyan SG, Akhumyan AA, Kalantaryan VP. Effects of the action of microwave-frequency electromagnetic radiation on the spike activity of neurons in the supraoptic nucleus of the hypothalamus in rats. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2007;37:175–80.
Pikov V, Arakaki X, Harrington M, Fraser SE, Siegel PH. Modulation of neuronal activity and plasma membrane properties with low-power millimeter waves in organotypic cortical slices. J Neural Eng. 2010;7:045003.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Munemori J, Ikeda T. Effects of low-level microwave radiation on the eye of the crayfish. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1982;20:84–8.
Munemori J, Ikeda T. Biological effects of X-band microwave radiation on the eye of the crayfish. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1984;22:263–7.
Pakhomov AG, Prol HK, Mathur SP, Akyel Y, Campbell CB. Frequency-specific effects of millimeter-wavelength electromagnetic radiation in isolated nerve. Electro Magnetobiol. 1997;16:43–57.
Pakhomov AG, Prol HK, Mathur SP, Akyel Y, Campbell CB. Search for frequency‐specific effects of millimeter‐wave radiation on isolated nerve function. Bioelectromagnetics. 1997;18:324–34.
Pakhomov AG, Prol HK, Mathur SP, Akyel Y, Campbell CB. Role of field intensity in the biological effectiveness of millimeter waves at a resonance frequency. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg. 1997;43:27–33.
Pikov V, Siegel PH. Millimeter wave-induced changes in membrane properties of leech Retzius neurons. Photonic Therapeutics Diagnostics. 2011;7883:56–1.
Romanenko S, Siegel PH, Pikov V. Microdosimetry and physiological effects of millimeter wave irradiation in isolated neural ganglion preparation. IEEE 2013 International kharkov symposium on physics and engineering of microwaves, millimeter and submillimeter waves. IEEE. 2013;13:512–6.
Romanenko S, Siegel PH, Wagenaar DA, Pikov V. Effects of millimeter wave irradiation and equivalent thermal heating on the activity of individual neurons in the leech ganglion. J Neurophysiol. 2014;112:2423–31.
Beneduci A, Filippelli L, Cosentino K, Calabrese ML, Massa R, Chidichimo G. Microwave induced shift of the main phase transition in phosphatidylcholine membranes. Bioelectrochemistry. 2012;1:18–24.
Beneduci A, Cosentino K, Chidichimo G. Millimeter wave radiations affect membrane hydration in phosphatidylcholine vesicles. Materials. 2013;6:2701–12.
Beneduci A, Cosentino K, Romeo S, Massa R, Chidichimo G. Effect of millimetre waves on phosphatidylcholine membrane models: a non-thermal mechanism of interaction. Soft Matter. 2014;10:5559–67.
Geletyuk VI, Kazachenko VN, Chemeris NK, Fesenko EE. Dual effects of microwaves on single Ca2+-activated K+ channels in cultured kidney cells Vero. FEBS Lett. 1995;359:85–8.
Chen Q, Zeng QL, Lu DQ, Chiang H. Millimeter wave exposure reverses TPA suppression of gap junction intercellular communication in HaCaT human keratinocytes. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004;25:1–4.
Shckorbatov YG, Shakhbazov VG, Navrotskaya VV, Grabina VA, Sirenko SP, Fisun AI, et al. Application of intracellular microelectrophoresis to analysis of the influence of the low‐level microwave radiation on electrokinetic properties of nuclei in human epithelial cells. Electrophoresis. 2002;23:2074–9.
Zhadobov M, Sauleau R, Vié V, Himdi M, Le Coq L, Thouroude D. Interactions between 60-GHz millimeter waves and artificial biological membranes: dependence on radiation parameters. IEEE Trans Micro Theory Tech. 2006;54:2534–42.
Deghoyan A, Heqimyan A, Nikoghosyan A, Dadasyan E, Ayrapetyan S. Cell bathing medium as a target for non thermal effect of millimeter waves. Electromag Biol Med. 2012;31:132–42.
D’Agostino S, Della Monica C, Palizzi E, Di Pietrantonio F, Benetti M, Cannatà D, et al. Extremely high frequency electromagnetic fields facilitate electrical signal propagation by increasing transmembrane potassium efflux in an artificial axon model. Sci Rep. 2018;8:9299.
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Ramundo-Orlando A, Longo G, Cappelli M, Girasole M, Tarricone L, Beneduci A, et al. The response of giant phospholipid vesicles to millimeter waves radiation. Biochem Biophys Acta. 2009;1788:1497–507.
Di Donato L, Cataldo M, Stano P, Massa R, Ramundo-Orlando A. Permeability changes of cationic liposomes loaded with carbonic anhydrase induced by millimeter waves radiation. Radiat Res. 2012;178:437–46.
Cosentino K, Beneduci A, Ramundo-Orlando A, Chidichimo G. The influence of millimeter waves on the physical properties of large and giant unilamellar vesicles. J Biol Phys. 2013;39:395–410.
Manikowska E, Luciani JM, Servantie B, Czerski P, Obrenovitch J, Stahl A. Effects of 9.4 GHz microwave exposure on meiosis in mice. Experientia. 1979;35:388–90.
Subbotina TI, Tereshkina OV, Khadartsev AA, Yashin AA. Effect of low-intensity extremely high frequency radiation on reproductive function in Wistar rats. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2006;142:189–90.
Volkova NA, Pavlovich EV, Gapon AA, Nikolov OT. Effects of millimeter-wave electromagnetic exposure on the morphology and function of human cryopreserved spermatozoa. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2014;157:574–6.
Kesari KK, Behari J. Microwave exposure affecting reproductive system in male rats. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;162:416–28.
Kumar S, Kesari KK, Behari J. Influence of microwave exposure on fertility of male rats. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1500–2.
Gapeyev AB, Safronova VG, Chemeris NK, Fesenko EE. Inhibition of the production of reactive oxygen species in mouse peritoneal neutrophils by millimeter wave radiation in the near and far field zones of the radiator. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg. 1997;43:217–20.
Gapeyev AB, Yakushina VS, Chemeris NK, Fesenko EE. Modification of production of reactive oxygen species in mouse peritoneal neutrophils on exposure to low-intensity modulated millimeter wave radiation. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg. 1998;46:267–72.
Safronova VG, Gabdoulkhakova AG, Santalov BF. Immunomodulating action of low intensity millimeter waves on primed neutrophils. Bioelectromagnetics. 2002;23:599–606.
Homenko A, Kapilevich B, Kornstein R, Firer MA. Effects of 100 GHz radiation on alkaline phosphatase activity and antigen–antibody interaction. Bioelectromagnetics. 2009;30:167–75.
Gapeyev AB, Kulagina TP, Aripovsky AV, Chemeris NK. The role of fatty acids in anti‐inflammatory effects of low‐intensity extremely high‐frequency electromagnetic radiation. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011;32:388–95.
Gapeyev AB, Kulagina TP, Aripovsky AV. Exposure of tumor-bearing mice to extremely high-frequency electromagnetic radiation modifies the composition of fatty acids in thymocytes and tumor tissue. Int J Radiat Biol. 2013;89:602–10.
Gapeyev AB, Aripovsky AV, Kulagina TP. Modifying effects of low-intensity extremely high-frequency electromagnetic radiation on content and composition of fatty acids in thymus of mice exposed to X-rays. Int J Radiat Biol. 2015;91:277–85.
Rotkovská D, Moc J, Kautská J, Bartonícková A, Keprtová J, Hofer M. Evaluation of the biological effects of police radar RAMER 7F. Environ Health Perspect. 1993;101:134–6.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Müller J, Hadeler KP, Müller V, Waldmann J, Landstorfer FM, Wisniewski R, et al. Influence of low power cm-/mm-microwaves on cardiovascular function. Int J Environ Health Res. 2004;14:331–41.
Webb SJ, Booth AD. Microwave absorption by normal and tumor cells. Science. 1971;1:72–4. 174
Stensaas LJ, Partlow LM, Bush LG, Iversen PL, Hill DW, Hagmann MJ, et al. Effects of millimeter‐wave radiation on monolayer cell cultures. II. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Bioelectromagnetics. 1981;2:141–50.
Bellossi A, Dubost G, Moulinoux JP, Himdi M, Ruelloux M, Rocher C. Biological effects of millimeter wave irradiation on mice-preliminary results. IEEE Trans Micro Theory Tech. 2000;48:2104–10.
Olchowik G, Maj JG. Inhibitory action of microwave radiation on gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activity in liver of rats treated with hydrocortisone. Folia Histochemica Et Cytobiologica. 2000;38:189–91.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Khizhnyak EP, Ziskin MC. Temperature oscillations in liquid media caused by continuous (nonmodulated) millimeter wavelength electromagnetic irradiation. Bioelectromagnetics. 1996;17:223–9.
Sarapultseva EI, Igolkina JV, Tikhonov VN, Dubrova YE. The in vivo effects of low-intensity radiofrequency fields on the motor activity of protozoa. Int J Radiat Biol. 2014;90:262–7.
Robinette CD, Silverman C, Jablon S. Effects upon health of occupational exposure to microwave radiation (radar). Am J Epidemiol. 1980;112:39–53.
Groves FD, Page WF, Gridley G, Lisimaque L, Stewart PA, Tarone RE, et al. Cancer in Korean war navy technicians: mortality survey after 40 years. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:810–8.
Degrave E, Autier P, Grivegnée AR, Zizi M. All-cause mortality among Belgian military radar operators: a 40-year controlled longitudinal study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20:677–81.
Degrave E, Meeusen B, Grivegnée AR, Boniol M, Autier P. Causes of death among Belgian professional military radar operators: a 37‐year retrospective cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:945–51.
Dabouis V, Arvers P, Debouzy JC, Sebbah C, Crouzier D, Perrin A. First epidemiological study on occupational radar exposure in the French Navy: a 26-year cohort study. Int J Environ Health Res. 2016;26:131–44.
Hayes RB, Brown LM, Pottern LM, Gomez M, Kardaun JW, Hoover RN, et al. Occupation and risk for testicular cancer: a case-control study. Int J Epidemiol. 1990;19:825–31.
Davis RL, Mostofi FK. Cluster of testicular cancer in police officers exposed to hand‐held radar. Am J Ind Med. 1993;24:231–3.
Hardell LE, Näsman A, Ohlson CG, Fredrikson MA. Case-control study on risk factors for testicular cancer. Int J Oncol. 1998;13:1299–602.
Baumgardt-Elms C, Ahrens W, Bromen K, Boikat U, Stang A, Jahn I, et al. Testicular cancer and electromagnetic fields (EMF) in the workplace: results of a population-based case–control study in Germany. Cancer Causes Control 2002;13:895–902.
Walschaerts M, Muller A, Auger J, Bujan L, Guérin JF, Lannou DL, et al. Environmental, occupational and familial risks for testicular cancer: a hospital‐based case‐control study. Int J Androl. 2007;30:222–9.
Grayson JK. Radiation exposure, socioeconomic status, and brain tumor risk in the US Air Force: a nested case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:480–6.
Santana VS, Silva M, Loomis D. Brain neoplasms among naval military men. Int J Occup Environ health. 1999;5:88–94.
Holly EA, Aston DA, Ahn DK, Smith AH. Intraocular melanoma linked to occupations and chemical exposures. Epidemiology. 1996;1:55–61.
Stang A, Anastassiou G, Ahrens W, Bromen K, Bornfeld N, Jöckel KH. The possible role of radiofrequency radiation in the development of uveal melanoma. Epidemiology. 2001;1:7–12.
La Vecchia CA, Negri E, D’avanzo BA, Franceschi S. Occupation and the risk of bladder cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 1990;19:264–8.
Finkelstein MM. Cancer incidence among Ontario police officers. Am J Ind Med. 1998;34:157–62.
Fabbro-Peray P, Daures JP, Rossi JF. Environmental risk factors for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a population-based case–control study in Languedoc-Roussillon, France. Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12:201–12.
Variani AS, Saboori S, Shahsavari S, Yari S, Zaroushani V. Effect of occupational exposure to radar radiation on cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J cancer prev. 2019;20:3211–9.
Weyandt TB, Schrader SM, Turner TW, Simon SD. Semen analysis of military personnel associated with military duty assignments. Reprod Toxicol. 1996;10:521–8.
Hjollund NH, Bonde JP, Skotte J. Semen analysis of personnel operating military radar equipment. Reprod Toxicol. 1997;11:897
Schrader SM, Langford RE, Turner TW, Breitenstein MJ, Clark JC, Jenkins BL. Reproductive function in relation to duty assignments among military personnel. Reprod Toxicol. 1998;12:465–8.
Velez De La Calle JF, Rachou E, le Martelot MT, Ducot B, Multigner L, Thonneau PF. Male infertility risk factors in a French military population. Hum reprod. 2001;16:481–6.
Baste V, Riise T, Moen BE. Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields; male infertility and sex ratio of offspring. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23:369–77.
Møllerløkken OJ, Moen BE. Is fertility reduced among men exposed to radiofrequency fields in the Norwegian Navy? Bioelectromagnetics. 2008;29:345–52.
De Roos AJ, Teschke K, Savitz DA, Poole C, Grufferman S, Pollock BH, et al. Parental occupational exposures to electromagnetic fields and radiation and the incidence of neuroblastoma in offspring. Epidemiology. 2001;1:508–17.
Mageroy N, Mollerlokken OJ, Riise T, Koefoed V, Moen BE. A higher risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring of personnel who served aboard a Norwegian missile torpedo boat. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63:92–7.
Baste V, Moen BE, Oftedal G, Strand LA, Bjørge L, Mild KH. Pregnancy outcomes after paternal radiofrequency field exposure aboard fast patrol boats. J Occup Environ Med. 2012;54:431–8.
Beard JD, Kamel F. Military service, deployments, and exposures in relation to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis etiology and survival. Epidemiol Rev. 2015;37:55–70.
Garaj-Vrhovac V, Gajski G, Pažanin S, Šarolić A, Domijan AM, Flajs D, et al. Assessment of cytogenetic damage and oxidative stress in personnel occupationally exposed to the pulsed microwave radiation of marine radar equipment. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2011;214:59–65.
Mortazavi SM, Shahram TA, Dehghan N. Alterations of visual reaction time and short term memory in military radar personnel. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42:428.
Singh S, Mani KV, Kapoor N. Effect of occupational EMF exposure from radar at two different frequency bands on plasma melatonin and serotonin levels. Int J Radiat Biol. 2015;91:426–34.
Ahlbom A, Green A, Kheifets L, Savitz D, Swerdlow A. ICNIRP standing committee on epidemiology: epidemiology of health effects of radiofrequency exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1741–54.
Savitz DA. Exposure assessment strategies in epidemiological studies of health effects of electric and magnetic fields. Sci Total Environ. 1995;168:143–53.
J‐H Kim S, Ioannides SJ, Elwood JM. Trends in incidence of primary brain cancer in New Zealand, 1995 to 2010. Aust NZ J Public Health. 2015;39:148–52.
Karipidis K, Elwood M, Benke G, Sanagou M, Tjong L, Croft RJ. Mobile phone use and incidence of brain tumour histological types, grading or anatomical location: a population-based ecological study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e024489.
Download references
This work was supported by the Australian Government’s Electromagnetic Energy Program. This work was also partly supported by National Health and Medical Research Council grant no. 1042464.
Authors and affiliations.
Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Ken Karipidis, Rohan Mate, David Urban & Rick Tinker
School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Ken Karipidis .
Conflict of interest.
The authors declare no competing interest
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Karipidis, K., Mate, R., Urban, D. et al. 5G mobile networks and health—a state-of-the-science review of the research into low-level RF fields above 6 GHz. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 31 , 585–605 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-021-00297-6
Download citation
Received : 30 July 2020
Revised : 23 December 2020
Accepted : 21 January 2021
Published : 16 March 2021
Issue Date : July 2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-021-00297-6
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Effects of radiofrequency field from 5g communication on fecal microbiome and metabolome profiles in mice.
Scientific Reports (2024)
Environmental Evidence (2023)
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2023)
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2023)
Environmental Evidence (2021)
Fifth-generation wireless (5G) is the latest iteration of cellular technology. 5G was engineered to greatly increase the speed and bandwidth of wireless networks while also reducing latency when compared to previous wireless standards.
5G is ideal for telecommunications, internet of things ( IoT ) and for private networks using private 5G . Cellular companies began deploying 5G networks in 2019 as the successor to fourth-generation wireless ( 4G ).
With 5G, data transmitted over wireless broadband connections can travel at multigigabit speeds, with potential ideal peak download speeds as high as 20 gigabits per second (Gbps). These speeds exceed wireline network speeds and can offer latency of below 5 milliseconds (ms) or lower, which is useful for applications that require real-time feedback. 5G enables a sharp increase in the amount of data transmitted over wireless systems due to more available bandwidth and advanced antenna technology.
Overall, 5G is expected to generate a variety of new applications , uses and business cases as the technology is rolled out.
5G is enabled by a 5G New Radio ( 5G NR ) air interface design, which acts as a specification for 5G networks -- describing how 5G products transmit data with 5G NR network infrastructure. 5G uses orthogonal frequency-division multiple access , the same radio access technology as 4G LTE networks use. In this way, 4G LTE wireless technology provides the foundation for 5G. Moreover, 5G also uses newer techniques such as quadrature amplitude modulation or QAM , beamforming, and other new features that increase the efficiency of a network and lower latency.
This article is part of
5G wireless networks are composed of cell sites divided into sectors that send data through radio waves. Unlike 4G, which requires large, high-power cell towers to radiate signals over longer distances, 5G wireless signals are transmitted through large numbers of small cell stations located in places like light poles or building roofs. The use of multiple small cells is necessary, as the millimeter wave ( mmWave ) spectrum -- the band of that 5G relies on to generate high speeds -- can only travel over short distances and is subject to interference from weather and physical obstacles.
MmWave frequencies can be easily blocked by objects such as trees, walls and buildings -- meaning that, much of the time, mmWave can only cover about a city block within direct line of sight of a cell site or node. Different approaches have been worked on to get around this issue. A brute-force approach involves using multiple nodes around each block of a populated area so that a 5G-enabled device can use an air interface -- switching from node to node while maintaining MM wave speeds.
Another, more feasible, way of offsetting the challenges relating to distance and interference with mmWave is using it in conjunction with a lower frequency wireless spectrum -- called Sub-6 5G.
The 5G spectrum is divided into mmWaves (high-band) and Sub-6 5G (low- and mid-bands). Although not as fast as mmWaves, Sub-6 5G is still typically faster than average 4G LTE speeds. Low-band frequencies are the slowest of 5G speeds, but are still faster than some 4G LTE speeds. Mid-band, by comparison, is faster than low-band, but is still eclipsed by mmWave.
Sub-6 5G reaches greater distances than mmWaves, but has lower speed and capacity compared to mmWave.
MmWave is still used in densely populated areas, while Sub-6 frequencies can be used in less dense areas. The lower-end frequencies can travel up to hundreds of square miles. This means that an implementation of all 5G frequency bands provides blanketed coverage while providing the fastest speeds in the most highly trafficked areas.
Each band in the 5G spectrum operates at different speeds:
Each band's speed varies depending on factors such as the carrier, distance, amount of traffic on the network, or obstacles (in the case of mmWaves).
Although 5G service is now widely available, it's not the initial replacement to 4G many thought it would be. While there are areas today with fast multi-gigabit download speeds, it's much more likely that users will encounter mid- or low-band 5G speeds. Even in a city block that provides mmWave 5G, its speed will diminish if the signal has to travel through a wall. Because of this, many users might notice only a minor speed improvement compared to 4G.
5G speeds are still considered fast in most cases, making consumer uses such as wirelessly streaming videos in 4K resolutions much more viable.
Even though the downsides of 5G are clear when considering how easily mmWave can be blocked, 5G still has plenty of worthy benefits, including the following:
Around the same time as the initial launch of 5G in 2019, the first 5G-compliant smartphones and associated devices started becoming commercially available.
At first, carrier 5G deployments were underwhelming, as some companies chose to build up their low-band infrastructure first. Although still 5G, it was not providing the blinding speed advertised by many carriers -- as that would come with mmWaves. Verizon was an early adopter of building their 5G mmWave architecture; however, this process is expensive and, at first, was only provided in a limited number of specific city areas.
Since 2019, many 5G carriers have had time to build up their 5G sub-6 and mmWave deployments. Many companies like Verizon or AT&T offer coverage maps on their websites, showing where they provide 5G mmWave, Sub-6 or 4G coverage. Each company has a different name for each band they offer, however. As an example, Verizon calls its 5G mmWave "5G Ultra Wideband," while AT&T calls its "5G+," and T-Mobile calls its "5G Ultra Capacity."
Network operators are developing two types of 5G services:
Each generation of cellular technology differs in its data transmission speed and encoding methods, which require end users to upgrade their hardware. 4G can support up to 2 Gbps and is slowly continuing to improve in speed. 4G featured speeds up to 500 times faster than 3G. 5G can be up to 100 times faster than 4G.
One of the main differences between 4G and 5G is the level of latency, of which 5G has much less. 5G uses orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing ( OFDM ) encoding, similar to 4G LTE. 4G, however, uses 20 MHz channels bonded together at 160 MHz. 5G is up to between 100 and 800 MHz channels, which requires larger blocks of airwaves than 4G.
Samsung is currently researching 6G. Not too much is currently known about how fast 6G would be and how it would operate. However, 6G will probably operate in similar differences of magnitude as between 4G and 5G. Some think 6G might use mmWave on the radio spectrum and might be a decade away.
5G use cases can range from business and enterprise use to more casual consumer use. Some examples of how 5G can be used include the following:
In addition to improvements in speed, capacity and latency, 5G offers network management features -- among them network slicing , which enables mobile operators to create multiple virtual networks within a single physical 5G network. This capability will enable wireless network connections to support specific uses or business cases and could be sold on an as-a-service basis. A self-driving car , for example, could require a network slice that offers extremely fast, low-latency connections so a vehicle could navigate in real time. A home appliance, however, could be connected via a lower-power, slower connection because high performance is not crucial. IoT could use secure, data-only connections.
5G's value chain and its support of a broad range of industries have led to a notable impact on economies. A study from PwC predicted that, by 2030, the total impact on the US economy by 5G will be $1.3 trillion. And in 2019, the leading industries 5G has affected include healthcare at $530 billion, smart utilities at $330 billion, consumer and media applications at $254 billion, industrial manufacturing at $134 billion and financial-services applications at $85 billion.
In another report published by CTIA , in 2020, the wireless industry generated over $1.3 trillion and added almost 4.5 million jobs to the American economy.
Many of the big carriers are working on building up and expanding their 5G networks. This includes Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile. Each carrier mentioned, for example, has embraced the idea of a multi-tier 5G strategy, which includes the use of low-band, mid-band and mmWave frequencies.
Likewise, 3GPP is working on more updates and improvements to their 5G specifications.
Early on in its 5G development, AT&T released a 5GE network, where 4G LTE users received an update that "upgraded" them to 5GE. 5GE was just a rebranding of AT&T's Gb 4G LTE network, however.
AT&T argued that the offered speeds were close enough to 5G, but it still was not technically 5G. The G stands for generation, typically signaling a compatibility break with former hardware. Users wouldn't have been able to update their phones to support 5G; rather, they would have needed to get a new phone that supports 5G entirely. This was a marketing strategy that misled individuals who did not know the specifics behind the technology.
A phone or another piece of hardware can't just get a software update on a 4G phone to enable 5G. 5G requires specific hardware.
To be able to utilize 5G, a user must have a device that supports 5G, a carrier that supports 5G and be within an area that has a 5G node within range.
Most new phones released today are developed to support 5G. As an example, the iPhone 12 and up all support 5G, while the Google Pixel 5 and up support 5G.
1G was launched by Nippon Telegraph and Telephone in 1979. By 1984, Japan became the first country to have the first generational network nationwide. Motorola introduced the first commercially available cellphone in 1983, called the DynaTAC.
The second generational network (2G) was released initially in Finland in 1991. 2G introduced significant improvements to mobile talk, such as improving sound quality, reducing static, and introducing encrypted calls. Another major addition to 2G was the ability to access media on cell phones by enabling the transfer of data bits.
The third-generation wireless ( 3G ) was first introduced in 2001. 3G focused on standardizing network protocols from different vendors. The biggest improvement to 3G was its increased speed, which enabled users to browse the internet on their mobile devices. 3G had four times the data transferring capability. International roaming services were also introduced.
The fourth-generation wireless was introduced in 2009. 4G enabled users to stream high-quality video with faster mobile web access. In 2011, LTE networks began launching in Canada. 4G LTE can still commonly be found in areas where 5G isn't yet provided.
Work developing 5G began in 2015 by the 3GPP -- a collaborative group of telecommunications associations. 3GPP's initial goal was to develop globally applicable specifications for 3G mobile systems. The 3GPP meets four times a year to plan and develop new releases. Each release improves upon the last while providing new standardized functionalities.
In 2017, the fifth 5G and 5G NR specifications were released. One year later, in 2018, the 3GPP approved release 16, which included a few specifications, including network slicing.
5G saw its public release in 2019, with Verizon being among the first carriers to develop a 5G mobile network in both Chicago and Minneapolis. Other carriers like Sprint, AT&T and T-Mobile began launching their own 5G infrastructure and services around the same time. Some companies started focusing on higher-speed mmWave infrastructure, while others decided to invest in developing lower band frequencies first.
In 2020, 3GPP release 16 was published, which focused on applications of 5G, such as automotive and industrial IoT. Release 18 was launched in 2022 and covered system architecture and services, security, multimedia codecs, as well as management orchestration and charging features.
The history of wireless networks has seen numerous iterations, and as 5G continues to be adopted, we will continue to see new iterations, updates and improvements. Learn more about the 5G adoption and how different industries will benefit from it in this article.
5g vs. 4g: learn the key differences between them.
Dig deeper on network infrastructure.
Microsoft 365 Copilot, an AI assistant, offers several promising features. Find out how to configure Copilot with Teams workflows...
With its AI capabilities, Microsoft Copilot provides several enhancements to Microsoft Teams functionality, including meeting ...
Organizations have ramped up their use of communications platform as a service and APIs to expand communication channels between ...
Auditing is a crucial part of mobile device security, but IT admins must ensure their approach is thorough and consistent. Learn ...
With the right software, almost any mobile device can be a payment terminal. Learn about the mobile point-of-sale options beyond ...
To keep corporate and user data safe, IT must continuously ensure mobile app security. Mobile application security audits are a ...
Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux are new distributions created after Red Hat announced the discontinuation of CentOS. These ...
The Broadcom CEO says public cloud migration trauma can be cured by private cloud services like those from VMware, but VMware ...
New capabilities for VMware VCF can import and manage existing VMware services through a single console interface for a private ...
Popular pricing models for managed service providers include monitoring only, per device, per user, all-you-can-eat or ...
Global IT consultancies take a multilayered approach to GenAI training by developing in-house programs, partnering with tech ...
IT service providers are upskilling a large portion of their workforces on the emerging technology. The campaign seeks to boost ...
Home — Essay Samples — Information Science and Technology — 5G Technology — The Future of 5g Networking
About this sample
Words: 847 |
Published: Nov 15, 2018
Words: 847 | Pages: 2 | 5 min read
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:
Let us write you an essay from scratch
Get high-quality help
Dr. Karlyna PhD
Verified writer
+ 120 experts online
By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
5 pages / 2618 words
2 pages / 835 words
3 pages / 1668 words
2 pages / 1062 words
Remember! This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.
121 writers online
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled
In conclusion, the arrival of 5G technology heralds a new era of connectivity that will reshape the global economy. With its potential to revolutionize industries, enable innovative applications, and enhance communication, 5G is [...]
In an era dominated by wireless communication, Bluetooth technology has emerged as a pivotal force, seamlessly connecting a myriad of devices and revolutionizing the way we interact with the digital world. From its inception in [...]
The expansion of 5G wireless is 5th generation wireless technology. This will complete wireless communication with almost no limitations. It can be called REAL wireless world. It has incrediable transmission speed. A 5G network [...]
The world has seen a number of advancements in wireless technology field. Starting from the first generation of wireless technology which was all about analog cellular, where cell phones of heavy weights and antennas were seen. [...]
The use of self-balancing robots has become quite extensive in the modern world and they form the basis of numerous applications. The main reason why this robot has gained fame is that it is fundamentally based on the ideology [...]
Nick Bostrom in his book “Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies” asks what will happen once we manage to build computers that are smarter than us, including what we need to do, how it is going to work, and why it has to [...]
By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Where do you want us to send this sample?
By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Be careful. This essay is not unique
This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before
Download this Sample
Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts
Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.
Please check your inbox.
We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!
We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .
COMMENTS
5G is the fifth-generation cellular network, as formally defined by global standards agencies. New networks have emerged roughly every 10 years since 1980, when 1G came on the scene with large cellphones that only made phone calls. Later, 2G introduced messaging, 3G brought access to the internet, and 4G, which emerged around 2009, brought a ...
5G Technology Essay - 5G Technology is the next generation of mobile broadband that will eventually replace, or at least expand 4G LTE connections. Long-term development (LTE) is a standard for wireless broadband communications for mobile devices and data terminals. 5G is a new revolutionary technology in the field of telecommunications.
An Android phone, showing that it is connected to a 5G network. In telecommunications, 5G is the fifth-generation technology standard for cellular networks, which cellular phone companies began deploying worldwide in 2019, and is the successor to 4G technology that provides connectivity to most current mobile phones.. Like its predecessors, 5G networks are cellular networks, in which the ...
5G, the fifth generation of wireless communication, represents a significant leap forward in the realm of mobile technology. Unlike its predecessors, 5G offers far more than just faster download and upload speeds. It promises a new digital ecosystem teeming with unprecedented connectivity, ultra-low latency, and massive network capacity.
Essay on 5G Technology in 250 words. The fifth generation of networks is the 5G network and this network promises to bring faster internet speed, lower latency, and improved reliability to mobile devices. In India, it is expected to have a significant impact on several industries such as healthcare, education, agriculture, entertainment, etc.
As the fifth generation of cellular networks, 5G is a global wireless standard. All cellular networks send encoded data through radio waves. Radio waves have different frequencies and are divided ...
The technology is built on standards that govern radio wave characteristics, frequency ranges, and network architecture. 5G technology uses numerous new approaches to improve communication speed and reliability, such as millimeter-wave (mmWave) spectrum, multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) antennas, network slicing, and edge computing.
Fifth generation (5G) wireless communication technology in wireless networks, has the ability to dramatically transform how, we connect to the internet and interact. In this essay, we examine the most recent developments in 5G wireless transmission technologies as well as their uses. We give a quick overview of the development of wireless transmission networks towards 5G throughout history ...
5G Network: A Technical Overview Introduction The advent of the 5th generation (5G) wireless technology represents a significant leap forward in mobile communication, promising faster speeds, lower latency, and the ability to connect a vast number of devices simultaneously. This essay delves into the technical intricacies of the 5G network,
The Technological Marvel: A Comprehensive Analysis of 5G Technology Abstract: The advent of 5G technology represents a significant milestone in the evolution of wireless communication. This essay aims to provide a detailed and technical exploration of 5G technology, covering its key components, architecture, benefits, and potential applications. Introduction: The fifth
27 Jan 2017. Everything You Need to Know About 5G. youtu.be. Today's mobile users want faster data speeds and more reliable service. The next generation of wireless networks—5G—promises to ...
Fifth time's the charm: 5G—or fifth-generation wireless technology— is powering the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Sure, 5G is faster than 4G. But 5G is more than just (a lot) faster: the connectivity made possible with 5G is significantly more secure and more stable than its predecessors. Plus, 5G enables data to travel from one place to ...
5G will support smart devices, including self-driving cars, wearable, telemedicine and internet of things (IoT). Autonomous cars and IoT devices are expected to be major revenue drivers for 5G networks.The IoT is the concept of connecting any device with an on-off switch to the internet and/or to each other.
The rollout of 5G technology creates jobs and drives economic growth. It requires the deployment of new infrastructure, the development of 5G-compatible devices, and the expansion of network services. These activities contribute to job creation and stimulate economic activity in various sectors. Conclusion of Essay on 5G Technology
Abstract. In wireless communication, Fifth Generation (5G) Technology is a recent generation of mobile networks. In this paper, evaluations in the field of mobile communication technology are presented. In each evolution, multiple challenges were faced that were captured with the help of next-generation mobile networks.
Conclusion: 5G technology represents a revolutionary leap forward in wireless communication, redefining the possibilities of connectivity and paving the way for a transformative future. With its remarkable speed, ultra-low latency, and massive connectivity, 5G has the potential to revolutionize industries, empower individuals, bridge the ...
The widest, base layer of 5G consists of today's low-band frequencies: 600 MHz to 1900 MHz. These allow about the same range and reliability as 4G but don't provide much of a boost in speed ...
Absolutely FREE essays on 5G Technology. All examples of topics, summaries were provided by straight-A students. Get an idea for your paper. search. Essay Samples Arts & Culture; Business; ... Currently, in Network Technology one of the most talked terms is 5G Networks, Although it is well informed that 5G is going to be launch by 2020 but ...
The increased use of radiofrequency (RF) fields above 6 GHz, particularly for the 5 G mobile phone network, has given rise to public concern about any possible adverse effects to human health.
A Review of 5g Wireless Technology. The expansion of 5G wireless is 5th generation wireless technology. This will complete wireless communication with almost no limitations. It can be called REAL wireless world. It has incrediable transmission speed. A 5G network will be able to handle 10,000 times more call and data traffic than the current 3G ...
Fifth-generation wireless (5G) is the latest iteration of cellular technology. 5G was engineered to greatly increase the speed and bandwidth of wireless networks while also reducing latency when compared to previous wireless standards. 5G is ideal for telecommunications, internet of things (IoT) and for private networks using private 5G.
Published: Nov 15, 2018. The next generation of wireless is in process and is causing a lot of excitement; 5G networking, also known as fifth generation of cellular networking, is expected to provide higher bandwidth and data rates, with fewer transmission delays. Currently the technology is in the planning stages but is expected to debut in 2020.
What is 5G and how does it work? Learn more about 5G technology and 5G networks, how it differs from 4G, and how it impacts communication and entertainment.