Evidence
From REF 1 .
Observational studies fall under the category of analytic study designs and are further sub-classified as observational or experimental study designs ( Figure 1 ). The goal of analytic studies is to identify and evaluate causes or risk factors of diseases or health-related events. The differentiating characteristic between observational and experimental study designs is that in the latter, the presence or absence of undergoing an intervention defines the groups. By contrast, in an observational study, the investigator does not intervene and rather simply “observes” and assesses the strength of the relationship between an exposure and disease variable. 6 Three types of observational studies include cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies ( Figure 1 ). Case-control and cohort studies offer specific advantages by measuring disease occurrence and its association with an exposure by offering a temporal dimension (i.e. prospective or retrospective study design). Cross-sectional studies, also known as prevalence studies, examine the data on disease and exposure at one particular time point ( Figure 2 ). 6 Because the temporal relationship between disease occurrence and exposure cannot be established, cross-sectional studies cannot assess the cause and effect relationship. In this review, we will primarily discuss cohort and case-control study designs and related methodologic issues.
Analytic Study Designs. Adapted with permission from Joseph Eisenberg, Ph.D.
Temporal Design of Observational Studies: Cross-sectional studies are known as prevalence studies and do not have an inherent temporal dimension. These studies evaluate subjects at one point in time, the present time. By contrast, cohort studies can be either retrospective (latin derived prefix, “retro” meaning “back, behind”) or prospective (greek derived prefix, “pro” meaning “before, in front of”). Retrospective studies “look back” in time contrasting with prospective studies, which “look ahead” to examine causal associations. Case-control study designs are also retrospective and assess the history of the subject for the presence or absence of an exposure.
The term “cohort” is derived from the Latin word cohors . Roman legions were composed of ten cohorts. During battle each cohort, or military unit, consisting of a specific number of warriors and commanding centurions, were traceable. The word “cohort” has been adopted into epidemiology to define a set of people followed over a period of time. W.H. Frost, an epidemiologist from the early 1900s, was the first to use the word “cohort” in his 1935 publication assessing age-specific mortality rates and tuberculosis. 7 The modern epidemiological definition of the word now means a “group of people with defined characteristics who are followed up to determine incidence of, or mortality from, some specific disease, all causes of death, or some other outcome.” 7
A well-designed cohort study can provide powerful results. In a cohort study, an outcome or disease-free study population is first identified by the exposure or event of interest and followed in time until the disease or outcome of interest occurs ( Figure 3A ). Because exposure is identified before the outcome, cohort studies have a temporal framework to assess causality and thus have the potential to provide the strongest scientific evidence. 8 Advantages and disadvantages of a cohort study are listed in Table 2 . 2 , 9 Cohort studies are particularly advantageous for examining rare exposures because subjects are selected by their exposure status. Additionally, the investigator can examine multiple outcomes simultaneously. Disadvantages include the need for a large sample size and the potentially long follow-up duration of the study design resulting in a costly endeavor.
Cohort and Case-Control Study Designs
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Cohort Study
Gather data regarding sequence of events; can assess causality |
Examine multiple outcomes for a given exposure |
Good for investigating rare exposures |
Can calculate rates of disease in exposed and unexposed individuals over time (e.g. incidence, relative risk) |
Large numbers of subjects are required to study rare exposures |
Susceptible to selection bias |
May be expensive to conduct |
May require long durations for follow-up |
Maintaining follow-up may be difficult |
Susceptible to loss to follow-up or withdrawals |
Susceptible to recall bias or information bias |
Less control over variables |
Cohort studies can be prospective or retrospective ( Figure 2 ). Prospective studies are carried out from the present time into the future. Because prospective studies are designed with specific data collection methods, it has the advantage of being tailored to collect specific exposure data and may be more complete. The disadvantage of a prospective cohort study may be the long follow-up period while waiting for events or diseases to occur. Thus, this study design is inefficient for investigating diseases with long latency periods and is vulnerable to a high loss to follow-up rate. Although prospective cohort studies are invaluable as exemplified by the landmark Framingham Heart Study, started in 1948 and still ongoing, 10 in the plastic surgery literature this study design is generally seen to be inefficient and impractical. Instead, retrospective cohort studies are better indicated given the timeliness and inexpensive nature of the study design.
Retrospective cohort studies, also known as historical cohort studies, are carried out at the present time and look to the past to examine medical events or outcomes. In other words, a cohort of subjects selected based on exposure status is chosen at the present time, and outcome data (i.e. disease status, event status), which was measured in the past, are reconstructed for analysis. The primary disadvantage of this study design is the limited control the investigator has over data collection. The existing data may be incomplete, inaccurate, or inconsistently measured between subjects. 2 However, because of the immediate availability of the data, this study design is comparatively less costly and shorter than prospective cohort studies. For example, Spear and colleagues examined the effect of obesity and complication rates after undergoing the pedicled TRAM flap reconstruction by retrospectively reviewing 224 pedicled TRAM flaps in 200 patients over a 10-year period. 11 In this example, subjects who underwent the pedicled TRAM flap reconstruction were selected and categorized into cohorts by their exposure status: normal/underweight, overweight, or obese. The outcomes of interest were various flap and donor site complications. The findings revealed that obese patients had a significantly higher incidence of donor site complications, multiple flap complications, and partial flap necrosis than normal or overweight patients. An advantage of the retrospective study design analysis is the immediate access to the data. A disadvantage is the limited control over the data collection because data was gathered retrospectively over 10-years; for example, a limitation reported by the authors is that mastectomy flap necrosis was not uniformly recorded for all subjects. 11
An important distinction lies between cohort studies and case-series. The distinguishing feature between these two types of studies is the presence of a control, or unexposed, group. Contrasting with epidemiological cohort studies, case-series are descriptive studies following one small group of subjects. In essence, they are extensions of case reports. Usually the cases are obtained from the authors' experiences, generally involve a small number of patients, and more importantly, lack a control group. 12 There is often confusion in designating studies as “cohort studies” when only one group of subjects is examined. Yet, unless a second comparative group serving as a control is present, these studies are defined as case-series. The next step in strengthening an observation from a case-series is selecting appropriate control groups to conduct a cohort or case-control study, the latter which is discussed in the following section about case-control studies. 9
Selection of subjects in cohort studies.
The hallmark of a cohort study is defining the selected group of subjects by exposure status at the start of the investigation. A critical characteristic of subject selection is to have both the exposed and unexposed groups be selected from the same source population ( Figure 4 ). 9 Subjects who are not at risk for developing the outcome should be excluded from the study. The source population is determined by practical considerations, such as sampling. Subjects may be effectively sampled from the hospital, be members of a community, or from a doctor's individual practice. A subset of these subjects will be eligible for the study.
Levels of Subject Selection. Adapted from Ref 9 .
Because prospective cohort studies may require long follow-up periods, it is important to minimize loss to follow-up. Loss to follow-up is a situation in which the investigator loses contact with the subject, resulting in missing data. If too many subjects are loss to follow-up, the internal validity of the study is reduced. A general rule of thumb requires that the loss to follow-up rate not exceed 20% of the sample. 6 Any systematic differences related to the outcome or exposure of risk factors between those who drop out and those who stay in the study must be examined, if possible, by comparing individuals who remain in the study and those who were loss to follow-up or dropped out. It is therefore important to select subjects who can be followed for the entire duration of the cohort study. Methods to minimize loss to follow-up are listed in Table 3 .
Methods to Minimize Loss to Follow-Up
Exclude subjects likely to be lost |
Planning to move |
Non-committal |
Obtain information to allow future tracking |
Collect subject's contact information (e.g. mailing addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses) |
Collect social security and/or Medicare numbers |
Maintain periodic contact |
By telephone: may require calls during the weekends and/or evenings |
By mail: repeated mailings by e-mail or with stamped, self-addressed return envelopes |
Other: newsletters or token gifts with study logo |
Adapted from REF 2 .
Case-control studies were historically borne out of interest in disease etiology. The conceptual basis of the case-control study is similar to taking a history and physical; the diseased patient is questioned and examined, and elements from this history taking are knitted together to reveal characteristics or factors that predisposed the patient to the disease. In fact, the practice of interviewing patients about behaviors and conditions preceding illness dates back to the Hippocratic writings of the 4 th century B.C. 7
Reasons of practicality and feasibility inherent in the study design typically dictate whether a cohort study or case-control study is appropriate. This study design was first recognized in Janet Lane-Claypon's study of breast cancer in 1926, revealing the finding that low fertility rate raises the risk of breast cancer. 13 , 14 In the ensuing decades, case-control study methodology crystallized with the landmark publication linking smoking and lung cancer in the 1950s. 15 Since that time, retrospective case-control studies have become more prominent in the biomedical literature with more rigorous methodological advances in design, execution, and analysis.
Case-control studies identify subjects by outcome status at the outset of the investigation. Outcomes of interest may be whether the subject has undergone a specific type of surgery, experienced a complication, or is diagnosed with a disease ( Figure 3B ). Once outcome status is identified and subjects are categorized as cases, controls (subjects without the outcome but from the same source population) are selected. Data about exposure to a risk factor or several risk factors are then collected retrospectively, typically by interview, abstraction from records, or survey. Case-control studies are well suited to investigate rare outcomes or outcomes with a long latency period because subjects are selected from the outset by their outcome status. Thus in comparison to cohort studies, case-control studies are quick, relatively inexpensive to implement, require comparatively fewer subjects, and allow for multiple exposures or risk factors to be assessed for one outcome ( Table 4 ). 2 , 9
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Case-Control Study
Good for examining rare outcomes or outcomes with long latency |
Relatively quick to conduct |
Relatively inexpensive |
Requires comparatively few subjects |
Existing records can be used |
Multiple exposures or risk factors can be examined |
Susceptible to recall bias or information bias |
Difficult to validate information |
Control of extraneous variables may be incomplete |
Selection of an appropriate comparison group may be difficult |
Rates of disease in exposed and unexposed individuals cannot be determined |
An example of a case-control investigation is by Zhang and colleagues who examined the association of environmental and genetic factors associated with rare congenital microtia, 16 which has an estimated prevalence of 0.83 to 17.4 in 10,000. 17 They selected 121 congenital microtia cases based on clinical phenotype, and 152 unaffected controls, matched by age and sex in the same hospital and same period. Controls were of Hans Chinese origin from Jiangsu, China, the same area from where the cases were selected. This allowed both the controls and cases to have the same genetic background, important to note given the investigated association between genetic factors and congenital microtia. To examine environmental factors, a questionnaire was administered to the mothers of both cases and controls. The authors concluded that adverse maternal health was among the main risk factors for congenital microtia, specifically maternal disease during pregnancy (OR 5.89, 95% CI 2.36-14.72), maternal toxicity exposure during pregnancy (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.66-13.68), and resident area, such as living near industries associated with air pollution (OR 7.00, 95% CI 2.09-23.47). 16 A case-control study design is most efficient for this investigation, given the rarity of the disease outcome. Because congenital microtia is thought to have multifactorial causes, an additional advantage of the case-control study design in this example is the ability to examine multiple exposures and risk factors.
Sampling in a case-control study design begins with selecting the cases. In a case-control study, it is imperative that the investigator has explicitly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria prior to the selection of cases. For example, if the outcome is having a disease, specific diagnostic criteria, disease subtype, stage of disease, or degree of severity should be defined. Such criteria ensure that all the cases are homogenous. Second, cases may be selected from a variety of sources, including hospital patients, clinic patients, or community subjects. Many communities maintain registries of patients with certain diseases and can serve as a valuable source of cases. However, despite the methodologic convenience of this method, validity issues may arise. For example, if cases are selected from one hospital, identified risk factors may be unique to that single hospital. This methodological choice may weaken the generalizability of the study findings. Another example is choosing cases from the hospital versus the community; most likely cases from the hospital sample will represent a more severe form of the disease than those in the community. 2 Finally, it is also important to select cases that are representative of cases in the target population to strengthen the study's external validity ( Figure 4 ). Potential reasons why cases from the original target population eventually filter through and are available as cases (study participants) for a case-control study are illustrated in Figure 5 .
Levels of Case Selection. Adapted from Ref 2 .
Selecting the appropriate group of controls can be one of the most demanding aspects of a case-control study. An important principle is that the distribution of exposure should be the same among cases and controls; in other words, both cases and controls should stem from the same source population. The investigator may also consider the control group to be an at-risk population, with the potential to develop the outcome. Because the validity of the study depends upon the comparability of these two groups, cases and controls should otherwise meet the same inclusion criteria in the study.
A case-control study design that exemplifies this methodological feature is by Chung and colleagues, who examined maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and the risk of newborns developing cleft lip/palate. 18 A salient feature of this study is the use of the 1996 U.S. Natality database, a population database, from which both cases and controls were selected. This database provides a large sample size to assess newborn development of cleft lip/palate (outcome), which has a reported incidence of 1 in 1000 live births, 19 and also enabled the investigators to choose controls (i.e., healthy newborns) that were generalizable to the general population to strengthen the study's external validity. A significant relationship with maternal cigarette smoking and cleft lip/palate in the newborn was reported in this study (adjusted OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.36-1.76). 18
Matching is a method used in an attempt to ensure comparability between cases and controls and reduces variability and systematic differences due to background variables that are not of interest to the investigator. 8 Each case is typically individually paired with a control subject with respect to the background variables. The exposure to the risk factor of interest is then compared between the cases and the controls. This matching strategy is called individual matching. Age, sex, and race are often used to match cases and controls because they are typically strong confounders of disease. 20 Confounders are variables associated with the risk factor and may potentially be a cause of the outcome. 8 Table 5 lists several advantages and disadvantages with a matching design.
Advantages and Disadvantages for Using a Matching Strategy
Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|
Eliminate influence of measurable confounders (e.g. age, sex) | May be time-consuming and expensive |
Eliminate influence of confounders that are difficult to measure | Decision to match and confounding variables to match upon are decided at the outset of the study |
May be a sampling convenience, making it easier to select the controls in a case-control study | Matched variables cannot be examined in the study |
May improve study efficiency (i.e. smaller sample size) | Requires a matched analysis |
Vulnerable to overmatching: when matching variable has some relationship with the outcome |
Investigations examining rare outcomes may have a limited number of cases to select from, whereas the source population from which controls can be selected is much larger. In such scenarios, the study may be able to provide more information if multiple controls per case are selected. This method increases the “statistical power” of the investigation by increasing the sample size. The precision of the findings may improve by having up to about three or four controls per case. 21 - 23
Evaluating exposure status can be the Achilles heel of case-control studies. Because information about exposure is typically collected by self-report, interview, or from recorded information, it is susceptible to recall bias, interviewer bias, or will rely on the completeness or accuracy of recorded information, respectively. These biases decrease the internal validity of the investigation and should be carefully addressed and reduced in the study design. Recall bias occurs when a differential response between cases and controls occurs. The common scenario is when a subject with disease (case) will unconsciously recall and report an exposure with better clarity due to the disease experience. Interviewer bias occurs when the interviewer asks leading questions or has an inconsistent interview approach between cases and controls. A good study design will implement a standardized interview in a non-judgemental atmosphere with well-trained interviewers to reduce interviewer bias. 9
In 2004, the first meeting of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) group took place in Bristol, UK. 24 The aim of the group was to establish guidelines on reporting observational research to improve the transparency of the methods, thereby facilitating the critical appraisal of a study's findings. A well-designed but poorly reported study is disadvantaged in contributing to the literature because the results and generalizability of the findings may be difficult to assess. Thus a 22-item checklist was generated to enhance the reporting of observational studies across disciplines. 25 , 26 This checklist is also located at the following website: www.strobe-statement.org . This statement is applicable to cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies. In fact, 18 of the checklist items are common to all three types of observational studies, and 4 items are specific to each of the 3 specific study designs. In an effort to provide specific guidance to go along with this checklist, an “explanation and elaboration” article was published for users to better appreciate each item on the checklist. 27 Plastic surgery investigators should peruse this checklist prior to designing their study and when they are writing up the report for publication. In fact, some journals now require authors to follow the STROBE Statement. A list of participating journals can be found on this website: http://www.strobe-statement.org./index.php?id=strobe-endorsement .
Due to the limitations in carrying out RCTs in surgical investigations, observational studies are becoming more popular to investigate the relationship between exposures, such as risk factors or surgical interventions, and outcomes, such as disease states or complications. Recognizing that well-designed observational studies can provide valid results is important among the plastic surgery community, so that investigators can both critically appraise and appropriately design observational studies to address important clinical research questions. The investigator planning an observational study can certainly use the STROBE statement as a tool to outline key features of a study as well as coming back to it again at the end to enhance transparency in methodology reporting.
Supported in part by a Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research (K24 AR053120) from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (to Dr. Kevin C. Chung).
None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
The term case study refers to both a method of analysis and a specific research design for examining a problem, both of which are used in most circumstances to generalize across populations. This tab focuses on the latter--how to design and organize a research paper in the social sciences that analyzes a specific case.
A case study research paper examines a person, place, event, phenomenon, or other type of subject of analysis in order to extrapolate key themes and results that help predict future trends, illuminate previously hidden issues that can be applied to practice, and/or provide a means for understanding an important research problem with greater clarity. A case study paper usually examines a single subject of analysis, but case study papers can also be designed as a comparative investigation that shows relationships between two or among more than two subjects. The methods used to study a case can rest within a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method investigative paradigm.
Case Studies . Writing@CSU. Colorado State University; Mills, Albert J. , Gabrielle Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010 ; “What is a Case Study?” In Swanborn, Peter G. Case Study Research: What, Why and How? London: SAGE, 2010.
General information about how to choose a topic to investigate can be found under the " Choosing a Research Problem " tab in this writing guide. Review this page because it may help you identify a subject of analysis that can be investigated using a single case study design.
However, identifying a case to investigate involves more than choosing the research problem . A case study encompasses a problem contextualized around the application of in-depth analysis, interpretation, and discussion, often resulting in specific recommendations for action or for improving existing conditions. As Seawright and Gerring note, practical considerations such as time and access to information can influence case selection, but these issues should not be the sole factors used in describing the methodological justification for identifying a particular case to study. Given this, selecting a case includes considering the following:
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (October 1989): 532-550; Emmel, Nick. Sampling and Choosing Cases in Qualitative Research: A Realist Approach . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2013; Gerring, John. “What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for?” American Political Science Review 98 (May 2004): 341-354; Mills, Albert J. , Gabrielle Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010; Seawright, Jason and John Gerring. "Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research." Political Research Quarterly 61 (June 2008): 294-308.
The purpose of a paper in the social sciences designed around a case study is to thoroughly investigate a subject of analysis in order to reveal a new understanding about the research problem and, in so doing, contributing new knowledge to what is already known from previous studies. In applied social sciences disciplines [e.g., education, social work, public administration, etc.], case studies may also be used to reveal best practices, highlight key programs, or investigate interesting aspects of professional work. In general, the structure of a case study research paper is not all that different from a standard college-level research paper. However, there are subtle differences you should be aware of. Here are the key elements to organizing and writing a case study research paper.
I. Introduction
As with any research paper, your introduction should serve as a roadmap for your readers to ascertain the scope and purpose of your study . The introduction to a case study research paper, however, should not only describe the research problem and its significance, but you should also succinctly describe why the case is being used and how it relates to addressing the problem. The two elements should be linked. With this in mind, a good introduction answers these four questions:
Each of these questions should be addressed in no more than a few paragraphs. Exceptions to this can be when you are addressing a complex research problem or subject of analysis that requires more in-depth background information.
II. Literature Review
The literature review for a case study research paper is generally structured the same as it is for any college-level research paper. The difference, however, is that the literature review is focused on providing background information and enabling historical interpretation of the subject of analysis in relation to the research problem the case is intended to address . This includes synthesizing studies that help to:
III. Method
In this section, you explain why you selected a particular subject of analysis to study and the strategy you used to identify and ultimately decide that your case was appropriate in addressing the research problem. The way you describe the methods used varies depending on the type of subject of analysis that frames your case study.
If your subject of analysis is an incident or event . In the social and behavioral sciences, the event or incident that represents the case to be studied is usually bounded by time and place, with a clear beginning and end and with an identifiable location or position relative to its surroundings. The subject of analysis can be a rare or critical event or it can focus on a typical or regular event. The purpose of studying a rare event is to illuminate new ways of thinking about the broader research problem or to test a hypothesis. Critical incident case studies must describe the method by which you identified the event and explain the process by which you determined the validity of this case to inform broader perspectives about the research problem or to reveal new findings. However, the event does not have to be a rare or uniquely significant to support new thinking about the research problem or to challenge an existing hypothesis. For example, Walo, Bull, and Breen conducted a case study to identify and evaluate the direct and indirect economic benefits and costs of a local sports event in the City of Lismore, New South Wales, Australia. The purpose of their study was to provide new insights from measuring the impact of a typical local sports event that prior studies could not measure well because they focused on large "mega-events." Whether the event is rare or not, the methods section should include an explanation of the following characteristics of the event: a) when did it take place; b) what were the underlying circumstances leading to the event; c) what were the consequences of the event.
If your subject of analysis is a person. Explain why you selected this particular individual to be studied and describe what experience he or she has had that provides an opportunity to advance new understandings about the research problem. Mention any background about this person which might help the reader understand the significance of his/her experiences that make them worthy of study. This includes describing the relationships this person has had with other people, institutions, and/or events that support using him or her as the subject for a case study research paper. It is particularly important to differentiate the person as the subject of analysis from others and to succinctly explain how the person relates to examining the research problem.
If your subject of analysis is a place. In general, a case study that investigates a place suggests a subject of analysis that is unique or special in some way and that this uniqueness can be used to build new understanding or knowledge about the research problem. A case study of a place must not only describe its various attributes relevant to the research problem [e.g., physical, social, cultural, economic, political, etc.], but you must state the method by which you determined that this place will illuminate new understandings about the research problem. It is also important to articulate why a particular place as the case for study is being used if similar places also exist [i.e., if you are studying patterns of homeless encampments of veterans in open spaces, why study Echo Park in Los Angeles rather than Griffith Park?]. If applicable, describe what type of human activity involving this place makes it a good choice to study [e.g., prior research reveals Echo Park has more homeless veterans].
If your subject of analysis is a phenomenon. A phenomenon refers to a fact, occurrence, or circumstance that can be studied or observed but with the cause or explanation to be in question. In this sense, a phenomenon that forms your subject of analysis can encompass anything that can be observed or presumed to exist but is not fully understood. In the social and behavioral sciences, the case usually focuses on human interaction within a complex physical, social, economic, cultural, or political system. For example, the phenomenon could be the observation that many vehicles used by ISIS fighters are small trucks with English language advertisements on them. The research problem could be that ISIS fighters are difficult to combat because they are highly mobile. The research questions could be how and by what means are these vehicles used by ISIS being supplied to the militants and how might supply lines to these vehicles be cut? How might knowing the suppliers of these trucks from overseas reveal larger networks of collaborators and financial support? A case study of a phenomenon most often encompasses an in-depth analysis of a cause and effect that is grounded in an interactive relationship between people and their environment in some way.
NOTE: The choice of the case or set of cases to study cannot appear random. Evidence that supports the method by which you identified and chose your subject of analysis should be linked to the findings from the literature review. Be sure to cite any prior studies that helped you determine that the case you chose was appropriate for investigating the research problem.
IV. Discussion
The main elements of your discussion section are generally the same as any research paper, but centered around interpreting and drawing conclusions about the key findings from your case study. Note that a general social sciences research paper may contain a separate section to report findings. However, in a paper designed around a case study, it is more common to combine a description of the findings with the discussion about their implications. The objectives of your discussion section should include the following:
Reiterate the Research Problem/State the Major Findings Briefly reiterate the research problem you are investigating and explain why the subject of analysis around which you designed the case study were used. You should then describe the findings revealed from your study of the case using direct, declarative, and succinct proclamation of the study results. Highlight any findings that were unexpected or especially profound.
Explain the Meaning of the Findings and Why They are Important Systematically explain the meaning of your case study findings and why you believe they are important. Begin this part of the section by repeating what you consider to be your most important or surprising finding first, then systematically review each finding. Be sure to thoroughly extrapolate what your analysis of the case can tell the reader about situations or conditions beyond the actual case that was studied while, at the same time, being careful not to misconstrue or conflate a finding that undermines the external validity of your conclusions.
Relate the Findings to Similar Studies No study in the social sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to previously published research. The discussion section should relate your case study results to those found in other studies, particularly if questions raised from prior studies served as the motivation for choosing your subject of analysis. This is important because comparing and contrasting the findings of other studies helps to support the overall importance of your results and it highlights how and in what ways your case study design and the subject of analysis differs from prior research about the topic.
Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings It is important to remember that the purpose of social science research is to discover and not to prove. When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the case study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases. Be alert to what the in-depth analysis of the case may reveal about the research problem, including offering a contrarian perspective to what scholars have stated in prior research.
Acknowledge the Study's Limitations You can state the study's limitations in the conclusion section of your paper but describing the limitations of your subject of analysis in the discussion section provides an opportunity to identify the limitations and explain why they are not significant. This part of the discussion section should also note any unanswered questions or issues your case study could not address. More detailed information about how to document any limitations to your research can be found here .
Suggest Areas for Further Research Although your case study may offer important insights about the research problem, there are likely additional questions related to the problem that remain unanswered or findings that unexpectedly revealed themselves as a result of your in-depth analysis of the case. Be sure that the recommendations for further research are linked to the research problem and that you explain why your recommendations are valid in other contexts and based on the original assumptions of your study.
V. Conclusion
As with any research paper, you should summarize your conclusion in clear, simple language; emphasize how the findings from your case study differs from or supports prior research and why. Do not simply reiterate the discussion section. Provide a synthesis of key findings presented in the paper to show how these converge to address the research problem. If you haven't already done so in the discussion section, be sure to document the limitations of your case study and needs for further research.
The function of your paper's conclusion is to: 1) restate the main argument supported by the findings from the analysis of your case; 2) clearly state the context, background, and necessity of pursuing the research problem using a case study design in relation to an issue, controversy, or a gap found from reviewing the literature; and, 3) provide a place for you to persuasively and succinctly restate the significance of your research problem, given that the reader has now been presented with in-depth information about the topic.
Consider the following points to help ensure your conclusion is appropriate:
Note that, depending on the discipline you are writing in and your professor's preferences, the concluding paragraph may contain your final reflections on the evidence presented applied to practice or on the essay's central research problem. However, the nature of being introspective about the subject of analysis you have investigated will depend on whether you are explicitly asked to express your observations in this way.
Problems to Avoid
Overgeneralization One of the goals of a case study is to lay a foundation for understanding broader trends and issues applied to similar circumstances. However, be careful when drawing conclusions from your case study. They must be evidence-based and grounded in the results of the study; otherwise, it is merely speculation. Looking at a prior example, it would be incorrect to state that a factor in improving girls access to education in Azerbaijan and the policy implications this may have for improving access in other Muslim nations is due to girls access to social media if there is no documentary evidence from your case study to indicate this. There may be anecdotal evidence that retention rates were better for girls who were on social media, but this observation would only point to the need for further research and would not be a definitive finding if this was not a part of your original research agenda.
Failure to Document Limitations No case is going to reveal all that needs to be understood about a research problem. Therefore, just as you have to clearly state the limitations of a general research study , you must describe the specific limitations inherent in the subject of analysis. For example, the case of studying how women conceptualize the need for water conservation in a village in Uganda could have limited application in other cultural contexts or in areas where fresh water from rivers or lakes is plentiful and, therefore, conservation is understood differently than preserving access to a scarce resource.
Failure to Extrapolate All Possible Implications Just as you don't want to over-generalize from your case study findings, you also have to be thorough in the consideration of all possible outcomes or recommendations derived from your findings. If you do not, your reader may question the validity of your analysis, particularly if you failed to document an obvious outcome from your case study research. For example, in the case of studying the accident at the railroad crossing to evaluate where and what types of warning signals should be located, you failed to take into consideration speed limit signage as well as warning signals. When designing your case study, be sure you have thoroughly addressed all aspects of the problem and do not leave gaps in your analysis.
Case Studies . Writing@CSU. Colorado State University; Gerring, John. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices . New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007; Merriam, Sharan B. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education . Rev. ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1998; Miller, Lisa L. “The Use of Case Studies in Law and Social Science Research.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14 (2018): TBD; Mills, Albert J., Gabrielle Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010; Putney, LeAnn Grogan. "Case Study." In Encyclopedia of Research Design , Neil J. Salkind, editor. (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010), pp. 116-120; Simons, Helen. Case Study Research in Practice . London: SAGE Publications, 2009; Kratochwill, Thomas R. and Joel R. Levin, editors. Single-Case Research Design and Analysis: New Development for Psychology and Education . Hilldsale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992; Swanborn, Peter G. Case Study Research: What, Why and How? London : SAGE, 2010; Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods . 6th edition. Los Angeles, CA, SAGE Publications, 2014; Walo, Maree, Adrian Bull, and Helen Breen. “Achieving Economic Benefits at Local Events: A Case Study of a Local Sports Event.” Festival Management and Event Tourism 4 (1996): 95-106.
At Least Five Misconceptions about Case Study Research
Social science case studies are often perceived as limited in their ability to create new knowledge because they are not randomly selected and findings cannot be generalized to larger populations. Flyvbjerg examines five misunderstandings about case study research and systematically "corrects" each one. To quote, these are:
Misunderstanding 1 : General, theoretical [context-independent knowledge is more valuable than concrete, practical (context-dependent) knowledge. Misunderstanding 2 : One cannot generalize on the basis of an individual case; therefore, the case study cannot contribute to scientific development. Misunderstanding 3 : The case study is most useful for generating hypotheses; that is, in the first stage of a total research process, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building. Misunderstanding 4 : The case study contains a bias toward verification, that is, a tendency to confirm the researcher’s preconceived notions. Misunderstanding 5 : It is often difficult to summarize and develop general propositions and theories on the basis of specific case studies [p. 221].
While writing your paper, think introspectively about how you addressed these misconceptions because to do so can help you strengthen the validity and reliability of your research by clarifying issues of case selection, the testing and challenging of existing assumptions, the interpretation of key findings, and the summation of case outcomes. Think of a case study research paper as a complete, in-depth narrative about the specific properties and key characteristics of your subject of analysis applied to the research problem.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (April 2006): 219-245.
Focus groups.
Working in effective study groups.
Study groups are a vital study strategy that fosters collaborative learning, allowing students to share diverse perspectives and deepen their understanding of complex material. Working together, students can clarify concepts, fill in gaps in knowledge, and reinforce what they've learned through discussion and peer teaching. Study groups also provide a structured environment that encourages accountability, helping students stay on track with their coursework. Additionally, the collaborative nature of study groups helps build communication and teamwork skills, which are valuable for both academic success and future professional endeavors.
Better customer interactions: new insights from hbr study.
There's a gap between the importance of customer interactions and how successful companies are in ... [+] delivering very positive ones, a new study from HBR and Tata Communications shows.
A recent study by Harvard Business Review, conducted in collaboration with Tata Communications, reveals some unexpected news and at least one unwelcome trend in customer experience.
Despite the widespread adoption of digital tools intended to enhance customer experience (CX), the study found that a mere 38% of those surveyed thought their organization was very successful at delivering positive customer interactions. Even that number could be high. Past research has shown companies often wildly overestimate the quality of their customer experience.
Clearly, simply implementing digital solutions isn’t enough; they must be thoughtfully integrated to truly benefit the customer.
The study surveyed 264 members of the Harvard Business Review Audience, all of whom were familiar with their company’s approach to customer interactions. Typically, these were senior executives and customer experience leaders across various industries worldwide.
The participants represented all major global regions and were primarily from large organizations with significant customer interaction needs. Industries included telecommunications, finance, retail, and healthcare. The study attempted to capture a comprehensive view of current CX challenges and strategies by gathering insights from those directly responsible for shaping and implementing customer interaction initiatives within their companies.
Best 5% interest savings accounts of 2024, cx matters: it’s (almost) unanimous.
How important are customer interactions and CX? Fully 92% of the participants said that every customer interaction impacts customer experience. And, 93% agreed that CX impacts the organization's ability to succeed.
The only surprising thing about this finding is that apparently 7% of those surveyed think CX is unimportant . Who are those people? Cable and internet provider executives? Pharma bros?
One significant finding was the impact of having too many customer interaction channels. While offering multiple channels seems like a good way to meet customers where they are, the study indicates that it can actually lead to increased confusion and frustration.
Mauro Carobene, VP and Global Head of Customer Interaction Suite at Tata Communications, highlighted this issue in an exclusive interview , noting that often changing channels means starting over. “A bad interaction is when you repeat the same experience, the same information... You contact technical support, you go through a number of menus, explain your problem, and so on. And at the end, you switch to an agent and you need to start again from scratch.”
Carobene emphasizes the importance of seamless interactions, even when customers change channels or encounter new representatives.
A major shift in customer interactions is looming as companies deploy chatbots to assist and/or replace human representatives. At the moment, customer opinion on chatbots is split. While they appreciate instant, 24/7 availability, many feel frustrated by their interaction with chatbots. We’ve all encountered useless chatbots that seem to serve mainly to delay or prevent human interaction.
In my conversation with Carobene, I stated my belief that people didn’t dislike chatbots per se, but rather disliked bad chatbots. I suggested that as AI-driven chatbots improved, they would displace millions of call center workers.
Carobene’s take was different. “Chatbots represent one of the biggest opportunities today to interact better with customers,” he said. He notes that to be truly useful, LLM-based chatbots will need extensive training to understand what customers are experiencing. For example, a non-technical customer might say their wi-fi wasn’t working when in fact the problem was their 5G data. Nuance is necessary, and fixed interaction flow charts will have to become dynamic.
Ultimately, Carobene sees chatbots as useful partners to human representatives, particularly in offering instant availability. “People forget when they were waiting for 20 minutes, or even hours, for an agent to be available.”
Carobene is optimistic on chatbot improvement. “AI will move from solving maybe 5% of the problems today automatically with bots to maybe 80%. And that will represent big savings for the company, but also huge time savings for customers.”
Customer experience doesn’t stand alone. In the study report, Carobene states, “In a hyperconnected ecosystem, enterprises need to think about creating superior experiences for their employees, customers, partners, and users.”
In our conversation, he pointed out that experience must be seamless for both employees and customers. A tech support person, for example, who is unhappy, upset, or struggling to find information will create a negative experience. A happy representative delivers positive energy and a good interaction.
“Successful companies,” he notes, “manage to increase their engagement internally and externally.”
Perhaps the best news from the study is that 97%. of the respondents said their organization is focused on making one or more improvements to customer interactions over the next 12 months.
At the top of the list for improvements are making interactions more seamless (55%), enhancing personalization (50%), and delivering a more consistent experience (50%). Nearly as many are working on improving marketing messaging (48%) and making interactions more seamless for employees (45%).
While these projects don’t actually guarantee that customer experience will improve, they indicate an understanding that CX has plenty of room for improvement and a commitment to making it better.
One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts.
Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.
In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's Terms of Service. We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.
Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:
User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:
So, how can you be a power user?
Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's Terms of Service.
Preventing millions of dollars in lost sales for one of the world’s most valuable entertainment brands.
This case study explores our work with a market leader in global entertainment to combat unlicensed merchandise and IP theft in South America, leveraging cultural and subject matter experts in Portuguese and enabling genuine merchandise to be distinguished from unlicensed products.
Scroll 👇 to read the case study. Explore how we partnered with one of the world’s most valuable brands to prevent millions of dollars in lost sales.
Intellectual property is a key asset and a vital source of revenue for global entertainment companies. This client is renowned for capturing audiences of all ages with its diverse portfolio of films, television shows, and more. With its rich history comes a dedication to upholding the highest standards of creativity, integrity, and brand excellence.
The organization owns an extensive range of IP and harnesses those properties to offer many products, from themed merchandise to interactive experiences and multimedia content.
Unfortunately, the company’s characters and innovative approach to content creation are fertile ground for copycats. It is essential for the client to have the means to detect and combat unlicensed merchandise and IP theft to prevent lost sales and protect its brand integrity.
The client became aware of the proliferation of unlicensed versions of its merchandise, particularly related to popular character lines and related toys, originating mainly from South America. These unauthorized products not only infringed upon its IP rights but also threatened its brand integrity and current and future revenue streams.
As the scale of unauthorized production and distribution escalated, the client’s anti-piracy group recognized the urgent need to identify the sources and distribution channels of these unauthorized products. It was also important that the client maintain consumers’ trust while mitigating against infringement.
The client’s anti-piracy group collaborated with Welocalize to determine where these unauthorized products came from and how they were distributed.
Drawing upon its extensive experience helping clients combat IP infringement in regions worldwide, Welocalize jumped into action.
First, we held initial discovery calls with the client to understand the scope of the problem and determine the services required. Then, we engaged our subject matter experts (SMEs) in Portuguese translation and Brazilian culture to identify and analyze the relevant materials, including links, websites, sale posters, and toy store pages.
The SMEs services were allocated based on content type and volume, ensuring that all our translations would be accurate, actionable, and completed quickly. The SMEs played a vital role in distinguishing genuine merchandise from unauthorized replicas.
As translation proceeded, Welocalize identified over 3,000 potential counterfeit products from four manufacturing plants. With that comprehensive analysis in hand, the client was ready to take swift legal action against the illegal distributors.
Welocalize’s timely translation and analysis, spanning approximately two weeks, enabled the client to quickly gather critical evidence for legal action. Armed with the information, the client initiated legal proceedings, resulting in the shutdown of all four warehouses identified. This halted the production and distribution of unauthorized merchandise and prevented millions of dollars in lost merchandise sales.
Relying on Welocalize’s linguistic expertise and investigative techniques – leading to the swift identification and shutdown of illegal distribution channels – the client’s anti-piracy group safeguarded its IP and brand integrity, ensuring continued consumer trust and loyalty and earning a significant return on its investment. The swift and decisive action will also act as a deterrent against potential future IP violations.
Subject matter experts with deep knowledge of local languages and cultures can play a crucial role in global discovery projects, with the goal of quickly generating accurate translations and identifying counterfeit products and distribution channels.
Welocalize SMEs possess years of local experience and are highly familiar with the cultural and linguistic nuances relevant to the region under scrutiny. In this case, they could immediately determine whether products were legitimate or counterfeit through precise translation and deep knowledge of the cultural context specific to the target market.
Their rapid translation of evidence and assessment of the extent of the counterfeit merchandise problem made it possible for the client to take effective legal action to protect its IP rights before the problem got out of hand.
Welocalize has never had a patent application rejected due to translation.
What's the difference.
Case study and single-case experimental designs are both research methods used in psychology and other social sciences to investigate individual cases or subjects. However, they differ in their approach and purpose. Case studies involve in-depth examination of a single case, such as an individual, group, or organization, to gain a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon being studied. On the other hand, single-case experimental designs focus on studying the effects of an intervention or treatment on a single subject over time. These designs use repeated measures and control conditions to establish cause-and-effect relationships. While case studies provide rich qualitative data, single-case experimental designs offer more rigorous experimental control and allow for the evaluation of treatment effectiveness.
Attribute | Case Study | Single-Case Experimental Designs |
---|---|---|
Research Design | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Focus | Exploratory | Hypothesis Testing |
Sample Size | Usually small | Usually small |
Data Collection | Observations, interviews, documents | Observations, measurements |
Data Analysis | Qualitative analysis | Statistical analysis |
Generalizability | Low | Low |
Internal Validity | Low | High |
External Validity | Low | Low |
Introduction.
When conducting research in various fields, it is essential to choose the appropriate study design to answer research questions effectively. Two commonly used designs are case study and single-case experimental designs. While both approaches aim to provide valuable insights into specific phenomena, they differ in several key attributes. This article will compare and contrast the attributes of case study and single-case experimental designs, highlighting their strengths and limitations.
A case study is an in-depth investigation of a particular individual, group, or event. It involves collecting and analyzing qualitative or quantitative data to gain a comprehensive understanding of the subject under study. Case studies are often used to explore complex phenomena, generate hypotheses, or provide detailed descriptions of unique cases.
On the other hand, single-case experimental designs are a type of research design that focuses on studying a single individual or a small group over time. These designs involve manipulating an independent variable and measuring its effects on a dependent variable. Single-case experimental designs are particularly useful for examining cause-and-effect relationships and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions or treatments.
In terms of data collection, case studies rely on various sources such as interviews, observations, documents, and artifacts. Researchers often employ multiple methods to gather rich and diverse data, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the case. The data collected in case studies are typically qualitative in nature, although quantitative data may also be included.
In contrast, single-case experimental designs primarily rely on quantitative data collection methods. Researchers use standardized measures and instruments to collect data on the dependent variable before, during, and after the manipulation of the independent variable. This allows for a systematic analysis of the effects of the intervention or treatment on the individual or group being studied.
One of the key differences between case studies and single-case experimental designs is their generalizability. Case studies are often conducted on unique or rare cases, making it challenging to generalize the findings to a larger population. The focus of case studies is on providing detailed insights into specific cases rather than making broad generalizations.
On the other hand, single-case experimental designs aim to establish causal relationships and can provide evidence for generalizability. By systematically manipulating the independent variable and measuring its effects on the dependent variable, researchers can draw conclusions about the effectiveness of interventions or treatments that may be applicable to similar cases or populations.
Internal validity refers to the extent to which a study accurately measures the cause-and-effect relationship between variables. In case studies, establishing internal validity can be challenging due to the lack of control over extraneous variables. The presence of multiple data sources and the potential for subjective interpretation may also introduce bias.
In contrast, single-case experimental designs prioritize internal validity by employing rigorous control over extraneous variables. Researchers carefully design the intervention or treatment, implement it consistently, and measure the dependent variable under controlled conditions. This allows for a more confident determination of the causal relationship between the independent and dependent variables.
Case studies often require significant time and resources due to their in-depth nature. Researchers need to spend considerable time collecting and analyzing data from various sources, conducting interviews, and immersing themselves in the case. Additionally, case studies may involve multiple researchers or a research team, further increasing the required resources.
On the other hand, single-case experimental designs can be more time and resource-efficient. Since they focus on a single individual or a small group, data collection and analysis can be more streamlined. Researchers can also implement interventions or treatments in a controlled manner, reducing the time and resources needed for data collection.
Both case studies and single-case experimental designs require researchers to consider ethical implications. In case studies, researchers must ensure the privacy and confidentiality of the individuals or groups being studied. Informed consent and ethical guidelines for data collection and analysis should be followed to protect the rights and well-being of the participants.
Similarly, in single-case experimental designs, researchers must consider ethical considerations when implementing interventions or treatments. The well-being and safety of the individual or group being studied should be prioritized, and informed consent should be obtained. Additionally, researchers should carefully monitor and evaluate the potential risks and benefits associated with the intervention or treatment.
Case studies and single-case experimental designs are valuable research approaches that offer unique insights into specific phenomena. While case studies provide in-depth descriptions and exploratory analyses of individual cases, single-case experimental designs focus on establishing causal relationships and evaluating interventions or treatments. Researchers should carefully consider the attributes and goals of their study when choosing between these two designs, ensuring that the selected approach aligns with their research questions and objectives.
Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.
A graduate student pictured during commencement at the University of Texas in May. Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images
By Arno Rosenfeld August 27, 2024
“Antisemitism Notebook” is a weekly email newsletter from the Forward, sign-up here to receive the full newsletter in your inbox each Tuesday
Two-thirds of college students do not hold views toward Israel or Jews “likely to threaten their relationship with their Jewish peers,” a new study from Brandeis University found.
But what about the remaining third? Researchers found that group split roughly equally between those who expressed hostility toward Israel (but not Jews) and those who thought poorly of Jews (but not Israel).
It represents the second recent study to find that animosity toward Israel is not clearly linked to an embrace of antisemitic ideas — even while these hostile attitudes can alienate them from Jews on campus.
Your weekly guide through the news and the noise of how rising antisemitism and disputes over how to address it are shaping American Jewish life.
The Brandeis team polled 4,123 undergraduates at 60 schools with a significant number of Jewish students. The academics asked a battery of questions, which you can see the in the chart below, and then using a complex process grouped respondents into one of four buckets: Those not hostile toward Israel or Jews (66% of the total); those hostile toward Israel but not Jews (15%); those hostile toward Jews but not Israel (16%) and those hostile toward both Israel and Jews (2%).
One datapoint that caught my eye is that the students who were more hostile toward Jews than Israel also were more supportive of terrorism against Israel. For example, 24% of the hostile-to-Jews group agreed that “all Israeli civilians should be considered legitimate targets for Hamas,” compared to 6% of those hostile to Israel.
Also: Among the group that agreed with statements including “Jews don’t care what happens to anyone but their own kind,” 66% said that Israel had a right to exist.
These findings track with a study I shared here in March showing that more conservative college students are more likely to support Hamas killing Israeli civilians.
So we now have two new studies showing that hardcore anti-Zionists on campus — around 15% of students nationally, according to the Brandeis study — are not especially likely to participate in “ consensus antisemitism ,” a term that the scholar Keith Kahn-Harris uses to describe ideas that disparage all Jews because they are Jews.
But there’s a similar share of students who do hold those sorts of views — they agree with antisemitic tropes and are more likely support Hamas terrorist attacks — who tend to be more conservative and more supportive of Israel (26% of them had a favorable view of the Israeli government, compared with 21% of the majority of students who were not hostile toward either Israel or Jews).
Some might see these findings as validation of the anti-Zionists’ refrain that their only objection is to the state of Israel, and a comfort to Jews worried that the growing animosity toward Israel will fuel a further rise in antisemitism. Among the anti-Zionists in the survey, for example, only 4% agreed that “Jews should be held accountable for Israel’s actions.”
Len Saxe, the lead researcher on the study, is skeptical. “It’s just a different way of expressing the same old hostility, the same old prejudices,” he said in an interview. “I would call it a new expression of traditional antisemitism.”
But the study may be another signal that while mainstream Jewish organizations have focused in recent years, and especially since Oct. 7, on left-wing threats, there may be an equal — or greater — threat festering among right-wing students.
Alas, the Brandeis study also confirmed a problem I highlighted in last week’s newsletter about the exclusion of “Zionists,” broadly defined, from progressive spaces: Roughly 11% of college students are effectively refusing to socialize with the vast majority of their Jewish peers over disagreements related to Israel.
That ostracism is a serious problem — but it’s more complicated than the simple story we’re often told of protesters who have turned their sights on Israel because they hate Jews, and policymakers trying to address the campus climate would do well to read the Brandeis study in full.
“Maybe we have to be a little less focused on calling out antisemitism,” Saxe suggested when we spoke, “and work harder to actually educate people about who Jews are.”
Arno Rosenfeld is enterprise reporter at the Forward , where he covers antisemitism, philanthropy, sexual misconduct and American Jewish politics. You can reach him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter @arnorosenfeld .
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.
Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.
Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Most popular.
In case you missed it.
Catch up on yiddish events.
100% of profits support our journalism
Our founder, Ab Cahan
1960s Yiddish hipi hoodie
It's spelled Khanike tee
The Forverts est. 1897 hoodie
Please read before republishing
We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines . You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search. See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.
To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines . Please email us at [email protected] , subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.
We don't support Internet Explorer
Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.
exclusive-design - stock.adobe.c
International home improvement retailer kingfisher group opens up about the evolution of its ai strategy, and the rewards it is reaping.
Several months into the start of the global Covid-19 coronavirus pandemic, international home improvement retail group Kingfisher debuted a revamped company strategy focused on repositioning the organisation as a digital and service-oriented entity.
Kingfisher, which owns the B&Q, Screwfix and DIY.com brands in the UK, had seen several of its brands suffer sales declines as a result of what it termed in its 2020 financial results as “the company’s operating model becoming overly complex”.
“While some of our banners [brands] have delivered growth over the past four years … our performance has been disappointing. Group sales and retail profit need to improve,” its financial report, published in June 2020, stated.
In the wake of this realisation, the Powered by Kingfisher strategy was created, with an emphasis on ensuring each of the company’s brands was meeting the diverse and distinct needs of their respective customer bases, while also drawing on the businesses “core strengths and commercial assets”.
“To serve customers effectively today, we also need to be digital and service-orientated, while leveraging our strong store assets,” the report added.
A month after going public with its plans for a strategic shift in how the company operates, Kingfisher announced the creation of a new role within its customer team with the appointment of Tom Betts as group data director.
Fast forward several years, and these two events have led to Kingfisher having its own in-house data and artificial intelligence (AI) team whose efforts have seen it centrally develop and roll out various digital tools that have boosted sales across its brands.
On this point, the company’s 2024 financial report stated: “Our [brands] are leveraging data and artificial intelligence to build customer-centric tools and solutions, support better commercial decision-making and higher productivity, thereby unlocking significant new sources of revenue, profit and cash.”
Speaking to Computer Weekly, Mohsen Ghasempour, group AI director at Kingfisher, said the appointment of Betts led to the creation of a team that has steadily grown in size and whose work has led to a notable uptick in sale across the group.
“We started with almost zero people on AI, and today we have around 28 – a mixture of machine learning engineers, data scientists, and engineers – so we [have the internal capabilities] to develop our own AI solutions,” he said,
“If you look at our portfolio of AI offerings today, we have 30-plus different initiatives on the go … and it might surprise people to know how much AI technology is impacting the way the DIY industry is operating.”
The company is using AI in its supply chain management and logistics function to deliver a demand forecasting model that can predict how demand for certain products will change over a 12-month period, as well as to pick up on patterns within the reviews customers leave about its products.
“We have services that sit on top of our customer reviews to extract actionable insights. Our AI algorithm can detect that 200 reviews are about product quality, and what specifically they are complaining about,” said Ghasempour.
The company is also working on some “very cool technology” that will help the group’s in-store customers find the products they are looking for more efficiently, he added. “There is a lot happening with AI here at the moment.”
However, when Ghasempour first joined the company three years ago, Kingfisher knew it wanted to use AI to help achieve its strategic goals, but was still figuring out what role the technology would play in its business.
“When we started, there was no plan in terms of ‘This is how we’re going to use AI’,” he said. “So, the question became ‘How are we going to use it?’”
The answer to that came through trying to address what Ghasempour describes as one of the businesses’ biggest problems: a customer wanting to buy a product online that is no longer in stock.
“It wasn’t an AI problem, it was a product availability issue [that needed solving] that was affecting customer experience,” he said. “At that time, the challenge was ‘How are we going to solve it?’, but we did not necessarily think the answer was in using AI.”
While addressing this challenge, the idea of creating an “alternative product” recommendation algorithm emerged, which Ghasempour said gave way to an exploration of what role AI could play in the process.
“We started investigating how we can use AI when customers are at the point of buying a product that is not available, and how you can recommend a product which is very similar to the product that they’re looking for as an alternative,” he said. “That was the first recommendation service we developed, it went live in early 2023 on [B&Q’s online site] diy.com.”
This service has now been rolled out, in one form or another, across all of Kingfisher’s brands, and since B&Q became the early adopter of the technology, the brand has seen more than 10% of its e-commerce sales originate from product recommendations, according to the company’s own stats.
“From the basic algorithm to solve one problem, today we have 10 different recommendation algorithms that try to help the customer journey in different ways by offering [serving customers information about] frequently bought together products and personalised recommendations,” said Ghasempour.
And the early success achieved from its first forays into building AI-powered recommendation engines allowed the company to take the concept of Powered by Kingfisher even further by providing it with the proof points needed to ditch some of its legacy tech providers, he added.
“We had some legacy recommendation providers on [our] e-commerce platform, and we started running tests A-B tests against those providers to demonstrate that we can achieve better performance, which justified building [out] this in-house [data and AI] capability even more,” he said.
“We completely replaced all the third-party providers we used for recommendation engines, so all of that, across all of our e-commerce platforms, is now powered by internal capabilities.”
These capabilities have also been created using Google Cloud’s portfolio of AI tools , with Ghasempour revealing that Kingfisher has partnerships in place with Microsoft and Amazon Web Services (AWS) too.
“Anybody wanting to build any kind of AI capability needs some infrastructure and at Kingfisher we have a partnership with all three cloud providers, but when it comes to AI and data science capability, Google has a bit more of a mature platform, from our point of view,” he said. “It was more intuitive and easier to use, so we started building that capability in Google’s infrastructure.”
Google Cloud’s fully managed development platform, Vertex AI, is playing a foundational role in the delivery of Kingfisher’s AI and data strategy, as it forms the basis of the company’s AI orchestration framework Athena.
Before the introduction of Athena, Kingfisher was effectively setting about addressing individual customer pain points, such as lack of product availability, by creating the AI microservices needed to address these problems from scratch each time.
In Kingfisher’s own words , this way of working resulted in lengthy development times for each microservice, which in turn slowed down the release time for them and caused scalability issues.
What Athena does is allow the Kingfisher team to automatically select the correct, ready-made Microsoft needed to answer a specific user issue or query, which it claims has cut the development time for new AI services from months to weeks.
“This is a fairly new technology for us, and is probably about a year old,” said Ghasempour. “And the idea behind Athena was, ‘How can we actually build a framework that means we can start to utilise the services in a in a safe and secure way, but also move fast because whoever is using this technology fastest is going to get the competitive advantage?’”
Athena acts as a “wrapper” around existing large language models, such as Google Gemini and Chat GPT, that allows Kingfisher to tap into the respective capabilities of these competing tools at once.
“Athena can wrap around all of those large language models, and provide a stronger and more powerful service because it can utilise all of those language models at the same time, plus build the security model around them. So, we can we can track all the conversation and we can make sure there is nothing inappropriate happening,” said Ghasempour.
This means Kingfisher can essentially take a “build once, apply everywhere” approach to rolling out AI services across its retail brands.
“You can just do the development once but you can scale it up to more banners [brands] while you’re still secure in the safe environment,” said Ghasempour.
Presently, Kingfisher is using Athena to create services that will make it even easier for the company’s customers to find products using AI-based conversational, image and text searches.
For instance, if a customer does not know the name of the piece of equipment they need to replace on a household item or what the name of a certain tool is, Athena makes it possible for the customer to search the product catalogue for what they need using an image and get a result in seconds.
“All they have to do is upload a photo of the part and we’ll show them exactly what they need,” said Ghasempour.
It is also experimenting with using Athena to moderate the content of the listings published on the marketplace section of diy.com, which allows third-party sellers to sell their home improvement wares online through its website.
“Athena assesses the description of the product to check for any racism or sexism, for example, and offers visual moderation of all the product images,” said Ghasempour.
Furthermore, the technology is being put to use internally at Kingfisher, to assist its 82,000-strong workforce with finding information about the group’s employment policies and guidelines that are contained within hundreds of internal staff documents.
“In any organisation you have a lot of documentation, from the legal team or HR, that tell staff what the rules of working there are, but people don’t go read the documents. So, at the moment, we’re putting [Athena] on top of those documents, so staff can ask an [internal chatbot] about the maternity leave policy, for example, and get the information they need,” said Ghasempour.
“Over the next couple of months, we’ve got a few more services going live internally to empower our colleagues using this technology to do their day-to-day jobs more efficiently.”
The next U.S. president will set the tone on tech issues such as AI regulation, data privacy and climate tech. This guide breaks ...
Financial services firm JPMorgan Chase seeks to balance technology modernization and cost optimization as it pursues initiatives...
Businesses nationwide will be able to forego the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's Sept. 4 deadline for compliance with the ...
The Tor browser has sparked discussion and dissension since its debut. Does the software, which promises anonymous and secure web...
As cyberattacks continue to rise, infosec professionals address the need to increase private and public sector partnerships to ...
A possible cyberattack against Washington's Port of Seattle has caused significant service disruptions to airline travel at the ...
Cloud and on-premises subnets use IP ranges, subnet masks or prefixes, and security policies. But cloud subnets are simpler to ...
Satellite connectivity lets Broadcom offer the VeloCloud SD-WAN as an option for linking IoT devices to the global network from ...
Enterprises have been slow to adopt Wi-Fi 7, as they find previous generations suit their needs. However, experts predict ...
New capabilities for VMware VCF can import and manage existing VMware services through a single console interface for a private ...
Due to rapid AI hardware advancement, companies are releasing advanced products yearly to keep up with the competition. The new ...
AMD plans to acquire AI systems designer and manufacturer ZT Systems for $5 billion. AMD CEO Lisa Su said hyperscalers want more ...
Serverless, first launched on AWS, is now available on all three major public clouds in a move aimed at enabling customers to ...
Implementing a data governance strategy requires a roadmap to keep everyone on track and overcome challenges. Follow eight key ...
Enable Microsoft Copilot in Power BI to automate key features using generative AI capabilities that improve insights and ...
IMAGES
COMMENTS
grounded theory, and a holistic view of how a culture-sharing group works results in an ethnography. An in-depth study of a bounded system or a case (or several cases) becomes a case study. The general structures of the written report may be used in designing a journal-article-length study. However, because of the numerous steps in
Revised on November 20, 2023. A case study is a detailed study of a specific subject, such as a person, group, place, event, organization, or phenomenon. Case studies are commonly used in social, educational, clinical, and business research. A case study research design usually involves qualitative methods, but quantitative methods are ...
A case study is one of the most commonly used methodologies of social research. This article attempts to look into the various dimensions of a case study research strategy, the different epistemological strands which determine the particular case study type and approach adopted in the field, discusses the factors which can enhance the effectiveness of a case study research, and the debate ...
A case study involves an in-depth analysis of a specific individual, group, or situation, aiming to understand the complexities and unique aspects of the subject. It often involves collecting qualitative data through interviews, observations, and document analysis. On the other hand, a survey is a structured data collection method that involves ...
Case study and research are both methods used in academic and professional settings to gather information and gain insights. However, they differ in their approach and purpose. A case study is an in-depth analysis of a specific individual, group, or situation, aiming to understand the unique characteristics and dynamics involved.
Case study is a research methodology, typically seen in social and life sciences. There is no one definition of case study research.1 However, very simply… 'a case study can be defined as an intensive study about a person, a group of people or a unit, which is aimed to generalize over several units'.1 A case study has also been described as an intensive, systematic investigation of a ...
A case study is a qualitative research method that involves the in-depth exploration and analysis of a particular case, which can be an individual, group, organization, event, or community. The primary purpose of a case study is to generate a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the case, including its history, context, and dynamics.
A case study protocol outlines the procedures and general rules to be followed during the case study. This includes the data collection methods to be used, the sources of data, and the procedures for analysis. Having a detailed case study protocol ensures consistency and reliability in the study.
A case study, also known as a case report, is an in depth or intensive study of a single individual or specific group, while a case series is a grouping of similar case studies / case reports together. A case study / case report can be used in the following instances: where there is atypical or abnormal behaviour or development.
Résumé. Case study is a common methodology in the social sciences (management, psychology, science of education, political science, sociology). A lot of methodological papers have been dedicated to case study but, paradoxically, the question "what is a case?" has been less studied.
Revised on June 22, 2023. A case-control study is an experimental design that compares a group of participants possessing a condition of interest to a very similar group lacking that condition. Here, the participants possessing the attribute of study, such as a disease, are called the "case," and those without it are the "control.".
Although case studies have been discussed extensively in the literature, little has been written about the specific steps one may use to conduct case study research effectively (Gagnon, 2010; Hancock & Algozzine, 2016).Baskarada (2014) also emphasized the need to have a succinct guideline that can be practically followed as it is actually tough to execute a case study well in practice.
However, they differ in their approach and purpose. A case study involves in-depth analysis of a particular individual, group, or situation, aiming to provide a detailed understanding of a specific phenomenon. On the other hand, an experiment involves manipulating variables and observing the effects on a sample population, aiming to establish ...
VARIATIONS ON CASE STUDY METHODOLOGY. Case study methodology is evolving and regularly reinterpreted. Comparative or multiple case studies are used as a tool for synthesizing information across time and space to research the impact of policy and practice in various fields of social research [].Because case study research is in-depth and intensive, there have been efforts to simplify the method ...
Cohort studies and case-control studies are two primary types of observational studies that aid in evaluating associations between diseases and exposures. In this review article, we describe these study designs, methodological issues, and provide examples from the plastic surgery literature. Keywords: observational studies, case-control study ...
Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007; Merriam, Sharan B. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Rev. ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1998; Miller, Lisa L. "The Use of Case Studies in Law and Social Science Research."
ISBN: 9781446248645. Publication Date: 2015-10-01. This sharp, stimulating title provides a structure for thinking about, analysing and designing case study. It explores the historical, theoretical and practical bones of modern case study research, offering to social scientists a framework for understanding and working with this form of inquiry.
Multiple case studies, has discretion information about particular case , imparting special information for reader, is a qualitative study but subjectivity is more while in focus group, also a ...
The contribution of the neurological case study approach for establishing the functional organisation of cognitive subsystems is assessed. A number of potential problems are considered, including ...
A case-control study (also known as case-referent study) is a type of observational study in which two existing groups differing in outcome are identified and compared on the basis of some supposed causal attribute. Case-control studies are often used to identify factors that may contribute to a medical condition by comparing subjects who have the condition with patients who do not have ...
Study groups are a vital study strategy that fosters collaborative learning, allowing students to share diverse perspectives and deepen their understanding of complex material. Working together, students can clarify concepts, fill in gaps in knowledge, and reinforce what they've learned through discussion and peer teaching.
A study from the Harvard Business Review details how companies view customer interactions. Mauro Carobene of Tata Communications, the study's sponsor, explains.
Case study is a research methodology, typically seen in social and life sciences. There is no one definition of case study research.1 However, very simply... 'a case study can be defined as an intensive study about a person, a group of people or a unit, which is aimed to generalize over several units'.1 A case study has also been described ...
This case study explores our work with a market leader in global entertainment to combat unlicensed merchandise and IP theft in South America, leveraging cultural and subject matter experts in Portuguese and enabling genuine merchandise to be distinguished from unlicensed products. ... the client's anti-piracy group recognized the urgent need ...
A case study is an in-depth investigation of a particular individual, group, or event. It involves collecting and analyzing qualitative or quantitative data to gain a comprehensive understanding of the subject under study. Case studies are often used to explore complex phenomena, generate hypotheses, or provide detailed descriptions of unique ...
Alas, the Brandeis study also confirmed a problem I highlighted in last week's newsletter about the exclusion of "Zionists," broadly defined, from progressive spaces: Roughly 11% of college ...
On 9 August 2024, Moumita Debnath, a trainee doctor at R. G. Kar Medical College in Kolkata, West Bengal, India, was raped and murdered in a college building.Her body was found in a seminar room on campus. The incident has amplified debate about the safety of women and doctors in India, and has sparked significant outrage, nationwide and international protests, and demands for a thorough ...
The company is also working on some "very cool technology" that will help the group's in-store customers find the products they are looking for more efficiently, he added. "There is a lot ...
Given compressor inlet temperature and H2 pressure loss constraints, a methodology was proposed to determine the optimal volume ratio for an unit cell. A cross-flow precooler case study showed that weight was minimum as TPMS cell size Δx decreased whereas pressure loss was minimum at Δx = 4.5cm.
The crime took place on the night of 9 August, when the woman, who was a junior doctor at the city's RG Kar Medical College, had gone to a seminar room to rest after a gruelling 36-hour shift.