research paper about crime prevention

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• HHS Author Manuscripts

Building Efficient Crime Prevention Strategies

D. max crowley.

Duke University

The aftermath of the global recession has encouraged policy makers to confront the staggering public burden of crime ( Cohen, 1988 , 2005 ; Ludwig, 2010 ; McCollister, French, and Fang, 2010 ; Miller, Cohen, and Rossman, 1993 ). In this context, there is growing acceptance that many “tough-on-crime” policies have become primary drivers of crime’s increasing societal cost ( Andrews and Bonta, 2010 ; Artello, 2013 ; Becker, 1968 ; Braga and Weisburd, 2011 ; Cameron, 1988 ; Cohen, 2005 ; Paternoster, 2010 ; Rikard and Rosenberg, 2007 ; Vitiello, 2013 ). Policy makers have responded with growing interest in making strategic investments in youth that prevent the development of lifetime offenders, instead of continuing to institute harsher punishments that lead to costly mass incarceration ( Dodge, 2001 ; Farrington, 1994 ; Heckman, 2006 ; Homel, 2013 ; O’Connell, Boat, and Warner, 2009 ). In response, innovative strategies for preventing crime and controlling costs are being engaged ( Barnett and Masse, 2007 ; Guyll, Spoth, and Crowley, 2011 ; Welsh and Farrington, 2010 ). At the forefront are developmental prevention programs that intervene early in life to reduce risk factors for delinquent and criminal behaviors ( Durlak, 1998 ; Eckenrode et al., 2010 ; Hawkins, Catalano, and Miller, 1992 ; Hawkins and Weis, 1985 ; Reynolds, Temple, White, Ou, and Robertson, 2011 ). As a growing body of evidence illustrates, when implemented appropriately, these developmental prevention efforts not only effectively prevent crime but also are cost-effective solutions that save public resources ( Crowley, Hill, Kuklinski, and Jones, 2013 ; Crowley, Jones, Greenberg, Feinberg, and Spoth, 2012 ; Heckman, Moon, Pinto, Savelyev, and Yavitz, 2010 ; Klietz, Borduin, and Schaeffer, 2010 ; Kuklinski, Briney, Hawkins, and Catalano, 2012 ; Reynolds et al., 2011 ).

Manning, Smith, and Homel (2013 , this issue) outline an innovative approach for valuing these programs to guide policy making. Their work draws on Saaty’s analytical hierarchy process (AHP), often used in the private sector, but less frequently in policy settings ( Saaty, 1988 ). This method ultimately provides an important framework for discussing how to build effective and efficient crime prevention efforts informed by developmental science ( Gifford-Smith, Dodge, Dishion, and McCord, 2005 ; Lerner et al., 2005 ; Osgood, 2005 ).

In this essay, I expand on Manning et al.’s (2013) discussion by highlighting how this new approach can complement current efforts to value developmental crime prevention programs for evidence-based policy making. I then discuss the importance of considering local programming capacity when investing in prevention and the economic value of prevention approaches that invest in both youth and their families (i.e., dual-generation approaches). Next, I provide a forward look at two approaches policy makers can engage when seeking to fund developmental prevention. I then conclude with four action steps for research and policy that can facilitate the dissemination of effective and efficient developmental crime prevention efforts.

Strategies for Valuing Developmental Prevention to Inform Public Policy

Broadly, the priority ranking and utility approach employed by Manning et al. (2013) is similar to ex-ante approaches used to elicit willingness-to-pay estimates around the cost of crime as well as cost-effectiveness analyses often employed in health-care decision making ( Birch and Gafni, 1992 ; Donaldson, Farrar, Mapp, Walker, and Macphee, 1997 ; Ludwig and Cook, 2001 ; Olsen and Smith, 2001 ; Zarkin, Cates, and Bala, 2000 ). Such approaches are gaining acceptance as they aim to estimate the value of preventing crime more completely—departing from ex-post approaches that rely explicitly on monetizable burden ( Brookshire and Crocker, 1981 ; Ryan and Watson, 2009 ). Furthermore, particularly for health outcomes, they avoid certain distributional problems that value morbidity and mortality at different rates for different groups (e.g., women and minorities; see Donaldson, Birch, and Gafni, 2002 ). The United Kingdom’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is one of the better known examples where national health policy is currently being informed by such utility-based approaches for valuing public services ( Kelly et al., 2010 ; Weatherly et al., 2009 ).

Although there is growing support for employing utility estimates to guide decision making, these approaches can be limited by the lack of clear cost and benefit estimates ( Marsh, Chalfin, and Roman, 2008 ; Weinstein and Manning, 1997 ). In particular, analysts scoring the fiscal impact of new policies for government bodies require robust estimates of prevention programs’ downstream costs to determine potential savings to agency budgets ( Aos, Lieb, Mayfield, Miller, and Pennucci, 2004 ; OMB, 1992 ). Several new efforts over the last 5 years have sought to promote the development of such estimates. One initiative that has gained substantial traction in the United States is the Results First Project supported by the Pew Charitable Trust and MacArthur Foundation ( Dueffert, 2012 ). This initiative partners with states to implement an innovative benefit-cost approach that assists policy makers seeking to invest in programs that can reduce crime, improve health, and result in public savings. By building tailored models of how programs impact a particular state’s budget, policy decisions can be made that are beneficial to both at-risk populations and local budgets ( Dueffert, 2013 ).

In part, the value of approaches that seek to monetize program outcomes is borne out by the ability to make estimates transferable across settings (where the value of currency is likely shared across groups). The approach outlined by Manning et al. (2013) captures a more idiographic—and possibly accurate—estimate of a group’s value of prevention programs, but this valuation is temporally and geographically bound. Specifically, a group of decision makers surveyed in one area or time may have a dramatically different valuation of a program than decision makers in another region at a different time. To use Manning et al.’s approach effectively to inform policy making, analysts will need to survey a larger sample of decision makers to develop more robust estimates. Furthermore, estimates will need to account for the larger body of prevention programs available in the marketplace. Although Manning et al. include more than 20 programs, policy makers may question valuation estimates that neglect commonly used or home-grown—even if ineffective—prevention programs. Ultimately, these programs may need to be included to facilitate decision maker buy-in.

In this context, there is a role for both utility approaches that elicit clear guidance for policy making as well as economic and fiscal analyses that place a monetary value on crime prevention programs. Next, I consider the importance of capturing infrastructure needs in program costs, the case for dual-generation programs, and promising approaches for investing in prevention.

Planning for Infrastructure and Capacity: The Costs of Developmental Crime Prevention

Recently, while accepting the 2013 Stockholm Prize in Criminology, Dr. David Farrington called for creation of national agencies to coordinate domestic prevention strategies ( Farrington, 2013 ). Although he is not the first to recognize that the patchwork of developmental crime prevention programs spanning the globe is inadequate for meeting the needs of youth at risk, Professor Farrington went further to outline the form and function of such agencies. This outline included the (a) recognition that primary crime prevention efforts are largely missing in most countries, (b) the need for continuous funding of prevention programs, and (c) the importance of building local prevention capacity. At the core of Professor Farrington’s message was that the continued lack of infrastructure and capacity to support the delivery of developmental prevention programs is a major threat to successfully preventing crime.

A closer look at the existing criminal justice, law enforcement, and education systems quickly reveals the limited capacity of localities to install and implement effective and efficient prevention efforts successfully ( Andréasson, Hjalmarsson, and Rehnman, 2000 ; Ringwalt et al., 2002 ; Spoth and Greenberg, 2011 ; Welsh, Sullivan, and Olds, 2009 ). For instance, most crime prevention is provided either when youth first enter the juvenile justice system (secondary prevention) or in an effort to prevent future recidivism (tertiary prevention; Farrington, 2013 ). These efforts are generally delivered in the context of the criminal justice system. In contrast, primary crime prevention programs have little or no natural home ( Dunworth, Mills, Cordner, and Greene, 1999 ; Hawkins and Weis, 1985 ; Hawkins et al., 2008 ; Spoth, Greenberg, Bierman, and Redmond, 2004 ). Schools generally have too many competing priorities to provide potent crime prevention efforts, and law enforcement personnel are rarely given the resources to implement effective crime prevention strategies among populations that have yet to commit a crime ( Dunworth et al., 1999 ; Spoth et al., 2004 ).

Developmental crime prevention programs delivered without appropriate levels of infrastructure and capacity not only are at risk for failing but also clutter a crowded marketplace. They contribute to a belief that prevention, although it is a nice idea, has weak effects at best ( Caulkins, Pacula, Paddock, and Chiesa, 2004 ; Spence and Shortt, 2007 ). In reality, developmental prevention programs that have been delivered with fidelity and have received adequate resources are not only effective but also cost effective ( Barnett and Masse, 2007 ; Dino, Horn, Abdulkadri, Kalsekar, and Branstetter, 2008 ; Foster, Jones, and the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group, 2006 ; Guyll et al., 2011 ; Kuklinski et al., 2012 ; Reynolds et al., 2011 ). Also, these programs face the same loss of potency that many effective medical interventions experience when delivered in parts of the world without the requisite infrastructure (electricity and refrigeration) and capacity (medical knowledge and reliable staff; Woolf, 2005 ). The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s work with disseminating malaria vaccines is a clear example of the value of local infrastructure and capacity ( Litzow and Bauchner, 2006 ).

Although Manning et al.’s (2013) work focuses on how to value prevention programs, researchers and policy makers alike must ask: What does an effective infrastructure for crime prevention programs look like, and what will it cost? The reality of investing in human development means that effective and efficient prevention efforts cannot succeed in environments with unstable or mismanaged funding streams ( Johnson, Hays, Center, and Daley, 2004 ; Scheirer and Dearing, 2011 ). To build efficient prevention efforts, investments also must support building local infrastructure and developing sustainable efforts with diverse funding streams that, when possible, recapture downstream savings for reinvestment ( Catalano, 2007 ; Crowley et al., 2012 ). To accomplish this goal, first researchers will need to provide a clear estimate of these costs.

Investing Across Ecological Systems: The Case for Dual Generation

As described by Manning et al. (2013) , the economic benefits of developmentally based prevention programs for crime and health are notoriously difficult to monetize ( Karoly, 2008 ). Numerous barriers are holding the field back in this area, but the primary obstacle stems from the difficulty in linking outcomes in childhood to future economic impact ( Crowley et al., 2013 ; Karoly, 2011 ). Early delinquency often occurs initially within the home and then in primary school where costs are low and difficult to quantify (likely in the form of lost parent or teacher productivity; Karoly, 2008 ; Karoly et al., 1998 ). These costs often are only apparent for the severest youth—until adolescence—when the rate of and harm from delinquent behavior grows exponentially ( Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group, 1992 ; Foster and Jones, 2007 ). Furthermore, the greatest economic impacts from criminal activity tend not to become manifest until youth enter the labor force or the criminal justice system ( Bongers, Koot, van der Ende, and Verhulst, 2004 ; Cohen, Piquero, and Jennings, 2010 ; Hao and Woo, 2012 ; Heckman et al., 2010 ). Consequently, the delayed benefits to youth from prevention programs makes investing in new developmental efforts difficult not only from a budgetary standpoint but also from a political one ( Welsh and Farrington, 2012 ). Interestingly, some forms of developmental crime prevention programs seek to target not only youth but also their families ( St. Pierre, Layzer, and Barnes, 1995 ). Growing out of ecological systems theory, which holds that human development is impacted by several environmental systems, researchers have found these “dual-generation” approaches could result not only in long-term savings from youth benefits but also in more immediate economic and fiscal savings from parent benefits ( Bronfenbrenner, 1986 ; Miller, 2013 ; Sommer et al., 2012 ).

In practice, dual-generation approaches comprise efforts that combine high-quality early education programs for youth with opportunities for parents to participate in workforce development and parent training programs ( Foundation for Child Development, 2012 ). In this manner, benefits accrue not only in the long term for youth but also in the near term for parents. In turn, these improved parent outcomes augment developmental gains from early education programs (e.g., socioeconomic, health, and parenting; Yoshikawa, Aber, and Beardslee, 2012 ). One commonly cited example is the Nurse Family Partnership program. In this program, public savings accrue not only from children when they reach adolescence (greater than 25% reduction in arrest between 12 and 15 years of age) but also beginning directly after delivery from parents (more than $8,000 in additional tax revenue in 2013 dollars, 33% reduction in welfare use; Karoly et al., 1998 ; Miller, 2013 ). Importantly, Manning et al. (2013) found similar support for dual-generation approaches using the AHP method, where programs that deliver preventive services in preschool and incorporate family interventions were the most preferred option.

In this manner, dual-generation approaches can make developmental crime prevention programs more appealing to decision makers seeking to demonstrate the value of their investments in the near term. Furthermore, knowing that a sizable proportion of a crime prevention program’s return will occur within the first few years after the initial investment can buffer its impact on tight government budgets. Therefore, this knowledge leads us to two innovative approaches for investing in and sustaining developmental crime prevention programs: prevention portfolios and social impact bonds.

Hedging Our Bets: Building Prevention Portfolios and the Promise of Social Impact Bonds

Global austerity efforts have forced policy makers to both cut services and avoid investing in programs that carry even a relatively low risk of failure. In response, many policy makers across the political spectrum desire robust estimates of a program’s potential benefits and costs before they are willing to support new policies ( The Pew Charitable Trusts, 2012 ). In response, innovative approaches for funding new programs and lowering risk to the taxpayer are gaining traction.

One such approach is the development of investment portfolios comprised of many prevention programs. These portfolios offer policy makers a variety of programs with different returns-on-investment (ROIs) and different levels of risk ( Aos et al., 2004 , 2011 ; Drake, Aos, and Miller, 2009 ; Lee et al., 2012 ). In this manner, policy makers can make explicit asset allocation decisions for each program in the portfolio. One example of such an approach comes from the Washington State Institute for Public Policy (WSIPP). To build these profiles, WSIPP has conducted large-scale meta-analyses to develop high-quality estimates of programs’ potential ROI and has engaged in sophisticated work modeling the risk of a program failing to produce expected savings. Like traditional financial portfolios, this approach distributes risk across different areas (e.g., primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention) to protect the principal investment. WSIPP has delivered these estimates to the legislature over the years and has increased state investment in prevention dramatically ( Dueffert, 2012 ). As a result, the state has observed meaningful declines in crime and incarceration—to the extent it avoided planned prison construction. The success of this model was the inspiration behind the Results First Initiative described previously and is being replicated across many U.S. states and internationally ( Dueffert, 2013 ).

In contrast to the portfolio approach that relies on public investment in developmentally based prevention, there is growing interest by many governments in offering the private sector incentives to invest in social welfare programs. One strategy that is gaining increasing support is known as a “social impact bond” (also known as a “social benefit bond,” “social policy bond,” or “pay-for-success bond”). These bonds are offered by governments to private investors to support prevention programs known to have a high ROI ( Horesh, 2000 ; Liebman, 2013 ; Liebman and Sellman, 2013 ). The program is delivered by an intermediary supported by the private investors’ funds. If the program is successful in delivering public savings, then the private investors receive both their principal investment and a predefined return (similar to a structured product or equity investment). The first social impact bond was developed by Social Finance UK in 2010. Since then, Australia and the United States have both observed offerings of social impact bonds (e.g., Massachusetts, New York City, and New South Wales). These trials are being closely watched for evidence that this new funding mechanism could be effectively used to support and incentivize efficient developmentally based crime prevention efforts.

Conclusions

Manning et al.’s (2013) valuation approach allows for a systematic comparison of developmental crime prevention programs and has the potential to fill a major gap in current efforts to value prevention for informing public policy. By further considering the economics of investing in developmental crime prevention programs, we can identify multiple actionable steps for research and policy. Combined, they offer the opportunity to build more efficient crime prevention efforts that will lead to substantial future savings. These steps are as follows:

• Replicate Manning et al.’s valuation approach (a) in new settings, (b) with new populations, and (c) with a broader array of crime prevention programs.
• Develop robust estimates of the costs from implementing and scaling developmental crime prevention programs.
• Invest in dual-generation interventions that deliver prevention programs to both youth and their families.
• Engage innovative mechanisms for investing in crime prevention efforts, including the development of prevention portfolios and social impact bonds.

In this context, policy makers wishing to install effective and efficient developmental crime programs into current crime prevention and control efforts should consider the utility of Manning et al.’s (2013) AHP approach and encourage replication of the process among their peers. Furthermore, policy makers should carefully consider the available programming infrastructure and capacity in target areas, the use of dual-generation programs, and innovative investment strategies that protect public resources from risk.

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges the feedback from Dr. Ken Dodge, Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, and Dr. Philip Cook, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University.

D. Max Crowley is a National Institute of Drug Abuse Fellow at Duke University’s Center for Child and Family Policy studying the economics of investing in human development. His research program seeks to prevent the development of health inequalities and criminal behavior through evidence-based investments in childhood and adolescence. Dr. Crowley co-chairs the Society for Prevention Research’s MAPS Taskforce on economic analyses of prevention, is a research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER-Crime), and winner of the Research Society on Alcoholism’s John T. and Patricia A. O’Neill Addiction Science Education Award. His work has been supported by the National Institute of Drug Abuse, NoVo Foundation, ACF’s Office of Research, Planning and Evaluation, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

• Andréasson Sven, Hjalmarsson Kerstin, Rehnman Charlotta. Implementation and dissemination of methods for prevention of alcohol problems in primary health care: A feasibility study. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2000; 35 :525–530. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Andrews Don A, Bonta James. Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy and Law. 2010; 16 :39–55. [ Google Scholar ]
• Aos Steve, Lee Stephanie, Drake Elizabeth K, Pennucci Annie, Klima Tali, Miller Marna G, et al. Return on Investment: Evidence-Based Options to Improve Statewide Outcomes. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy; 2011. Retrieved from wsipp.wa.gov/pub.asp?docid=11-07-1201 . [ Google Scholar ]
• Aos Steve, Lieb Roxanne, Mayfield Jim, Miller Marna G, Pennucci Annie. Benefits and Costs of Prevention and Early Intervention Programs for Youth. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy; 2004. Retrieved from wsipp.wa.gov/pub.asp?docid=04-07-3901 . [ Google Scholar ]
• Artello Kristine. Shifting “tough on crime” to keeping kids out of jail: Exploring organizational adaptability and sustainability at a mental health agency serving adjudicated children living with severe mental illness. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 2013 doi: 10.1177/0887403412473473. E-pub ahead of print. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Barnett W Steven, Masse Leonard N. Comparative benefit–cost analysis of the Abecedarian program and its policy implications. Economics of Education Review. 2007; 26 :113–125. [ Google Scholar ]
• Becker Gary S. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy. 1968; 76 :169–217. [ Google Scholar ]
• Birch Stephen, Gafni Amiram. Cost effectiveness/utility analyses: Do current decision rules lead us to where we want to be? Journal of Health Economics. 1992; 11 :279–296. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bongers Ilja L, Koot Hans M, van der Ende Jan, Verhulst Frank C. Developmental trajectories of externalizing behaviors in childhood and adolescence. Child Development. 2004; 75 :1523–1537. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Braga Anthony A, Weisburd David L. The effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 2011; 49 :323–358. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bronfenbrenner Urie. Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology. 1986; 22 :723–742. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brookshire David S, Crocker Thomas D. The advantages of contingent valuation methods for benefit-cost analysis. Public Choice. 1981; 36 :235–252. Retrieved March 15, 2011 from jstor.org/stable/30023439 . [ Google Scholar ]
• Cameron Samuel. The economics of crime deterrence: A survey of theory and evidence. Kyklos. 1988; 41 :301–323. [ Google Scholar ]
• Catalano Richard F. Prevention is a sound public and private investment. Criminology & Public Policy. 2007; 6 :377–397. [ Google Scholar ]
• Caulkins Jonathan P, Pacula Rosalie Liccardo, Paddock Susan, Chiesa James. What we can—and cannot—expect from school-based drug prevention. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2004; 23 :79–87. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cohen Mark A. Pain, suffering, and jury awards: A study of the cost of crime to victims. Law & Society Review. 1988; 22 :537–556. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cohen Mark A. The Costs of Crime and Justice. London, U.K: Routledge; 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cohen Mark A, Piquero Alex R, Jennings Wesley G. Studying the costs of crime across offender trajectories. Criminology & Public Policy. 2010; 9 :279–305. [ Google Scholar ]
• Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. A developmental and clinical model for the prevention of conduct disorders. Development and Psychopathology. 1992; 4 :509–527. [ Google Scholar ]
• Crowley D Max, Hill Laura Griner, Kuklinski Margaret R, Jones Damon E. Research priorities for economic analyses of prevention: Current issues & future directions. Prevention Science. 2013 doi: 10.1007/s11121-013-0429-z. E-pub ahead of print. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Crowley D Max, Jones Damon E, Greenberg Mark T, Feinberg Mark E, Spoth Richard L. Resource consumption of a diffusion model for prevention programs: The PROSPER delivery system. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2012; 50 :256–263. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dino Geri, Horn Kimberly, Abdulkadri Abdullahi, Kalsekar Iftekhar, Branstetter Steven. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Not on Tobacco program for adolescent smoking cessation. Prevention Science. 2008; 9 (1):38–46. doi: 10.1007/s11121-008-0082-0. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dodge Kenneth A. The science of youth violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2001; 20 :63–70. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Donaldson Cam, Birch Stephen, Gafni Amiram. The distribution problem in economic evaluation: Income and the valuation of costs and consequences of health care programmes. Health Economics. 2002; 11 :55–70. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Donaldson Cam, Farrar Shelley, Mapp Tracy, Walker Andrew, Macphee Susan. Assessing community values in health care: Is the “willingness to pay” method feasible? Health Care Analysis. 1997; 5 :7–29. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Drake Elizabeth K, Aos Steve, Miller Marna G. Evidence-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington State. Victims & Offenders. 2009; 4 :170–196. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dueffert Nicole. Better Results, Lower Costs: Washington State’s Cutting-Edge Policy Analysis Model. Washington, DC: The Pew Center on the States; 2012. Retrieved from pewstates.org/uploadedFiles/PCS_Assets/2012/ResultsFirst_Washington_casestudy.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• Dueffert Nicole. Pew-Macarthur Results First Initiative. Washington, DC: The Pew Center on the States; 2013. States’ Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis: Improving Results for Taxpayers. Retrieved from pewstates.org/uploadedFiles/PCS_Assets/2013/Pew_Results_First_50state_report.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• Dunworth Terence, Mills Gregory, Cordner Gary, Greene Jack. National Evaluation of Weed and Seed Cross-Site Analysis. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; 1999. Retrieved from ncjrs.gov/txtfiles1/176358.txt . [ Google Scholar ]
• Durlak Joseph A. Common risk and protective factors in successful prevention programs. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1998; 68 :512–520. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Eckenrode John, Campa Mary, Luckey Dennis W, Henderson Charles R, Jr, Cole Robert, Kitzman Harriet, et al. Long-term effects of prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation on the life course of youths: 19-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2010; 164 :9–15. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Farrington David P. Early developmental prevention of juvenile delinquency. RSA Journal. 1994; 142 :22–34. [ Google Scholar ]
• Farrington David P. Saving Children from a Life of Crime: The Benefits Greatly Outweigh the Costs!. Presented at the Stockholm Price in Criminology; Stockholm, Sweden. 2013. Retrieved from criminologysymposium.com . [ Google Scholar ]
• Foster E Michael, Jones Damon E. The economic analysis of prevention: An illustration involving children’s behavior problems. The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics. 2007; 10 :165–175. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Foster EM, Jones D the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Can a costly intervention be cost-effective?: An analysis of violence prevention. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2006; 63 :1284–1291. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.11.1284. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Foundation for Child Development. Investing in Public Programs Matters: How State Policies Impact Children’s Lives. New York: Author; 2012. Retrieved from resourcecentre.savethechildren.se/sites/default/files/documents/5551.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• Gifford-Smith Mary, Dodge Kenneth A, Dishion Thomas J, McCord Joan. Peer influence in children and adolescents: Crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2005; 33 :255–265. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Guyll Max, Spoth Richard L, Crowley Daniel Max. Economic analysis of methamphetamine prevention effects and employer costs. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 2011; 72 :577–585. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hao Lingxin, Woo Han S. Distinct trajectories in the transition to adulthood: Are children of immigrants advantaged? Child Development. 2012; 83 :1623–1639. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hawkins J David, Catalano Richard F, Arthur Michael W, Egan Elizabeth, Brown Eric C, Abbott Robert D, et al. Testing communities that care: The rationale, design and behavioral baseline equivalence of the community youth development study. Prevention Science. 2008; 9 :178–190. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hawkins J David, Catalano Richard F, Miller Janet Y. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin. 1992; 112 :64–105. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hawkins J David, Weis Joseph G. The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention. The Journal of Primary Prevention. 1985; 6 :73–97. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Heckman James J. Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science. 2006; 312 :1900–1902. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Heckman James J, Moon Seong Hyeok, Pinto Rodrigo, Savelyev Peter A, Yavitz Adam. The rate of return to the High Scope Perry Preschool Program. Journal of Public Economics. 2010; 94 :114–128. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Homel Ross. Developmental crime prevention. In: Tilley Nick., editor. Handbook of Crime Prevention Community Safety. London, U.K: Routledge; 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Horesh Ronnie. Injecting incentives into the solution of social problems: Social policy bonds. Economic Affairs. 2000; 20 :39–42. [ Google Scholar ]
• Johnson Knowlton, Hays Carol, Center Hayden, Daley Charlotte. Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: A sustainability planning model. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2004; 27 :135–149. [ Google Scholar ]
• Karoly Lynn A. Technical Report. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation; 2008. Valuing Benefits in Benefit-Cost Studies of Social Programs. Retrieved from rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2008/RAND_TR643.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• Karoly Lynn A. Toward standardization of benefit-cost analyses of early childhood interventions. SSRN Electronic Journal 2011 [ Google Scholar ]
• Karoly Lynn A, Greenwood Peter W, Everingham Susan S, Houbé Jill, Rebecca Kilburn M, Peter Rydell C, et al. Investing in Our Children: What We Know and Don’t Know About the Costs and Benefits of Early Childhood Interventions. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation; 1998. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kelly Michael, Morgan Antony, Ellis Simon, Younger Tricia, Huntley Jane, Swann Catherine. Evidence based public health: A review of the experience of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) of developing public health guidance in England. Social Science & Medicine. 2010; 71 :1056–1062. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Klietz Stephanie J, Borduin Charles M, Schaeffer Cindy M. Cost-benefit analysis of multisystemic therapy with serious and violent juvenile offenders. Journal of Family Psychology. 2010; 24 :657–666. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuklinski Margaret R, Briney John S, David Hawkins J, Catalano Richard F. Cost-benefit analysis of Communities That Care outcomes at eighth grade. Prevention Science. 2012; 13 :150–161. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee Stephanie, Aos Steve, Drake Elizabeth K, Pennucci Annie, Miller Marna G, Anderson Laurie. Return on Investment: Evidence-Based Options to Improve Statewide Outcomes April 2012 Update. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy; 2012. Retrieved from wsipp.wa.gov/pub.asp?docid=12-04-1201 . [ Google Scholar ]
• Lerner Richard M, Lerner Jacqueline V, Almerigi Jason B, Theokas Christina, Phelps Erin, Gestsdottir Steinunn, et al. Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifthgrade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 2005; 25 :17–71. [ Google Scholar ]
• Liebman Jeffrey B. Building on Recent Advances in Evidence-Based Policymaking. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Liebman Jeffrey B, Sellman Alina. Social Impact Bonds: A Guide for State and Local Governments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School Social Impact Bond Technical Assistance Lab; 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Litzow Jennifer M, Bauchner Howard. The grand challenges of the Gates Foundation: What impact on global child health? Journal of the Royal Society on Medicine. 2006; 99 :171–174. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ludwig Jens. The costs of crime. Criminology & Public Policy. 2010; 9 :307–311. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ludwig Jens, Cook Philip J. The benefits of reducing gun violence: Evidence from contingent-valuation survey data. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 2001; 22 :207–226. [ Google Scholar ]
• Manning Matthew, Smith Christine, Homel Ross. Valuing developmental crime prevention. Criminology & Public Policy. 2013; 12 :305–332. [ Google Scholar ]
• Marsh Kevin, Chalfin Aaron, Roman John K. What does cost-benefit analysis add to decision making? Evidence from the criminal justice literature. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 2008; 4 :117–135. [ Google Scholar ]
• McCollister Kathryn E, French Michael T, Fang Hai. The cost of crime to society: New crime-specific estimates for policy and program evaluation. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2010; 108 :98–109. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Miller Ted R. Nurse-Family Partnership Home Visitation: Costs, Outcomes, and Return on Investment. Bethesda, MD: HBSA Inc; 2013. Retrieved from pewstates.org/uploadedFiles/PCS_Assets/2013/Costs_and_ROI_report.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• Miller Ted R, Cohen Mark A, Rossman Shelli B. Victim costs of violent crime and resulting injuries. Health Affairs. 1993; 12 :186–197. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• O’Connell Mary Ellen, Boat Thomas F, Warner Kenneth E. Preventing Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders Among Young People: Progress and Possibilities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Office of Management & Budget (OMB) Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs. A-94. Washington, DC: Author; 1992. Retrieved from whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/a94/a094.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• Olsen Jan Abel, Smith Richard D. Theory versus practice: A review of “willingness-to-pay” in health and health care. Health Economics. 2001; 10 :39–52. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Osgood D Wayne. Making sense of crime and the life course. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2005; 602 :196–211. [ Google Scholar ]
• Paternoster Raymond. How much do we really know about criminal deterrence? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 2010; 100 :765–823. [ Google Scholar ]
• Reynolds Arthur J, Temple Judy A, White Barry AB, Ou SuhRuu, Robertson Dylan L. Age 26 cost-benefit analysis of the Child-Parent Center Early Education Program. Child Development. 2011; 82 :379–404. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rikard RV, Rosenberg ED. Aging inmates: A convergence of trends in the American criminal justice system. Journal of Correctional Health Care. 2007; 13 :150–162. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ringwalt Christopher L, Ennett Susan T, Vincus Amy A, Thorne Judy, Rohrbach Louise Ann, Ashley Simmons-Rudolph A. The prevalence of effective substance use prevention curricula in U.S. middle schools. Prevention Science. 2002; 3 :257–265. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ryan Mandy, Watson Verity. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Economics. 2009; 18 :389–401. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Saaty Thomas L. What is the analytic hierarchy process. In: Mitra Gautam., editor. Mathematical Models and Decision Support. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1988. [ Google Scholar ]
• Scheirer MaryAnn, Dearing James W. An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. American Journal of Public Health. 2011; 101 :2059–2067. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sommer Teresa Eckrich, Lindsay Chaise-Lansdale P, Brooks-Gunn Jeanne, Gardner Margo, Rauner Diana Mendley, Freel Karen. Early childhood education centers and mothers’ postsecondary attainment: A new conceptual framework for a dual-generation education intervention. Teachers College Record. 2012; 114 :1–40. [ Google Scholar ]
• Spence Susan H, Shortt Alison L. Research review: Can we justify the widespread dissemination of universal, school-based interventions for the prevention of depression among children and adolescents? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2007; 48 :526–542. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Spoth Richard L, Greenberg Mark T. Impact challenges in community science-with-practice: Lessons from PROSPER on transformative practitioner-scientist partnerships and prevention infrastructure development. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2011; 48 :106–119. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Spoth Richard L, Greenberg Mark T, Bierman Karen, Redmond Cleve. PROSPER community–university partnership model for public education systems: Capacity-building for evidence-based, competence-building prevention. Prevention Science. 2004; 5 :31–39. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• St Pierre Robert G, Layzer Jean I, Barnes Helen V. Two-generation programs: Design, cost, and short-term effectiveness. The Future of Children. 1995; 5 :76–93. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• The Pew Charitable Trusts. Results First Initiative [homepage] 2012 Retrieved from pewstates.org/projects/results-first-328069 .
• Vitiello Michael. Still between a rock and a hard place: Sentencing reform in California. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 2013; 25 :233–235. [ Google Scholar ]
• Weatherly H, Drummond M, Claxton K, Cookson K, Ferguson B, Godfrey C, et al. Methods for assessing the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions: Key challenges and recommendations. Health Policy. 2009; 93 :85–92. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Weinstein Milton C, Manning Willard G., Jr Theoretical issues in cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of Health Economics. 1997; 16 :121–128. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Welsh Brandon C, Farrington David P. The Future of Crime Prevention: Developmental and Situational Strategies. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Justice; 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Welsh Brandon C, Farrington David P. Science, politics, and crime prevention: Toward a new crime policy. Journal of Criminal Justice. 2012; 40 :128–133. [ Google Scholar ]
• Welsh Brandon C, Sullivan Christopher J, Olds David L. When early crime prevention goes to scale: A new look at the evidence. Prevention Science. 2009; 11 :115–125. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Woolf Steven H. The break-even point: When medical advances are less important than improving the fidelity with which they are delivered. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2005; 3 :545–552. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yoshikawa Hirokazu, Lawrence Aber J, Beardslee William R. The effects of poverty on the mental, emotional, and behavioral health of children and youth: Implications for prevention. American Psychologist. 2012; 67 :272–284. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zarkin Gary A, Cates Sheryl C, Bala Mohan V. Estimating the willingness to pay for drug abuse treatment: A pilot study. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2000; 18 :149–159. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]

Community Approaches for Addressing Crime and Violence: Prevention, Intervention, and Restoration

• First Online: 23 May 2018

Cite this chapter

• Tracy M. Soska 4 &
• Mary L. Ohmer 4  

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

1485 Accesses

3 Citations

Crime and violence have long been among the more pressing and recalcitrant community challenges especially with increasing inequality and growing disparities among communities. Given this context for exploring and understanding community-based approaches for crime prevention, in America, this chapter examines theories related to crime prevention, as well as community organizing and programmatic community-based approaches used to address crime and community violence at the local level. In discussing community intervention methods, strategies, and tactics that have been effective in crime prevention, violence intervention, and promoting collective efficacy and restorative justice, this chapter will provide brief case examples of projects and programs that have been undertaken at the community level. These examples provide lessons learned for community practitioners and leaders to undertake and replicate in similar efforts. We will also examine the evidence-base of such community approaches and what applied research supports as best practice in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Community Violence Overview: Guiding Principles, Critical Issues, and Prevention and Intervention Strategies

Community-Based Empowerment, Collective Efficacy, and Collaborative Data-Sharing: Key Elements for Crime Reduction Planning in Baltimore

Abramson, L., & Beck, E. (2011). Using conflict to build community: Community conferencing. In E. Beck, N. Kropf, & P. Leonard (Eds.), Social work and restorative justice: Skills for dialogue, peacemaking, and reconciliation (pp. 149–174). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–87.

Article   Google Scholar  

Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M. S. (2001). A comparison of four restorative conferencing justice models. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved July 13, 2016 from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/184738.pdf .

Beck, E., Ohmer, M. L., & Warner, B. (2012). Strategies for preventing neighborhood violence: Toward bringing collective efficacy practice into social work. Journal of Community Practice, 20 (3), 225–240.

Bennett, T., Holloway, K., & Farrington, D. (2008). The effectiveness of neighborhood watch . Campbell Systematic Reviews.

Google Scholar  

Bergseth, K. J., & Bouffard, J. A. (2007). The long-term impact of restorative justice programming for juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35 (4), 433–51.

Braga, A. A., Kennedy, D. M., Waring, E. J., & Piehl, A. M. (2001). Problem-oriented policing, deterrence, and youth violence: An evaluation of Boston’s Operation Ceasefire. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 195–225.

Braga, A. A., Pierce, G. L., McDevitt, J., Bond, B. J., & Cronin, S. (2008). The strategic prevention of gun violence among gang-involved offenders. Justice Quarterly, 25, 132–162.

Brooks, L. (2008). Volunteering to be taxed: Business improvement districts and the extra-governmental provision of public safety. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 388–406.

Buchanan, M. (2013). Want to fight crime? Address economic inequality. Bloomberg, 1-7-13. Retrieved July 23, 2016 from https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2013-01-06/want-to-fight-crime-address-economic-inequality .

Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). (2016). Crime victimization 2016 . Downloaded from https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=6166 .

Burgess, R. L., & Akers, R. L. (1968). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14 , 128–147.

Choi, K., Libertt, M., & Collins, T. (2014). An empirical evaluation: Gunshot detection system and its effectiveness on police practices. Police, Practice, & Research, 15 (1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2013.80067 .

Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.

Cook, P. J., & MacDonald, J. (2011). Public safety through private action: An economic assessment of BIDS. The Economic Journal, 121, 445–462.

Connell, N., Miggans, K., & McGloin, J. M. (2008). Can a community policing initiative reduce serious crime? Police Quarterly, 11, 127–150.

Crime in America. (2016). Downloaded from http://www.crimeinamerica.net/crime-rates-united-states/ .

Davis, A. (2015). In U.S., concern about crime climbs to 15-year high. Gallup Polls. Retrieved July 25, 2016 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/190475/americans-concern-crime-climbs-year-high.aspx .

Development Services Group, Inc. (2010). Restorative justice literature review . Washington, D.C.: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved July 13, 2016 http://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/Restorative_Justice.pdf .

Dunworth, T., Mills, G., Cordner, G., & Greene, J. (1999). National evaluation of weed & seed: Cross-site analysis. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.

Eck, J. E., & Wartell, J. (1999). Reducing crime and drug dealing by improving place management: A randomized experiment . Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.

Eichler, M. (2007). Consensus organizing: Building communities of mutual self-interest . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications, Inc.

Fagan, J., & Tyler, T. (2004) Policing, order maintenance, and legitimacy. U.S. Department of Justice. Document No.: 207975. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/Mesko/207975.pdf .

France, A., & Crow, I. (2005). Using the ‘risk factor paradigm’ in prevention: Lessons from the evaluation of communities that care. Children and Society, 19 (2), 172–184.

Gafield, J. (2010). Landscaping neo-liberalism: The weed and seed strategy . The Advocate’s Forum: University of Chicago, School of Social Service Administration.

Gallup. (2016). Downloaded from http://www.gallup.com/poll/190475/americans-concern-crime-climbs-yearhigh.aspx .

Gill, C., Lum, C., Cave, B. Dario, L., Telep, C., Vitter, Z., & Weisburd, D. (2012). Evidence-based assessment of the city of seattle’s crime prevention programs . Fairfax: Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, George Mason University

Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C., Vitter, Z., & Bennet, T. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology , 10 (4), 399–428. Retrieved July 13, 2016 from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11292-014-9210-y#page-2 .

Green, L. (1995). Cleaning up drug hotspots in Oakland, California: The displacement and diffusion effects. Justice Quarterly, 12, 737–754.

Greenberg, S. W., Williams, J. R., & Rohe W. R. (1982). Safety in urban neighborhoods: A comparison of physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods. Population and Environment, 5 , 141–165.

Gumz, E., & Grant, C. (2009). Restorative justice: A systematic review of the social work literature. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 90 (1), 119–126.

Harlem Children’s Zone. (2016). Retrieved July 29, 2016 from https://www.hcz.org .

Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency . Berkeley: University of California Press.

Holloway, K. Bennett, T., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Does neighborhood watch reduce crime? The Campbell Collaborative Crime and Justice Group for the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Retrieved July 17, 2016 from http://journalistsresource.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/e040825133-res-review3.pdf .

Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. (2000). Social cohesion, social capital, and health In Social Epidemiology, Chap. 8. In L. Berkman, & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social Epidemiology . Oxford University Press.

Kelling, G. L., & Coles, C. M. (1996). Fixing broken windows . New York: Martin Kessler Books.

Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. The Prison Journal , 85 (2), 127–144.

LaVigne, N. G., Lowry, S. S., Markman, J., & Dwyer, A. (2011). Evaluating the use of public surveillance cameras for crime control and prevention . Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute. September 19, 2011. Retrieved July 7, 2016 from http://www.urban.org/research/publication/evaluating-use-public-surveillance-cameras-crime-control-and-prevention .

Lee, C. G., Cheesman, F. L., Rottman, D. B., Swaner, R., Lambson, S., Rempel, M., & Curtis, R. (2013). A community court grows in Brooklyn: A Comprehensive evaluation of the Red Hook community justice—Final report . Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.

Lum, C., Koper, C. S., & Telep, C. W. (2011). The evidence-based policing matrix. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7 , 3–26.

Maimon, D., & Browning, C. R. (2010). Unstructured socializing, collective efficacy, and violent behavior among urban youth. Criminology, 48 (2), 443–474. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00192.x .

Maimon, D., Browning, C. R., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2010). Collective efficacy, family attachment, and urban adolescent suicide attempts. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51 (3), 307–324.

Matsueda, R. L. (1988). The current state of differential association theory. Crime and Delinquency, 34 (3), 277–306, Sage Journals. Download from https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128788034003005 .

McEachern, D. (2016). Director, neighborhood safety program . Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh Community Services, Inc. (Personal communications July).

Odgers, C. L., Moffitt, T. E., Tach, L. M., Sampson, R. J., Taylor, A., Matthews, C. L., et al. (2009). The protective effects of neighborhood collective efficacy on British children growing up in deprivation: A developmental analysis. Developmental Psychology, 45 , 942–957.

Ohmer, M. L. (2016). Strategies for preventing youth violence Facilitating collective efficacy among youth and adults. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 7 (4), 681–705.

Ohmer, M. L., & DeMasi, K. (2009). Consensus organizing: A community development workbook. In A comprehensive guide to designing, implementing and evaluating community change initiatives . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Ohmer, M. L., & Owens, J. (2013). Using photovoice to empower youth and adults to prevent crime. Journal of Community Practice, 21 (4), 410–433.

Ohmer, M. L., Warner, B., & Beck, E. (2010). Preventing violence in low-income communities: Facilitating residents’ ability to intervene in neighborhood problems. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, XXXVII (2), 159–179.

Painter, K. A., & Farrington, D. P. (1999). Improved street lighting: Crime reducing effects and cost-benefit analysis. Security Journal, 12, 17–32.

Perkins, D., Wandersman, A., Rich, R., & Taylor, R. (1992). The physical environment of street crime: Defensible space, territoriality and incivilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13 (1), 29–49.

Peterson, R. D., Krivo, L. J., & Harris, M. A. (2000). Disadvantage and neighborhood violent crime: Do local institutions matter? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37 (1), 31–63.

Pittsburgh Community Services. (2016). Retrieved July 17, 2016 from https://www.pghcsi.org/about-us .

Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6 (1), 65–78.

Roeder, O., Eisen, L.-B., & Bowling, J. (2015). What caused the crime decline? The Brennan Center for Justice, New York University, School of Law.

Sampson, R. J. (2008). Collective efficacy theory: Lessons learned and directions for future research. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (Ch. 5). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Sampson, R. J., & Graif, C. (2009). Neighborhood social capital as differential social organization: Resident and leadership dimensions. American Behavioral Scientist, 52 (11), 1579–1605.

Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.

Saulnier, A., & Sivasubramaniam, D. (2015). Restorative justice: Underlying mechanisms and future directions. New Criminal Law Review: In International and Interdisciplinary Journal . https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2015.150014 .

Scharf, P., Geerken, M., & Bradley, G. (2008). Draft technical report for SECURES demonstration in Hampton and Newport News . Virginia. Washington, D.C.: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. Retrieved July 27, 2016 from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/233342.pdf .

Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1969). Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas: A study of rates of delinquency in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities (Original book publication in 1942). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Sherman, L. (1995). Hot spots of crime and criminal careers of places. In J. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place. Crime prevention studies (Vol. 4). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). Evidence-based crime prevention (Original book publication in 2002). New York: Routledge.

Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. D. (1998). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising . Research in Brief. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.

Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., Burt, C. H., Brody, G. H., & Cutrona, C. (2005). Collective efficacy, authoritative parenting and delinquency: A longitudinal test of a model integrating community and family level processes. Criminology, 43 (4), 989–1029.

Soska, T. (2016). Communities combatting crime program . Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh Neighborhood Alliance (Personal Communication July 2016).

Spelman, W. (1993). Abandoned buildings: Magnets for crime? Journal of Criminal Justice, 21 (5), 481–495.

Stone, R. (Ed.). (1996). Core issues in comprehensive community-building initiatives . Chapin Hall: University of Chicago. Retrieved July 29, 2016 from http://www.chapinhall.org/research/report/core-issues-comprehensive-community-building-initiatives-0 .

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 571–610.

Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th Ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.

Taylor, R. B., & Harrell, A. V. (1996). Physical environment and crime: Final summary report presented to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.

Teixeira, S., & Wallace, J. M. (2013). Data-driven organizing: A community—university partnership to address vacant and abandoned property. Journal of Community Practice, 21 (3), 248–262.

Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6 (231), 231–275.

Uggen, C., & McElrath, S. (2013). Six social sources of the US crime drop . The Society Pages: Social Science That Matters, 2/4/2013.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2016). Does Neighborhood Watch Reduce Crime? Crime Prevention Research Review . U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS).

U.S. Department of Justice, & Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2015). Uniform crime reports 2014 . Washington, DC. 9-28-15. Retrieved July 27, 2016 from https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-releases-2014-crime-statistics .

U.S. Department of Justice, & Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2016) FBI releases preliminary semiannual crime statistics for 2015. Washington, DC; 1-19-16. Retrieved July 25, 2016 from https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-releases-preliminary-semiannual-crime-statistics-for-2015 .

U.S. Department of Justice, & Office of Justice Programs. (1996). LEAA/OJP retrospective: 30 years of federal support to state and local criminal justice.

U.S. Department of Justice, & Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. (1999). Mapping crime: Principle and Practice . Washington, D.C.: Crime Mapping Research Center.

Warner, B. (2007). Directly intervene or call the authorities? A study of forms of neighborhood social control within a social disorganization framework. Criminology, 45 , 99–129.

Webster, D. W., Vernick, J. S., & Mendel, J. (2009). Interim evaluation of Baltimore’s Safe Streets Programs . Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for the Prevention of Youth Violence.

Weisburd, D. (2008). Place-based policing. In Ideas in American policing . Washington, D.C.: Police Foundation.

Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L. A., Ready, J., Eck, J. E., Hinkle, J. C., & Gajewski, F. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits.

Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Effects of improved street lighting on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews.

Welsh, B. C., Mudge, M. E., & Farrington, D. P. (2010). Reconceptualizing public area surveillance and crime prevention: Security guards, place managers and defensible space. Security Journal, 23, 299–319.

Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger (374 pages). New York and Oxford: Bloomsbury Press.

Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic , March 1982. Retrieved July 17, 2016 from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/ .

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Pittsburgh School of Social Work, 2117 Cathedral of Learning, 4200 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA

Tracy M. Soska & Mary L. Ohmer

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracy M. Soska .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

School of Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Ram A. Cnaan

Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, USA

Carl Milofsky

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Soska, T.M., Ohmer, M.L. (2018). Community Approaches for Addressing Crime and Violence: Prevention, Intervention, and Restoration. In: Cnaan, R., Milofsky, C. (eds) Handbook of Community Movements and Local Organizations in the 21st Century . Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77416-9_29

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77416-9_29

Published : 23 May 2018

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-77415-2

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-77416-9

eBook Packages : Social Sciences Social Sciences (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• PubMed/Medline
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Knowledge development trajectories of crime prevention domain: an academic study based on citation and main path analysis.

1. Introduction

• To identify the overall development trajectory of crime prevention and key studies on crime prevention in the academic field through a main path analysis and find out the relevant research in the academic field of crime prevention in different periods.
• To identify key themes in the research on crime prevention through a cluster analysis.
• To identify key themes in the research on crime prevention for different periods through text mining and growth curve, and the growth trend of each research topic is predicted through growth curve analysis.

1.1. Crime Prevention Theories

1.1.1. purpose of crime prevention.

• Primary prevention strategies: to eliminate opportunities to commit crimes by improving physical and social environments.
• Secondary prevention strategies: to pre-emptively intervene in the activities of potential criminals.
• Tertiary prevention strategies: to provide treatment to criminals to stop them from committing crimes.

1.1.2. Types of Crime Prevention

1.2. literature on main path analyses, 2. materials and methods, 2.1. data source, 2.2. main path analysis, 2.3. basic statistics analysis of journals and authors, 2.4. growth curve analysis, 2.5. cluster analysis, 2.6. data mining, 3.1. data statistics, 3.1.1. crime prevention journals, 3.1.2. authors, 3.2. academic literature and the overall development trajectory of crime prevention, 4. discussion, 4.1. development trajectory of crime prevention and clusters, 4.2. cluster analysis of field of crime prevention, 4.2.1. the effects of crime displacement control on crime prevention, 4.2.2. cpted, 4.2.3. the effects of developmental programs on crime prevent, 4.2.4. the effects of communalism on crime prevention, 4.2.5. the effects of childhood sexual abuse on crime prevention, 4.3. crime prevention growth curve analysis, 5. conclusions.

• Early-term (1989–1997): Proposed prevention programs for different crime types. In order to improve social order and reduce citizens’ fear of crime, build a mutual aid and security system to reduce community-based crime, use crime propaganda to promote campus crime to protect young people, and reduce the causes of crime.
• Mid-term (1998–2002): Substantial effectiveness evaluation of situational prevention programs. Through crime reporting and cost–benefit analysis, adding street lights can indeed reduce crime rates. This phase is also aimed at reducing the incidence of youth crime, with youth self-report studies being a valid and reliable measure.
• Later period (2003–2020): Discuss the impact of physical construction and crime reporting on crime rates. Through the active monitoring system and the scheme of cooperating with the police patrol, the security guards and the police mixed the operation of the monitor and the use of blockchain technology to ensure that the stored video is not modified and the data are authentic.
• The effects of crime displacement control on crime prevention: There are 122 articles in this group. In the early period (1996–2014), there were 87 literature reviews in the study, and studies examined focused police action. The most discuss police roles, police executive powers and applications, and integrity organization design. In the late stage (after 2015), there were 35 literature reviews in the study, and studies evaluated the effects of crime displacement control and other strategies. A more systematic solution is to collect relevant information and raw data (such as transportation, community monitoring, formal cases); the acceleration of big data application is certainly the crucial strategy of scientific development in Taiwan at this stage. It is hoped that the application of big data would enhance the governmental efficacy and articulate examining public need.
• The effects of CPTED: There are 104 articles in this group. Early (1996–2007) studies focused on the relationship environmental characteristics and social disorder, and late-stage (after 2011) studies examined CPTED. A total of 28 articles were reviewed discussing the impact of burglary and sexual assault on crime prevention. Among them, 15 articles discussed the phenomenon of homeowners’ fear of burglary crimes. Neighborhood cohesion can reduce the rate of residential burglary; seven articles reviewing the literature discussing reducing sexual assault in target areas. It is particularly pointed out that potential high-risk offenders with previous convictions are under the government’s management, and they are also the main benefactors of current social safety net counseling and the construction of social prevention safety nets; six studies in the literature discuss the protection of outer walls, the fear of crime and the function of keeping yourself in a safe environment.
• The effects of developmental programs on crime prevention: There are 104 articles in this group. Early (2000–2013) studies explored the relationship between policy and crime prevention; the main research direction is the use of scientific methods and inclusion in policy making and enabling decision makers to put research evidence into the policy making process more rationally. In the late stage (after 2014), studies analyzed the effects of developmental crime prevention programs. A total of 36 articles in the literature discuss the feasibility of constructing a common indicator and cost–benefit analysis evaluation and estimating crime prevention costs.
• The effects of communalism on crime prevention: There are 59 articles in this group. Early (1989–1994) studies mainly researched the nature of crime prevention, whereas late-stage (after 2014) studies explored the effects of communalism on crime prevention. Reviewing 25 studies in the literature, the topics discussed are all about the substantive effect of proper government governance and community security on crime prevention.
• The effects of childhood sexual abuse on crimes: There are 53 articles in this group. Early (2007–2011) studies analyzed childhood sexual abuse; the literature discusses the connotation and related research of boundary trauma, self-trauma and complex post-traumatic stress reaction caused by abuse. In contrast, late-stage (after 2015) studies explored programs for preventing such abuse.
• The themes from the global main path and key-route main path, namely cost–benefit analyses of crime prevention strategies, corresponded to the themes identified through cluster analysis, namely the effects of CPTED. We finds that there is a growing body of scientific research that shows that early prevention is an effective and worthwhile investment of public resources.
• “Exploring the Impact of Physical Construction and Crime Reporting on Crime Rates”, “Exploring the Substantial Effects of Surveillance on Crime Prevention”, “Exploring the Impact of the Integration of Surveillance and Police Patrols on Crime Rates” and “Exploring the Effects of Surveillance on Crime Rates” impact are four issues that can be classified into the cluster analysis “Assessing the impact of development programs on crime prevention”. Looking back at the literature review of the past two years, the concept of smart buildings has been applied to security measures for crime prevention, adding smart street lights and joint patrols by the police and the public to eliminate target areas such as communities or campuses that are prone to crime.
• The “crime prevention methods proposed for different crime types” can correspond to the influence of crime diversion control on crime in the cluster analysis. Looking back at the literature review of the past two years, the majority of crime types are juvenile deviant behavior and online misconduct. The results show that deviant behaviors of adolescents are affected by law cognition and friend support, and online misbehaviors of adolescents are affected by law cognition and welfare needs. Accordingly, schools should provide law-related courses and information to young people to avoid deviant behaviors and online misbehaviors, so that the youth understand the consequences of their risky behaviors. In addition, young people’s interaction with their peers has to be paid attention in order to avoid peer instigation and participation in deviation behaviors. For youth’s online misbehaviors, it properly links to the youth’s various welfare resources. Practitioners should understand the problems that they encounter in their lives and online spaces, and provide appropriate assistance to reduce their online misbehaviors.

Author Contributions

Institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.

• Zheng, R. Research on the Construction of Family Support System for Juvenile Delinquency by the Ministry of Justice by 2007. Available online: https://www.moj.gov.tw/media/6693/9415194750118.pdf?mediaDL=true (accessed on 19 October 2020).
• Cai, D.; Yang, S. Criminology , 4th ed.; Wunan Book Publishing Company: Taichung City, Taiwan, 2006; Available online: https://www.taaze.tw/rwd_searchResult.html?keyType%5B%5D=0&keyword%5B%5D=%E7%8A%AF%E7%BD%AA%E5%AD%B8%E8%94%A1%E5%BE%B7%E8%BC%9D%E3%80%81%E6%A5%8A%E5%A3%AB%E9%9A%86 (accessed on 1 June 2020).
• The 50th Issue of Criminal Bimonthly. October 2012. Available online: https://cib.npa.gov.tw/ch/app/data/list?module=wg135&id=2049 (accessed on 1 November 2020).
• Cai, D.; Yang, S. A survey of criminology. 2019 , 305 , 322–324. Available online: https://www.taaze.tw/usedList.html?oid=11100869514 (accessed on 30 December 2020).
• Xu, C. A survey of criminology. 2003 , 766–774. Available online: https://www.ruten.com.tw/item/show?21839699937770 (accessed on 31 July 2020).
• Verspagen, B. Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Adv. Complex Syst. 2007 , 10 , 93–115. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fontana, R.; Nuvolari, A.; Verspagen, B. Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: An application to data communication standards. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 2009 , 18 , 311–336. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Consoli, D.; Mina, A. An evolutionary perspective on health innovation systems. J. Evol. Econ. 2009 , 19 , 297–319. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bekkers, R.; Martinelli, A. Knowledge positions in high-tech markets: Trajectories, standards, strategies and true innovators. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2012 , 79 , 1192–1216. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lucio-Arias, D.; Leydesdorff, L. Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCite™-based historiograms. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 2008 , 59 , 1948–1962. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bhupatiraju, S.; Nomaler, O.; Triulzi, G.; Verspagen, B. Knowledge flows—Analyzing the core literature of innovation, entrepreneurship and science and technology studies. Res. Policy 2012 , 41 , 1205–1218. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Calero-Medina, C.; Noyons, E.C.M. Combining mapping and citation network analysis for a better understanding of the scientific development: The case of the absorptive capacity field. J. Inform. 2008 , 2 , 272–279. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Colicchia, C.; Strozzi, F. Supply chain risk management: A new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain. Manag. 2012 , 17 , 403–418. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harris, J.K.; Beatty, K.E.; Lecy, J.D.; Cyr, J.M.; Shapiro, R.M. Mapping the multidisciplinary field of public health services and systems research. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2011 , 41 , 105–111. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, J.S.; Lu, L.Y.; Ho, M.H.C. A few notes on main path analysis. Scientometrics 2019 , 119 , 379–391. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chuang, T.C.; Liu, J.S.; Lu, L.Y.Y.; Tseng, F.M.; Lee, Y.; Chang, C.T. The main paths of eTourism: Trends of managing tourism through Internet. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2017 , 22 , 213–231. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yan, J.; Tseng, F.M.; Lu, L.Y.Y. Developmental trajectories of new energy vehicle research in economic management: Main path analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2018 , 137 , 168–181. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Su, W.H.; Chen, K.Y.; Lu, L.Y.; Wang, J.J. Identification of technology diffusion by citation and main paths analysis: The possibility of measuring open innovation. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021 , 7 , 104. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lee, M.C. A Study of the Critical Cited Decision in CAFC by Using Main Path Analysis ; National Yunlin University of Science and Technology: Douliu City, Taiwan, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee, J. A Survey of the Development Track and Trend of Patent Abuse Theory: A Viewpoint of Main Path Analysis ; National Taiwan University of Science and Technology: Taipei, Taiwan, 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• Xu, S. A Survey of Using Main Path Analysis, Citation Analysis and Text Mining Techniques to Establish a Research Field Conceptual Development Model ; Fu Jen Catholic University: New Taipei City, Taiwan, 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Liu, J.S.; Lu, L.Y. An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 2012 , 63 , 528–542. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pennell, S.; Curtis, C.; Henderson, J.; Tayman, J. Guardian-angels-A unique approach to crime-prevention. Crime Delinq. 1989 , 35 , 378–400. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bennett, S.F.; Lavrakas, P.J. Community-based crime-prevention—An assessment of the Eisenhower-foundations neighborhood program. Crime Delinq. 1989 , 35 , 345–364. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mulvey, E.P.; Arthur, M.W.; Reppucci, N.D. The prevention and treatment of juvenile-delinquency—A review of the research. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 1993 , 13 , 133–167. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Graham, J.; Bennett, T. Crime prevention strategies in Europe and North America. Can. J. Criminol. 1997 , 28 , 77–81. [ Google Scholar ]
• Welsh, B.C.; Farrington, D.P. Assessing the effectiveness and economic benefits of an integrated developmental and situational crime prevention programme. Psychol. Crime Law 1998 , 4 , 281–308. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Welsh, B.C.; Farrington, D.P. Monetary costs and benefits of crime prevention programs. Crime Just. 2000 , 27 , 305–361. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Painter, K.A.; Farrington, D.P. Evaluating situational crime prevention using a young people’s survey. Br. J. Criminol. 2001 , 41 , 266–284. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Farrington, D.P.; Welsh, B.C. Improved street lighting and crime prevention. Just. Qtly. 2002 , 19 , 313–342. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Welsh, B.C.; Farrington, D.P. Effects of closed-circuit television on crime. Ann. Am. Acad. Politic. Soc. Sci. 2003 , 587 , 110–135. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Welsh, B.C.; Farrington, D.P. Public area CCTV and crime prevention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Just. Qtly. 2009 , 26 , 716–745. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Piza, E.L.; Caplan, J.M.; Kennedy, L.W. Analyzing the influence of micro-level factors on CCTV camera effect. J. Quant. Criminol. 2014 , 30 , 237–264. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Piza, E.L.; O’Hara, B. Saturation foot-patrol in a high-violence area: A Quasi-experimental evaluation. Just. Qtly. 2014 , 31 , 693–718. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Piza, E.L.; Caplan, J.M.; Kennedy, L.W.; Gilchrist, A.M. The effects of merging proactive CCTV monitoring with directed police patrol: A randomized controlled trial. J. Exp. Criminol. 2015 , 11 , 43–69. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Piza, E.L.; Gilchrist, A.M.; Caplan, J.M.; Kennedy, L.W.; O’Hara, B.A. The financial implications of merging proactive CCTV monitoring and directed police patrol: A cost-benefit analysis. J. Exp. Criminol. 2016 , 12 , 403–429. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Piza, E.L. The crime prevention effect of CCTV in public places: A propensity score analysis. J. Crime Just. 2018 , 41 , 14–30. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Welsh, B.C.; Piza, E.L.; Thomas, A.L.; Farrington, D.P. Private security and Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) surveillance: A systematic review of function and performance. J. Contemp. Crim. Just. 2020 , 36 , 56–69. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Khan, P.W.; Byun, Y.C.; Park, N. A data verification system for CCTV surveillance cameras using blockchain technology in smart cities. Electronic 2020 , 9 , 484. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Polvi, N.; Looman, T.; Humphries, C.; Pease, K. Repeat break-and-enter victimization—time course and crime-prevention opportunity. J. Police Sci. Admin. 1990 , 17 , 8–11. [ Google Scholar ]
• Trickett, A.; Osborn, D.R.; Seymour, J.; Pease, K. What is different about high crime areas. Br. J. Criminol. 1992 , 32 , 81–89. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Farrell, G.; Pease, K. Crime seasonality—Domestic disputes and residential Burglary in Merseyside. Br. J. Criminol. 1994 , 34 , 487–498. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Farrington, D.P. Quantitative criminology in the United Kingdom in the 1990S: A brief overview. J. Quant. Criminol. 1996 , 12 , 249–263. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Guerette, R.T.; Bowers, K.J. Assessing the extent of crime displacement and diffusion of benefits: A review of situational crime prevention evaluations. Criminology 2009 , 47 , 1331–1368. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gabor, T. Crime prevention-The agenda. Can. J. Criminol. 1990 , 32 , 1–7. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Braga, A.A. The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 2001 , 578 , 104–125. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Weisburd, D.; Wyckoff, L.A.; Ready, J.; Eck, J.E.; Hinkle, J.C.; Gajewski, F. Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology 2006 , 44 , 549–591. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Braga, A.A.; Bond, B.J. Policing crime and disorder hot spots: A randomized. controlled trial. Criminology 2008 , 46 , 577–607. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Durlauf, S.N.; Nagin, D.S. Imprisonment and crime: Can both be reduced? Criminol. Public Policy 2011 , 10 , 13–54. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Johnson, S.D.; Tilley, N.; Bowers, K.J. Introducing EMMIE: An evidence rating scale to encourage mixed-method crime prevention synthesis reviews. J. Exp. Criminol. 2015 , 11 , 459–473. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Santos, R.B.; Santos, R.G. Offender-focused police intervention in residential burglary and theft from vehicle hot spots: A partially blocked randomized. control trial. J. Exp. Criminol. 2016 , 12 , 373–402. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Braga, A.A.; Turchan, B.S.; Papachristos, A.V.; Hureau, D.M. Hot spots policing and crime reduction: An update of an ongoing systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Exp. Criminol. 2019 , 15 , 289–311. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Piza, E.L.; Wheeler, A.P.; Connealy, N.T.; Feng, S.Q. Crime control effects of a police substation within a business improvement district: A quasi-experimental synthetic control evaluation. Criminol. Public Policy 2020 , 19 , 653–684. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Taylor, R.B. Neighborhood responses to disorder and local attachments: The systemic model of attachment, social disorganization, and neighborhood use value. Sociol. Forum 1996 , 11 , 41–74. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Loukaitou-Sideris, A. Hot spots of bus stop crime-The importance of environmental attributes. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 1999 , 65 , 395–411. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Loukaitou-Sideris, A.; Eck, J.E. Crime prevention and active living. Am. J. Health Promot. 2007 , 21 , 380–389. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Marzbali, M.H.; Abdullah, A.; Razak, N.A.; Tilaki, M.J.M. The influence of crime prevention through environmental design on victimisation and fear of crime. J. Environ. Psychol. 2012 , 32 , 79–88. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Marzbali, M.H.; Abdullah, A.; Abd Razak, N.; Tilaki, M.J.M. The relationship between socio-economic characteristics, victimization and CPTED principles: Evidence from the MIMIC model. Crime Law Soc. Change 2012 , 58 , 351–371. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abdullah, A.; Marzbali, M.H.; Tilaki, M.J.M. Predicting the influence of CPTED on perceived neighbourhood cohesion: Considering differences across age. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013 , 36 , 54–64. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Marzbali, M.H.; Abdullah, A.; Ignatius, J.; Tilaki, M.J.M. Examining the effects of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) on residential Burglary. Int. J. Law Crime Just. 2016 , 46 , 86–102. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, J.G.; Liu, L.; Zhou, S.H.; Xiao, L.Z.; Jiang, C. Spatial variation relationship between floating population and residential Burglary: A case study from ZG, China. Isprs Int. J. Geo Inform. 2017 , 6 , 246. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cho, I.H.; Jung, K. A weighted displacement quotient model for understanding the impact of crime prevention through environmental design evidence from Seoul, South Korea policing-An international. J. Police Strat. Manag. 2018 , 41 , 41–57. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• He, Y.F.; Chen, C.P.; Chou, R.J. The key factors influencing safety analysis for traditional settlement landscape. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 3431. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kim, B.; Park, J. Awareness of crime prevention effects associated with a wall removal project in Seoul. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 2020 , 19 , 264–272. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• MacKenzie, D.L. Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime Delinq. 2000 , 46 , 457–471. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Welsh, B.C.; Farrington, D.P. Toward an evidence-based approach to preventing crime. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 2001 , 578 , 158–173. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Manning, M.; Smith, C.; Homel, R. Valuing developmental crime prevention. Criminol. Public Policy 2013 , 12 , 305–332. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Crowley, D.M. Building efficient crime prevention strategies considering the economics of investing in human development. Criminol. Public Policy 2013 , 12 , 353–366. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Farrington, D.P. Encouraging policy makers and practitioners to make rational choices about programs based on scientific evidence on developmental. Criminol. Public Policy 2013 , 12 , 295–301. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Weisburd, D.; Farrington, D.P.; Gill, C.; Ajzenstadt, M.; Bennett, T.; Bowers, K.; Caudy, M.S.; Holloway, K.; Johnson, S.; Losel, F.; et al. What works in crime prevention and rehabilitation: An assessment of systematic reviews. Criminol. Public Policy 2017 , 16 , 415–449. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Spasic, D.; Simonovic, B. Police officers’ and police educators’ receptivity to the concept of evidence-based policing—A comparative study. Rev. Za Krim. Kriminol. 2018 , 4 , 299–309. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Farrington, D.P.; Losel, F.; Boruch, R.F.; Gottfredson, D.C.; Mazerolle, L.; Sherman, L.W.; Weisburd, D. Advancing knowledge about replication in criminology. J. Exp. Criminol. 2019 , 15 , 373–396. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Picasso, E.; Cohen, M.A. Valuing the public’s demand for crime prevention programs: A discrete choice experiment. J. Exp. Criminol. 2019 , 15 , 529–550. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• King, M. Crime-prevention in France. Res. Bull. 1987 , 14 , 27–32. [ Google Scholar ]
• OMalley, P. Risk, power and crime-prevention. Econ. Soc. 1992 , 21 , 252–275. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• OMalley, P. Responsibility and crime prevention—A response. Aust. N. Zeal. J. Criminol. 1994 , 21 , 21–24. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• OMalley, P.; Weir, L.; Shearing, C. Governmentality, criticism, politics. Econ. Soc. 1997 , 26 , 501–517. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Carson, W.G. Is communalism dead? Reflections on the present and future practice of crime prevention: Part one. Austr. N. Zeal. J. Criminol. 2004 , 37 , 1–21. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hughes, G. Communities, crime prevention and the politics of articulation: A reply to Kit Carson. Austr. N. Zeal. J. Criminol. 2004 , 37 , 431–442. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Carson, W.G. Is communalism dead? Reflections on the present and future practice of crime prevention: Part two. Austr. N. Zeal. J. Criminol. 2004 , 37 , 192–210. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Selmini, R. Towards Citta sicure? Political action and institutional conflict in contemporary preventive and safety policies in Italy. Theor. Criminol. 2005 , 9 , 307–323. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hughes, G. Community cohesion, asylum seeking and the question of the stranger—Towards a new politics of public safety. Cult. Stud. 2007 , 21 , 931–951. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Beauregard, E.; Proulx, J.; Rossmo, K.; Leclerc, B.; Allaire, J.F. Script analysis of the hunting process of serial sex offenders. Crim. Just. Behav. 2007 , 34 , 1069–1084. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leclerc, B.; Proulx, J.; Beauregard, E. Examining the modus operandi of sexual offenders against children and its practical implications. Aggres. Violent Behav. 2009 , 14 , 5–12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leclerc, B.; Wortley, R.; Smallbone, S. Getting into the script of adult child sex offenders and mapping out situational prevention measures. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 2011 , 48 , 209–237. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leclerc, B.; Smallbone, S.; Wortley, R. Prevention nearby: The influence of the presence of a potential guardian on the severity of child sexual abuse. Sex. Abuse 2015 , 27 , 189–204. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leclerc, B.; Chiu, Y.N.; Cale, J. Sexual violence and abuse against children: A first review through the lens of environmental criminology. Int. J. Offender Ther. Comp. Criminol. 2016 , 60 , 743–765. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Guerzoni, M.A. A situational crime prevention analysis of Anglican clergy’s child protective practices. Child Abus. Negl. 2018 , 77 , 85–98. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Hsu, S.-C.; Chen, K.-Y.; Lin, C.-P.; Su, W.-H. Knowledge Development Trajectories of Crime Prevention Domain: An Academic Study Based on Citation and Main Path Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022 , 19 , 10616. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710616

Hsu S-C, Chen K-Y, Lin C-P, Su W-H. Knowledge Development Trajectories of Crime Prevention Domain: An Academic Study Based on Citation and Main Path Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health . 2022; 19(17):10616. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710616

Hsu, Song-Chia, Kai-Ying Chen, Chih-Ping Lin, and Wei-Hao Su. 2022. "Knowledge Development Trajectories of Crime Prevention Domain: An Academic Study Based on Citation and Main Path Analysis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 17: 10616. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710616

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Effectiveness of Patrol Methods in Crime Prevention

chapter 1-5

Related Papers

MARK LIDDLE

The Home Office Police Research Group (PRG) was formed in 1992 to carry out and manage research in the social and management sciences relevant to the work of the police service and Home Office policy divisions. One of the major police department divisions which acts as customer for the PRG is the Home Office Crime Prevention Unit which was formed in 1983 to promote preventive action against crime. It has a particular responsibility to disseminate information on crime prevention topics. The object of the present series of occasional papers is to present research material in a way which should help and inform practitioners, including the police, whose work can help reduce crime.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Robert Kirchner

Journal of Experimental Criminology

David Spade

Hal Campbell

About a million years ago (circa 1985) while serving as the Law Enforcement Planning Coordinator for the Los Angeles County Sheriffs’ Department, I undertook the task of developing an empirical method for determining the number of crimes prevented from occurring as a result of directed patrol and strategic law enforcement operations. I labored over the assignment for a considerable period of time and eventually developed what was deemed to be an exceptionally well crafted methodology for incorporating time-series analysis and linear regression, along with post-operational empirical measures of crimes reported and loss prevention computations to derive a crimes prevent-ed estimate. I even created a cost-benefit analysis procedure that measured police expenditures over and above normal enforcement, versus actual loss savings, on a week by week basis, so we knew when a pro-gram was no longer cost effective.

Operational Research

D. Van Oudheusden , Dirk Cattrysse

John M . Klofas

Cody W Telep

Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

Donald Mbosowo

Nick Tilley

The collected papers in this volume address analysis for crime prevention. Analysis for crime prevention differs from analysis of crime prevention. Analysis of crime prevention stands back from and comments on what has been and is being done to try to prevent crime. It may be concerned with effectiveness as part of a broad agenda of social reform, but is not concerned directly to inform ef- forts to identify and deal with specific crime threats at specific times and places (see, for example, Crawford, 1997, Gilling, 1997, Garland, 2001, and Hughes, 1998). Analysis for crime prevention is oriented directly to the formulation of preventive strategies. It does so in three ways. First, it identifies concentrations of either crime as a whole or single offences where there is a potential yield from preventive efforts. Second, it helps find the most efficient, effective and, perhaps, equi- table means of prevention. Third, it can help forecast likely future crime problems with a view to de...

Critical Social Policy

Sacha Darke

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Human Rights Documents Online

Giovanni Mastrobuoni

Criminology

Elizabeth Groff

Marie Segrave

Christine Cole

International Journal of the Sociology of Law

Barry Loveday

INTERNATIONAL YEARBOOK FACULTY OF SECURITY 2022/2

bogdancho gogov

Journal of Criminology

Augustine Kposowa

Mohammad Alrefath

Patrick McNees

Police Discretion: State Practices. Raadhakalyani. k (ed.) Amicus Books Icfai University Press India.

Akintunde Otubu

muweebwa moreen

Sanjiv Phansalkar

Paul Ekblom

Karen L Amendola

International Journal of The Sociology of Law

Jennifer Brown

vedat kargin

Journal of Criminal Justice

Wesley Skogan

Crime and Technology

Gloria Laycock

International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

Dr Dr Motsamai John Modise MJ

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Crime Prediction and Analysis

• February 2020
• Conference: 2020 2nd International Conference on Data, Engineering and Applications (IDEA)

• National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur

• This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations
• Prof. Sonali Pakhmode
• Vanshita Gaikwad
• Bhargavee Talekar
• Vipin Jaiswal
• Noble Thomas
• Anupam Kumar

• R. Ramyadevi

• Ms S Devi Priya
• K Isakkipriya
• Kirandeep Kaur
• Astitva Kumar Sana
• Naman Sharma
• Anitha Julian
• K. Varshini
• K. Tharun Nayak
• K. Anil Kumar
• Manisha M. Patil

• Janardan A. Pawar
• Ibrahim Olabisi Yusuf

• Yaswanth Kumar Raju Konduru
• K. V. Kanimozhi

• Meet Timbadia

• Shiju Sathyadevan

• Surya S Gangadharan

• Nasim Khanahmadliravi

• Xiaoyi Zhang
• A S Malathi
• S. Santhosh Baboo
• James L. LeBeau
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up