essay reflection about contemporary world subject

Essays About the Contemporary World: Top 5 Examples

We live in a very different world from the one our parents lived in; if you are writing essays about the contemporary world, you can start by reading essay examples.

The contemporary world refers to the circumstances and ideas of our current time. From costly conflicts to tremendous political developments to a global pandemic, it is safe to say that the 21st century has been quite chaotic. Recent events have put various issues including bodily autonomy, climate change, and territorial sovereignty, at the forefront of the global discussion.

A good understanding of the contemporary world helps us become more conscious, responsible citizens, no matter what country we are from. Therefore, many schools have included subjects such as “the contemporary world” or “contemporary issues” in their curricula. 

If you wish to write essays about the contemporary world, here are five essay examples to help you. 

You might also be interested in these essays about engineering and essays about cooperation .

1. Our Future Is Now by Francesca Minicozzi

2. what it may be like after the chaos by kassidy pratt, 3. does social media actually reflect reality by kalev leetaru.

• 4.  Importance of English by Terry Walton

5. The Meaning of Life in Modern Society (Author Unknown)

1. the effects of technology, 2. why you should keep up with current events, 3. college education: is it essential, 4. politics in the contemporary world, 5. modern contemporary issues.

Top 5 Examples of Essays About the Contemporary World

“Our globe is in dire need of help, and the coronavirus reminds the world of what it means to work together. This pandemic marks a turning point in global efforts to slow down climate change. The methods we enact towards not only stopping the spread of the virus, but slowing down climate change, will ultimately depict how humanity will arise once this pandemic is suppressed. The future of our home planet lies in how we treat it right now.”

Minicozzi discusses the differences in the U.K.’s and her native U.S.’s approaches to one of today’s greatest issues: climate change. The U.K. makes consistent efforts to reduce pollution, while the U.S., led by President Donald Trump, treats the issue with little to no regard. She laments her homeland’s inaction and concludes her essay with suggestions for Americans to help fight climate change in their way. 

“College began, in-person classes were allowed, but with half the students, all social distanced, wearing a mask at all times. Wearing a mask became natural, where leaving without one felt like I was leaving without my phone. It is our normal for now, and it has worked to slow the spread. With the vaccines beginning to roll out, we all hope that soon things will go back to the way

we remember them a year ago before the pandemic began.”

Pratt reflects on her school life throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in this short essay. She recalls the early days of class suspension, the lockdowns, and the social distancing and mask guidelines. She understands why it has to be this way but remains hopeful that things will return as they once were. 

You might be interested in these essays about cheating .

“While a tweet by Bieber to his tens of millions of followers will no doubt be widely read, it is unlikely that his musings on the Syrian peace process will suddenly sway the warring factions and yield overnight peace. In fact, this is a common limitation of many social analyses: the lack of connection between social reality and physical reality. A person who is highly influential in the conversation on Twitter around a particular topic may or may not yield any influence in the real world on that topic.”

Leetaru criticizes the perception that social media gives users that what they see is an accurate representation of contemporary worldviews. However, this is not the case, as the content that social media shows you are based on your interactions with other content, and specific demographics dominate these platforms. As a result, people should be more aware that not everything they read on social media is accurate. 

4.   Importance of English by Terry Walton

“We can use English to develop ourselves culturally and materially so that we can compete with the best side in the world of mind and matter. We can say that English language is our window to the world. One of advantage is that it is the world most used business and political language. Those who are still unaware about the importance of English. They should start learning English as a time come when everything would be understood spoken and written in English.”

According to author Terry Walton, proficiency in the English language is vital in today’s world. He discusses its status as a lingua franca used by people worldwide. He also lists some of the ways English is used today, such as in business, science and technology, and education. 

“The socialites have ensured the meaning of life is to push their followers beyond their healthy lives by making them feel that they are only worthy of keeping tabs on the next big thing that they are engaging. These socialites have ensured that life has been reduced to the detrimental appraisal of egos. They have guaranteed that the experience of social media is the only life worth living in the modern society.”

This essay describes the idea in contemporary culture that prioritizes social media image over well-being. People have become so obsessed with monitoring likes and follow that their lives revolve around social media. We seldom genuinely know a person based on their online presence. The meaning of life is reduced to the idea of a “good” life rather than the true reality. 

Top Prompts On Essays About the Contemporary World

Technology is everywhere in our life –  in social media, internet services, and artificial intelligence. How do you think technology affects the world today, and how will it affect the future? If this topic seems too broad, you can focus on technology in one particular sector, such as education or medicine. Describe the common technologies used in everyday life, and discuss the benefits and disadvantages of relying on these technologies.

In your essay, you can write about the importance of being aware of whatever is happening in the contemporary world. Discuss lessons you can learn from current events and the advantages of being more conscious or knowledgeable in day-to-day life.

In the 21st century, we have heard many success stories of people who dropped out or did not attend college. In addition, more and more job opportunities no longer require a college degree. Decide whether or not a college education is still necessary in the contemporary world and discuss why. Also include context, such as reasons why people do not attend college.

Many countries have undergone drastic political changes, from coups d’état to wars to groundbreaking elections. In your essay, write about one important political event, global or in your home country, in the contemporary world. Provide context by giving the causes and effects of your chosen event. 

From vaccination to the racial justice movement to gun control. For your essay, you can pick a topic and explain your stance on it. Provide a defensible argument, and include ample evidence such as statistics, research, and news articles. 

Tip: If writing an essay sounds like a lot of work, simplify it. Write a simple 5 paragraph essay instead.

If you’d like to learn more, check out our guide on how to write an argumentative essay .

• Find a course
• Undergraduate study
• Postgraduate study
• MPhil/PhD research
• Short courses
• Entry requirements
• Financial support
• How to apply
• Come and meet us
• Evening study explained
• International Students
• Student Services
• Business Services
• Student life at Birkbeck
• The Birkbeck Experience
• Boost your career
• About Birkbeck
• Contact Birkbeck
• Faculties and Schools
• ReciteMe accessibility

Globalization in the Contemporary World

• Credit value : 30 credits at Level 6
• Convenor : Dr Olivia Sheringham
• Assessment : a 1500-word book review (30%), 3000-word essay (60%) and weekly reading journal (10%)

Module description

‘Globalisation’ is one of the most important intellectual and social phenomena of the contemporary moment, yet its meanings and effects are widely contested. From the financial crisis to climate change, it is clear that local issues can have global impacts, and, equally, global pandemics, corporations, markets and other phenomena impact upon local lives in multiple and uneven ways.

In this module we critically engage with globalisation, exploring some of the key ways in which the concept has been theorised, and how it has been used as a lens through which to understand social change. In addition to engaging with the key debates, we will focus on themes such as urban change, migration and identities, and the globalisation of food and religion. Central to our critical engagement with the concept will be a focus on alternative processes and narratives of globalisation, and we will contemplate what the future of globalisation might look like.

Indicative syllabus

• What is globalisation?
• Economic globalisation, trade and inequality
• Political globalisation: beyond the nation state?
• Cultural globalisation: convergence or hybridity?
• Globalisation from below: social movements and the politics of identity
• Globalisation: postcolonial and decolonial perspectives
• Globalisation, migration and diaspora
• Global geographies of food and religion
• (Anti)globalisation and climate justice
• What future(s) for globalisation?

• No category

GE 3 Contemporary World (BTLEd)

Related documents.

Add this document to collection(s)

You can add this document to your study collection(s)

Add this document to saved

You can add this document to your saved list

Suggest us how to improve StudyLib

(For complaints, use another form )

Input it if you want to receive answer

Teaching History for the Contemporary World: An Introduction

• First Online: 18 April 2021

Cite this chapter

• Jennifer Clark 3 &
• Adele Nye 4  

447 Accesses

History is constantly revised and re-envisioned. How should we teach history to take into account the concerns of our own era? Should history be more than just an interpretation of the past? Should it also be a positive force in the present to create understanding that leads to a better future? This chapter asks whether teaching history comes with added responsibilities, opportunities, difficulties, and challenges if we specifically focus on how we teach the discipline for the contemporary world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Introduction: History Education in Theory, Practice, and the Space in Between

Introduction: Connecting Historical Justice and History Education

Why does changing the orientation of history teaching take so long a case study from finland.

Axelrod, J. (1970). Teaching styles in the humanities. In W. H. Morris (Ed.), Effective college teaching: The quest for relevance (pp. 38–55). American Association for Higher Education.

Google Scholar  

Beineke, J. (2011). Teaching history to adolescents: A quest for relevance. Peter Lang.

Boulianne, S. (2019). Revolution in the making?: Social media effects across the globe. Information, Communication & Society, 22 (1), 39–54.

Article   Google Scholar  

Bryant, W., & Bricknall, S. (2017). Homicide in Australia 2012–2014: National homicide monitoring program report . Australian Institute of Criminology. https://aic.gov.au/publications/sr/sr002 .

Carroll, B. A. (1994). Scholarship and action: CCWHP and the movement(s). Journal of Women’s History, 6 (3), 79–96.

Carroll, B.A. (1999). Three faces of Trevia: Identity, activism, and intellect. In E. Boris & N. Chaudhuri (Eds.), Voices of women historians: The personal, the political, the professional (pp. 13–28). Indiana University Press.

Coleman, L-E. S., & Moore, P. (2019). From the ground up: Grassroots social justice activism in American museums. In R. R. Janes & R. Sandell (Eds.), Museum activism (pp. 91–103). Routledge.

Doucet, M., & Rovers, M. (2010). Generational trauma, attachment, and spiritual/religious interventions. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 15 (2), 93–105.

Eckmann, M. (2010). Exploring the relevance of holocaust education for human rights education. Prospects, 40 (1), 7–16.

Epstein, T. (2018). Section 4 commentary. In T. Epstein & C. L. Peck, (Eds.), Teaching and learning difficult histories in international contexts: A critical sociocultural approach (pp. 247–251). Routledge.

Epstein, T., & Peck C. L. (2018). Introduction. In T. Epstein and C. L. Peck, (Eds.), Teaching and learning difficult histories in international contexts: A critical sociocultural approach (pp. 1–13). Routledge.

Farmer, P. (2004). An anthropology of structural violence. Current Anthropology, 45 (3), 305–335.

First Nations Deaths in Custody. (2020). https://www.commonground.org.au/learn/deaths-in-custody .

Heal, S. (2019). Museums in the age of intolerance. In R. R. Janes & R. Sandell (Eds.), Museum activism (pp. 208–219). Routledge.

Janes, R. R., & Sandell, R. (2019). Posterity has arrived: The necessary emergence of museum activism. In R. R. Janes & R. Sandell (Eds.), Museum activism (pp. 1–22). Routledge.

Johnson, L. B. (1965, March 15). President Lyndon B. Johnson’s speech before Congress on voting rights. https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/march-15-1965-speech-congress-voting-rights .

Kellermann, N. P. F. (2013). Epigenetic transmission of holocaust trauma: Can nightmares be inherited? The Israel Journal of Psychiatry Related Science, 50 (1), 33–39.

Lake, M. (2003). Kay Daniels as feminist historian. Women’s History Review, 12 (2), 149–151.

Lerner, G. (1999). Women among the professors of history: The story of a process of transformation. In E. Boris & N. Chaudhuri (Eds.), Voices of women historians: The personal, the political, the professional (pp. 1–10). Indiana University Press.

Maron, M. (Host). (2015, June 22). Barack Obama. WTF with Marc Maron [Audio Podcast episode]. Episode 613, www.wtfpod.com/podcast/episodes/episode_6123_-_president_barrack_obama .

McCully, A. (2012). History teaching, conflict and the legacy of the past. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 7 (2), 145–159.

Nevett, J. (2019, May 3). The Greta effect?: Meet the schoolgirl climate warriors. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-48114220 .

Obama, B. (2015). President Obama’s speech in Selma. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/03/07/remarks-president-50th-anniversary-selma-montgomery-marches .

Osterberg, G. (2017, December 26). Update on the Twitter Archive at the Library of Congress.  Library of Congress Blog. https://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2017/12/update-on-the-twitter-archive-at-the-library-of-congress-2/ .

Sandell, R., & Janes, R. R. (2019). Preface. In R. R. Janes & R. Sandell (Eds.), Museum activism (n.p.). Routledge.

Sturm, C., & Amer, H. (2013). The effects of social media on revolutions—Perspectives from Egypt and the Arab Spring. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human computer interaction. Users and contexts of Use . 15th International Conference, Proceedings, Part III.

Taylor, A. (2020, July 2). The statues brought down since the George Floyd protests began. The Atlantic . https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2020/07/photos-statues-removed-george-floyd-protests-began/613774/ .

Van Straaten, D., Wilschut, A., & Oostdam, R. (2015). Making history relevant to students by connecting past, present and future: A framework for research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48 (4), 479–502.

Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature . Oxford University Press.

World Economic Forum. (2016, November 9). What do young people care about? We asked 26,000 of them . https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/what-do-young-people-care-about-we-asked-26-000-of-them-741a81cbca16 .

World Health Organisation. (2017, November 29). Violence against women . https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women .

Wright, C. (2016, October 19). How women historians smashed the glass ceiling. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/how-women-historians-smashed-the-glass-ceiling-66778 .

Yehuda, R., Daskalakis, N. P., Bierer, L. M., Bader, H. N., Klengel, T., Holsboer, F., et al. (2016). Holocaust exposure induced intergenerational effects on FKBP 5 methylation. Biological Psychiatry, 80 (5), 372–380.

Zembylas, M. (2018). Teacher resistance towards difficult histories: The centrality of affect in disrupting teacher learning. In T. Epstein and C.L. Peck, (Eds.), Teaching and learning difficult histories in international contexts: A critical sociocultural approach (pp. 189–202). Routledge.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Jennifer Clark

University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Clark .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Clark, J., Nye, A. (2021). Teaching History for the Contemporary World: An Introduction. In: Nye, A., Clark, J. (eds) Teaching History for the Contemporary World. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0247-4_1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0247-4_1

Published : 18 April 2021

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-16-0246-7

Online ISBN : 978-981-16-0247-4

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Contemporary World Subject Guides: Contemporary World Research Paper Resources

• Contemporary World Research Paper Resources
• Junior School Digital Resources
• Middle School, Senior School, and Pre-U Digital Resources
• APA This link opens in a new window
• Chicago This link opens in a new window
• MLA 9 This link opens in a new window

For a full database list with descriptions, click here . 

Resources For Your Essay

These resources have been assembled to help you with your Contemporary World essay. Refer to it often while researching, writing, and citing.

Ask your librarians! We are happy to help.

Using the BAnQ Resources

The Bibliothéque et Archives nationales du Québec is an excellent resource that you can use for your paper.

It is open to all residents of Quebec.

BAnQ Registration Form

Use your school e-mail address to register. You should receive an e-mail with your login within 24 hours and a password by mail within 10 days. If you do not receive this information, fill out this form .

BAnQ Numérique

Purdue owl chicago style guide.

Visit the Purdue OWL's Chicago Style Guide here.

Identifying Media Bias

Use the following resources to help you recognize media bias and identify fake news.

We The Voters - Mediaocracy from Gunpowder & Sky on Vimeo.

• Interactive Media Bias Chart This interactive chart reviews hundreds of news sources to determine if they are biased towards the left, centre, or right.
• All Sides This website analyzes news articles from popular outlets and identifies whether they are biased to the left, center, or right. Search by topic, or browse a dictionary of common terms that have very different meanings and connotations depending on whether left-wing or right-wing journalists use them.
• How to Spot Fake News This site from the Toronto Public Library outlines a number of strategies you can use to identify fake or misleading news.

How to Log in to JSTOR

Junior Library Catalogue Senior Library Catalogue

• Chicago Style Paper Template

Use this template to help you create citations for ANY source you encounter. This template comes from the SUNY Broome Library.

• Next: Digital Resources >>
• Last Updated: May 31, 2024 9:57 AM
• URL: https://lcc-ca.libguides.com/contemporary-world-research-paper

Using the Library

• Library Catalogue

Subject Guides

Project guides, digital resources, reading lists, quick access.

• Junior School Catalog
• Senior School Catalog
• Sora Tutorials
• Sora Web Application
• Citation Guides

Lower Canada College Libraries

514-482-9916 ext. 473

LCC is an English coeducational K-11 school leading to the MEES Secondary Leaving Diploma / LCC est une école anglophone mixte de la maternelle à la 5e secondaire menant au DES du MEES.

• Contributors
• Valuing Black Lives
• Black Issues in Philosophy
• Blog Announcements
• Climate Matters
• Genealogies of Philosophy
• Graduate Student Council (GSC)
• Graduate Student Reflection
• Into Philosophy
• Member Interviews
• On Congeniality
• Philosophy as a Way of Life
• Philosophy in the Contemporary World
• Precarity and Philosophy
• Recently Published Book Spotlight
• Starting Out in Philosophy
• Syllabus Showcase
• Teaching and Learning Video Series
• Undergraduate Philosophy Club
• Women in Philosophy
• Diversity and Inclusiveness
• Issues in Philosophy
• Public Philosophy
• Work/Life Balance
• Submissions
• Journal Surveys
• APA Connect

Philosophy in the Contemporary World: Thinking about Ideology

This series, Philosophy in the Contemporary World, is aimed at exploring the various ways philosophy can be used to discuss issues of relevance to our society. There are no methodological, topical, or doctrinal limitations to this series; philosophers of all persuasions are invited to submit posts regarding issues of concern to them.  Please contact us here if you would like to submit a post to this series.

Lately, I have been thinking a lot about ideology. My thoughts were prompted by remarks by some of my philosopher friends, as well as comments in the mass media, to the effect that Donald Trump does not have an ideology. This claim didn’t sit well with me. I felt that there was something wrong with it, but I didn’t know what, so I decided to dig a little deeper and reconsider what’s meant by “ideology.” I’ve come to some conclusions that might be of interest to readers of this blog.

“Ideology” is an ambiguous term. The meanings of the word are all over the map.  That’s obvious from even a cursory look at the scholarly literature. As the political scientist John Gerring remarked,

Condemned time and again for its semantic excesses, for its bulbous unclarity, the concept of ideology remains, against all odds, a central term of social science discourse.

So the answer to the question of whether or not Trump has an ideology is going to depend on what you mean by “ideology.” If you think of ideology as something like a coherent, well-articulated political Weltanschauung , then it’s probably true that Trump doesn’t have an ideology.  But I don’t think that’s the most useful way to think about ideology.

If ideology is nothing but a political world-view, then why complicate matters by using the already overburdened term “ideology”?   To me, it makes more sense to reserve “ideology” for something that’s not covered by any of the other terms that are currently on the table.  That’s why I’m attracted to what’s known as the functional conception of ideology.

Stripped down to its barest bones, the functional approach states that beliefs (and related practices, institutions, representations, etc.) are ideological if they have the function of promoting oppression. [1]

There’s a problem lurking behind this seemingly clear definition. The problem is that “function” can mean a couple of different things. The function of a thing might be its causal role in a system—it’s what a thing does (for instance, the liver functions to maintain normal blood glucose levels). Call this a causal function .  Alternatively, the function of a thing might be what a thing is for (the liver is for, among other things, maintaining normal blood glucose levels). Call this a teleological function (or teleofunction , for short).

Consider the parts of a washing machine. The agitator is the part of the machine that moves dirty laundry around in the tub. The agitator has the causal function of agitating laundry, because having that effect how the agitator contributes to the capacity of the machine to wash laundry. The teleofunction of the agitator is to agitate laundry, because that’s what the agitator is for.

Don’t these two boil down to the same thing?  No, not really. If the agitator is broken, or there’s a power outage, or there’s some other reason why it can’t agitate the washing, then it no longer produces the right effect and thus loses (temporarily or permanently) its causal function. But it doesn’t lose its teleofunction. A defective agitator still has the purpose of churning the laundry around, because things retain their teleofunctions even if they can’t discharge them. Furthermore, if the causal function of a thing is just the effect that it has, then things can have causal functions accidentally—they produce the effect serendipitously. But this isn’t true of teleofunctions.  A thing can’t just happen to have a certain purpose, because purpose is always a product of design.

Now it’s clear that there are two different ways that we can understand what’s meant by the functional conception of ideology. If ideological beliefs have the causal function of promoting oppression, then it follows that there’s no such thing as a “broken” or dysfunctional ideology. Once a belief no longer promotes oppression, it stops being an ideological belief. The causal approach also allows that beliefs can be accidentally ideological—beliefs count as ideological even if they only coincidentally happen to underwrite oppression. But if ideology has the teleofunction of promoting oppression, this leads to quite a different picture. From the teleofunctional perspective, ideological beliefs have the purpose of producing oppression.  That’s their raison d’etre.   And they have this purpose whether they succeed or fail at bringing oppression about. The teleofunctional approach allows that there are “broken” or causally inefficacious ideologies and it’s incompatible with the idea that beliefs can be accidentally ideological.

I suspect that most philosophers who are attracted to the functional approach think that ideologies have the purpose of promoting oppression, and are comfortable with the idea that there are “broken” or failed ideologies.  Anyone who looks at ideology in this way implicitly prefers the teleological approach to the causal one, and I think that they’re right to do so. To my mind, the teleological interpretation of the functional makes a lot more sense than the causal one.

But the analysis can’t stop here. To develop a clear account of ideology, we need to be able to explain how ideologies get their teleofunctions and to explore what this implies about the nature of ideology. To do this, let’s return to the example of the washing machine for a moment, and consider how the agitator gets its teleofunction.  The answer is straightforward. It gets its teleofunction from the intentions of its designers. The folks who designed the washing machine did so with the intention of making a part for agitating laundry and that explains why the agitator is for agitating laundry.

This sort of explanation isn’t useful for explaining how ideological beliefs get their teleofunctions, because people who embrace ideological beliefs don’t embrace them in order to promote oppression. They don’t say to themselves, or to others, “I will believe such-and-such because it contributes to the oppression of such-and-such a group.”  Rather, they say to themselves, or to others, “I believe such-and-such because it’s true.”  People adopt ideological beliefs because they think that these beliefs are true, so it can’t be the case that ideological beliefs get their teleofunctions from the oppressive intentions of those who adopt them.

I grew up in the Deep South at the tail end of the Jim Crow era. Many of the people that I knew and interacted with were marinated in the ideology of white supremacism. These people held beliefs that promoted the oppression of African Americans, but if you were to ask any one of them why they believed that white people are superior to black people, they would sincerely answer that it is just obviously true that whites are the superior race. Something similar could be said of Nazi anti-Semites.  People like Hitler and Goebbels didn’t just pretend to believe that Jews are evil.  They really believed that it was true.  If you don’t get this point, you are missing something very important about ideology.

If we can’t explain how ideologies get their teleofunctions by citing people’s oppressive intentions, then how can we explain it?  Fortunately, philosophers of biology have already figured this out. We often talk about the purposes of parts of organisms. Eyes are for seeing, wings are for flying, hearts are for pumping blood, and livers are for regulating blood glucose. Unless you’re a certain kind of theist, you’ve got to rule out the idea that these sorts of purposes are derived from anyone’s intentions. But philosophers of biology—most notably, Ruth Millikan—have an alternative explanation at hand.  Millikan argues that to have a non-intentional purpose (or, in her jargon, a “proper function”) a thing must be a member of a reproductive lineage that proliferated because of some effect that was produced by ancestral members of that lineage. It’s this effect fixes the biological purpose of the item. Take eyes. On her analysis, the reason that eyes are for seeing is because (a) eyes are part of a lineage of eyes, and (b) that eyes enabled ancestral organisms to see explains why eyes were reproduced down the generations (this is, of course, a deliberately oversimplified version of a much more complex biological story). Millikan’s analysis can be applied very general: anything that’s part of a lineage (anything that’s a copy, or a copy of a copy) and which was copied because of some effect that it had thereby has a teleofunction. This works for cultural items such as beliefs and practices every bit as much as it works for biological items such as eyes and wings.

So, teleofunctions are fixed historically. The teleofunction of a thing is what its ancestors did to get copied. If we look at ideology through this explanatory lens, we get the following picture.  To count as ideological, beliefs must be copies of earlier beliefs, or copies of copies of earlier beliefs. These earlier beliefs were reproduced because they promoted oppression.

Let me illustrate this using the example of white supremacism.  The doctrine of white supremacism emerged in the context of the transatlantic slave trade. The belief that Africans are inferior to Europeans, and that Africans benefitted from being enslaved (a racialized version of Aristotle’s doctrine of natural slavery), was reproduced because it legitimated the oppression of black people and thereby enabled the beneficiaries of the ideology to accumulate wealth. White supremacism is an ideology because of these historical facts—historical facts that are widely accepted by scholars of racism. What the teleofunctional approach does is to explain how these historical facts make it the case that white supremacism is an ideology.

This analysis of ideology has a wealth of implications, some of which fly in the face of conventional assumptions about ideology. I’ll restrict myself here to considering only four of them. First, the ideological character of a belief can’t be understood psychologically. You can’t discover that you embrace an ideology by introspection or any other psychological means. That’s because the ideologicity of a belief is not a psychological property of it. To recognize that you embrace an ideology you have to track the social-historical pedigree of your beliefs. Second, beliefs don’t have to be false in order to be ideological. The popular idea that ideology necessarily involves “false consciousness” turns out to be misleading.  Ideological beliefs don’t have to misrepresent social reality because it’s possible for true beliefs to spread not because of their truth but rather because they promote oppression. Third, beliefs don’t have to be coherent in order to count as ideological.  It’s sufficient that a person’s beliefs, however incoherent, are products of a certain sort of historical trajectory. Finally, a person can hold oppressive beliefs without these beliefs being ideological, and can also hold ideological beliefs without these beliefs having oppressive consequences. Because a belief’s present-day causal powers can come apart from its history, a belief can have oppressive effects even if it did not proliferate because of those effects, and a belief can have proliferated because of its oppressive effects without currently giving rise to any of these effects.

It should now be evident why I reject the claim that Trump does not have an ideology. Even if Trump doesn’t operate with anything like a coherent framework of political beliefs, the fact that many of his beliefs have an oppressive historical pedigree (for example, those expressed in the slogan “Make America Great Again”) is sufficient to make it the case that they are ideological.  But perhaps it is incorrect to say that Donald Trump—or anybody else, for that matter—has an ideology. In light of the considerations that I’ve presented here, it might be more accurate to say that ideologies have us , for we are all, to some degree, vessels into which the oppressive forces of history have been poured.

[1] Although I talk about ideological beliefs in this essay, this is shorthand.  I don’t think that beliefs can be segregated from the practices that they underpin and that they are underpinned by.

Update: David Livingstone Smith was interviewed about ideology and the politics of fear on “Truth, Politics, and Power” with Neal Conan.  You can listen to the show here .

• David Livingstone Smith

David Livingstone Smith is professor of philosophy at the University Of New England, in Maine. He is author of three books on dehumanization, the most recent of which,  Making Monsters: The Uncanny Power of Dehumanization , was published last year by Harvard University Press.

• Donald Trump
• Editor: Nathan Eckstrand
• philosophy of race
• teleological function

RELATED ARTICLES

The irrational status of the natural, recently published book spotlight: inquiry under bounds, are you anthropomorphizing ai, defining and determining human death, medusa: an undergraduate journal of feminist philosophy, the mystery of consciousness shows there may be a limit to what science alone can achieve.

Two questions:

What’s the difference that makes a difference between Millikan on teleofunctions and Dennett on the design stance? Is it just that Millikan is more forthrightly committed to realism about functions? I was struck by this: “Ideological beliefs don’t have to misrepresent social reality because it’s possible for true beliefs to spread not because of their truth but rather because they promote oppression.” If that’s right then there’s a systematic error that runs through Ideologiekritik from Marx through the Frankfurt School and beyond.

But that raises the question, how does one empirically distinguish between “true beliefs spreading because of their truth” and “true beliefs spreading because they promote oppression”? In short, what happens to the Marxian contrast between science and ideology, given this theory of ideology?

For 1, have a look at the Dennett-Millikan exchange in Dennett’s Philosophy: A Comprehensive Assessment. For 2, yes, I think that the whole “false consciousness” thing is a red herring. It is true that ideologies are likely to be false, but they don’t HAVE to be.

Thanks, David, for sharing your insightful weblog. I particularly like this observation you make on the “character” of an ideological belief: “[T]he ideological character of a belief can’t be understood psychologically. You can’t discover that you embrace an ideology by introspection or any other psychological means. That’s because the ideologicity of a belief is not a psychological property of it. To recognize that you embrace an ideology, you have to track the social-historical pedigree of your beliefs.” When students in my Introduction to Ethics class try to deflect a challenging question by replying, “Well, that’s just what I believe,” I remind them that tyrants of all ages have said the same thing. If we don’t take the time to understand where our beliefs come from, why we hold them, or what social consequences they might entail, then our beliefs have the character of being dogmatic or ideological rather than ethically justified.

For me, the practical meaning of “ideology” or “ideological” should be understood in relation to ethics or axiology more broadly as well as in connection with the “social-historical pedigree” of one’s beliefs. The thread that connects the study of ideology to ethics and social history is the use of institutional/governmental power or authority.

Any political office is therefore “ideological” in a functional sense, even if the person in office is ignorant of the genealogical pedigree of his own political beliefs or views. This kind of ignorance may be a benign fault from an individual standpoint, but it is a vice and a danger for anyone who occupies a political office that can exercise power over others.

Thanks for your kind and thoughtful comments, David.

LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield

Currently you have JavaScript disabled. In order to post comments, please make sure JavaScript and Cookies are enabled, and reload the page. Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Advanced search

Posts You May Enjoy

Apa member interview: russ shafer-landau, on divestiture, steven m. cahn, epistemic doubt: a dream we dreamed one afternoon long ago, reparations: what does benefiting have to do with it, what are you reading…on justice, recently published book spotlight: the chinese liberal spirit.