ib tok essay topics 2024

EXPLAINED: May 2024 TOK Essay Prescribed Titles

What happened to this post? HackIB has been acquired by MyIBTutor . All content is now available on the MyIBTutor Blog with more exciting IB content to come! Click here to see it for yourself!

Looking for November 2024 Session TOK Essay titles? Click here.

TOK Essay Titles – May 2024 Examination Session

The titles for May 2024 are released! Here they are below:

Make sure to bookmark this page as I explain and provide examples for each of these titles in depth! UPDATE: Title 1, 2, 5 and 6 are now available. Stay tuned for more! For general guidance on how to write a good TOK essay, check out my TOK Essay advice collection .

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

This title attempts to challenge students on the main school of thought that you learn over the TOK course. The gist of your TOK teaching on both of these AOKs probably boiled down to something like: everything is art and it’s just whatever the artist wants to create, while history is always biased because the winners always write all of history. However, this eliminates much of the nuance in each of these AOKs that are worth exploring. That’s what makes this prompt interesting.

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts? I will be honest, I never thought we really ‘celebrated’ subjectivity. It just, was. Inherently, art is a subjective exercise – you can think about this point a little further. You will find some heated discussion on whether art is subjective or could it be objective on the internet and I won’t delve into that here, because it isn’t the point of this title. The key here is to focus on the EXTENT of subjectivity and is it to the detriment of the area of knowledge itself. Then, we have to consider, whose subjectivity are we talking about: is it the artist’s subjectivity, or the audience’s subjectivity. For example, the Mona Lisa wasn’t that well known when it was first painted. I’m sure the Da Vinci thought it was quite a nice piece, but it seems like we didn’t really celebrate his subjectivity. It wasn’t until a certain audience found it subjectively good, that we accepted it as one of the greatest pieces of art in the world! That is an example of how subjectivity is relevant in the dissemination of artistic knowledge. For a more modern example, what about your favourite YouTuber? Do they truly make what they want? NO! They are often beholden to sponsors, and you – the audience! What you want to see, is what they will make! So it is YOUR subjectivity that drives their decision to produce art, not necessarily purely their subjectivity. Subjectivity by definition is just a person’s opinions, emotions, thoughts. This connects well with the TOK concept of values. What VALUES and WHOSE values are determining what art is created (in a variety of contexts), how art is perceived, and how art changes in its reception over time? These are all good questions to ponder. For more unconventional examples about art, think about how museums choose what art to display, what constitutes good art for prizes like the Nobel Prize for Literature, or why some art is considered more expensive than others? Are there systematic ways to think about our subjectivity and how we apply it to art? Is it really overly celebrating subjectivity or simply a necessity to make sense of the abundance of artistic knowledge in a sea of information today?

History gets a bad rep in the TOK classroom. Students like to trash on History calling it biased and unreliable. In this prompt, I don’t want you to refute these claims, but just think about how they aren’t necessarily catastrophic as we might think. We aren’t denying that biases in history could be problematic. I would be suspicious too, if the only accounts of the Rohingya Genocide came from the Myanmar military. However, the word condemned in the title suggests that we might be too harsh on historians when they get things wrong. We should focus on how the historical method recovers itself from failures in biases from its sources. Yes, it might be biased, but is it better than no history? Furthermore, does subjectivity actually ADD value to the way we produce, and interpret historical knowledge? While I’m sure a completely objective, news story like report of what happened in 1886 would be a historian’s dream, that isn’t the case! No matter how objective we try to be, we colour the events we experience by our own opinions, feelings and emotions. But isn’t that history in itself? In an almost cliched way, history’s subjectivity tells us more about what happened in the past and their beliefs and values more than words could ever say.

In both the historical and artistic discussions, you should focus more on the methodologies of these AOKs and how they achieve their AOK’s purpose. Subjectivity manifests in different ways in these AOKs and their methodology reflects that. In the overt awareness of subjectivity in the Arts, its method to produce knowledge is characteristically defined by subjectivity. In History, the method is to identify the covert influences of subjectivity, then to produce the most truthful knowledge possible. You can see that the goals of these two are different, and hence they deal with subjectivity differently. Don’t fall in the trap of focusing your discussion too much on your examples, but generalise to the patterns of how subjectivity manifest in your AOKs and whether their treatment of it is problematic.

It is crucial, when writing the essay for this prompt, to clearly define in your introduction what specialisation and generalisation means. DO NOT use the dictionary definitions here – since this is a TOK Essay, you want to make a TOK version of specialisation and generalisation, in terms of how these two things differ in the production of knowledge. Clearly defining the two in this way will form a solid foundation for you to have a nuanced discussion on this process of reconciliation between the two. The prompt hints at the competing demands on knowledge of specialisation and generalisation – i.e. you might not be able to produce knowledge in the same way if you were aiming for specialisation versus generalisation. So, this provides a point of contrast for you to choose examples and frame your discussion. Remember, the idea of competing demands is an ASSUMPTION, not an argument posed by the question. You should focus on how your chosen examples demonstrate a way to balance the interests of both and reach a ‘middle-ground’ rather than arguing that specialisation or generalisation are compatible with each other. TLDR: Don’t challenge the assumption.

For the first AOK of Mathematics, you should have encountered many personal examples just from your study of IB Maths. Most of your learning has been on generalisation, and the application of such generalisations. For instance, you learn about Calculus, a general topic within Mathematics, and then apply it in various contexts. Mathematicians love generalisations – that Calculus you learned? Well, the definition of a derivative generalised for all functions could be summarised by the first principles of derivatives function that HL AA students learn. You would have less interaction with specialisation of Mathematical knowledge. In a broader sense, the specific components of mathematics, cannot be separated from the general. You can’t solve calculus problems without the fundamental theorem of calculus. However, you could argue that the fundamental theorem of calculus didn’t need calculus problems to exist. Thus, an interesting dilemma arises in Mathematics – the generalisation could be produced, without a particular need for specialisation, but specialisation often calls for generalisation to first exist.

Looking at the latest mathematics research, you will find that applied mathematics is most common. Rarely do you see people get excited by new discoveries of solutions to elliptical curves, but more do when you tell them a new mathematical model to improve our prediction of the weather. We may place greater value on specialisation of knowledge, because we could see its usefulness more immediately, but, the Area of Knowledge does not require such specialisation to produce knowledge. So, do we encourage people to produce knowledge with the goal of specialisation in mind, or do we tell them to produce whatever theoretical generalised mathematical knowledge they can? Look to how mathematics is applied to Quantitative Finance, Econometrics, and Actuarial Science. They specialise mathematical knowledge and provide for some of the most lucrative careers. Does that speak to our preference and demand for specialised knowledge? But then again, what of the interdependence between generalisation and specialisation? How do we balance the two and how does the methodologies of the AOK contribute to this balancing act?

For the second, complimentary AOK, you could have discussions with all of the AOKs. For the Sciences, you could present a similar argument about needing to have some general theories before you could specialise. The scientific method is essentially one big generalisation process – you take specific observations and you make inferences so that you can generalise about some natural process. However, the knowledge that produces need not be general, it can still be specific. If we take specialisation as the goal, then we could pose narrow hypotheses to test. If we take generalisation as the goal, then we might need multiple of these narrow hypotheses to form a full picture, testing each individual case. Thus, specialisation could lead to specialisation alone, but more often, generalisation is the result of many specialisations.

One last question you might want to consider and attempt to answer in your essay is, do you want to know something about everything or everything about something? The answer to that will depend on your AOK. While we want to know about everything on everything, that is simply not reality. So, what trade offs do we make in each AOK, and how does each AOK decide on what we need to know more on?

You might be able to appreciate how long it takes ideas to actually be implemented in reality by looking at the recent Nobel Prize winners for Economic Sciences. The winner of the 2017 prize was Richard H. Thaler, for his contributions to behavioural economics. He explored the impacts of limited rationality, social preferences and the lack of individual self-control on economic decision making on an individual and market level. He started these findings from the 1980s, but it is only recently, in the 2022 revision of the IB syllabus that Economics students learn about the field of Behavioural economics in any detail! So why is it so?

To some extent, it is hard to criticise things for moving slowly. After all, new discoveries like behavioural economics represents a fundamental paradigm shift towards the way research is conducted in the particular AOK. Often times, fresh ideas are left to “ferment” so that their truthfulness can be tested with time. Nothing is more embarrassing than going down a rabbit hole only to find that your assumptions turned out to be monumentally incorrect. Even if we are making a big shift in light of new ideas towards the way we produce knowledge, doing so takes time! For many years and still now, we rely on strong assumptions of rationality to make economic models function. While the psychology of such behaviours are well researched, applying them to an Economic setting may not be. That is to say, it is important to consider how these new ideas arise, and what effect it has on existing knowledge, and the way we produce future knowledge. New ideas is simply new knowledge, but with the added implication that it has some effect on the existing knowledge within an AOK. It could potentially change how we view current knowledge, or how we conduct research given a particular discovery.

In the AOK of the human sciences, which broadly follows the scientific method, you could drawn some inspiration from the philosopher Thomas Kuhn’s view of scientific progress. He argues that within a period of “normal science” where we make incremental progress under the assumption of an overarching model, but there comes a point where we notice accumulation of imperfections with such a model that leads to new paradigms – new ideas, that fundamentally change how we do science. Then we undergo a sort of scientific revolution, where there are debates and decisions made over what sort of model we need to follow, until everyone eventually accepts the new paradigm and returns to a normal science period so that continual small improvements are made to knowledge, until another paradigm shift happens again. While you are not expected to demonstrate such strong philosophy knowledge within the TOK Essay, it is helpful to consider how each AOK handles such ‘revolutions’. For instance, it is harder to irrefutably find falsities in human sciences given the difficulty in replicability and corroborative studies compared to natural sciences.

As for complimentary AOKs, any would suit here, as each AOK has a very different way to handle new ideas. Many factors influence the way new ideas is accepted. For this title, we need to take the assumption that their acceptance is slow, not argue with it. Instead, you should consider what factors influence this slowness, and how different AOKs have different factors in mind when deciding how to accept new ideas. This relates to the nature of the AOK (what is its purpose) and the methodology guiding knowledge production in them.

Have you ever said something that sounds very weird out of context? That might have just been something silly with no real consequences, but in the realm of knowledge, we need to be careful about the consequences of knowledge taken out of their original context. This article highlights how the context of medical treatment matters a lot! As you can imagine, something that works in one field, doesn’t always apply in a straightforward manner to another. This is why there are whole research teams dedicated to what we call “translational research”. That is, trying to “translate” what you get from something like a lab setting, into actual products, like life-saving medications.

The obvious links to AOKs here are the Natural and Human Sciences. For Natural Sciences, we often start off knowledge production in a lab setting, or in a controlled environment. However, the application of such knowledge is rarely as controlled! So an interesting point to consider is how natural scientists have to account for the fact that their findings won’t ever be used in as perfect a setting as their research. Sure, you might have developed bullet proof wood , but how is that going to work in practically when it comes to mass manufacturing it for the army or the police? This is one of the biggest challenges that natural scientists face. It’s not that we aren’t trying to produce exciting knowledge, but that the application of such knowledge in a practical and appreciable context is often very difficult. Something like the mRNA technology (which recently was awarded a Nobel) took a long time to be developed into actual vaccines. The question then is, do we underestimate this process? Often it depends on the goal of the scientist. If the knowledge producer set out with an idea to commercialise in mind, then they would often consider the practical implications of findings. However, people studying theoretical physics for example, would struggle to immediately find very accessible real life implications. That doesn’t mean the knowledge is worthless, but certainly, the challenges are there.

What about non-scientific disciplines? Recently, I went to an art exhibition that trend Van Gough’s paintings into a 3D digital display. There was a Banksy exhibition that took the original murals he painted on the street, into this museum environment. Does changing the context of how art work is shown, and the manipulation of artistic knowledge change its meaning? What is the goal of transforming art into a different context? There are many reasons. Sometimes, it is to create satire (have a look at the parodies of the Mona Lisa), bringing old art onto a new audience (like VR exhibitions of Da Vinci), or simply making it more accessible to people (by making art works digitally available). The producers of these adapted forms of knowledge take great care in considering how this impacts the meaning of the art in its changed form. When artwork is so subjective, the context of art is often required to understand the artist’s meaning and intention, to ‘interpret’ works accordingly. At the same time, as we know art is quite subjective, is a ‘correct interpretation’ always required? If we are to remain artistic purists, then many of the joys of art could be lost! Imagine if you were admonished for listening to Taylor Swift through Spotify on your AirPods because it isn’t the original uncompressed music file with all the details, and you aren’t listening to it on the exact set of thousand dollar speakers it was created with? It would be ludicrous to assume that artistic knowledge is always going to be disseminated in the same context. Thus, this must be a consideration of artists. Is this consideration more or less difficult for different types of art? How is this consideration different to science considering there is no ‘right’ answer to interpreting art?

When thinking about this title, we aren’t arguing whether it is difficult. I think we all agree it is. However, it is about whether we underestimate just how difficult it is! Center your focus on how each AOK’s methodology highlights the consideration of being able to change contexts, and whether that affects the interpretation of the knowledge in question.

The term ‘custodians of knowledge’ is not something TOK students have likely heard of before, but this concept is relatively simple to understand. If you think positively about it, it could be protectors of knowledge, people who preserve knowledge, keeping it for generations to come – for example, some people might consider the Indigenous Peoples’ in Australia to be custodians of their unique cultural knowledge and what they call dreamtime stories. In this way, they keep culture alive, even if most people nowadays speak English and don’t readily tell their history. However, thought about negatively, it could also mean “gatekeepers’ (pardon the Gen Z language) of knowledge. The idealogical “protection” of knowledge could also be seen as a way to prevent some forms of knowledge from becoming knowledge in the first place. Talk to any university academic, and they will tell you how many times their research papers have been rejected. That’s why there is a bias towards statistically significant results, while research that showed that nothing significant has happened doesn’t often get published. Thus, these two contrasts provide for interesting discussion, particularly when considering how each AOK has different forms of custodians of knowledge and how they “gatekeep” or “protect” knowledge in different ways.

Take the AOK of the arts as an example. The career of artists are laughed upon because it is so hard to “break in” to the fine world of art. Many artists aren’t acclaimed until they are long dead. Perhaps most famously, the Mona Lisa wasn’t very well known until several hundred years after it was made. Thus, artists are often at the mercy of custodians of artistic knowledge like art curators and critics, who decide what merits acknowledgement as knowledge. After all, knowledge is only knowledge when there is consensus it is. And if the big wigs in the art industry doesn’t think it’s worth a mention, your art, however brilliant it seems to you, would not reach the consensus required to be considered knowledge. Of course, there are debates on the necessity of custodians in such a subjective AOK. After all, there were many times I questioned how some “artworks” even made it into the modern art museum when it’s literally splashes of paint on a canvas. I digress. However, there is something to be said about maintaining some form of standard to art. We judge whether some art is good or bad, but not in a very rigorous way. Custodians of knowledge supposedly have a framework to make such judgement in a way which preserves the nature of the AOK, and the knowledge within it. Therefore, discussion about the necessity of the custodians should focus on how they contribute to the purpose of the AOK, and whether it is compatible with the nature and methodologies of the AOK.

To further illustrate what I mean, you could see that Natural Sciences might present a stronger argument to the necessity of such custodians. We implicitly “trust” science, for better or for worse, because we know that there is a level of credibility imbued by the scientific method. It is the custodians’ role to maintain the standard of adherence to the scientific method that keeps this credibility alive. This is why, when flat earthers argue that they can’t see the curvature of the earth from the horizon, that it doesn’t get published in a scientific journal as fact! This is why, when research emerges that denies the existence of climate change, custodians have a responsibility to retract such research . However, at the same time, it also places much pressure on producers of such knowledge to create something worthy in the eyes of custodians. You might have heard of the data manipulation scandal that forced Stanford’s president to resign. Thus, custodians do appear quite important in this AOK, when we value the truthfulness of knowledge so much, but that isn’t without its consequences.

I recommend picking two contrasting AOKs that value much different things when writing the essay. While comparison is not a requirement for the essay, it gives you a more nuanced understanding of the question and thus a more reflective piece. For instance, we have just demonstrated that art is relatively subjective, while the sciences are less so. Thus, this influences the role which custodians need to play in each AOK.

The framework to answering this title for many students will follow a similar structure: an example of when novel evidence was accepted and had groundbreaking impacts, and another example where such evidence was problematic and disputed. Repeat this for the second AOK you choose and you’ll have 4 contrasting examples. This is not the only way to approach this title, but is my personal preference considering the structure I suggest to most students that ensures firstly, you will pass the basic criteria of a TOK Essay, and secondly, you will have a strong foundation to succeed. However, since everyone will have a similar style and collection of examples, it is even more important for this title, that you tease out the meaning and the effect on each area of knowledge, and knowledge in general, that your examples represent.

To demonstrate what I mean, let’s focus on two natural sciences examples. First, consider the case of “Cold Fusion”, a theory that you could supposedly have nuclear fusion at room temperature, discovered and subsequently debunked in 1989. A contrasting example, could be recent Nobel Prize winner of Medicine and Physiology, for the research on mRNA vaccines. Immediately, it is obvious that one shows where recent evidence isn’t the strongest, while the latter shows that it could be. But the focus should be on are we TOO QUICK in assuming so, not whether we should or not. Well, what are the reactions and timelines for each example? While Cold Fusion was met with excitement from the general public for the potential it holds for energy production, I wouldn’t say we ‘assumed’ it to be strong. Looking at the news reports from that time, you can see that there was great anticipation about the discovery, leading to lots of sudden funding and interest to investigate it and replicate it. As for mRNA, that discovery took a long time! First the technology, and the getting it to not appear foreign to the human body was very tricky. Even after it was discovered, we waited quite a while, with many people’s first experience with mRNA to be their COVID 19 vaccine. What you need to draw from these two examples is the methodological similarities and differences which reflect the NATURE of Science, and thus, the purpose of science. You see in both how there is an emphasis on replication which corroborates or falsifies, and only after doing so for a long time do we accept it to be true, otherwise it is debunked. So yes, there are moments where Natural Sciences provides strong compelling evidence that ends up false, there are many hurdles with in the methodology of the Natural Science that prevents us from being TOO QUICK to assume it to be true.

For this prompt, it is too easy to fall into the debate of why something was true or why something was false and tricked the population. This is not the point of the essay. You should avoid talking about the specifics of your examples at length. You need to demonstrate how your examples reflect the wider methodologies of the Natural Sciences (and similarly, for your second AOK) that either encourages or discourages our assumptions that novel evidence is always best. As you can see from my examples above, I focused on how such assumption does not happen too quickly because there are many ways we verify scientific knowledge to be true. I don’t discuss the specifics of the actual science behind Cold Fusion or mRNA as that isn’t required. You are better off focusing on the methodologies behind the AOKs themselves and answering the question.

Some interesting complements to the Natural Science AOK could be History (particularly focusing on revisionism and how historical events could be interpreted differently over time), Mathematics (how could the methodologies differ and are there ‘mistakes’ in Maths), or even Human Sciences (replication is a bit more difficult with that!).

Share this:

20 responses to “explained: may 2024 tok essay prescribed titles”.

Hi, when will you deconstruct #6? Much appreciated.

I just did! Hope it helps.

Thank you so much!

hello! when will you deconstruct #2? would really really appreciate it !!!

Just posted!

Hi when will you deconstruct No. 5? Much appreciated.

Could you please deconstruct no5. ?

Check it out!

Please Please deconstruct 5 ASAP, first draft due in 5 days!!!! Thanks!

I just did! It’s a very interesting title.

Hi, when will you deconstruct #3? Much appreciated.

I have just posted this. Thanks!

Hi, when will you deconstruct #4? Thanks!

Just updated!

Hi, is there more in depth analysis of title 4 coming?

Sorry it took a while, but it’s here now!

I have a question, for PT3, so what will be our possible counterclaim? is it another factor that will make it slow? or find another RLS that show sometimes fresh ideas can be adopted fast ?

I would reread the prescribe title. The title is asking you “why”. So all you need to do is propose different sorts of reasons as to why this slowness occurs. You don’t need to challenge the assumption within the title that it is slow. Accept that it is slow, and propose various ideas for why that is the case according to the properties of your chosen AOK.

Could you explain how you would format number One. Would I only be talking about two examples one for each AOK and what about them? Introduction, aok 1 and aok2 and conclusions

For sure! You should refer to my article on structuring for TOK Essay for more details. In general though, you can approach this prompt with two examples for each AOK, with one example about subjectivity being overly celebrated, and one not in the arts, while for history, it would be one where it is condemned unfairly vs not.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

Extended Essay Writers

May 2024 TOK Essay Titles. Short Descriptions & Tips for Writing

Luke MacQuoid

Hello, IB students! As a seasoned IB writer, I’m thrilled to share my insights on the intriguing May 2024 TOK essay titles. Having walked the complex world of Theory of Knowledge, I understand the challenges and excitement that come with these essays. Let’s dig into each title by offering practical strategies and psychological hooks to make your TOK path rewarding and enjoyable.

What Are TOK Essay Titles?

So, Theory of Knowledge essay titles are prompts provided by the International Baccalaureate (IB) Organization for students enrolled in the IB Diploma Programme. These prompts form the basis for the TOK essay, a core component of the IB curriculum. Here’s a bit more about them:

• The TOK essay encourages students to reflect on the nature of knowledge and how we come to know what we claim to know. It’s an exercise in critical thinking and philosophical inquiry designed to challenge students’ understanding of knowledge.
• Typically, the IB provides a list of prescribed titles for each exam session. These titles are carefully formulated questions covering various knowledge, understanding, and belief topics.
• The questions often require students to draw upon different Areas of Knowledge (AOKs) — such as the Natural Sciences, Human Sciences, History, or the Arts — and Ways of Knowing (WOKs) like Language, Emotion, Reason, or Sense Perception. The essay prompts students to analyze and evaluate knowledge claims, considering their validity and the role of perspective.
• In writing the essay, students are expected to engage with the title critically and thoughtfully, often drawing on real-life situations (RLS) or personal experiences to illustrate their points. The essay should demonstrate the student’s ability to think deeply about knowledge and its implications.
• The TOK essay is externally assessed and contributes to the overall score of the IB Diploma. It is evaluated based on criteria that include understanding of knowledge issues, critical thinking, organization and analysis, and clarity of expression.

In essence, the TOK essay titles serve as a starting point for deep and reflective research of how we know what we know, and they play a crucial role in developing critical thinking and analytical skills in IB students. By the way, we have previously reviewed the November 2023 TOK essay titles .

May 2024 TOK Essay Titles: An Overview

Having established a solid foundation, let’s focus on the six engaging TOK essay titles for May 2024. Additionally, our blog offers numerous informative articles. We suggest checking out our piece on the TOK and EE matrix for more valuable insights.

1. Is Subjectivity Overly Celebrated in the Arts but Unfairly Condemned in History?

Discuss with reference to the Arts and History.

In my opinion, the first title probes the intriguing contrast in how we perceive subjectivity in the arts and history. AOKs like Visual Arts or Music and WOKs like Emotion and Imagination come into play for the arts. Conversely, in history, we lean on Reason and Language. A riveting RLS could be the differing interpretations of historical events in movies or paintings. Here’s a tip: balance your essay with examples showing both the necessity and pitfalls of subjectivity in these fields.

2. How Can We Reconcile the Opposing Demands for Specialization and Generalization in the Production of Knowledge?

Discuss with reference to Mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

Next, we tackle the delicate balance between specialization and generalization. Particularly, let’s focus on mathematics and other areas like Ethics. Mathematics thrives on specialization – think of the precise nature of algorithms. In Ethics, however, a more generalized approach often prevails. From my experience, a compelling RLS could involve the ethical implications of AI in mathematical problems. My suggestion? Highlight the benefits and drawbacks of both approaches in producing knowledge.

3. Nothing Is More Exciting than Fresh Ideas, So Why Are Areas of Knowledge Often So Slow to Adopt Them?

Discuss with reference to the Human Sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Nothing excites me more than fresh ideas, yet they’re often slow to be adopted. This title invites us to examine this paradox in the human sciences and another area, say, Natural Sciences. Consider the slow acceptance of psychological theories or environmental concerns. As I know it, the key here is to research the resistance and eventual acceptance of new ideas, using specific examples that demonstrate this dynamic.

4. Do We Underestimate the Challenges of Taking Knowledge out of Its Original Context and Transferring It to a Different Context?

Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Now, let’s ponder the underestimated challenges of transferring knowledge across contexts. My advice? Choose two contrasting areas: Ethics and Physics. Discuss how ethical principles might struggle to find relevance in physical theories or vice versa. This title requires a nuanced understanding of the limitations and potentials of knowledge application.

5. Do We Need Custodians of Knowledge?

Do we need custodians of knowledge? This title pushes us to think about who controls knowledge and why. For instance, consider the role of peer review in Natural Sciences and the guardians of historical narratives in History. According to general IB criteria, debating the positive and negative aspects of having knowledge custodians is crucial.

6. Are We Too Quick to Assume That the Most Recent Evidence Is Inevitably the Strongest?

Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Lastly, we question our tendency to favor recent evidence. In areas like Biology and History, this can be particularly prevalent. From my experience, a great RLS could involve new archaeological findings versus established historical narratives. Using solid examples and critical analysis, challenge the assumption that new is always better.

The Best Writing Tips for TOK Essays

Drawing on my extensive experience as an IB writer, I’m here to offer you some insider tips for writing a successful Theory of Knowledge essay. The essence of an excellent paper lies in the fusion of critical thinking, deep personal reflection, and solid academic argumentation. Let’s look at some strategies for improving your writing.

Personal Insight and Scholarly Perspectives

In my opinion, the most compelling TOK essays are those that masterfully blend personal insights with academic viewpoints. This balancing act is not always straightforward but achievable with the right approach. Here’s what I’ve learned:

• Begin with a personal observation or experience that intrigued you. It can serve as a powerful springboard into a broader academic discussion. For instance, a personal encounter with a scientific phenomenon could lead to research of scientific theories.
• Critically assess your personal experiences. It’s important to scrutinize and question your experiences, not just narrate them. Ask yourself how these experiences illuminate more significant concepts or ideas within the TOK framework.
• Correlate your reflections with established knowledge. As I know from experience, an essay that weaves personal insights with academic research stands out. Make sure to support your insight with scholarly evidence or theories.

Remember, your TOK essay is an opportunity to showcase your ability to think critically and reflect deeply on the nature of knowledge.

Writing a Clear and Cohesive TOK Essay

According to general IB criteria, clarity and coherence are non-negotiable in a TOK essay. A clear, well-structured essay not only demonstrates your understanding but also engages and convinces your reader. Here are some techniques I’ve found useful:

• Create a detailed essay outline before you start writing. It will help organize your thoughts and ensure each paragraph connects seamlessly to the next.
• Steer clear of unnecessary jargon and overly complex language. Simplicity is often more powerful.
• Each paragraph should serve a purpose. It should either introduce a new idea or build upon the previous one, all contributing to your overarching argument.

Need help with your IB TOK essay?

From research and analysis to structuring and editing, our skilled mentors will be by your side, helping you write an exceptional TOK essay that meets the word count and stringent IB criteria.

From my experience, these strategies will improve the quality of your TOK essay and make the writing process more enjoyable and fulfilling. Also, you can consult with your teacher or supervisor .

Addressing Counterarguments in Your TOK Essay

An aspect that often distinguishes an excellent TOK essay from a good one is the ability to address counterarguments effectively. This skill demonstrates not only depth of understanding but also critical engagement with the essay topic. In my years of writing and mentoring IB students, I’ve gathered some insights on how to do this effectively:

• Begin by thinking about possible objections or alternate viewpoints to your argument. From experience, understanding different perspectives enhances your argument’s depth and shows your ability to engage critically with the topic.
• More than just a counterargument is needed; you should integrate it into your discussion. It means examining how it interacts with your original argument. From my experience, a well-integrated counterargument can strengthen your position by showing you’ve considered multiple angles.
• There are two main ways to deal with a counterargument: refute it with evidence and reasoning or reconcile it with your argument, finding a middle ground. Choose the approach that most effectively strengthens your essay, depending on the situation.

Remember, TOK is about exploring knowledge, not just defending a position. As such, encountering and addressing counterarguments can be a valuable learning experience, offering insights you might not have considered otherwise.

The Bottom Line

May 2024 TOK essay titles are not just academic exercises. They’re gateways to deeper understanding and critical thinking. My parting advice? Be bold in your assertions, critical in your analysis, and most importantly, enjoy the intellectual research. Good luck, scholars! Also, remember that you can always contact our IB writers if you need help with the TOK essay .

Luke MacQuoid has extensive experience teaching English as a foreign language in Japan, having worked with students of all ages for over 12 years. Currently, he is teaching at the tertiary level. Luke holds a BA from the University of Sussex and an MA in TESOL from Lancaster University, both located in England. As well to his work as an IB Examiner and Master Tutor, Luke also enjoys sharing his experiences and insights with others through writing articles for various websites, including extendedessaywriters.com blog

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

15% OFF your first IB order using the code

May 2024 TOK Essay Prompts | IB Experts Guide + Examples

Table of contents

• Writing Metier

The TOK essay prescribed titles for May 2024 are now available.  Understanding these TOK essay prompts is essential for IB students aiming for a successful essay. This is why I’m writing this article with expert suggestions from our IB experts for you.

UPD… November 2024 TOK titles released !

I do not want to spend your precious time with a long introduction, so let me go straight to the point!

May 2024 TOK essay titles list

Here’s a breakdown of each title, offering insights and potential approaches.

• Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history?  Discuss with reference to the arts and history.
• How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge?  Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.
• Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them?  Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.
• Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context?  Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
• Do we need custodians of knowledge?  Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
• Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest?  Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Get TOK essay assistance from IB experts

At Writing Metier, we understand the intricacies and challenges of crafting a compelling TOK essay . Our team of seasoned IB experts is here to guide you every step of the way for Custom TOK Essay

We will provide you with a tailor-made sample TOK essay that aligns seamlessly with your specific instructions, adheres to the TOK essay rubric , and meets the overarching IB criteria. 

Trust in our expertise and let us support you in achieving excellence in your TOK essay writing .

Breakdown of each 2024 May TOK Essay Prompt

Now, let me break each TOK essay title for May 2024 in detail. I’ll also suggest several possible areas of knowledge, ways of knowing and applicable real-life examples to give you some inspiration for these prompts.

Let’s begin!

TITLE 1:   Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

Examine the role of emotion and intuition WOKs in the arts, where personal interpretations often lead to diverse artistic expressions. 

For instance, Picasso’s abstract art is open to multiple interpretations. Contrast this with history, where reason and language WOKs play a pivotal role in documenting events. 

For example, while historians value primary sources for their objectivity, they often criticize biased accounts.

TITLE 2:   How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

In mathematics, specialization might refer to mastering a specific theorem, while generalization involves understanding broader mathematical principles. 

For instance, Pythagoras’ theorem is specialized, but its application in various real-life scenarios , like architecture, is a generalization. Contrast this with the natural sciences, where specialized knowledge might refer to niche research studies, while general knowledge encompasses broader scientific theories.

TITLE 3:   Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

In human sciences, new psychological theories, for instance, undergo rigorous testing and peer reviews before acceptance. This slow adoption ensures reliability. 

Contrast this with ethics, where new moral ideas, like those concerning AI’s rights, face resistance due to cultural and societal values, making their adoption slow.

TITLE 4:   Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

In religious knowledge systems, scriptures taken out of their historical context can lead to misinterpretations. 

For instance, ancient religious texts might not directly apply to modern ethical dilemmas. 

Similarly, in the arts, a piece of art created in a specific cultural context might lose its original meaning when viewed in a different cultural setting.

TITLE 5:   Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

In indigenous knowledge systems, elders often act as custodians, preserving traditions and stories for future generations. Their role ensures that knowledge is not lost over time. 

In contrast, academic journals and institutions act as custodians in the natural sciences, ensuring that scientific knowledge is recorded, peer-reviewed, and accessible for future research.

TITLE 6:   Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

In the natural sciences, newer research, such as recent findings on climate change, might be considered more accurate due to advanced technology and methodologies. However, it’s essential to consider the reliability and validity of these findings. 

In history, newer historical evidence, like a recently discovered manuscript, might shed light on an event, but its authenticity and context must be verified.

Now let me share some samples written by our expert IB writers at Writing Metier.

Breathe Easy! We’re Handling Your Paper

• Polished Papers : Styled right, glitch-free
• Ask Away : Direct chat with your writer
• Free Goodies : Revisions, title page, and bib
• Fair Prices : Plus a money-back guarantee
• All Human : No AI, just real experts
• Private & Secure : Your details, our secret

Bye-Bye, Burnout!

Slash 15% OFF using the coupon code: BLG15WM

May 2024 TOK essay samples

Let’s start with the sample of the TOK essay on May 2024 prompt 2 – How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge?

If you need a professionally written TOK essay, feel free to ask for help from our IB experts.

If you have missed it, I also have an article about prior TOK essay titles with suggestions and samples. Make sure to check them out as well!

The year 2023:

• November 2023 TOK essay prompts
• May 2023 TOK essay titles

The year 2022:

• November 2022 TOK essay prompts
• May 2022 ToK essay titles

Previous years’ prompts:

• November 2021 ToK Essay titles
• May 2021 Theory of Knowledge essay prompts

With a clear understanding of these TOK titles, IB students are well-prepared to select a topic and begin their essay. 

Need a Dope Paper Written? We've Got Your Back!

Keep in mind that the key to a compelling TOK essay is a thorough understanding of the chosen prompt and a structured approach to addressing it.

If you need assistance writing a custom TOK essay , Writing Metier is here to help you out. Contact our support team via email or using a live chat or simply fill out our online order form with details of your IB TOK essay.

Free topic suggestions

Vasy kafidoff.

Vasyl Kafidoff is a co-founder and CEO at WritingMetier. He is interested in education and how modern technology makes it more accessible. He wants to bring awareness about new learning possibilities as an educational specialist. When Vasy is not working, he’s found behind a drum kit.

Similar posts

November 2024 tok essay prompts explained + samples.

This article is a complete guide to the November 2023 TOK essay prompts, which includes detailed explanations of each prompt along with samples to help students understand them better. It offers practical advice and expert guidance to help students improve their writing skills and succeed in this important assignment. Whether you need help selecting a topic or want to enhance your critical thinking skills, this article provides valuable insights that will help you craft a successful TOK essay.

IB ToK Essay Prompts for November 2024

Every year, students who started IBDP are waiting for IB to share the list of specific prescribed titles for Theory of Knowledge essays. Like in all the previous years, IB opened a list of six topics for TOK essays for the next semester.

ToK Essay Titles November 2024 | Explained + SAMPLES

In this article, we will be talking about the six Theory of knowledge essay topics students enrolled in the IB diploma need to be aware of. Just like every year, this TOK November’s topics vary in different elements, and in this article, we will share descriptions about each topic which the students need to keep in their minds when selecting the essay topic for their diplomas.

30 Different TOK Presentation Topic Ideas to Succeed in IB

Given that the TOK essay's structure and the presentation are unlike others, students can find it challenging to proceed with it. You can only do well on the TOK presentation if you have an excellent idea.

May 2023 TOK Essay Prompts + SAMPLES and Suggestions

Every year, students anxiously wait for the IB to announce the TOK essay topics. So this year is not an exception; IBO has also announced 2023 May titles for IB TOK essay. In this article, we have provided the list of prompts with short directions and suggestions for each topic. Enjoy reading ;)

TOK Exhibition IA Prompts 2023/2024

The list of TOK exhibition prompts for the years 2023/2024. You can easily get through the TOK exhibition with the right understanding of how to work your way through it. All you need is to select the right TOK exhibition IA prompt and have the proper focus with determination to complete it.

We rely on cookies to give you the best experince on our website. By browsing, you agree to it. Read more

• [email protected]
• Get 21% OFF . Use the code: FIRST21

2024 November TOK Essay Prompts | How to Write Them?

Hello, budding scholars! As an experienced IB writer, I’ve often faced the intellectual hardships of the Theory of Knowledge essays. Today, I’m excited to share insights on tackling the November 2024 TOK essay prompts. Let’s look at all prompts with a keen eye on the latest updates and my wealth of experience in the IB DP curriculum .

What Are 2024 November TOK Essay Titles?

A TOK essay prompt or title is a carefully formulated question that challenges you to think deeply about the nature of knowledge and how we come to understand and interpret the world around us. As an experienced IB writer, I’ve found these prompts essential in developing critical thinking and encouraging students to evaluate different perspectives and methods of acquiring knowledge.

From my experience, each TOK essay prompt is structured to investigate specific areas of knowledge (AOKs) and ways of knowing (WOKs), requiring you to draw on real-life situations and personal insights. It helps develop a nuanced understanding and enhances your ability to apply theoretical knowledge practically.

So, the IB has rolled out thought-provoking prompts for November 2024. Each question invites you to examine knowledge through various AOKs. Here’s a quick overview:

• Does our responsibility to acquire knowledge vary according to the area of knowledge? Discuss with reference to history and one other area of knowledge.
• In the production of knowledge, is ingenuity always needed but never enough? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.
• How might it benefit an area of knowledge to sever ties with its past? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
• To what extent do you agree that there is no significant difference between hypothesis and speculation? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.
• In the production of knowledge, are we too quick to dismiss anomalies? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
• In the pursuit of knowledge, what is gained by the artist adopting the lens of the scientist and the scientist adopting the lens of the artist? Discuss with reference to the arts and the natural sciences.

Remember, according to general IB criteria, a well-written TOK essay should not merely summarize existing knowledge but engage with the prompt critically and creatively. It’s about questioning our assumptions and considering various viewpoints, which can sometimes be contradictory or challenging. The good news is that you don’t have to do it alone because you can always turn to our experienced IB writers for help with your TOK essay .

2024 November TOK Essay Prompts in Details

For those entering the world of epistemology , these essays are your playground for intellectual investigation. In keeping with the general IB criteria, understanding and responding accurately to your essay prompts is crucial. This year’s titles challenge you to think critically about knowledge itself, from its acquisition to its production. So, let’s look at what each entails and how you can excel in writing them.

You Might Also Like:

• TOK Exhibition Word Count
• TOK Essay Word Count
• How to Write TOK Essay in One Week
• IB TOK Essay Structure in Detail
• What Is Theory of Knowledge in IB?
• AOKs in IB TOK
• 12 TOK Key Concepts with Examples
• The Human Sciences AOK in TOK
• The Natural Sciences AOK and Its Significance in TOK

1. Does our responsibility to acquire knowledge vary according to the area of knowledge?

Discuss with reference to history and one other area of knowledge.

As I know, the rigorous validation of historical sources often contrasts sharply with the more subjective, philosophical debates in ethics. This difference fundamentally affects how knowledge is validated and challenges in these fields:

• AOKs . History, Ethics
• WOKs . Memory, Reason
• RLS . Consider the study of historical events like the Holocaust versus ethical debates on euthanasia.

In my experience, contrasting these AOKs helps illuminate the varying responsibilities. Historians rely heavily on documented evidence (memory), while ethicists often argue based on moral reasoning. Discuss how these responsibilities shape our understanding and the implications of neglecting them.

2. In the production of knowledge, is ingenuity always needed but never enough?

Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

From my observations, the burst of creativity in arts often precedes formal recognition and understanding, similar to the initial skepticism that meets new mathematical theories:

• AOKs . Mathematics, Arts
• WOKs . Imagination, Intuition
• RLS . Mathematical theories that revolutionized understanding, like Einstein’s theory of relativity, versus innovative art movements such as Surrealism.

Highlight the necessity of ingenuity in pushing boundaries and limits without rigorous validation in mathematics or emotional resonance in arts. Use examples to discuss how creativity initiates ideas but requires more to be entirely accepted and integrated into the knowledge framework.

3. How might it benefit an area of knowledge to sever ties with its past?

Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Indeed, breaking from past knowledge allows for a radical rethinking of established norms, which is essential in fields that rely heavily on empirical evidence or doctrinal faith:

• AOKs . Natural Sciences, Religious Knowledge Systems
• WOKs . Sense perception, Faith
• RLS . The shift from Newtonian to Quantum Physics versus reforms in religious practices.

Argue the benefits of evolving beyond outdated theories in science due to new evidence or the transformative effects of reinterpreting religious texts. From my experience, showcasing how this severance can lead to progress or upheaval helps create a compelling argument.

4. To what extent do you agree that there is no significant difference between hypothesis and speculation?

Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Speculation can spark the initial inquiry in both areas, yet in natural sciences, the empirical testing phase significantly distances it from mere speculation, enhancing the reliability of the knowledge produced:

• AOKs . Human Sciences, Natural Sciences
• WOKs . Reason, Imagination
• RLS . The development of psychological theories versus hypotheses in climate science.

Discuss how both fields use hypotheses but differentiate with the rigor and methodology of testing in natural sciences compared to often speculative frameworks in human sciences. Use specific examples to illustrate how speculation can lead to a hypothesis but remains distinct in its validation.

5. In the production of knowledge, are we too quick to dismiss anomalies?

Anomalies test the robustness of our existing theories and act as catalysts for deeper inquiry and understanding, particularly in dynamic fields such as ethics and environmental science.

• AOKs . Ethics, Environmental Science
• WOKs . Emotion, Observation
• RLS . Unusual ethical dilemmas in medical ethics versus unexpected climate phenomena.

Discuss the importance of anomalies in challenging existing beliefs and leading to new insights. From my experience, evaluating how these anomalies are often sidelined but can drive significant paradigm shifts provides a rich discussion point.

6. In the pursuit of knowledge, what is gained by the artist adopting the lens of the scientist and the scientist adopting the lens of the artist?

Discuss with reference to the arts and the natural sciences.

This interdisciplinary approach not only enriches the individual fields but also fosters a holistic view of knowledge that challenges and expands the boundaries of traditional disciplinary methods:

• AOKs . Arts, Natural Sciences
• WOKs . Imagination, Empirical Evidence
• RLS . Use of scientific techniques in digital art creation versus the influence of artistic creativity in scientific visualization and communication.

Consider how integrating methodologies enhances understanding and innovation in both fields. From my experience, this cross-pollination fosters a deeper engagement with material realities in art and a more imaginative approach to scientific research.

Get Help With Your Paper

How to choose your tok essay prompt.

Choosing the correct prompt is not just about fulfilling an academic requirement; it’s about engaging deeply with a question that resonates with your areas of strength. Here are some tried and tested tips to help you make this critical decision.

Consider Your Interests

In my opinion, interest in the topic is crucial. TOK essays dig deep into the nature of knowledge across various disciplines. Select a prompt that aligns with your interests or subjects you are passionate about. This natural curiosity will fuel your research and writing process, making it more enjoyable and engaging. As I know, students who choose topics they are interested in typically write more compelling essays.

Evaluate Your Understanding

From my experience, your familiarity with the concepts each prompt discusses is critical. Before deciding, assess your understanding of the AOKs and WOKs involved in each question. According to general IB criteria, an excellent TOK essay meets a  strict word count  and clearly describes the relevant AOKs and WOKs. It might be the right choice if a prompt requires stronger reasoning skills and you excel in analytical thinking.

Reflect on the Scope of Critical Thinking

A good TOK essay prompt should allow you to showcase your ability to think critically and evaluate knowledge claims from multiple perspectives. Choose a prompt that offers scope for analysis and argumentation. From my experience, prompts that initially seem complex often provide the most fertile ground for a rich, detailed knowledge investigation.

Consider the Availability of Resources

Another practical aspect to consider is the availability of resources. Some topics may be more challenging to research due to limited materials or complex theoretical frameworks. As I know, access to a good range of sources eases essay writing stress and enriches your  final TOK submission .

Discuss with Your Teacher

Finally, don’t underestimate the value of a good brainstorming session with your TOK teacher. Their insight into your strengths and weaknesses can be invaluable in selecting the most suitable prompt. From my experience, teachers often provide perspectives or resources you may not have considered, which can make all the difference in your writing process.

In conclusion, each TOK essay prompt for November 2024 presents a unique opportunity to refine your understanding of knowledge. I advise approaching your essay with curiosity and rigor and ensuring that your arguments are well-supported and articulated. The process of writing your TOK essay is as crucial as the final piece itself. Good luck, and remember that our experts at  IBStudentHelp.com  are always by your side!

Valerie Green

Valerie Green is a dedicated educator who spends her time helping high school and college students succeed. She writes articles and guides for various online education projects, providing students with the tools they need to excel in their studies. Friendly and approachable, she is committed to making a difference in the lives of students.

Best Effective Time Management Strategies in IB Diploma

For the IB Diploma, where homework, projects, and tests can quickly pile up, learning how to handle your time well is essential. I believe that coming up with good ways to handle your time is not only helpful, it’s necessary.

How to Develop a Research Question for IB IA?

The most important thing for a good IB Internal Assessment (IA) is coming up with a good research question. As a former IB writer, I can promise you that a well-written research question will not only help you with your research, but it will also help you keep your analysis on track and make sense.

IB English Paper 2 Writing Guide

To do well on IB English Paper 2, you need to know not only the texts, but also how to compare and contrast them in a test-like setting. I use my many years of experience as an IB teacher to give you important tips and techniques in this complete guide.

IB Paper 1 Writing Guide

As an experienced IB writer, I’ve compiled this complete guide to help you feel strong as you take on this critical part of the IB Diploma Programme. This article details the methods and skills you need to ace Paper 1, from understanding how the test is set up and choosing the right texts.

IB Economics IA Article Suggestions 2024/2025

When IB students start their Economics Internal Assessment (IA), it’s important for them to pick an interesting topic. For the school years 2024/2025, we will consider many different areas of economics, ranging from the rise of inflation to the changing nature of global trade.

What Are the Easiest and Hardest Extended Essay Subjects?

In this article, we discuss the easiest and hardest extended essay subjects, providing insights to help you make an informed decision. From the creative freedom found in the Arts to the demanding nature of the Experimental Sciences, we break down into what makes a subject approachable or daunting.

© 2024  I Bstudenthelp.com. This website is owned and operated by Udeepi OU Harju maakond, Tallinn, Lasnamäe linnaosa, Sepapaja tn 6, 15551. Disclaimer : Services we provide are only to assist the buyer like a guideline to complete any kind of writing assignment. Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions Cookie Policy Revision Policy Refund Policy

November 2024 TOK Essay Titles. Short Description for Each Topic and How to Write It

Hello, fellow IB enthusiasts! As a seasoned IB writer with years of experience guiding bright young minds through the intricacies of the Theory of Knowledge (TOK), I’m thrilled to share my insights on the upcoming November 2024 TOK essay titles. Given the diverse topics this year, it’s an exciting opportunity for students to showcase their analytical prowess and deep understanding of knowledge.

What Are the November 2024 TOK Essay Titles?

In my experience, IB TOK essay prompts are structured to challenge students to think deeply about how we know what we claim to know. They encourage investigating knowledge across disciplines, using the framework of Areas of Knowledge (AOKs) and Ways of Knowing (WOKs).

For example, an essay prompt might ask students to consider the role of language and reason in science and the arts. This type of question tests students’ ability to identify and argue how these WOKs help or hinder our understanding of these fields. The best responses provide a balanced discussion enriched with specific examples and critical insights, reflecting a well-rounded engagement with the topic. Now, let’s look at the six November 2024 TOK essay titles:

Does our responsibility to acquire knowledge vary according to the area of knowledge? Discuss with reference to history and one other area of knowledge.

In the production of knowledge, is ingenuity always needed but never enough? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

How might it benefit an area of knowledge to sever ties with its past? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

To what extent do you agree that there is no significant difference between hypothesis and speculation? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

In the production of knowledge, are we too quick to dismiss anomalies? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

In the pursuit of knowledge, what is gained by the artist adopting the lens of the scientist and the scientist adopting the lens of the artist? Discuss with reference to the arts and the natural sciences.

In line with general IB criteria, each essay title invites students to discuss, analyze, and critically evaluate knowledge questions related to real-life situations and classroom studies.

November 2024 TOK Essay Titles: Detailed Breakdown

Now, I’ll explain how to approach each TOK essay title using unique AOKs, WOKs, and Real-Life Situations (RLSs). I’ll also provide some writing suggestions based on my extensive experience guiding IB students.

1. Responsibility to Acquire Knowledge

Whether our responsibility to acquire knowledge varies across different AOKs is an intriguing question. Students should consider how the nature of knowledge itself can influence our ethical and intellectual obligations:

• AOKs – History and Ethics
• WOKs – Memory and Reason
• RLS – The debate over historical interpretations of colonial histories versus ethical discussions on modern privacy issues.

Analyze how historical knowledge, reliant on evidence and memory, requires a different approach than the more normative and reasoning-based field of ethics. Use examples to demonstrate the varying responsibilities in preserving truth versus promoting good.

2. Ingenuity in Knowledge Production

Investigating the role of ingenuity in knowledge production calls for an examination of its necessity and its limitations. Students should reflect on how different fields utilize creativity and rigor:

• AOKs – Mathematics and Arts
• WOKs – Intuition and Imagination
• RLS – The creation of the Mandelbrot set in mathematics and the development of surrealism in art.

Discuss the critical role of intuition in creating new mathematical theories and how imagination drives artistic innovation. Next, argue that while ingenuity sparks initial ideas, both fields require systematic validation and context.

3. Severing Ties with Past Knowledge

Considering the benefits of disconnecting from historical knowledge offers a rich area for debate. It’s vital to assess how evolving past established norms can propel or hinder progress:

• AOKs – Natural Sciences and Religious Knowledge Systems
• WOKs – Logic and Faith
• RLS – The shift from classical physics to quantum physics; Reforms in Protestantism.

Evaluate the necessity and impact of challenging old paradigms in natural sciences compared to the more tradition-bound religious systems. Use historical shifts as case studies to discuss innovation versus tradition.

4. Hypothesis versus Speculation

This topic invites a comparison between hypothesis and speculation across various knowledge domains. It’s an excellent opportunity to dissect the foundations of knowledge claims.

• AOKs – Human Sciences and Religious Knowledge Systems
• WOKs – Empirical Evidence and Faith
• RLS – Psychological theories on human behavior versus eschatological speculations in theology.

Illustrate how hypotheses in the human sciences are grounded in empirical research, contrasting with the faith-based speculations in religious contexts. Discuss the value and limitations of both approaches in constructing meaningful knowledge.

5. Dismissal of Anomalies

Are fields of knowledge too quick to dismiss anomalies? This question challenges students to think about the dynamics of knowledge acceptance and rejection:

• AOKs – Environmental Systems and Societies and Ethics
• WOKs – Perception and Emotion
• RLS – Overlooked early warnings in climate science and initial resistance to ethical considerations in genetic engineering.

Critique the tendency to ignore data that doesn’t fit existing environmental science and ethical theory models. Encourage investigation of how acknowledging anomalies can lead to breakthroughs and moral progress.

6. Cross-Disciplinary Insights

The mutual enrichment when artists and scientists adopt each other’s perspectives can lead to a deeper understanding and novel insights. This essay should highlight the benefits of interdisciplinary approaches:

• AOKs – Arts and Natural Sciences
• WOKs – Creativity and Scientific Methodology
• RLS – Using artistic techniques in scientific visualization and incorporating scientific concepts in modern art.

Discuss how applying scientific methods in art can enhance artistic precision while artistic creativity can inspire innovative scientific experiments. Emphasize the value of merging diverse methodologies for richer knowledge production.

More Posts:

• IB Math Exams Guide and Strategies for Success
• What Is the Role of the Supervisor in IB?
• May 2024 TOK Essay Titles. Descriptions and Tips for Writing
• What Is an IB Student in the IB Curriculum and Daily Life?
• What Is IB Classes? Student’s Guide to International Baccalaureate Courses
• What Is IB English IO? The Ultimate Guide for Students
• IB Math Analysis and Approaches HL (High Level)

Don’t let the stress of the IB TOK essay hold you back.

Are you struggling to come up with TOK essay titles? Or do you need help writing a TOK essay?

Our experienced writers can help you choose the perfect topic and assist you with any assignment. Tailored to your specific requirements.

Just buy a TOK essay from us today and take the stress out of your TOK essay writing.

Simply click:

Choosing the Best Title for Your TOK Essay

Here, I will share insights from years of experience to help you make an informed choice that aligns with general IB criteria and personal learning objectives.

Understand the Scope of Each Title

From my experience, it is crucial to understand what each essay title asks fully. Sometimes, a title may seem straightforward but requires a deep immersion into complex philosophical territories. Reviewing the exact phrasing of the title can help decipher the specific TOK concepts and AOKs involved, ensuring your essay remains focused and relevant.

Align the Title with Your Strengths

Choosing a TOK essay title should also involve reflecting on your strengths and areas of interest. According to general IB criteria, an essay demonstrating genuine engagement and personal insight stands out. If you have a strong background or interest in a particular area of knowledge, like the natural sciences or ethics, select a title that fits that expertise.

Consider the Availability of Resources

In my opinion, the availability of resources and real-life examples to support your analysis is another critical factor to consider. Some TOK essay titles may be intriguing but challenging to back up with concrete evidence. Choosing a title with readily available examples and resources allows for a more robust discussion and well-supported argument.

Evaluate Personal Interest

Choosing a TOK essay title that aligns with the curriculum and captures your interest is essential. In my experience, an engaged and curious student writes more convincingly and passionately. A topic that challenges and intrigues you will likely result in a more enjoyable and fulfilling essay writing process.

Seek Feedback from Educators

Lastly, don’t hesitate to seek advice from your TOK teacher or mentor. As someone who has guided many through this process, I affirm that a second opinion can provide new perspectives and valuable insights. Discussing your ideas with an experienced educator can help clarify doubts and refine your essay approach according to general IB criteria.

A successful TOK essay is about answering the question and critically and creatively engaging. Make sure your essays are well structured, use a variety of examples, and, above all, reflect a deep engagement with the knowledge questions. In my extensive experience, the secret to excelling in your TOK essays lies in connecting abstract ideas with concrete examples and effectively arguing your position.

Always strive to present a balanced perspective enriched with clear, real-world applications that vividly illustrate your points. Good luck, scholars, and remember that you can always contact our experts at IBWritingService.com for help.

Get hot offers and discounts for your IB Assignments

Our writing solutions cater to all disciplines within the IB program, and we specialize in crafting academic papers for students of all levels. We follow the IB criteria.

Adhering strictly to the rigorous standards set by the IB, we deploy a methodical approach to our writing process. This ensures that every piece of content we generate not only meets but exceeds the expectations set within the program.

Contact us:

[email protected]

[email protected]

Latest Articles:

Latest Extended Essay Requirements Updates for the Years 2023/2024

Is It Legit to Buy Extended Essay Online?

What Is the Recommended Amount of Sources for an IB EE?

Our services:.

• Buy Internal Assessment
• Buy Math IA
• Buy Extended Essay
• Buy TOK Essay
• Buy TOK Exhibition

IBWritingService.com is an independent academic writing aid with no official ties to the International Baccalaureate Organization (IBO). Our use of “IB” in the domain and title is purely for identification, and we neither claim nor imply any endorsement or partnership with the IBO. Our services aim to support students’ educational needs without violating IBO policies. Trademarks mentioned are property of their owners and do not suggest affiliations. By using our services, you acknowledge our non-affiliation with the IBO and that we’re not a substitute for IBO requirements. We deny any liability for use of our services in relation to the IBO.

ALL PAPERS WRITTEN BY OUR EXPERTS AS PART OF THIS WRITING SERVICE ARE FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. WHEN USING CONTENT PURCHASED FROM THIS WEBSITE, IT MUST BE PROPERLY REFERENCED.

• Terms & Conditions
• Revision Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Refund Policy
• Cookie Policy

© 2024. All Rights Reserved.

ToK Essay Nov 24

We have many resources designed to help you to write a great ToK Essay Nov 24. ToKToday resources have been used to great success by hundreds of students in the last 3 exam sessions, these resources have been updated specifically for the Nov 2024 titles, and in response to the latest ToK Examiners reports.

Normal Written Feedback (24 hrs return): click here.

Resources available for each Nov 2024 ToK Essay Title:

Essay 1: Responsibility to acquire knowledge

• Detailed Essay Guidance Notes linked here
• Covering The Basics video for Essay #1
• Main video for Essay #1
• Covering the basics blogpost for Essay #1
• Main blogpost for Essay #1

Essay 2: Ingenuity: always needed, but never enough?

• Covering The Basics video for Essay #2
• Main video for Essay #2
• Covering the basics blogpost for Essay #2
• Main blogpost for Essay #2

Essay 3: Sever ties: benefits ?

• Covering The Basics video for Essay #3
• Main video for Essay #3
• Covering the basics blogpost for Essay #3
• Main blogpost for Essay #3

Essay 4: Hypothesis & Speculation

• Covering The Basics video for Essay #4
• Main video for Essay #4
• Covering the basics blogpost for Essay #4
• Main blogpost for Essay #4

Essay 5: Anomalies

• Covering The Basics video for Essay #5
• Main video for Essay #5
• Covering the basics blogpost for Essay #5
• Main blogpost for Essay #5

Essay 6: Lens of artist & scientist

• Covering The Basics video for Essay #6
• Main video for Essay#6
• Covering The Basics blogpost for Essay #6
• Main blogpost for Essay #6

Frequently Asked Questions re. ToK Essay Guidance Notes.

The IB own the copyright to the ToK Essay Nov 24 Titles, and they don’t allow people to repost them without written permission. We respect academic integrity, and the rights of IB. Therefore, I can only post ‘attenuated’ versions of the titles here. If you’re a student writing an essay for Nov 24 ensure that you get the exact title from your teacher rather than use my ‘version’ of the essay title .

More on ToK Essay Nov 24 Titles:

If you need help writing your ToK Essay see our student support pages here .

If you want to watch videos about the ToK Essay see our YouTube Channel here.

ToKTutor - The Worldwide Tutor

TOK ESSAY GUIDES May 2024

Our new and enlarged (3000-3800 words) specialist publications of TOK essay guides are based on the new 2022 Guide Specifications and get you to think about what to do when preparing for your ToK essay.

Essay Guides May 2024

The guides have been developed independently and the content is in no way connected with or endorsed by the International Baccalaureate.

Please DO NOT simply cut and paste details from the guides into your work as plagiarism will be penalised. And remember: we will NOT write essays for you.

Click on the 'Sample Guide' tab to see an example of the kind of guidance that you'll get when you order our ToK Essay Guide for the essays on the Essay topics for May 2024.

If you decide you want guidance to help you with your essay, click on an individual question or the 'BUY NOW' button, making sure that you indicate clearly the exact NUMBER of the Essay Guide you wish to purchase.

May 2024 Titles at a glance

The ToK Essay questions for May 2024 are usually released in September 2023

Click HERE to purchase a Guide when available

Q1. Subjectivity & knowledge in the Arts & History.

Q2. Specialisation & generalisation in knowledge production.

Q3. Fresh ideas & the pursuit of knowledge.

Q4. Challenges of transferring knowledge between contexts.

Q5. Custodians of knowledge.

Q6. Recent evidence & pursuit of knowledge.

May 2024 Guides

Please CLEARLY indicate the ESSAY NUMBER you require on the PAYPAL form in the 'Enter description' box or send a separate email to: [email protected]

We cannot exchange Guides once we have mailed them to you.

 YOUR ESSAY GUIDE WILL BE EMAILED TO YOU ON RECEIPT OF THE £35   FEE

Please allow 24 hrs for delivery owing to global time differences & ensure you check your SPAM folder.

By clicking the 'BUY NOW' button, you acknowledge that you agree to the terms and conditions of use of ToKTutor.net©

ToK Essay Guides May 2024

A more detailed view of the guides will be available below when the new titles are published..., sample guide, title 1: is subjectivity overly celebrated....

Subjectivity, in the context of knowledge...

What the students say...

“The TOK Essay Guide was really informative, but most of all, it helped me to think through the topic for myself. Thanks!”

Arvind, Delhi

Title 2: How can we reconcile...

Any production process...

Title 3: Nothing is more exciting...

‘Fresh’ or new ideas belong...

Title 4: Do we underestimate...

Knowledge is born out of networks...

Title 5: Do we need custodians...

A ‘custodian’ is someone who...

Title 6: Are we too quick...

‘Evidence’ – underlines a key focus...

Quality Guaranteed

Present advice in a more enlarged 3000-3800 words (10+ pages) format. 

Link to the specification changes for 2022. 

Help you unpack the terms of the question.

Give you a framework to design your knowledge questions and key perspectives. 

Point you in the direction of examples to support arguments/counter claims.

Trace links to Core/Optional Themes

Indicate 'Tips on Essay Writing Style'.  

Plagiarism Warning

Delivery note.

Our Essay Guides are delivered to you by email, so please ensure you give a valid email address when ordering through PAYPAL's secure site AND please check your junk/spam folder in case the email delivery is filtered out of your inbox.

Please note: make sure you choose your Guide title correctly as we cannot exchange a Guide once it has been delivered.

We aim to send your Guide within 24 hours of PAYPAL's confirmation of your payment.

Please allow for global time differences linked to the UK.

ToK Essay Guides for November 2024?

These are now available!

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Copyright Notice |  Website Usage

Contact: [email protected]

Last Updated: 17 Mar 2024

All Rights Reserved | ToKTutor.net 2010-24

IB TOK Essay examples

Type a search phrase to find the most relevant TOK Essay examples for you

Not sure what to search for? You can always look through our example Theory of Knowledge coursework below for inspiration.

All TOK Essay Examples

Filter exemplars, are visual representations always helpful in the communication of knowledge discuss with reference to the human sciences and mathematics., to what extent is the knowledge we produce determined by the methodologies we use discuss with reference to history and one area of knowledge., want to get full marks for your tok essay allow us to review it for you 🎯, for artists and natural scientists, which is more important: what can be explained or what cannot be explained discuss with reference to the arts and the natural sciences., does it matter if our acquisition of knowledge happens in "bubbles" where some information and voices are excluded discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge., fast track your coursework with mark schemes moderated by ib examiners. upgrade now 🚀, is replicability necessary in the production of knowledge discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge., tok essay: 5. “how can we distinguish between good and bad interpretations discuss with reference to the arts and one other area of knowledge”, are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge., is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history discuss with reference to the arts and history, is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history discuss with reference to the arts and history., nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them, nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them discuss with reference to human sciences and one other area of knowledge., how can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge., nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt‬ ‭them discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.‬, nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge., nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them discuss concerning the human sciences and one other area of knowledge., do we need custodians of knowledge discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge., is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history, do we need custodians of knowledge, do we need custodians of knowledge discuss concerning two areas of knowledge.

Get the Reddit app

This is the unofficial subreddit for all things concerning the International Baccalaureate, an academic credential accorded to secondary students from around the world after two vigorous years of study, culminating in challenging exams. This subreddit encourages questions, constructive feedback, and the sharing of knowledge and resources among IB students, alumni, and teachers. Note that the subreddit is not run by the International Baccalaureate.

TOK Essay Titles - May 2024 Examination Session

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

By continuing, you agree to our User Agreement and acknowledge that you understand the Privacy Policy .

Enter the 6-digit code from your authenticator app

You’ve set up two-factor authentication for this account.

Enter a 6-digit backup code

Create your username and password.

Reddit is anonymous, so your username is what you’ll go by here. Choose wisely—because once you get a name, you can’t change it.

Reset your password

Enter your email address or username and we’ll send you a link to reset your password

Check your inbox

An email with a link to reset your password was sent to the email address associated with your account

Choose a Reddit account to continue

TOK - Essay: Class of 2024 Essay Topics

• Natural Science
• Human Science
• Mathematics
• Class of 2024 Essay Topics

1: Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history?

2: How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization & generalization in the production of knowledge? (Discuss with reference to mathematics & one other Area of Knowledge )

3: Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge so slow to adopt them? (Discuss with reference to the human sciences & one other Area of Knowledge )

4: Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? (Discuss with reference to two Areas of Knowledge )

5: Do we need custodians of knowledge? (Discuss with reference to two Areas of Knowledge )

6: Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? (Discuss with reference to the natural sciences & one other Area of Knowledge )

• << Previous: Chicago
• Last Updated: May 24, 2024 3:51 PM
• URL: https://nist.libguides.com/tok_essay

The Complete IB TOK Exhibition Guide

The Theory of Knowledge (TOK) Exhibition task is one of the most unique IB assessment tasks you will complete, worth 1/3 of your final TOK grade. It is a truly complex challenge – you need to find a way to integrate TOK concepts, your selected objects and your selected theme, all while remaining focused on addressing the prompt.

In this guide, we will unpack everything you need to achieve a Grade A in your TOK Exhibition, from object selection to a structure designed around the marking criteria, setting you up for success!

Selecting a Prompt and Objects

It can be daunting to select a prompt with 35 different options. Our recommendation is to shortlist them – narrow the 35 prompts down to 5-6 which really stand out to you. When finalising your prompt, there are a few important things to keep in mind:

Ensure you understand the prompt and can connect it to a theme

Select a prompt which allows you to discuss a range of perspectives and ideas

Start thinking about potential objects for each of your shortlisted prompts and select the prompt which allows you to integrate the best objects and analysis

But how do you even choose an object? Could I choose my living room couch? Or a football jersey?...Where do you even start?!

The TOK guide outlines some criteria to help narrow the scope of your selection process:

1. The object can be a digital or physical object

2. The object should be of personal interest and should have a personal context for you. It does not necessarily have to be something you own, but you must establish a personal connection to the object in some way.

Some interesting examples which we have seen from our students include personal training splits, novels studied in class, tweets from their social feed, photographs from overseas travels and childhood toys.

3. The object must have an identifiable, real-world specific context . It must not be a hypothetical or vague object. For example...

"World War 2 historiography" would NOT be a specific object...

Whereas, "Trevor-Roper's historical text, The Wartime Journals" would be an object with a specific real-world context.

And to that we'd add one more component that is almost essential to succeed:

4. The object has to be connectable to the prompt and be illustrative of the point you are trying to make!

Structuring the TOK Exhibition

With so many different components to cover and a marking criteria with such depth, it can be daunting to even start writing this task. Our recommended structure provides a framework for you to get started, while also ensuring that you integrate the characteristics of a top-band essay using the TOK Exhibition marking criteria.

To Intro or not to Intro

There has been some disagreement as to whether or not an introduction is necessary for this task. With only 950 words available to cover three objects, integrating TOK concepts, the prompt and the theme, every word is vital .

At IB Solved, we pride ourselves on providing specialist advice which aligns with EXACTLY what the IB wants to see. So we went digging through the feedback on some IB-released exemplars and found the following excerpt from a top-scoring TOK exhibition:

"This student has included an introduction to their work. It should be noted that this is not required, but students are free to include a short introduction if they wish to do so"

So from a strategic perspective, we recommend NOT including an introduction and instead focusing on using the full 300-320 words for each of their three objects.

Part 1: Introduce the Object and its Specific Real-World Context

The very first thing to do is to introduce your object . You need to establish the object's specific real-world context and also a personal connection ; explain what it is with relation to its real-world context, where and when YOU first encountered it, the impact it had on YOU and finally, its connection to the prompt.

This should be around 60-80 words and is vital to reaching the top band of the marking criteria, by 'clearly identifying' the specific real-world context of the object, as well as providing a strong justification for the object's inclusion within the exhibition.

Part 2: Object + Prompt + TOK Concepts = Top Band Analysis

This section is the bulk of your writing for each object and you have A LOT to cover. To reach the top band, you need to do 3 things:

Establish a clear and well-explained link between the object and the prompt

Provide a strong justification of the particular contribution of the object (this is why it is important to select objects which each allow you to discuss a distinct perspective on the prompt)

Construct points which are well-supported by appropriate evidence, making explicit references to the prompt

And we'd like to add one bonus factor, which is inspired by the overarching question of the TOK exhibition marking criteria – "Does the exhibition successfully show how TOK manifests in the world around us?":

4.  Integrate TOK concepts, theories and language within your arguments

So what does this look like in practice? How can you possibly do this within the constraints of this section, which should be between 220-250 words?

The trick is to do many of these things at once (yes, that is incredibly vague, but the structure below will add much needed clarity):

Topic Sentence: Connect the object (which you have just introduced) to the prompt and state your argument, implementing the words of the prompt in your statement

Make Your Argument: Explain your point, implementing the TOK concepts and making explicit references to the prompt

Relate back to Your Object: Use your object as a clear exemplification of the point you are making, providing specific and detailed analysis to demonstrate how the object proves your point, justifying its inclusion in the exhibition

Concluding Sentence: Reiterate the point you are making, using the words of the prompt to show how you have developed an effective argument which is connected to the prompt

Now depending on how much analysis and discussion is required to truly expand on your point, you may have one or two different points to make. Ensure that regardless of the number of points, you always relate each point back to both the object and the prompt .

So whether you decide to do 2 short points or one longer point, you are always making explicit references back to both the object (to justify its inclusion) and the prompt (to meet that third criterion noted earlier).

Part 3: Strong Closing Link Statement

You thought we were done earlier?

Think again, because we really want to show these IB markers that we understand the requirements of the task and remind them that we have met all the expectations of the top criterion . And we want to do it all in ideally one, maximum two, final, magical sentences …

OPP (yes, I know you IB students are sick of acronyms but too bad because this is important), which stands for Object , Point , Prompt .

But to really demonstrate this, let's use an example from one of our exemplar TOK Exhibitions . This exhibition discusses the prompt:

"What is the relationship between personal experience and knowledge?"

The candidate uses her mother's diary as the object, and secures her top mark with the following statement:

"Therefore, this object reveals how personal experiences can contribute to historical knowledge by providing unique individualised insights. Whilst often historians will exercise caution and insist upon corroboration between experiences, a strong relationship between personal experiences and historical knowledge exists." 

Object. Point. Prompt.

How to Start?

And that's it! Still unsure how to start? Need some help putting the pieces together for this complex yet important task? Make sure to check out some of our Grade 7 TOK Exhibition Exemplars , especially our perfect 10/10 IB TOK Exhibition Example !

Or even better, click below to work with one of our many expert IB Theory of Knowledge tutors  who can guide you personally through the complete process of achieving top marks in your own TOK Exhibition!

• Internal Assessment Guides

Recent Posts

The Secrets to Success in the Theory of Knowledge (TOK) Essay

Unpacking the 2023 November TOK Titles: A Comprehensive IB Solved Guide

Unpacking the 2024 November TOK Titles: A Comprehensive IB Solved Guide

[email protected]

+919878797000.

TOK ESSAY TITLE MAY 2023

Tok essay title 6, to what extent is the knowledge we produce determined by the methodologies we use discuss with reference to history and one other area of knowledge..

Title 6 of the May 2023 TOK essay prompt draws attention to the methods and tools used in the TOK knowledge framework.

The essay explores the extent to which the observations collected and evaluated through the use of methodologies impact the nature of newly produced knowledge. The focus lies on examining the influence of different methodologies on the contestability and accuracy of the knowledge produced.

In the field of history, primary sources may provide evidence for interpreting the past, raising questions about the reliability and biases associated with different historical methodologies.

Similarly, in the natural sciences, it is intriguing to investigate the nature of knowledge produced through empirical approaches, considering the role of experimentation, data collection, and analysis.

To excel in the May 2023 TOK essay and achieve a perfect score, it is advisable to start early and seek guidance from TOK experts throughout the essay writing process.

카테고리 이동 클쌤의 IB/SAT/ACT 개인수업 자료실

IB ToK Essay 2024 November session 질문 (prescribed title) 발표

2024. 3. 18. 14:48

• 본문 폰트 크기 조정 본문 폰트 크기 작게 보기 본문 폰트 크기 크게 보기 가

안녕하세요 클쌤이에요.

얼마 전 November 2024 IB ToK prescribed title (PT)가 발표됐어요.

올해 11월 졸업생들이 써야 하는 ToK Essay 주제입니다.

1. Does our responsibility to acquire knowledge vary according to the area of knowledge? Discuss with reference to history and one other area of knowledge.

2. In the production of knowledge, is ingenuity always needed but never enough? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

3. How might it benefit an area of knowledge to sever ties with its past? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

4. To what extent do you agree that there is no significant difference between hypothesis and speculation? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

5. In the production of knowledge, are we too quick to dismiss anomalies? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

6. In the pursuit of knowledge, what is gained by the artist adopting the lens of the scientist and the scientist adopting the lens of the artist? Discuss with reference to the arts and the natural sciences.

ToK Essay (67%)는 대부분 DP 1 학년 때 제출한 exhibition (33%) 보다 무려 두 배 정도 중요한 과제입니다.

ToK Exhibition, Essay 둘 다 중요한 건 학생이 해당 질문에 대한 얼마나 깊고 NUANCED 된 claim/counterclaim 을 보여주는지가 고득점을 받는 키포인트입니다.

여섯 개의 질문 중 첫 번째 질문만 brainstorming 해봅시다!

ToK에서 가장 중요한 스킬 중 하나는 질문을 unpack 하는 거예요. Exhibition도 그렇고, essay도 그렇습니다. 3번 질문에서 우리가 먼저 refine 해야 하는 표현은 "benefit" 한다는 건데요. beneficial 하다는 건 knowledge acquisition 혹은 knowledge production에 있어 이로운 점이 있다고 좀 더 구체적으로 생각을 해볼 수 있겠죠. 또 재밌는 부분은, 이 pt 자체가 <AoK는 과거와의 tie를 끊으면 이점이 있다>라는 assumption이에요. 우리는 당연히 이전 과거 자료, 업적, 사건 등을 통해 (혹은 덕분에) 현재를 살아간다고 당연시 여기는 걸 뒤엎는 발상이기도 합니다.

그다음으로 unpack 해야 할 표현은 "sever ties with its past"인데요. 물리적으로는 과거와 연을 끊을 수 없는데 "sever" 한다는 걸 어떻게 받아들일지는 학생의 argument (&counterarguments), AoK, 그리고 real-life situation(RLS)을 미리 한번 구상해 보고 이에 어울리는 sever의 좀 더 구체적이고 일관성 있는 해석을 할 필요가 있습니다.

가장 직관적인 AoK 선택은 history가 있을 수 있겠네요. 두 번째 AoK는 history와 좀 결이 다른, 색다른 perspective를 보여줄 수 있는 선택이 되면 좋겠습니다.

바로 직전 ToK 포스팅에서 ToK Essay를 쓸 때 너무도 중요한 1) ToK concepts 그리고 2) implication 설명을 했었어요. 꼭 참고해서 ToK Essay 고득점 가즈아~~~

https://blog.naver.com/claire_ssam/223263323624

안녕하세요 클쌤이에요. 대부분 11학년 때 ToK Exhibition은 그까짓 거 그~~냥 뭐! 하면서 쓱쓱 써서 제...

blog.naver.com

꼭 피해야 하는 overused/cliche 예시들:

https://blog.naver.com/claire_ssam/223021558980

안녕하세요 클쌤입니다. 11학년들은 IB ToK 연습 Essay를 쓰고 있고, 12학년들은 거의 다 Essay를 마...

곧 IB May 2024 파이널을 앞두고 있는 친구들 화이팅! 나도 화이팅!

ToK 하기 싫어 죽겠는(?) 친구들, 질문 있는 친구들, 수업 문의는 오픈챗으로 해주세요 :)

https://open.kakao.com/o/s3xni7jc

당분간 수업상담은 카톡으로만 진행합니다. 톡 남겨주시면 순차적으로 답변드리겠습니디. 한국시간 밤 12시 이후 카톡은 다음날 연락드립니다.

open.kakao.com

• #ibenglishee
• #ibenglishLAL
• #ibenglishliterature
• #ibenglishpaper1
• #ibenglishpaper2
• #ibglobalpolitics

IB 전문강사 클쌤입니다

Our Services

College Admissions Counseling

UK University Admissions Counseling

EU University Admissions Counseling

College Athletic Recruitment

Crimson Rise: College Prep for Middle Schoolers

Indigo Research: Online Research Opportunities for High Schoolers

Delta Institute: Work Experience Programs For High Schoolers

Graduate School Admissions Counseling

Private Boarding & Day School Admissions

Essay Review

Financial Aid & Merit Scholarships

Our Leaders and Counselors

Our Student Success

Crimson Student Alumni

Our Results

Our Reviews

Our Scholarships

Careers at Crimson

University Profiles

US College Admissions Calculator

GPA Calculator

Practice Standardized Tests

SAT Practice Test

ACT Practice Tests

Personal Essay Topic Generator

eBooks and Infographics

Crimson YouTube Channel

Summer Apply - Best Summer Programs

Top of the Class Podcast

ACCEPTED! Book by Jamie Beaton

Crimson Global Academy

+1 (646) 419-3178

Go back to all articles

Easiest and Hardest IB Courses

The International Baccalaureate® (IB) Diploma Programme (DP) is a well-respected high school program that has been around since 1968. It's designed for students aged 16-19 and aims to prepare them for university and beyond. The program includes six different subject areas, plus some core requirements: Theory of Knowledge (TOK), Creativity, Activity, Service (CAS), and the Extended Essay.

IB students often go on to succeed in higher education at higher rates than their peers, thanks to the program's focus on developing well-rounded, capable individuals.

However, not all IB courses are created equal. Some are easier and more straightforward, while others are known for being particularly challenging. In this blog, we’ll look at recent data to help you understand which IB courses are considered the easiest and which ones are the hardest. This will help you choose the courses that best fit your strengths and interests.

When choosing IB subjects , it's important to consider your interests, strengths, and future academic goals. The IB Diploma requires students to choose six subjects, with three taken at the Higher Level (HL) and three at the Standard Level (SL) . The subjects are chosen from six groups:

• Language and Literature : This can be your first language or literature course.
• Language Acquisition : A second language, which could be a new language or one you've previously studied.
• Individuals and Societies : Subjects like History, Geography, Economics, Psychology, etc.
• Sciences : Options include Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Environmental Systems and Societies, etc.
• Mathematics : Either Mathematics: Analysis and Approaches or Mathematics: Applications and Interpretation.
• The Arts : Choices like Visual Arts, Music, Theatre, or an additional subject from another group.

Balancing your subjects to align with your interests and university aspirations is key. For example, if you plan to pursue engineering , focusing on HL Mathematics and Physics would be wise. If you’re interested in humanities , History and Literature at HL might be better suited.

How IB Courses Are Graded

In the Diploma Programme (DP), students get grades from 1 to 7 for each course, with 7 being the best. To get their final diploma, students need to add up their grades from all their courses. They must earn at least 24 points overall and meet specific requirements, including completing three key components of the DP.

Students do not qualify for a diploma if they meet any of the following criteria:

• Score a 1 in any subject
• Score more than two 2’s in any subject
• Score more than three 3’s or lower in any subject

Converting an IB score to a GPA is not straightforward, as different schools and countries may use different conversion scales. However, a general guideline is:

• 7 in HL : Equivalent to an A or A+ in GPA terms, often considered a 4.0.
• 6 in HL/SL : Roughly equivalent to an A or A-, typically a 3.7-3.9 GPA.
• 5 in HL/SL : Similar to a B or B+, translating to a 3.0-3.6 GPA.
• 4 in SL : Usually considered a C or C+, around a 2.0-2.9 GPA.

Keep in mind that the conversion might vary , so it’s best to check with specific universities or consult your school's guidance counselor for more precise information.

Easiest IB Courses

Ib business management.

• Overview: Business Management is frequently regarded as one of the more accessible IB courses. It introduces students to fundamental business concepts such as marketing, human resources, and finance in a practical manner.
• Average Grades: Data from the IB Organization shows that students in Business Management often achieve higher-than-average scores , with mean grades typically ranging from 5.5 to 6 out of 7.
• Why It's Easier: The course's practical and real-world applications make it more approachable for many students. The straightforward nature of the material and the focus on current business practices contribute to its relative ease.

IB Psychology

• Overview: Psychology is another course often perceived as less challenging. It covers basic psychological theories, research methods, and applications in an engaging format.
• Average Grades: The average score for Psychology is generally higher , around 5.5 to 6 out of 7, indicating that many students find the course manageable.
• Why It's Easier: The course’s engaging content and the clear, structured approach to studying human behavior make it accessible. Its relevance to everyday life also enhances student interest and understanding.

Hardest IB Courses

Ib mathematics: analysis and approaches (aa).

• Overview: Mathematics AA is renowned for its complexity and rigor. It includes advanced mathematical concepts, proofs, and problem-solving techniques.
• Average Grades: Recent data suggests that the average score for Mathematics AA is relatively low, ranging from 4.5 to 5 out of 7.
• Why It's Hard: The abstract nature of the content and the high level of mathematical rigor required make this course challenging. Success in Mathematics AA demands a solid foundation in mathematics and strong analytical skills.
• Overview: Physics is often considered one of the most difficult IB courses due to its demanding content and extensive mathematical requirements. The course explores complex topics such as mechanics, electromagnetism, and quantum physics.
• Average Grades: The average scores for Physics tend to be lower , around 4.5 to 5 out of 7, reflecting the course’s difficulty.
• Why It's Hard: The course's combination of theoretical and practical components, along with significant mathematical calculations, poses a challenge. Students must grasp intricate concepts and apply them to solve problems effectively.

Cambridge vs. IB vs. NCEA Qualifications

Factors Influencing Course Difficulty

Several factors can influence how difficult an IB course might feel:

• Background Knowledge: Students with a strong background in a particular subject may find related courses easier. For example, those proficient in mathematics may handle Mathematics AA better.
• Interest and Engagement: Courses that align with a student's interests are often perceived as less difficult. Passion for a subject can make studying and understanding the material more enjoyable.
• Support and Resources: Access to resources such as tutoring , study groups, and teacher support can significantly affect a student's ability to succeed in challenging courses.

What Is a Good IB Score for Top Universities?

A good IB score depends on the university and the program to which you are applying. Generally:

• Top Universities (e.g., Ivy League , Oxbridge ) : A score of 38-40 or higher out of 45 is often required. Competitive programs might even expect scores above 40, particularly in subjects related to your chosen field of study.
• Highly Selective Universities : A score of 36-38 can be competitive, depending on the specific course and other application components like extracurriculars , personal statements , and interviews.
• Good Universities : Scores of 32-35 are often sufficient for many reputable institutions, though this can vary by program.

Universities also consider your HL scores individually, especially in subjects relevant to your intended major.

Benefits of the IB Diploma

The IB Diploma offers several benefits:

• Holistic Education : The curriculum is broad, encouraging students to become well-rounded, critical thinkers.
• Global Recognition : The IB is recognized by universities worldwide, often providing an advantage in admissions.
• Development of Skills : It emphasizes research , essay writing , and independent study through the Extended Essay (EE) and Theory of Knowledge (TOK) components.
• Preparation for University : The rigorous nature of the IB prepares students for the demands of higher education, fostering time management, self-discipline, and problem-solving skills.
• International Perspective : The program promotes cultural understanding and global awareness, which are valuable in our interconnected world.

Final Thoughts

The IB Diploma Programme is a rigorous and rewarding path that not only challenges students academically but also prepares them for the complexities of higher education.

While the program offers a wide range of subjects, each with its own level of difficulty, success ultimately depends on how well students align their choices with their personal interests and future goals. By understanding the demands of each course and the expectations of top universities, students can make informed decisions that enhance their academic journey and open doors to prestigious opportunities.

Whether you’re aiming for a high IB score to secure a spot at a top university or looking to develop critical life skills, our experts can help. Book a free consultation now!

More Articles

From ib to college: how the diploma program boosts your admission chances.

What Is A Good IB Score For Top Universities?

Pros and Cons of the International Baccalaureate