argumentative essay on vandalism

The New York Times

Advertisement

The Opinion Pages

Graffiti is always vandalism.

Heather Mac Donald is the Thomas W. Smith Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, and a contributing editor of City Journal.

Updated December 4, 2014, 9:16 AM

Anyone who glorifies graffiti needs to answer one question: If your home were tagged during the night without your consent, would you welcome the new addition to your décor or would you immediately call a painter, if not the police?

No institution that has celebrated graffiti in recent years — like the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles or the Museum of the City of New York — would allow its own premises to be defaced for even one minute. Graffiti is something that one celebrates, if one is juvenile enough to do so, when it shows up on someone else’s property but never on one’s own.

The question “When does graffiti become art?” is meaningless. Graffiti is always vandalism. By definition it is committed without permission on another person's property, in an adolescent display of entitlement. Whether particular viewers find any given piece of graffiti artistically compelling is irrelevant. Graffiti’s most salient characteristic is that it is a crime. John Lindsay, the progressive New York politician who served as mayor from 1966 to 1973, declared war on graffiti in 1972. He understood that graffiti signaled that informal social controls and law enforcement had broken down in New York’s public spaces, making them vulnerable to even greater levels of disorder and law-breaking. A 2008 study from the Netherlands has shown that physical disorder and vandalism have a contagious effect, confirming the " broken windows theory ."

There is nothing “progressive” about allowing public amenities to be defaced by graffiti; anyone who can avoid a graffiti-bombed park or commercial thoroughfare will do so, since tagging shows that an area is dominated by vandals who may be involved in other crimes as well. New York’s conquest of subway graffiti in the late 1980s was the first sign in decades that the city was still governable; that triumph over lawlessness paved the way for the urban renaissance that followed.

Join Opinion on Facebook and follow updates on twitter.com/roomfordebate .

Topics: Law , art

Legal Venues Celebrate the Art Form

It's Young, Cool, Creative – Let It Happen

When does graffiti become art, it’s always vandalism, it’s young, cool, creative – let it happen, value in the message and the medium.

Related Discussions

Recent Discussions

Not all graffiti is vandalism – let’s rethink the public space debate

Researcher in the Philosophy of Play, The University of Queensland

Disclosure statement

Liam Miller does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

University of Queensland provides funding as a member of The Conversation AU.

View all partners

Earlier this month, at the opening of an exhibition dedicated to his work at Brisbane’s GOMA, David Lynch got stuck into street art, calling it “ugly, stupid, and threatening”. Apparently, shooting movies can be very difficult when the building you want to film is covered in graffiti and you don’t want it to be.

Is there a distinction between art and vandalism? This is the question that always seems to rise up when graffiti becomes a topic of conversation, as it has after Lynch’s outburst. This is, however, not just important for those of us who want to know the answers to obscure questions such as, “what is art?” It affects everyone.

Why? Because graffiti exists in our public spaces, our communities and our streets.

Let’s for a minute put aside the fact that an artist such as David Lynch, known for pushing the envelope in terms of what art is and can be, is criticising one type of art on the grounds that it is inconvenient to the kind of art that he prefers to undertake.

There is something more important to discuss here. The opinion that street art is vandalism (that is, not art) is widely held. Many people despise graffiti – but we are more than happy to line our public spaces with something much more offensive: advertising. That’s the bigger story here, the use and abuse of public space.

At heart, I think this is why people don’t like graffiti. We see it as someone trying to take control of a part of our public space. The problem is, our public spaces are being sold out from under us anyway. If we don’t collectively protect our public spaces, we will lose them.

Two types of graffiti

I would like to make a bold distinction here.

I want to draw out the difference between two kinds of graffiti: street art and vandalism.

We need something to be able to differentiate between Banksy and the kids who draw neon dicks on the back of a bus shelter. They are different, and the difference lies in their intention.

Tagging, the practice of writing your name or handle in prominent or impressive positions, is akin to a dog marking its territory; it’s a pissing contest. It is also an act of ownership. Genuine street art does not aim at ownership, but at capturing and sharing a concept. Street art adds to public discourse by putting something out into the world; it is the start of a conversation.

The ownership of a space that is ingrained in vandalism is not present in street art. In fact, street art has a way of opening up spaces as public. Street art has a way of inviting participation, something that too few public spaces are even capable of.

Marketing vandals

If vandalism is abhorrent because it attempts to own public space, then advertising is vandalism.

The billboards that line our streets, the banner ads on buses, the pop-ups on websites, the ads on our TVs and radios, buy and sell our public spaces. What longer lasting sex? A tasty beverage? To be young, beautiful, carefree, cutting edge, and happy? For only $24.95 (plus postage)!

Advertising privatises our public spaces. Ads are placed out in the public strategically. They are built to coerce, and manipulate. They affect us, whether we want them to or not. But this is not reciprocated.

We cannot in turn change or alter ads, nor can we communicate with the company who is doing the selling. If street art is the beginning of a conversation, advertising is the end. Stop talking, stop thinking – and buy these shoes!

Ads v graffiti

We are affronted by ads. They tell us we are not enough. Not good enough, not pretty enough, not wealthy enough.

At its worst, graffiti is mildly insulting and can be aesthetically immature. But at its best, it can be the opening of a communal space: a commentary, a conversation, a concept captured in an image on a wall. Genuine street art aims at this ideal.

At its best, advertising is an effective way of informing the public about products and services. At worst, advertising is a coercive, manipulative form of psychological warfare designed to trick us into buying crap we don’t need with money we don’t have.

What surprises me is that the people who find vandalism in the form of tagging and neon dicks highly offensive have no problem with the uncensored use of our public spaces for the purposes of selling stuff.

What art can do

If art is capable of anything in this world, it is cutting through the dross of everyday existence. Art holds up a mirror to the world so that we can see the absurdity of it. It shows us who we really are, both good and bad, as a community.

Street art has an amazing ability to do this because it exists in our real and everyday world, not vacuum-sealed and shuffled away in a privileged private space. Its very public nature that makes street art unique, powerful, and amazing.

If we as a community can recognise the value in street art, we can begin to address it as a legitimate expression. When we value street art as art, we can engage with it as a community and help to grow it into something beautiful.

When street art has value, our neon dicks stop being a petty and adolescent attempt at ownership, and become mere vandalism. When we value our public spaces as places where the we can share experiences, we will start to see the violence that is advertising as clearly as the dick on the back of a bus shelter.

• Advertising
• David Lynch

Director of STEM

Community member - Training Delivery and Development Committee (Volunteer part-time)

Chief Executive Officer

Finance Business Partner

Head of Evidence to Action

We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.

• Essay Database >
• Essays Samples >
• Essay Types >
• Argumentative Essay Example

Vandalism Argumentative Essays Samples For Students

2 samples of this type

Regardless of how high you rate your writing abilities, it's always an appropriate idea to check out a competently written Argumentative Essay example, especially when you're handling a sophisticated Vandalism topic. This is precisely the case when WowEssays.com directory of sample Argumentative Essays on Vandalism will prove handy. Whether you need to think up a fresh and meaningful Vandalism Argumentative Essay topic or look into the paper's structure or formatting peculiarities, our samples will provide you with the required data.

Another activity area of our write my paper agency is providing practical writing assistance to students working on Vandalism Argumentative Essays. Research help, editing, proofreading, formatting, plagiarism check, or even crafting completely original model Vandalism papers upon your demand – we can do that all! Place an order and buy a research paper now.

Arbitration Assignment Argumentative Essays Examples

Introduction, good example of trustworthiness of wikipedia argumentative essay.

Don't waste your time searching for a sample.

Get your argumentative essay done by professional writers!

Just from $10/page

Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]

Use your new password to log in

You are not register!

By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .

Now you can download documents directly to your device!

Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.

or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone

The sample is NOT original!

Short on a deadline?

Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED

No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline

Calabasas Courier Online

Graffiti should be recognized as art, not vandalism

Graffiti covers the walls of freeways, bridges and buildings, showcasing the talent of those who create the beautiful imagery.  It continues to become more widespread despite the ongoing debate of whether or not it is vandalism.  This street art beautifies cities by giving them character and making them look unique and personal.  As a non-violent form of expression, graffiti is a necessary outlet and should not be limited.

Buildings that are “tagged” have a more personal feel than buildings with plain white walls.  Because of the appreciation for graffiti’s beauty, instead of viewing graffiti as vandalism, many realize the amount of skill necessary to create the street art and appreciate the message it delivers.  Many people admire Keith Haring, a famous graffiti artist from the 80s known for his artwork around New York City.  Haring’s artwork is so widely known that the city has embraced its presence around the city.

“Graffiti reflects individuals’ views on various issues and can make a dull brick wall stunningly beautiful,” said junior Megan Richardson.

Graffiti is a form of expression, and artists should be free to make their thoughts and beliefs public.  Serving as a way to avoid violence, graffiti is an outlet for many to express their feelings.  Making street art illegal limits the freedom of artists to create influential masterpieces.  Graffiti artists create works that reflect both struggles and accomplishments and at many times display political and social messages.  The paint that coats walls in communities everywhere can contain symbolism so profound that it has been compared to poetry.  People around the world also know Banksy, a famous London-based graffiti artist, for his satirical street art that reflects his political views.  Banksy’s work is so distinct that it has inspired Obey Propaganda, a famous clothing company.  Many others are beginning to realize the influence graffiti has on the world, and famous street art will only continue to flourish.

Many believe that graffiti rebels against authority, yet the skill required to create elaborate graffiti is remarkable.  The world is a canvas for graffiti artists, and they should feel free to cover it as they please.

Your donation will support the student journalists of Calabasas High School. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

Comments (23)

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Anonymous Hacker • Jun 10, 2021 at 8:49 pm

I have to write a debate for IPSHA Debating (in Australia) and this information has provided me much help. Thank you 🙂

Faye Aston • Mar 12, 2021 at 3:55 am

I’m writing a debate on this and it’s so helpful just reading ideas to write thank you so much for this website it’s helped me a lot

Chloe Wicker • Mar 5, 2021 at 8:39 am

Hello i’m in 7th Grade and I am writing an argumentative essay about Weather or not I think Graffiti should be illegal and I think it shouldn’t be this story is really helping me write my essay thanks so much for it

Jesus • Feb 5, 2021 at 8:28 am

Beautiful work

unkown • Oct 19, 2018 at 8:17 am

hmm. lameeee

carman flores • May 21, 2018 at 2:05 pm

I honestly believe that graffiti is a way for people not as wealthy as others to show that art doesnt come from intelligence but the desire to bring whats in their minds out for others t see. ~Carman Flores

Ashlynn Anthony • May 9, 2018 at 5:48 pm

I am doing an essay on this and I think all you’re comments are very helpful and the information is valid. Although I do think you should include more insite for both sides of the debate. Cheers.

nino • Mar 13, 2018 at 2:53 pm

6this article was very helpful for essay at evergreen

destiny • Jan 11, 2018 at 8:48 pm

i beleie that graffiti is art its beautiful and it allows you to pour out your feelings into a drawing

Jane • Jun 6, 2017 at 9:44 pm

I’m writing an argument to argue that graffiti is art and not vandalism and this is so helpful thankyou!

Quack • May 17, 2017 at 12:03 am

I really need some help on my debating topic

Hailey • Mar 1, 2017 at 8:13 am

Thankyou so much this helped so much with my paper i’m writing.

Brandon • Aug 18, 2016 at 1:54 pm

I am also writing an essay on this and think it is a great topic. I think all these people are really talented. Thank you for the info.

Say_savage • Feb 15, 2017 at 6:54 pm

Thanks for this I really needed this article to provide evidence that graffiti is an art thanks again

notme • Jul 1, 2016 at 1:21 pm

it is art but its better that it is illegal if it was not it wouldn’t be so prolific, so dramatic, and intensified. to get in the mind of a writer is a crazy thing but they enjoy it being illegal. if graffiti was legal it would cease to have those powerful messages they convey they say so much if a writer goes out at dead of night while no one is their. it would be like a verse with no beat if it would ever be legal…people would loose their drive for it

samantha • Jun 1, 2016 at 6:24 am

Graffiti is a beautiful non-violent to express emotion.

carly • Feb 26, 2016 at 9:31 am

I believe graffiti is art it shows emotion and skill plus an amazing talent the artists have.

Dana • Mar 22, 2016 at 11:02 am

I am writing a paper on this topic and I think this is so true

jordan • Feb 9, 2017 at 9:40 am

i am to and this is helpful for my debate

Maddie • May 14, 2018 at 4:31 am

Me to I am writting an exposition writing for it

Seth Price • Mar 26, 2017 at 9:39 pm

im doing a debate on this topic and I think the info is great

destiny • Jan 11, 2018 at 8:37 pm

yes i aslo agree with what you have said it also!

carman flores • May 21, 2018 at 2:02 pm

I honestly believe graffiti is a way for people who dont have any money to show that they are talented too.

Graffiti Art: Why Graffiti Is Art And Not Vandalism

Although graffiti is generally considered to be a contemporary artform, it actually originated thousands of years ago. The earliest examples are things like cave paintings and inscriptions on ancient buildings in Egypt, Greece and the Roman Empire, with the word ‘graffiti’ itself stemming from the Italian word graffiato, meaning ‘scratched’. Yet as the art form has evolved, so have the connotations surrounding it, and at present, turning walls into canvases remains nothing more than vandalism according to US law.

Editorial Team , Oct 3, 2023

The debate over whether graffiti constitutes art or vandalism is incredibly complex, and depends on many factors, such as the location of a particular piece, and the quality and message of the design. There is no clear answer, and it’s easy to see both sides of the debate — after all, not everyone would be happy to have their property painted without their consent. On the flip side, it could also be argued that graffiti is an artist’s right to freedom of expression, and a way to ensure their work can be appreciated by those beyond the artistic elite.

However, we champion plenty of graffiti artists here at ArtLife, and even though there will always be exceptions, we stand firm that graffiti is deserving of its status as art for the following reasons:

Graffiti Takes Technical Skill

A great deal of talent is required to create brilliant artwork, and graffiti is no exception. In fact, there are plenty of street artists whose work clearly displays an immense level of technical ability. Take Retna, for example, who has gone beyond painting walls to cover entire buildings with his distinct calligraphic style, such as the 21-story Cuauhtemoc building in Mexico City. This unbelievably complex achievement required a great deal of strategic planning and real imagination to pull off, as well as a clear understanding of color and composition. This may not be true of all graffiti creations — many critics would argue that you don’t need talent to paint a scruffy tag. However, art is subjective, and there will always be ‘good’ and ‘bad’ artists within every movement. Those like Retna prove that, as in any art form, graffiti can be exceptional when created by someone with impressive skill.

It Exemplifies Freedom Of Expression

Art ceases to be art without freedom of expression, and perhaps graffiti exercises this right more than any other medium. Taking creativity to the streets means that the artists don’t need to worry about gallery curators, critics or potential buyers, and can therefore be completely unrestrained, and even anonymous if they so choose. Status doesn’t matter, and the lack of limitations allow graffiti artists to break conventions and push boundaries to create even more exciting — and arguably more authentic — works of art.

Political And Social Themes Are Powerfully Represented

Many of the most renowned artworks make a powerful comment on the social and political issues of their time, and graffiti can make a huge impact in this respect. Just look at Banksy, who has become world-famous for his humorous and subversive commentaries like Love is in the Air, first painted on Jerusalem’s West Bank barrier in 2003 as a statement in favor of Palestinian rights. Similarly, Keith Haring was able to bring mass attention to the crack epidemic through his Crack is Wack mural, as well as homosexuality and the AIDS crisis. Plenty of aficionados would argue that it’s art’s duty to shed light on such topics, and given that these themes relate to ordinary people, perhaps it’s unsurprising that the most iconic examples were created on the streets the target audience live on.

Impressive Works Bring Drab Spaces To Life

As well as having meaning, art is also valued for its beauty, and there’s no denying how beautiful some graffiti can look, which is why street art tours are now so popular all over the world. Even though graffiti is generally free to access, more and more people are willing to pay to see some of the most magnificent works in the city of choice. Bold colours, shapes and patterns are key features of this art form, and when artists let their imaginations run wild, their creations instantly transform drab spaces into places people are excited to be. Seeing as art is used to decorate the walls of our homes, couldn’t it be argued that graffiti does the same to the walls outside?

Huge Sales Demonstrate Its Artistic Value

Anyone arguing that graffiti isn’t art may struggle to explain why people have paid so much for it in recent years. For example, Untitled by Jean-Michel Basquiat sold for a huge $110.5 million in 2017, the most expensive American painting ever to sell at auction at the time, while Banksy’s Girl with Balloon sold for $1.37 million. Other expensive pieces include Retna’s Untitled ($38,000) and Charlie Chaplin by Mr. Brainwash ($100,000). Not everyone would agree that an artwork’s value is determined by its price tag, however the fact that graffiti can sell for such high sums proves the respect and prestige it has generated within the art community, and it would therefore be entirely reductive to claim all graffiti is mere vandalism.

Arguments for Graffiti as Art Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Introduction

Definition of art, quality as a prerequisite, functions of art.

The modern world has born witness to the emergence of a new form of creative expression known as graffiti. It is usually represented by writings or drawings on walls, which are in many cities prohibited. There is a debate on whether this type of artistry is art or vandalism. Given the comprehensive nature of art and the time and care necessary to produce a piece of graffiti, it should be considered a form of art.

Before determining the appropriateness of calling graffiti art, it is essential to understand what is meant by art. It is an extremely wide term that encompasses a large array of human activities. In its most general definition, almost anything created by a person can be considered art. However, children’s drawings are not displayed in a museum, although they also can be an example. The same principle of distinguishing creations by the fact of their existence applies to graffiti.

Graffiti is a form of art because it requires creativity and artistic expression. Any form of drawing or aesthetic writing cannot be accomplished without skill and talent. Graffiti are complex creations, consisting of numerous details and stylistic choices. An individual without the knowledge of the basics of drawing and the ability to use a paint stick is not capable of producing an adequate graphical piece. As a result, the limitations in people’s capacity in graffiti production exemplifies it as art.

It should also be noted that not all art in history was immediately recognized as such. Some of the creations, which are socially accepted and positively regarded today, were also previously condemned. As arts writers point out, “statues and other works of art flaunting penises and the naked body were considered perverse and sacrilegious” ( Graffiti: Is Graffiti Art ). Therefore, the current lack of tolerance toward graffiti does not mean that perception will not change over time.

Many people do not acknowledge this type of drawing as a form of art. The reason for graffiti’s ambivalent status lies in the lack of official quality criteria. Whereas it is possible to analyze a painting relying on a set of artistic standards, there are no established and agreed guidelines for evaluating graffiti. Nevertheless, the absence of formal recognition does not devalue the efforts that are necessary to embellish walls with aerosol paint.

It might even be possible that the lack of rules for making graffiti is precisely what distinguishes it as art. “Graffiti is one of the purest forms of art, supporters say, because it can exist without support or syndication from the mainstream art establishment” ( Graffiti: Is Graffiti Art ). In essence, nothing constrains an artist from delivering the work they envision. The freedom of expression further solidifies graffiti’s position as art.

Just like any human creation, pieces of graffiti differ based on quality. Writing and drawing on walls have evolved into a subculture. Its representatives have their own conception of techniques and standards for creating a work of graffiti ( Graffiti: Is Graffiti Art ). Moreover, the illegal nature of these drawings has forced creators to work faster, incorporating stencils. “As a result, graffiti has grown more complex and specialized, including stickers and other media besides spray paint” ( Graffiti: Is Graffiti Art ). Overall, the qualitative features of graffiti have added to its artistic value.

Most pieces of art convey a creator’s message or artistic idea. Graffiti is not an exception since it emerged as a means to voice social displeasure. As supporters of attributing graffiti to art claim, it “provides a tool for communicating with the larger population” ( Graffiti: Is Graffiti Art ). Similar to many other forms of visual art, like caricatures, cinema, or paintings, writing on walls can draw attention to social issues, propagate an idea and, in any other way, execute the communicative function of art.

Another purpose of art is setting the tone and accentuating an artist’s feelings. In a similar manner to typical visual art, graffiti can also brighten the mood. Colorful drawings and writings on walls can make urban surroundings less grim and more joyful. Graffiti can impact a person emotionally and psychologically, appeal to their sense of beauty, and entertain them, thus functioning as any other work of art.

Probably the most evident feature of art is that it does not have to be enjoyed by everyone. There are pieces, which are appraised as manifestations of genius and dismissed as shallow objects at the same time. Graffiti also form a wide range of reactions, from those who consider it to be evidence of criminalization and vandalism to those who sincerely uphold it as the modern iteration of street art.

Altogether, graffiti can, by all means, be considered a form of art. It requires skill and lets artists express their ideas and sentiment. Some graffiti can be characterized as possessing exceptional quality rivaling socially accepted works of art. The opinion and legal status can change over time, with the current condemnation of graffiti being a contemporary phenomenon. Ultimately, it executes all functions typical of art and should subsequently be recognized as such.

“Graffiti: Is Graffiti Art.” Infobase . 2011. Web.

• Trend on the Parody of “The Mona Lisa” by DaVinci
• The Death of Hybrid Bodies in Literature and Cinematography
• Graffiti Culture: Is It a Form of Artistic Expression or Criminal Activity?
• Analyzing Graffiti as a Subculture
• Views on Graffiti From Sociological Perspectives
• The Artistic Legacy of Maya Lin: A Cultural Response to the Vietnam War
• Brush Reveals Heart: Artistic Features of Su Shi's Calligraphy
• Mix of Non-Traditional Media and Images in Postmodernism Art
• Art: Painting, Printmaking, Architecture, Installation
• "The Smoking Plant" Project: Artist Statement
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2022, February 25). Arguments for Graffiti as Art. https://ivypanda.com/essays/arguments-for-graffiti-as-art/

"Arguments for Graffiti as Art." IvyPanda , 25 Feb. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/arguments-for-graffiti-as-art/.

IvyPanda . (2022) 'Arguments for Graffiti as Art'. 25 February.

IvyPanda . 2022. "Arguments for Graffiti as Art." February 25, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/arguments-for-graffiti-as-art/.

1. IvyPanda . "Arguments for Graffiti as Art." February 25, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/arguments-for-graffiti-as-art/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Arguments for Graffiti as Art." February 25, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/arguments-for-graffiti-as-art/.

• Graffiti, its Significance and Drawbacks Words: 2003
• Street Art Graffiti as a Culture Words: 1110
• Graffiti as a Monumental Form of Art Words: 607
• Criminal Law – Is Graffiti a Crime or Not? Words: 1362
• Graffiti Evaluation and Labeling Theory Words: 557
• Graffiti: Whether It Is a Good or Bad Side of Society Words: 856
• Graffiti as a Cultural Phenomenon Words: 573
• Anthropology: Melbourne Graffiti Culture Comparing to New York Words: 2327
• Street Art, Graffiti, and Instagram Words: 608
• Art and Community Participation and Interaction Words: 1442
• The Power of Art in Society Words: 2488
• The Question of Ownership of Art Words: 1984
• What is Art? Finding a Definition Words: 1194
• Public Art and Communities’ Needs Words: 759
• The Representational Aspect of Art Words: 662
• The History and Concepts of Art Nouveau Words: 1106
• Art’ and Money Relations Words: 657
• The World of Art: Categories and Types Words: 1147
• The Role of Art in the World and Culture Words: 1472
• Arts Organizations Management Words: 2236
• Art: Dictionary, Societal, Personal Definitions Words: 1276
• Arts Education and Its Benefits in Schools Words: 729
• Cataloging Street Art: Main Features, Kinds, Shapes, and Sizes Words: 1757
• History of Ecology Topic in Art Words: 1655
• Interpreting Art: Term Definition Words: 2143

Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism?

Introduction – what is graffiti.

Graffiti is a word used to describe any writing or images that have been painted, sketched, marked, scrawled or scratched in any form on any type of property. It can be a design, figure, inscription or even a mark or word that has been written or drawn on either privately held or government owned properties. While graffiti refers to an entire scribbling or drawing, graffito describes a single scribble. Graffiti can be any form of public marking which appears as a distinguishing symbol and most of the time it comes out as a rude decoration having the form of simply written words, elaborate and complicated wall paintings or etchings on walls and rocks.

Graffiti can also be described as an unauthorized drawing or inscription on any surface situated in a public area. Apart from this graffiti also includes hideous scribbles which we often find scrawled and painted on the fences of a house, in subways, bridges, along the sides of houses and other buildings and even on trains, buses and cars. Although some look like elaborate paintings most of them are garbage which appears to have been done by small children.

Graffiti vandalism has a number of forms. The most harmful and destructive of all are the gang graffiti and tags. The former are generally used by gang members to outline their turf or threat opposite gangs. These often lead to acts of violence. Tags represent the writer’s signature and can also be complicated street art. Conventional graffiti is often hurtful and malicious and generally the act of impulsive or isolated youths. Ideological graffiti is hateful graffiti which expresses ethnic, racial or religious messages through slurs and can cause a lot of tension among the people. Sometimes the graffitists also use acid etching where they use paints mixed with acids and additional chemicals which can rankle the surface making the etchings permanent. (Wilson, 52-66)

Graffiti – Art or Vandalism

Graffiti cannot be considered as a form of art since its basic difference from art is consent or permission. Although a number of people consider graffiti to be one of the numerous art forms, most of the times graffiti is considered as unwanted and unpleasant damage to both public and government properties. In modern times almost all of the countries in the world consider the defacing of public or government owned property with any type of graffiti without taking the owner’s permission or authorization to be an act of vandalism.

Had graffiti been created without destroying someone’s belongings then even it would have appeared artistic, due to their bright use of colors, and not as an act of vandalism. Graffiti scribblers often claim that in order to improve the look of the walls and fences of one’s property they make colorful paintings on them. But this is highly questionable since they almost never take the permission of the owner of the property before making their art, turning the entire thing into vandalism. They do not have the right to destroy or change the look of one’s property without taking their permission or authority. (Smollar, 47-58)

All throughout history people have considered graffiti to be an act of vandalism since it incorporates an illegal use of public and government property. Such an act is not only mutilation of property and an ugly thing but is also very expensive to remove. Although graffiti artists use their talents to share and express their feelings, until and unless graffiti is done on an area designated for it and by somebody authorized to do so, graffiti in any form will remain to be an act of vandalism and not art.

Graffiti done without proper authority cannot be considered as art since immature vandals simply use graffiti as a means to seek infamy. Graffiti is noting more than an irresponsible and dangerous form of art promoting gang activities and truancy. Thus, we can see that there is nothing artistic about graffiti vandalism. (Austin, 450-451)

The Problem of Graffiti

The problem both the government and the people of the world face due to graffiti is not at all a new one as it has existed for centuries, and sometimes it is even dated back to the Roman Empire and Ancient Greece. Some people even consider graffiti as an act of terrorism which is in its larval stage. The main problem with graffiti is that it is fundamentally unauthorized and is created by destroying someone’s possessions.

Today graffiti vandals use markers and spray paints as their most common medium for creating graffiti which makes it a much bigger problem. Painting over the graffiti is a costly affair which the owners of the property vandalized have to bear. Graffiti makers tend to remain unknown and thus, never even make an offer to pay for the repairs for vandalizing someone’s property which at times could even be thousands of dollars.

Sometimes due to graffiti a property’s value gets lowered by a huge rate due to some inane scribbling across the wall or fence of the property. Not only do these graffiti vandals scribble on the fences and walls of the property they sometimes even destroy them by breaking a window, door or fence just for the mere sake of art. They slash the seats of the cars, buses and trains for which the government has to pay. (Ley, 491-505)

Recent History

In the last few decades the problem of graffiti has become far reaching and has spread from the largest of cities to small localities. Graffiti should not be viewed as an isolated problem since it leads to other public disorders, like loitering, littering and even public urination, and crimes, since most of the time the graffiti scribblers unable to pay for the markers and paints shoplift the required materials. Since graffiti is considered to be a public disorder it is sometimes even perceived as a means of lowered quality of living in certain communities.

As graffiti is almost always associated with crimes, it tremendously increases the fear of various criminal activities among the families of a community. Sometimes graffiti vandals even arouse questions in the hearts of the citizens by making them feel that the government authorities are incapable of protecting them from graffiti scribblers, thus making them further insecure.

Graffiti vandals have no concern for public or government property near public areas and deface anything they can lay their hand on including blank walls, trees, alley gates, monuments, statues, utility boxes, schools, furniture in parks and streets, buses and bus shelters, pavements, railway areas, utility poles, telephone boxes, street lights, traffic signs and signals, inside and outside of trains, vending machines, vacant buildings, freeway, subways, bridges, billboards, parking garages, sheds and road signs.

In a nutshell, graffiti is present almost in any area that is open to the view of the general public. Since graffiti vandals even mess with street signs and traffic signals that help the drivers navigate through busy towns, graffiti poses a threat to the safety of those drivers. Sometimes due to depreciation in land value or excessive nuisance created by these graffiti vandals, families and businesses alike have to avoid certain areas and may even have to move out of it completely. People facing graffiti vandalism and living in areas with graffiti have to face reduced business activities since common people generally associate criminal activities with graffiti and are thus, afraid to set up businesses in those areas. (D’Angelo, 102-109)

Cost of cleaning

Prevention and cleaning up of graffiti is associated with high costs. The government and the public have to bear heavy costs in order to protect themselves from the graffiti vandals. Currently, it had been estimated that almost $22 billion is spent in the US each year for cleaning up and preventing various acts of graffiti. It was also found that England almost has to spend £26 million every year to remove graffiti which is present in almost 90% of the places in the nation.

It becomes the headache of the local authorities to clean up the graffiti and fix whatever has been destroyed as soon as possible. Councils and government officials have to maintain quick responsive units who can rapidly and effectively clean out graffiti and fix damages the instant such an act is reported. Government authorities and councils even have to take up a combination of protective, preventive and removal strategies to fight back graffiti vandalism, making the whole process extremely costly. But since protecting or deterring property will not completely eliminate graffiti, it is better to remove graffiti as soon as it is reported. (Ley, 491-505)

Negatives of Graffiti

Graffiti not only causes danger to the citizens of a neighborhood but it also creates a huge mess which government officials have to clean up by paying from the city funds. Since the government has to bear the cost for cleaning up graffiti, it has a direct impact on the budget of a city too. Government officials have to use a significant amount from the available city budget for fixing damages to public buildings, streets and other properties. A huge amount of money also goes in the eradication and prevention of graffiti vandalism since this requires special equipment, materials and trained labors, making the entire matter highly expensive and time consuming.

Graffiti also adversely affects the taxpayers who have to pay extra for fixing damages to public properties, circuitously, during their yearly property taxes. Sometimes businesses pass on the cost for cleaning graffiti off their property on to their customers, who have to make larger payments for their goods purchased, for no fault of theirs. (Rafferty, 77-84)

Further, graffiti also causes losses in revenues related to reductions in retail sales and the transit systems. Thus, the money that needs to be spent for cleaning up and preventing graffiti can also be used for improving an area and may also have other valuable uses. Since graffiti contributes to a reduction in retails sales, businesses plagued by graffiti is least likely to be sponsored by others. Also the general public will be afraid and will feel unsafe when entering a retail store scrawled all over with graffiti. Graffiti vandalism is not always simply limited to spray painting and destruction of property since the graffiti vandals often commit severe crimes like rape and robbery. Given that they are not caught or reported most of the times, graffiti vandals think that they can do anything and get away with it. (Austin, 450-451)

Graffiti is frequently associated with gangs, although graffiti vandals are not limited only to these gangs. It creates an environment of blight and intensifies the fear of gang related activities and violence in the heart of the general public. It has been seen that gangs often use graffiti as a signal for marking their own territory and graffiti also functions as a tag or indicator for the various activities of a gang. In those areas, where graffiti is extremely common, tag and gang graffiti is extremely widespread and also causes a lot of trouble.

Gangs commonly make tags using acid spray paints or markers on apartments and buildings and they serve as a motto or statement or an insult. Such graffiti also include symbols and slogans that are exclusive for a particular gang and may also be made as a challenge or threat for a rival gang. Not only are graffiti made to disrespect other gangs but sometimes racist graffiti is also scribbled on walls which creates a lot of racist tension among the people of certain communities.

Such activities shock the residents who are indirectly forced to move out of the areas for the safety of their families. Graffiti scribblers who are also members of a gang or part of its crew sometimes get involved in fighting, and every now and then a number of them end up dead due to these gang wars. The messages relayed through graffiti are taken very seriously by gang members and the threats are almost always acted upon. (Smollar, 47-58)

Another problem with graffiti is that although sometimes a single act of graffiti may not be a serious offence, graffiti itself has a cumulative outcome which makes it even more serious. Its original emergence in a particular neighborhood almost always attracts even more graffiti vandals. At certain areas graffiti tend to occur over and over. Graffiti offenders are inclined to attack those areas that are painted over to clean the graffiti. Such areas act as a magnet attracting graffiti offenders to commit re-vandalism repeatedly.

Some graffitists commit acts of vandalism since they are extremely stubborn and do so in order to fight an emotional and psychological battle with the city council and government officials. They deliberately commit graffiti vandalisms in order to establish their authority and claim over a specific area. Graffiti offenders do so with the intention to defy the government authorities. (Wilson, 52-66)

Sometimes graffiti is extremely repulsive and thus, gets people, especially teenagers into extremely bad habits. They stop caring about other people or the government and develop a tendency to scribble anywhere they find a blank space. They stop respecting people and their property and the kids even start to make graffiti on the desks and tables of their schools. Graffiti vandals have no concern for the people around them and thus, increase the pessimistic attitude of the neighborhoods around them.

Not only does graffiti lead to crimes but the scribblers also harbor disruptive anti-social feelings and behavior inside them. Sometimes teenagers and kids place graffiti on other people’s property without their authority or consent as a mischievous act, not realizing that they are committing a crime which is equivalent to vandalism and punishable by law. These juvenile scribblers are accountable for almost all of the graffiti we find on the buildings and streets and they do not even realize that their graffiti sometimes even becomes offensive and racist in nature. (Rafferty, 77-84)

Juvenile crime

City officials are also concerned about the fact that when juveniles take part in graffiti vandalism it may be their initial offence leading them into much more harmful and sometimes even sophisticated crimes. Not only does graffiti create a gateway for these juveniles into a world of crime, it can sometimes also be associated with truancy due to which the juveniles may remain uneducated their whole lives.

Deprived of a proper education these young minds get involved with alcoholism and drug abuse, thus leading to even severe problems. Adolescents and juveniles become astray sending a message to all that graffiti give rise to various criminal activities. In those communities where people gather in groups at street corners during late hours, it is easier for the drug peddlers to promote their products among the juveniles without being interrupted either by the authorities or residents. (Smollar, 47-58)

Graffiti as a Social menace

Graffiti is a huge problem since it contaminates the environment of a locality. It is undeniably a plague for our modern cities since it leads to visual pollution. City officials and councils have to spend huge sums in order to clean the ever present graffiti on the walls and fences. But even an expensive cleaning strategy is not but a useless and ineffective way to deal with these graffiti vandals since they almost always find a way to reproduce graffiti.

Graffiti vandalism is an extremely complex and multifaceted public disorder which does not have any easy solution. Not only is the cleaning of graffiti an expensive affair, it is also an extremely difficult one since it involves a lot of hard work. Sometimes graffiti damages certain surfaces to such an extent that they remain permanently impaired as the graffiti vandals change the entire nature of the surfaces they paint on, thus changing the nature and environment of the whole neighborhood. If an act of graffiti vandalism is left unchecked, then it may even lead to urban decay by causing further decline in property value and increasing fear in communities.

Most of the times when graffiti is cleaned or painted over a part of the damage always remains. For example, the paint does not match entirely or sometimes the area becomes darker than before, making the cover up completely visible. Graffiti has a significant impact on the overall appearance of a neighborhood and almost always lowers the quality of life of the entire community. When these graffiti scribblers destroy train terminal and subways they immediately create a harmful first impression on others, of that city, all over the country.

Graffiti simply does not give rise to maintenance issues but it gives rise to a complicated social problem, one that makes people feel extremely unsafe in their own neighborhoods. Communities become unlivable due to reduction in the beauty and pride of their neighborhood. Graffiti completely destroys the design and scenic beauty of the entire community and the hate messages conveyed through graffiti hurts the people of the community.

Sometimes graffiti becomes so offensive that it disturbs the local residents making it a concern for the entire community. The residents not only feel unsafe themselves but also fear for their children who have to grow up in such a disturbing and troublesome locality. Though graffiti may appear to be a radical form of art, to the people whose belongings have been disfigured by graffiti it is nothing more than an unwanted form of vandalism, which is not only distressing but also extremely difficult to remove. (Rafferty, 77-84)

Consequences of Graffiti

Since defacing of public or government property without the owners authority is considered to be vandalism, offenders are even punishable by the law of many countries. Graffiti is like a crime since its creators steal the rights of the owners of the property to have their possessions look well and clean. Police authorities all over the world refer to graffiti vandalism as criminal damage. Graffiti vandals should be made to face strict penalties which should not only include jail time but also large fines, so that they do not repeat their actions again. The offenders not only have to pay huge penalties but can even be prosecuted for their crimes.

The graffiti vandals should not only have to pay fines for destroying properties but should also be made to clean the graffiti themselves, as a punishment. Juvenile scribblers have to carry out community services as a punishment for their crime. Graffiti vandals who have committed serious crimes, like rape or murder can even be imprisoned for life. Not only do these graffiti vandals damage other people and government properties, they also risk their own lives in making the graffiti. They often display their stupidity by gambling with their lives while trying to create graffiti on trains and bridges. It has often been seen that these graffiti scribblers suffer from dreadful injuries and some even end up dead. (D’Angelo, 102-109)

Some countries do not view graffiti as a major problem since they may not have encountered widespread incidences of graffiti vandalism, which may have been focused on only a few relatively hot spot areas. But the areas facing the problem of graffiti vandalism realize its intensity. Since graffiti is a highly visible form of vandalism, it greatly affects the people living in that area since it completely changes their existing perception of the entire neighborhood.

Graffiti scribblers carefully choose those locations frequented by passersby so that they can be affected by the drawings and scribbling even more. Graffiti becomes a form of vandalism due to the medium the graffitists use to display their art which is almost anything other than a piece of canvas. Graffiti vandals somewhat force the viewers to view their work, even if they do not want to do so.

They have no consideration as to where they place their work or that it may become a problem for the general public or that the medium which they are using either belongs to the government or to an individual. All these add up to people’s perception which views graffiti as vandalism leading to urban decay and crime and causing depreciation of business and property value and in the growth of industries.

Works Cited

Austin, J. “Wallbangin’: Graffiti and Gangs in L.A.” American Ethnologist 29.2 (2004): 450-451.

D’Angelo, Frank J. “Fools’ Names and Fools’ Faces are Always Seen in Public Places: A Study of Graffiti.” Journal of Popular Culture 10.1 (2006): 102-109.

Ley, D. “Urban Graffiti as Territorial Markers.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 64.4 (2001): 491-505.

Rafferty, P. Discourse on Difference: Street Art/ Graffiti Youth.” Visual Anthropology Review 7.2 (2005): 77-84.

Smollar, J. “Homeless Youth in the United States: Description and Developmental Issues.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 39.5 (2006): 47-58.

Wilson, J. “Racist and Political Extremist Graffiti in Australian Prisons, 1970s to 1990s.” The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 47.1 (2008): 52-66.

Cite this paper

• Chicago (N-B)
• Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2021, October 29). Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism? https://studycorgi.com/graffiti-is-it-art-or-vandalism/

"Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism?" StudyCorgi , 29 Oct. 2021, studycorgi.com/graffiti-is-it-art-or-vandalism/.

StudyCorgi . (2021) 'Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism'. 29 October.

1. StudyCorgi . "Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism?" October 29, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/graffiti-is-it-art-or-vandalism/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism?" October 29, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/graffiti-is-it-art-or-vandalism/.

StudyCorgi . 2021. "Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism?" October 29, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/graffiti-is-it-art-or-vandalism/.

This paper, “Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism?”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: October 29, 2021 .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal . Please use the “ Donate your paper ” form to submit an essay.

Essay Service Examples Art Graffiti

Is Graffiti Vandalism: Argumentative Essay

• Proper editing and formatting
• Free revision, title page, and bibliography
• Flexible prices and money-back guarantee

Our writers will provide you with an essay sample written from scratch: any topic, any deadline, any instructions.

Cite this paper

Related essay topics.

Get your paper done in as fast as 3 hours, 24/7.

Related articles

Most popular essays

• New York City

When citizens have grievances with their government and desire change, it is always the youth and...

This report will address the antisocial behaviour of Graffiti. The report will subsequently...

The reason I decided to do an extended project on graffiti is I have a personal interest in...

• Conversation

Almost all people dream to leave their mark on earth after their death. Some of them leave...

Art and Culture are very important for the development of any nation. Culture and Creativity/ Art...

Graffiti is something that is not taken into account from the positive point of view of society...

In her research paper The Making of Space, Race and Place, the author Maggie Dickinson examines...

• Philippines

In the Philippines, people are known to be artistic and creative in different aspects of life....

• Perspective
• Rogerian Argument

For more than half a decade, Graffiti has been around Furthermore polished everywhere throughout...

Join our 150k of happy users

• Get original paper written according to your instructions
• Save time for what matters most

Fair Use Policy

EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected].

We are here 24/7 to write your paper in as fast as 3 hours.

Provide your email, and we'll send you this sample!

By providing your email, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Say goodbye to copy-pasting!

Get custom-crafted papers for you.

Enter your email, and we'll promptly send you the full essay. No need to copy piece by piece. It's in your inbox!

24/7 writing help on your phone

To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”

Graffiti: A Debate Between Art and Vandalism

Save to my list

Remove from my list

Graffiti: A Debate Between Art and Vandalism. (2016, Sep 17). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/graffiti-is-vandalism-essay

"Graffiti: A Debate Between Art and Vandalism." StudyMoose , 17 Sep 2016, https://studymoose.com/graffiti-is-vandalism-essay

StudyMoose. (2016). Graffiti: A Debate Between Art and Vandalism . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/graffiti-is-vandalism-essay [Accessed: 29 Aug. 2024]

"Graffiti: A Debate Between Art and Vandalism." StudyMoose, Sep 17, 2016. Accessed August 29, 2024. https://studymoose.com/graffiti-is-vandalism-essay

"Graffiti: A Debate Between Art and Vandalism," StudyMoose , 17-Sep-2016. [Online]. Available: https://studymoose.com/graffiti-is-vandalism-essay. [Accessed: 29-Aug-2024]

StudyMoose. (2016). Graffiti: A Debate Between Art and Vandalism . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/graffiti-is-vandalism-essay [Accessed: 29-Aug-2024]

• Graffiti is Art not Vandalism Pages: 2 (478 words)
• Graffiti: An Art of Vandalism or Dreams Pages: 10 (2712 words)
• Graffiti: An Art Or A Vandalism Pages: 4 (1170 words)
• Graffiti: The Thin Line Between Creativity and Vandalism Pages: 4 (1149 words)
• Graffiti and vandalism acts in our community Pages: 6 (1556 words)
• Different Types Of Graffiti: Ancient and Modern, Hip Hop And Punk Graffiti Pages: 7 (2033 words)
• From the Street to Art Galleries: How Graffiti Became a Legitimate Art Form Pages: 7 (1857 words)
• An Analysis of the Significance of Graffiti and Street Art Pages: 2 (573 words)
• The Writing On The Wall (is graffiti an art form?) Pages: 3 (707 words)
• The History of Graffiti Art Pages: 5 (1260 words)

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

Grade 6 | Argumentative | Source-Based Source Lexile® : 1160L-1230L | Learning Standards

Is graffiti art or vandalism? The city of Covina is preparing to write a position statement on whether graffiti is an art form, or whether it is vandalism. The mayor has invited the public to join in the debate before the city writes its position statement.

After reading the provided articles and viewing the video on the topic, write an argumentative, multi-paragraph essay that addresses the question “Is graffiti art or vandalism?” You must support your position with evidence from the texts and video.

“Is Graffiti Art?”

By Steve Dolan

You can travel almost anywhere in the world, and you will probably see graffiti. Although graffiti art is usually more common in big cities, the reality is that it can occur in almost any community, big or small.

The problem with graffiti art is the question of whether it's really art, or just plain vandalism. This isn't always an easy question to answer, simply because there are so many different types of graffiti. Some is simply a monochrome collection of letters, known as a tag, with little artistic merit. Because it's quick to produce and small, it is one of the most widespread and prevalent forms of graffiti.

Although tagging is the most common type of graffiti, there are bigger, more accomplished examples that appear on larger spaces, such as walls. These are often multicolored and complex in design, and so start to push the boundary of whether they should really be defined as graffiti art.

If it wasn't for the fact that most graffiti is placed on private property without the owner's permission, then it might be more recognized as a legitimate form of art. Most graffiti art, however, is only an annoyance to the property owner, who is more likely to paint over it or remove it than applaud its artistic merit.

Many solutions have been put into practice around the world, with varying degrees of success. Paints have been developed that basically cause graffiti paint to dissolve when applied, or else make it quick and easy to remove. Community groups and government departments coordinate graffiti removal teams.

In some places you can't buy spray paint unless you're over 18. Cans of spray paint are locked away in display cases. In a nearby area the local council employs someone to go around and repaint any fences defaced by graffiti. A friend of mine has had his fence repainted 7 times at least, and it took him a while to find out why it was happening! Certainly the amount of graffiti in my local area has dropped substantially in the last year or two, so it appears these methods are working to a great extent.

But is removing the graffiti doing a disservice to the artistic community? Maybe if some of the people behind the graffiti art were taken in hand and trained, they could use their artistic skills in more productive ways. It hardly makes sense to encourage these artists to deface public property, and so commit a crime. But perhaps there are other ways to cooperate with the graffiti artists rather than just opposing them. Graffiti artists can create sanctioned murals for private property owners and get paid for it.

Maybe we need to start at a very basic level and find a way to encourage the creation of graffiti art on paper or canvas, rather than walls. After all, who would remember Monet or Picasso if they'd created their masterpieces on walls, only to have them painted over the next day? Finding a solution to such a complex situation is never going to be easy, but as more graffiti art is being recognized in galleries around the world, we do need to try.

"Graffiti: Art or Vandalism?" (Video)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Eu2na_diY&safe=active

"Graffiti as Art"

Any passerby in an urban cityscape has observed the colorful, provocative, illegal "eyesore" that is graffiti. Although many consider the spray-painted pieces a nuisance, graffiti has been gaining recognition from the art world more and more as a legitimate form of art.

When most people think of graffiti, they imagine "tags," or a stylized writing of a person's name. While tags are probably the most popular forms, graffiti art is much more than that. It can mean a colorful mural with a message of diversity or a black and white stencil piece protesting police brutality. In each case, graffiti art makes a statement.

"Wildstyle changes with each artist's interpretation of the alphabet, but it also relies on the use of primary colors, fading, foreground and background, and the like to create these letters," he writes. The artist's intention is to produce a work of art, and that must be taken into account when considering street art's legitimacy.

Stowers explains that graffiti cannot be disregarded because of its location and illegality. The manner in which graffiti art is executed is the only obstacle it faces in being considered an art form.

A Nod from the Art Crowd

One of the most famous graffiti artists, Banksy, has had his work shown in galleries such as Sotheby's in London. Despite his anonymity, the British artist has gained tremendous popularity. Celebrities such as Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt have purchased his work for a hefty price.

Recognition by the art world and inclusion in galleries and auctions is one way that graffiti art is legitimized as "real" art. In addition, this exposure has helped the graffiti movement to become launched into the rest of the world.

A Style All Its Own

Like all other artistic forms, graffiti has experienced movements or changes in style. From the first tag scribbled on a subway train to the large, complex mural on a billboard, the movement has experienced change. The tools and the means have changed as well. Markers were traded in for spray paint, and stencils and stickers were introduced to make pieces easier to execute in a hurry.

The messages have also evolved. Graffiti has always been somewhat political, but it has come a long way from simply tagging one's name to parodying world leaders to make a statement.

This is further proof that graffiti is a form of art and not just a result of random acts of vandalism. The graffiti community moves in different directions and the resultant artwork moves with it.

"Graffiti as Vandalism"

Although its artistic merits can't be denied, graffiti is still in fact a form of vandalism. Artists tag both public and private property, which becomes costly for taxpayers and business and property owners.

The cost for cleanup in the U.S. has not been documented definitively, but it is safe to assume that it is in the billions of dollars. Large cities typically budget more money toward graffiti removal. In 2006, Chicago budgeted $6.5 million while Omaha, Nebraska spends about $100,000 annually, according to graffitihurts.org.

In addition to cleanup costs, graffiti vandals often shoplift their materials, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. Stealing spray paint and markers adds an additional cost to businesses.

Vandalism also affects revenue from transportation, as evidenced by the reduction in riders during the 1960s and 1970s. Even before graffiti became associated with gangs, people became afraid of riding the vandalized subways.

Graffiti sometimes has a wave effect, in which a heavily vandalized area will experience increases in other sorts of crimes as well. Gang-related crimes and violence are the crimes most commonly associated with graffiti.

Public disorder crimes, such as littering and loitering and other forms of property destruction are sometimes related to graffiti crimes. Because most taggers are males between 15 and 23, there is the concern that tagging may be a "gateway crime," and may lead young offenders to more serious or dangerous crimes such as truancy and drug and alcohol use.

Quality of Life

Vandalism is usually seen as a quality of life issue. When an area has extensive graffiti, people tend to view it as a "bad neighborhood." Nearby property value may decrease and crime may increase. Plus, residents see graffiti as an eyesore. Graffiti that is gang-related or expresses hateful sentiments is most likely to be unwelcome in an area.

Need to contact a human?

• Release Notes
• Known Issues
• Privacy and Security
• System Status

Home — Essay Samples — Law, Crime & Punishment — Vandalism — Understanding Of Vandalism And Its Effects

Understanding of Vandalism and Its Effects

• Categories: Vandalism

About this sample

Words: 500 |

Published: Dec 12, 2018

Words: 500 | Page: 1 | 3 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Prof. Kifaru

Verified writer

• Expert in: Law, Crime & Punishment

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 972 words

3 pages / 1286 words

1 pages / 1357 words

2 pages / 705 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Vandalism

Vandalism is a growing problem that affects communities worldwide. It is an act of deliberate destruction or damage to property, including public and private structures, buildings, and vehicles. Vandalism is not only a financial [...]

Graffiti has long been a contentious form of expression, eliciting both admiration and disdain from society. While some view it as a vibrant art form that adds color and character to urban landscapes, others condemn it as a [...]

Nowadays, many issues of this case which is always happened and also has been increasing in Malaysia. As we know, this issue is a moral of crime. In that case, the issue often associated by teenagers because of lack morals. [...]

When you think of graffiti what’s the first thing that comes to mind? Vandalism or street art? Most would say vandalism, but what makes the distinction between the two? The intention of the piece. There’s a difference between [...]

Graffiti: a form of artistic expression or a destructive act of vandalism? This age-old debate has sparked controversy and divided opinions for decades. From the vibrant murals adorning city walls to the crude tags scribbled on [...]

People turn to vandalism because of the satisfying feeling of watching something physically fall apart. The disassembling of objects creates a feeling of accomplishment for the vandalizer, because it was his goal to break [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

• Argumentative
• Ecocriticism
• Informative
• Explicatory
• Illustrative
• Problem Solution
• Interpretive
• Music Analysis
• All Essay Examples
• Entertainment
• Law, Crime & Punishment
• Artificial Intelligence
• Environment
• Geography & Travel
• Government & Politics
• Nursing & Health
• Information Science and Technology
• All Essay Topics

Argumentative Essay On Vandalism

Vandalism, often regarded as a senseless act of destruction, is a multifaceted issue that warrants careful examination and analysis. While some may dismiss vandalism as mere mischief or juvenile delinquency, its impact extends far beyond the immediate damage caused to property. This essay seeks to explore the complexities surrounding vandalism, examining its root causes, societal implications, and potential solutions.

At its core, vandalism can be understood as a manifestation of various underlying factors, including socioeconomic disparities, urban decay, and a lack of community engagement. In many cases, individuals engage in acts of vandalism as a form of protest or expression of frustration when they feel marginalized or disenfranchised by society. Moreover, the anonymity afforded by urban environments and the prevalence of social media have facilitated the spread of vandalism as a means of gaining recognition or validation within certain subcultures.

However, it is essential to recognize that vandalism not only harms physical infrastructure but also undermines social cohesion and erodes trust within communities. The defacement of public spaces can instill feelings of insecurity and fear among residents, leading to a decline in property values and a deterioration of the overall quality of life. Furthermore, repeated instances of vandalism can perpetuate a cycle of disinvestment and disrepair, exacerbating existing socioeconomic inequalities and perpetuating a sense of urban blight.

In addressing the issue of vandalism, it is crucial to adopt a multifaceted approach that addresses both the underlying causes and the immediate consequences of these acts. This may involve investing in community development initiatives, such as youth mentorship programs and recreational facilities, to provide individuals with constructive outlets for their energy and creativity. Additionally, enhancing surveillance and implementing stricter enforcement measures can serve as deterrents against future acts of vandalism, while also holding perpetrators accountable for their actions.

In conclusion, vandalism is a complex social phenomenon that demands thoughtful consideration and proactive intervention. By addressing the root causes of vandalism, promoting community engagement, and implementing targeted interventions, we can work towards creating safer, more vibrant urban environments where acts of vandalism are no longer seen as a viable means of expression. Only through collaborative efforts and a commitment to fostering inclusivity and opportunity can we hope to mitigate the destructive impact of vandalism on our communities.

Related Essays

• Argumentative Essay : Loitering By Gang Members Essay
• Rogerian Argument Vs Classical Argument Essay
• Argumentative Essay - Argumentative Research
• Argumentative Essay : Argumentative Synthesis

Harper Lee's Argumentative Essay

Harper Lee, the renowned author of the classic novel "To Kill a Mockingbird," presents a compelling argument in her work that addresses the issues of racism, prejudice, and social injustice in the American South during the 1930s. Through the character of Atticus Finch, Lee argues for the importance of moral courage and standing up for what is right, even in the face of overwhelming opposition. Atticus serves as a moral compass in the novel, teaching his children and the readers valuable lessons about empathy, compassion, and the importance of fighting for justice. One of the central themes of Lee's argument in "To Kill a Mockingbird" is the destructive nature of racism and prejudice. Through the trial of Tom Robinson, a black man falsely accused of raping a white woman, Lee exposes the deep-seated racism and injustice that permeated Southern society at the time. Atticus's defense of Tom, despite knowing the odds are stacked against him, highlights the importance of standing up for what is right, even when it is unpopular or dangerous to do so. Lee's argument is clear: racism and prejudice have no place in a just and equitable society. Furthermore, Lee's argument extends to the importance of empathy and understanding in overcoming prejudice and hatred. Through the character of Boo Radley, a reclusive neighbor who is misunderstood and feared by the townspeople, Lee challenges the readers to look beyond appearances and stereotypes. By humanizing Boo and revealing his true nature, Lee demonstrates the power of empathy in breaking down barriers and fostering understanding between people. This argument is particularly relevant in today's society, where divisions and prejudices continue to plague communities. In conclusion, Harper Lee's argumentative essay in "To Kill a Mockingbird" is a powerful and timeless call to action against racism, prejudice, and social injustice. Through the characters and events in the novel, Lee presents a compelling case for the importance of moral courage, empathy, and standing up for what is right. Her message resonates as strongly today as it did when the novel was first published, serving as a reminder that the fight for justice and equality is an ongoing struggle that requires the courage and conviction of individuals like Atticus Finch....

• Race and Ethnicity
• Social Inequality
• Discrimination and Prejudice
• Human Rights

Big-Mart Argumentative Essay

In the contemporary retail landscape, the emergence of giant supermarket chains has sparked a heated debate regarding their impact on local economies, small businesses, and consumer choice. This essay delves into the contentious issue surrounding Big Mart, examining the multifaceted dimensions of its influence on various stakeholders. Historical Context: To comprehend the significance of the Big Mart phenomenon, it is crucial to explore the historical context of the retail industry. Over the past few decades, the rise of mega-retailers has reshaped consumer habits and transformed the traditional shopping experience. Big Mart, as a key player in this evolution, has faced both praise and criticism for its dominance in the market. Economic Impact: One of the primary concerns raised by critics is the economic impact of Big Mart on local businesses. The aggressive expansion and competitive pricing strategies of these retail giants have been accused of driving smaller enterprises out of business. However, proponents argue that Big Mart's scale allows for economies of scale, leading to lower prices for consumers and increased efficiency in the supply chain. Consumer Choice: The question of consumer choice is central to the debate surrounding Big Mart. Critics argue that the dominance of these mega-retailers limits diversity in product offerings, ultimately diminishing consumer choice. On the contrary, supporters contend that Big Mart's ability to offer a wide array of products at competitive prices enhances consumer welfare by providing convenience and affordability. Employment and Labor Practices: Examining the impact on employment is essential when evaluating the consequences of Big Mart's presence. Critics often point to concerns about exploitative labor practices and the potential for job displacement in smaller enterprises. On the other hand, advocates highlight the vast employment opportunities created by these retail giants, both directly and indirectly through the supply chain. Local vs. Global: The Big Mart debate extends beyond local economic concerns, delving into the global implications of its operations. This essay explores how the globalization of retail, epitomized by Big Mart, intersects with issues such as sustainability, ethical sourcing, and the global distribution of wealth. Conclusion: In conclusion, the Big Mart debate is a complex and nuanced discussion that requires a careful examination of economic, social, and global factors. As we navigate the ongoing evolution of the retail landscape, it is imperative to consider the interests of various stakeholders and strike a balance between market efficiency and the preservation of local economies. The essay has endeavored to provide a comprehensive analysis, offering insights into the multifaceted dimensions of the Big Mart argument....

• Global Economy
• Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
• Sustainable Economic Practices

Mark Dyble's Argument Essay

In recent years, there has been a growing debate surrounding the impact of technology on our lives. While some argue that technology has brought about numerous benefits, others believe that it has led to detrimental consequences. Mark Dyble, a renowned scholar and advocate for the preservation of traditional values, presents a compelling argument against the excessive use of technology in his thought-provoking essay. Dyble asserts that the overreliance on technology has resulted in a decline in face-to-face interactions and interpersonal relationships. He highlights how the constant use of smartphones and social media platforms has led to a disconnect between individuals, with people becoming engrossed in virtual worlds rather than engaging with the real world. Dyble argues that this lack of personal connection has negative implications for mental health and social cohesion, as it diminishes our ability to empathize and build meaningful relationships. Furthermore, Dyble raises concerns about the impact of technology on our cognitive abilities. He argues that the constant access to information through search engines and digital platforms has made individuals more reliant on external sources, undermining their critical thinking and problem-solving skills. According to Dyble, this overreliance on technology hampers our ability to think independently and creatively, ultimately stifling innovation and personal growth. Dyble also addresses the issue of privacy in the digital age. He argues that the widespread use of technology has eroded our privacy rights, with personal data being collected and exploited by corporations and governments. This invasion of privacy, according to Dyble, not only undermines our individual autonomy but also poses significant risks to our personal security and freedom. In conclusion, Mark Dyble presents a compelling argument against the excessive use of technology. He highlights the negative consequences of technology on interpersonal relationships, cognitive abilities, and privacy. While technology undoubtedly offers numerous benefits, Dyble's essay serves as a reminder to critically evaluate its impact on our lives. As we navigate the digital age, it is essential to strike a balance between embracing the advancements of technology and preserving our fundamental human values. Only by doing so can we ensure a harmonious coexistence between the virtual and real worlds....

Argumentative Essay On Junk Food

Junk food has become ubiquitous in modern society, readily available in convenience stores, fast-food chains, and vending machines. While these foods are often convenient and appealing, they pose significant health risks due to their high levels of calories, sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats. In this essay, we will explore the detrimental effects of junk food consumption on individuals' health and well-being and argue for the importance of reducing its intake. Health Implications: One of the primary arguments against junk food is its detrimental impact on health. Regular consumption of junk food has been linked to an increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic conditions. These foods are typically high in calories and low in essential nutrients, leading to weight gain and nutritional deficiencies. Moreover, the excessive intake of sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats found in junk food can disrupt metabolic processes and contribute to the development of various health problems. Impact on Children: Children are particularly vulnerable to the negative effects of junk food consumption. With the proliferation of marketing campaigns targeting children, junk food has become a staple in many children's diets. Excessive consumption of sugary snacks, fried foods, and carbonated beverages can impair children's growth and development, leading to obesity, poor academic performance, and behavioral issues. Additionally, habits formed during childhood often persist into adulthood, increasing the likelihood of long-term health problems. Economic Costs: In addition to its health implications, the widespread consumption of junk food imposes significant economic costs on society. The healthcare costs associated with treating obesity-related illnesses and chronic diseases place a substantial burden on healthcare systems and taxpayers. Furthermore, productivity losses due to absenteeism and decreased work performance further exacerbate the economic impact of junk food consumption. Addressing the root causes of poor dietary habits and promoting healthier eating behaviors can help alleviate these economic burdens. Conclusion: In conclusion, junk food poses significant risks to individuals' health, particularly when consumed regularly and in large quantities. The high levels of calories, sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats found in junk food contribute to obesity, chronic diseases, and economic burdens on society. By raising awareness of the detrimental effects of junk food consumption and advocating for policies that promote healthier dietary choices, we can work towards improving public health and well-being for future generations....

• Health Care
• Economic Issues
• Public Health Issues
• Nutrition & Dieting

Juvenile Justice Argumentative Essay

In the realm of criminal justice, the treatment of juvenile offenders is a topic of ongoing debate and scrutiny. The question of how to effectively address the actions of minors who commit crimes has sparked controversy and raised important questions about accountability, rehabilitation, and societal responsibility. One perspective advocates for a more punitive approach, arguing that harsher penalties and stricter measures are necessary to deter juvenile crime and protect communities. Proponents of this viewpoint emphasize the importance of holding young offenders accountable for their actions and ensuring that they face consequences commensurate with the severity of their crimes. They argue that leniency or lenient sentencing can undermine the deterrent effect of the justice system and perpetuate a cycle of criminal behavior. Conversely, others advocate for a more rehabilitative approach to juvenile justice, emphasizing the developmental vulnerabilities and potential for reform among young offenders. This perspective contends that punitive measures often exacerbate underlying issues such as poverty, trauma, and mental health struggles, further entrenching youth in the criminal justice system. Instead, proponents of rehabilitation argue for interventions that address the root causes of delinquency, provide access to education and support services, and offer opportunities for personal growth and rehabilitation. One of the key challenges in the juvenile justice system is striking a balance between accountability and rehabilitation. While it is essential to hold juvenile offenders accountable for their actions and ensure that victims receive justice, it is equally important to recognize the potential for growth and change among young people. By providing comprehensive support and intervention programs, the justice system can help juvenile offenders address underlying issues, develop pro-social skills, and ultimately reintegrate into society as productive members. In conclusion, the debate over juvenile justice is multifaceted and complex, touching on issues of morality, social responsibility, and practicality. While there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, ultimately, the goal of the juvenile justice system should be to promote accountability, rehabilitation, and community safety. By adopting a balanced approach that combines accountability with opportunities for growth and rehabilitation, the justice system can better serve the needs of young offenders and society as a whole....

• Emotions & Feelings

Argumentative Essay On Steve Harmon's Trial

Steve Harmon's Trial: An Argumentative Perspective Steve Harmon's trial has garnered significant attention due to its complex nature and the ethical dilemmas it presents. As a young African-American man accused of being involved in a robbery that resulted in murder, Harmon's case raises important questions about justice, race, and the legal system. The prosecution argues that Harmon played a role in the crime, while his defense maintains his innocence. This trial serves as a microcosm of broader societal issues surrounding race, prejudice, and the presumption of innocence. One of the key points of contention in Steve Harmon's trial is the reliability of witness testimony. The prosecution heavily relies on eyewitness accounts to link Harmon to the crime scene. However, research has shown that eyewitness testimony can be unreliable due to factors such as stress, memory distortion, and suggestibility. In Harmon's case, the defense has raised doubts about the accuracy of the witnesses' recollections, highlighting the potential for misidentification and false accusations. Moreover, the portrayal of Steve Harmon in the media and by the prosecution has also played a significant role in shaping public perception of the case. The media often sensationalizes criminal trials, portraying defendants in a negative light and influencing public opinion before all the facts are presented in court. This bias can impact the fairness of the trial and the defendant's right to a fair hearing. In Harmon's trial, the defense has raised concerns about the prejudicial nature of media coverage and its potential impact on the jury's decision. In conclusion, Steve Harmon's trial raises important questions about the fairness and integrity of the legal system, particularly concerning issues of race, witness testimony, and media influence. As the case unfolds, it underscores the need for a thorough examination of the evidence, a fair trial free from bias, and a commitment to upholding the principles of justice for all individuals, regardless of their background or circumstances....

• Environmental Sustainability

F. Scott Walker Argumentative Essay

F. Scott Walker, the renowned American novelist, essayist, and short story writer, stands as a towering figure in 20th-century literature. His works, marked by their exploration of the complexities of the human condition and the American Dream, continue to resonate with readers across generations. However, amidst the acclaim and admiration, Walker's legacy is not without its controversies and critics. This essay aims to delve into the arguments surrounding F. Scott Walker's literary contributions, examining both the praise and the criticisms leveled against his work. One of the primary arguments in favor of F. Scott Walker's literary prowess is his adept portrayal of the Jazz Age and the Roaring Twenties in America. Through novels like "The Great Gatsby" and "Tender Is the Night," Walker captured the essence of the era, depicting its opulence, excesses, and underlying disillusionment. His keen observation of society's elite, coupled with his lyrical prose, painted a vivid picture of a time marked by both grandeur and moral decay. This portrayal not only serves as a valuable historical document but also offers timeless insights into the human condition and the pursuit of the elusive American Dream. Moreover, Walker's character development and narrative depth have been lauded by many literary scholars and enthusiasts. In works like "The Great Gatsby," he crafted complex characters that grapple with themes of love, ambition, and societal expectations. Jay Gatsby, with his enigmatic charm and tragic fate, remains one of literature's most enduring figures, symbolizing the allure of wealth and the emptiness it often conceals. Walker's ability to imbue his characters with depth and nuance allows readers to empathize with their struggles and aspirations, fostering a deeper connection to the narrative. However, detractors of F. Scott Walker's work often point to issues of elitism and misogyny present in his writing. Critics argue that Walker's portrayal of women, particularly in "The Great Gatsby," perpetuates harmful stereotypes and reduces female characters to mere objects of desire or symbols of moral decay. Furthermore, some contend that Walker's focus on the lives of the wealthy elite neglects the experiences of marginalized groups, providing a narrow and skewed perspective of American society during the Jazz Age. In conclusion, the debate surrounding F. Scott Walker's literary legacy is multifaceted, with supporters praising his insightful portrayal of the Jazz Age and complex character development, while critics raise concerns about issues of elitism and misogyny in his works. Regardless of where one stands on this argument, it is undeniable that F. Scott Walker's contributions to American literature continue to spark dialogue and debate, ensuring his enduring significance in the literary canon....

Argumentative Essay On American Imperialism

American imperialism has been a contentious topic, sparking debates over the moral and political implications of the United States' expansionist policies. Proponents argue that imperialism was a natural progression of American power and necessary for economic growth, while critics condemn it as a form of exploitation and domination. This essay will delve into both sides of the argument, examining the motivations behind American imperialism and its impact on both domestic and international affairs. Supporters of American imperialism point to economic incentives as a primary driving force behind expansionist policies. The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw the United States undergo rapid industrialization, creating a surplus of goods that needed markets for consumption. Imperialism provided access to new resources and markets, allowing American businesses to thrive and bolstering the nation's economy. Additionally, proponents argue that imperialism was necessary for maintaining national security and promoting American interests abroad. By establishing colonies and military bases in strategic locations, the United States could protect its trade routes and assert its dominance on the global stage. However, critics of American imperialism contend that such expansion came at a steep cost, both morally and politically. One of the most significant criticisms is the violation of sovereignty and autonomy of indigenous peoples and nations. American expansion often involved the forcible annexation of territories and the suppression of local populations, leading to widespread suffering and oppression. Furthermore, imperialism fueled xenophobia and racial discrimination, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and attitudes towards non-Western cultures. Critics argue that such actions tarnished America's reputation as a beacon of freedom and democracy, undermining its moral authority on the world stage. Moreover, opponents of American imperialism argue that it had detrimental effects on domestic society, exacerbating social inequalities and eroding democratic principles. The concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few elite corporations and individuals led to widespread corruption and exploitation at home. Additionally, militarization and overseas conflicts diverted resources away from pressing domestic issues, such as poverty alleviation and social welfare programs. Critics contend that imperialism undermined the values of democracy and self-determination upon which the United States was founded, turning it into a hypocritical oppressor rather than a champion of liberty. In conclusion, the debate over American imperialism is multifaceted, encompassing economic, moral, and political considerations. While supporters argue that it was a necessary means of securing national interests and promoting economic growth, critics condemn it as a form of exploitation and oppression. Ultimately, the legacy of American imperialism continues to shape global geopolitics and influence contemporary debates on foreign policy and interventionism....

• Social Issues

Can't find the essay examples you need?

Use the search box below to find your desired essay examples.